I hiked up New York's highest waterfall with the Apple Watch 10 vs Garmin Instinct 3 — 5 things I learned
Of course, when life hands you an epic hike to an incredible waterfall, what do you do? Why, record the trek on as many devices as you can muster and compare all the data, of course!
And that's exactly what I did. Not only did I capture the journey on not one but two smartwatches, I also recorded it using the Strava app on my iPhone, along with the AllTrails app.
This isn't the first time I've pitted the Apple Watch Series 10 against the Garmin Instinct 3. Oh contrare. And it certainly won't be the last. After all, these are two of my favorite smartwatches currently on the market.
I appreciate the Instinct 3 for its impossibly long-lasting battery, playful and durable design, accurate fitness tracking and helpful training tools. Meanwhile, the Apple Watch Series 10 is my go-to full-featured smartwatch, thanks to a delightfully vibrant and easy-to-read display, lightweight case and access to more apps than I have time in my life to try out (though here are some favorites from the Apple Watch app store).
The latest Apple Watch is also a reliable fitness tracker, even if the Instinct 3 proved more accurate in the last walk test showdown between the two.
The Apple Watch Series 10 is a pleasure to have on the wrist thanks to a slender, lightweight case and immersive display. It's also jam-packed with useful smart tools, like on-wrist translations and global tide tracking. Plus, the Series 10 is compatible with a seriously enormous range of third-party apps, making it easily one of the best full-featured smartwatches you can buy today.
The Garmin Instinct 3 is a super-rugged and sporty smartwatch with class-leading battery life, support for an enormous range of workout types (including lots of extreme sports), impressive training tools and super-accurate location and holistic tracking. It also boasts a handy and unique onboard "torch" LED flashlight for navigating in the dark.
Despite heavy rain and rough terrain, I enjoyed every moment of my roughly four-mile hike in upstate New York. This was partly because the Timberland Motion Access hiking sneakers I was testing kept my feet bone dry. However, gorgeous surroundings and quality company all contributed to a grand time. Oh, and the giant waterfall. I can't forget the giant waterfall.
Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.
And with that, on to the hike data and takeaways.
Apple Watch 10
Garmin Instinct 3
Strava app
AllTrails app
Distance
3.8 miles
3.5 miles
4.4 miles
3.9 miles
Elevation gain
2,011 feet
673 feet
638 feet
650 feet
Steps
no data
8,690 steps
8,082 steps
n/a
Average heart rate
123 bpm
121 bpm
n/a
n/a
Max heart rate
157 bpm
156 bpm
n/a
n/a
Calories burned
815 calories
711 calories
n/a
1,000 calories
Distance data is a little bit scattered, with nearly a mile separating the shortest distance of 3.5 miles (Garmin) from the longest of 4.4 miles (Strava). Meanwhile, the Apple Watch 10 and AllTrails app measured roughly the same ground covered at 3.8 and 3.9 miles, respectively.
The average of these four distance values equals 3.9 miles, suggesting that, indeed, Garmin likely undercounted by roughly a half mile and Strava probably overcounted by a slightly less egregious amount.
It's worth noting that I was careful to start and stop tracking all four methods without taking any additional steps. So, no, user error is not a factor here.
While Garmin, Strava and AllTrails each noted elevation gains in the neighborhood of 650 feet, give or take 25 feet, the Apple Watch Series 10 measured my climb as roughly three times that amount.
When it comes to calculating elevation gain, the best Apple Watch models tend to be fairly accurate; in a recent walk test between the Series Watch 10 vs Instinct 3, only 5 feet separate Apple's climb data from Garmin's.
So what in the world happened here? The short answer is, I have no idea. Clearly, something severely skewed Apple's data well beyond reality for this hike, which is a great reminder that even the top fitness trackers and best smartwatches sometimes muck up fitness data.
Note: I won't stop mentioning this until Cupertino addresses my grievance. Apologies in advance for sounding like a skipping CD.
The latest watchOS 11.4 software still doesn't support step count tallies for individually tracked workouts. Sure, your Apple Watch provides a daily step count total, but that's not enough. I want to know exactly how many steps I took during my afternoon walk or epic weekend hike.
In 2025, Apple is one of the only major brands that restricts step-count data to daily totals. Meanwhile, Amazfit, Fitbit, Garmin, Google, and Samsung all provide both individual tallies for exercises like walks and hikes, along with daily totals.
Perhaps Cook and Co. will bring the Apple Watch up to speed with the competition when watchOS 12 debuts later this summer. All we can do is hope!
With step count data from just the Garmin Instinct 3 and Strava, I can say for certain that I walked at least 8,000 steps during my hike to and around Kaaterskill Falls. Unfortunately, what I don't know is whether my actual total is closer to 8,100 steps as recorded by Strava or 8,700 steps as noted by Garmin.
A difference of roughly 600 steps over a four-mile hike is significant. For example, when I last pitted the Instinct 3 vs Apple Watch 10 in a 5,000-step walk test, Garmin's step count total was just six steps off from Strava's and four steps away from my actual (manual) count.
However, in a more recent hiking comparison between the Apple Watch Ultra 2 vs Garmin Instinct 3, more than 500 steps separated Garmin's tally from Strava's, a result more in line with this hike's data.
With so much conflicting data, it's reassuring to see nearly identical average and max heart rate data between the Apple Watch Series 10, which I wore on my right wrist, and the Garmin Instinct 3, worn on my left.
Looking ahead, I'd like to rerun this test on a similar-length hike. However, this time I'll manually count my steps to know for sure which device is most spot-on. I'll also be sure to carry but not wear the Apple Watch 10 until I get to the trailhead, and then note my day's step count total as soon as the hike has concluded.
With that, I should be able to say for sure which of these two popular smartwatches is more accurate for tracking hikes. Until then, the Instinct 3 remains my top choice over the Series 10 based on its prior victory over Apple.
Now the question is, can the Series 10 reclaim that title? Stay tuned.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
3 hours ago
- The Hill
The New York Times wants your private ChatGPT history — even the parts you've deleted
Millions of Americans share private details with ChatGPT. Some ask medical questions or share painful relationship problems. Others even use ChatGPT as a makeshift therapist, sharing their deepest mental health struggles. Users trust ChatGPT with these confessions because OpenAI promised them that the company would permanently delete their data upon request. But last week, in a Manhattan courtroom, a federal judge ruled that OpenAI must preserve nearly every exchange its users have ever had with ChatGPT — even conversations the users had deleted. As it stands now, billions of user chats will be preserved as evidence in The New York Times's copyright lawsuit against OpenAI. Soon, lawyers for the Times will start combing through private ChatGPT conversations, shattering the privacy expectations of over 70 million ChatGPT users who never imagined their deleted conversations could be retained for a corporate lawsuit. In January, The New York Times demanded — and a federal magistrate judge granted — an order forcing OpenAI to preserve 'all output log data that would otherwise be deleted' while the litigation was pending. In other words, thanks to the Times, ChatGPT was ordered to keep all user data indefinitely — even conversations that users specifically deleted. Privacy within ChatGPT is no longer an option for all but a handful of enterprise users. Last week, U.S. District Judge Sidney Stein upheld this order. His reasoning? It was a 'permissible inference' that some ChatGPT users were deleting their chats out of fear of being caught infringing the Times's copyrights. Stein also said that the preservation order didn't force OpenAI to violate its privacy policy, which states that chats may be preserved 'to comply with legal obligations.' This is more than a discovery dispute. It's a mass privacy violation dressed up as routine litigation. And its implications are staggering. If courts accept that any plaintiff can freeze millions of uninvolved users' data, where does it end? Could Apple preserve every photo taken with an iPhone over one copyright lawsuit? Could Google save a log of every American's searches over a single business dispute? The Times is opening Pandora's box, threatening to normalize mass surveillance as another routine tool of litigation. And the chilling effects may be severe; when people realize their AI conversations can be exploited in lawsuits that they're not part of, they'll self-censor — or abandon these tools entirely. Worst of all, the people most affected by this decision — the users — were given no notice, no voice, and no chance to object. When one user tried to intervene and stop this order, the magistrate judge dismissed him as not 'timely,' apparently expecting 70 million Americans to refresh court dockets daily and maintain litigation calendars like full-time paralegals. And last Thursday, Stein heard only from advocates for OpenAI and the Times, not from advocates for ordinary people who use ChatGPT. Affected users should have been allowed to intervene before their privacy became collateral damage. The justification for the unprecedented preservation order was paper-thin. The Times argued that people who delete their ChatGPT conversations are more likely to have committed copyright infringement. And as Stein put it in the hearing, it's simple 'logic' that '[i]f you think you're doing something wrong, you're going to want that to be deleted.' This fundamentally misapprehends how people use generative AI. The idea that users are systematically stealing the Times's intellectual property through ChatGPT, then cleverly covering their tracks, ignores the thousand legitimate reasons people delete chats. Users share intimate details about their lives with ChatGPT; of course they clear their conversations. This precedent is terrifying. Now, Americans' private data could be frozen when a corporate plaintiff simply claims — without proof — that Americans' deleted content might add marginal value to their case. Today it's ChatGPT. Tomorrow it could be your cleared browser history or your location data. All they need to do is argue that Americans who delete things must have something to hide. We hope the Times will back away from its stunning position. This is the newspaper that won a Pulitzer for exposing domestic wiretapping in the Bush era. The paper that built its brand in part by exposing mass surveillance. Yet here it is, demanding the biggest surveillance database in recorded history — a database that the National Security Agency could only dream of — all to win a copyright case. Now, in the next step of this litigation, the Times's lawyers will start sifting through users' private chats — all without users' knowledge or consent. To be clear, the question of whether OpenAI infringed the Times's copyrights is for the courts to decide. But the resolution of that dispute should not cost 70 million Americans their privacy. What the Times calls 'evidence,' millions of Americans call 'secrets.' Maybe you have asked ChatGPT how to handle crippling debt. Maybe you have confessed why you can't sleep at night. Maybe you've typed thoughts you've never said out loud. Delete should mean delete. The New York Times knows better — it just doesn't care. Jay Edelson has been recognized by Forbes as one of America's top 200 lawyers and by Fortune as one of the most creative people in business. His privacy cases have recovered over $1.5 billion for consumers nationwide.
Gizmodo
4 hours ago
- Gizmodo
This Is the Cheapest Apple Watch Ever, Amazon Is Going Completely Nuts for Prime Day
Apple has no true competition in the smartwatch world, especially if you're an iPhone user. While there are a few different models to choose from, the most affordable entry into the Apple Watch universe is the SE version. With its already attractive price and a special Prime Day discount on Amazon, you're looking at a deal that's hard to beat: Right now, the Apple Watch SE (2nd Gen) GPS 40mm is available for just $169, down from its usual $249. That's an all-time low price and it is equal to many of the inexpensive Android smartwatches, but you still get to experience the smooth Apple ride. Even better, this deal isn't limited to Prime members. See at Amazon The 2nd Gen Apple Watch SE has all of the features you desire in a smartwatch and it's a great choice if you'd like a device that keeps up with your busy life and is always connected to your Apple devices. The watch comes powered by watchOS 11 which has smarter features, more personalization and more connectivity than ever before. With a 40mm starlight aluminum case and a comfortable lake green sport loop, this model looks as good as it performs. First and foremost, you'll enjoy robust set of health and safety features: Advanced fitness and sleep tracking are also included and allows you to monitor your activity, set goals, and track your overall health. The heart rate sensor informs you about your heart health and you'll be notified if your heart rhythm isn't normal or if your heart rate is elevated or too low. Safety is a priority too with Fall Detection and Crash Detection included. If you ever need help, Emergency SOS is a tap away, and the Check In feature will automatically send messages to your family upon your arrival. It's simple to stay in touch with Apple Watch SE: Send messages, receive calls, listen to music and podcasts, use Siri, and even pay with Apple Pay. The watch integrates simply with your iPhone and other Apple devices so you can unlock your Mac, locate devices and keep things organized in your digital life. What's great is that the Apple Watch SE is swimproof with up to 50 meters of water resistance and allows you to wear it in the pool or shower without worrying about damaging it. The color-matched back case is made using a manufacturing process that produces less carbon emissions and the watch itself is carbon neutral when some bands are included. At $169, this Apple Watch SE is an incredible value. With Prime Day sales this great, it's time to upgrade your wrist. See at Amazon
Forbes
4 hours ago
- Forbes
Save Up To $150 With The Best Prime Day Apple Watch Deals So Far
Amazon Prime Day kicks off this Tuesday, July 8, unlocking big savings on popular Apple Watches. But even with the event still a couple days out, early discounts are already live. The best Prime Day Apple Watch deals so far include $80 off the Apple Watch SE (2nd Gen With GPS) and $150 off some Apple Watch Ultra 2 (GPS And Cellular) models. Early Prime Day deals on Apple Watches include 24% off the Apple Watch SE (2nd Gen). ILLUSTRATION: FORBES / PHOTO: RETAILERS Because Apple prices rarely drop, we expect these deals to sell out quickly. If you're looking to invest in an Apple Watch, it's worth jumping on early offers before Prime Day hits full swing. Here are all the Amazon Prime Day Apple Watch deals we recommend shopping now. The Apple Watch Ultra 2 remains the brand's most premium smartwatch, and it's currently at the lowest price we've seen in 2025. The Ultra 2 is built for adventurers like climbers and divers versus everyday wearers. It offers a two-day battery, an action button to toggle between apps, a sturdy case and extra brightness. Last year, Apple debuted its latest wearables and iPhones , including the Apple Watch Series 10. It tops our list of the best smartwatches thanks to its sleek design and advanced health tracking. The new watch has a larger display, a thinner design and a new chipset (the S10). While not a huge discount, it's rare to see the brand's newest tech on sale and, right now, you can get it for 7% off. The Apple Watch SE with GPS is the most affordable option in the current lineup, but it still offers a robust smartwatch experience. It's a bit smaller than its higher-end counterparts, with a variety of health features, including heart rate monitoring, cycle tracking and activity ring goals. You can grab the version with GPS now while it's 32% off. Are Apple Products Available On Prime Day? The short answer: Yes. Although the tech giant rarely offers discounts on its products, Amazon Prime Day is typically a good time to save big on all things Apple, from AirPods to Apple Watches. What Is The Best (But Least Expensive) Apple Watch? If affordability is your top priority, the Apple Watch SE is the least expensive Apple Watch—and it's currently up to 32% off for Amazon Prime Day. If you're looking for top-of-the-line health features, however, the Apple Watch Series 9 or Series 10 is the better bet. Is The Apple Watch SE Worth Buying? While the Apple Watch SE is the brand's most affordable smartwatch, it makes a few concessions to reach that price. At 40mm or 44mm, its display is slightly smaller than its more expensive counterparts, and it lacks some of the advanced health sensors found on the Apple Watch Series 10 and Ultra 2. However, for most users looking for solid performance and essential health features at a budget-friendly price, the SE remains a very worthwhile choice.
