
How many college football teams could have won a national title with Nick Saban?
Editor's note: This story is a part of No Wrong Answers, a series that explores the college sports questions you've always been curious about — and the ones you never thought to ask. Read our attempt to figure out which college football team has the most fans here.
Before Nick Saban became the greatest coach of all time, he was calculated about the jobs he took. The LSU and Alabama programs he inherited were underachievers that still had great recruiting footprints, top-tier resources, storied traditions and everything else that adds up to championship potential. Saban turned them into champions again. But what if Saban chose differently?
Advertisement
What if, instead of pursuing distressed assets, he went after a bigger fixer-upper — or a program that was never up in the first place? That leads us to this hypothetical with no wrong answers.
Let's say Saban left Alabama after winning it all in 2015. What's the worst program the best version of the best coach in college football history could have led to a national title? Could he have lived out the video game dynasty mode fantasy of turning a low-prestige program into a champion? What limits would there have been to Saban's power?
To come up with a good-faith, albeit unscientific, answer, The Athletic examined six critical factors, from on-field metrics to talent to money. We identified every FBS program's historic norms, quantified Alabama's growth under Saban — let's call it the Saban Effect — and then determined whether he could have pushed that school past the threshold necessary to win a national championship.
Our process took us from 133 potential candidates — every FBS incumbent except for Alabama (no need to game that one out) — to a list of 33 programs. The final list of possible title winners includes obvious headliners, a couple of surprises and one very tantalizing what-if.
At the end, we survey our staff for their thoughts. Let us know who you think Saban could have won a championship with in the comments.
It's unreasonable to think that even Saban could lead perennial cellar-dwellers like UMass or his alma mater, Kent State, to a national championship. So we used two sets of advanced metrics to lop off the bottom chunk of the FBS. Bear with us for a little wonky math that's not as complicated as it sounds.
ESPN's Football Power Index (FPI) and Sports Reference's Simple Rating System (SRS) both crunch numbers beyond wins and losses to compare teams to the national average. For broad context, the best teams' ratings are generally above 20, and the worst teams are below negative-20.
Advertisement
Before Saban (2005-06), Alabama's FPI average was 11.6. During his 2010-13 peak, the Crimson Tide's average FPI was 29. Subtract Saban's starting point from his peak, and we see how much better he made the Crimson Tide: a Saban Effect of 17.4.
With SRS, we compared the four years before Saban to a different elite stretch (2017-20). The Saban Effect (17.1) was about the same.
Still with us? Good.
Our next step was to establish the advanced-metrics floor for title winners. Aside from 2010 Auburn — not even Saban can clone Cam Newton — the lowest FPI for a recent national champion was 24 (Saban's 2009 Crimson Tide). In SRS, it was 20 (2016 Clemson).
Because the Saban Effect boosts his new team by about 17, a program needed a baseline of 6.6 in FPI and 2.9 in SRS to reach the championship floor. Our grading was generous; a program passed if it averaged those figures over any four-season stint since 2005.
This category knocked out 70 teams, including Illinois, Maryland, Purdue, Syracuse, Vanderbilt, Virginia and Wake Forest at the Power 4 level — plus Toledo, Saban's first head coaching job in 1990.
The only teams outside the current Power 4 to live on? Pac-12 holdovers Oregon State and Washington State, plus Appalachian State, Boise State, Memphis and South Florida.
You can't win championships without loaded recruiting classes, and nobody in modern college football history has amassed talent on the recruiting trail like Saban. We used the same thought process as in Factor 1 to determine whether adding Saban's recruiting prowess could build a championship-level roster at each school. We assumed any program that hires him will provide the staff and infrastructure necessary to sign top-tier classes … as long as they're financially able to do so (we'll come back to that).
Advertisement
We used Rivals' rankings because its data goes back farthest, and we excluded Saban's 2007 transition class, signed just after he became head coach.
Alabama recruiting pre-Saban (2002-06)
Alabama recruiting with Saban (2008-23)
That data gives us a Saban Effect of about 23 spots in the class rankings and almost one full star per recruit.
To find the recruiting floor for a national championship, we analyzed the four classes before a team's title run (those hauls formed the bulk of every depth chart). All but 2010 Auburn averaged a top-12 ranking or better, and nearly every champion since 2005 averaged at least 3.6 stars per signee. Those thresholds mean a team's historical average must be a top-35 recruiting class or 2.6 stars to rise to championship contention with the Saban Effect.
This factor eliminates the remaining teams outside the Power 4, except for Oregon State. Though BYU, Cincinnati, Houston and UCF were weighed down by their time outside a Power 4 conference, none have signed a top-35 class since joining the Big 12, either.
The list of 53 contenders still includes Cal (which hit both criteria) along with Kansas, Boston College, Northwestern and Rutgers (which survived based on their recruits' average star ranking).
Two other caveats: We ignored the transfer portal as a workaround because Saban relied mostly on high school prospects during his Alabama tenure. And because his Crimson Tide recruited so well nationally — he plucked superstars everywhere from Texas, Florida, California, New Jersey and Hawaii — we didn't consider geography or proximity to talent, which were inherent advantages Saban had at Alabama.
This one is slightly arbitrary but simple. Even though Saban is a historically great recruiter, it's unrealistic to expect him to sign several elite prospects annually at a school that has no track record of doing so. Our proof-of-concept requirement: at least one five-star signee in any of the 24 classes of the modern recruiting era.
Advertisement
Kansas' title hopes end here, along with Baylor, Iowa State, Minnesota and Northwestern. Georgia Tech's out, too, because Calvin Johnson was merely a four-star prospect by Rivals.
But three-time Pro Bowler DeSean Jackson was a five-star talent, which helped Cal advance. The top junior college signee of 2008, defensive lineman Simu Kuli, keeps Oregon State in the mix, just as the No. 25 recruit in the 2004 class, linebacker Brian Toal, pushes Boston College to the next phase.
Even if a school is willing to install and implement Saban's famed 'Process,' it has to have the money to fund his army of analysts while competing in the arms races of facilities and NIL.
In the three years before Saban's arrival, Alabama reported an average of $46.9 million in football revenue to the U.S. Department of Education. In the three years after his arrival, the Crimson Tide reported $64.6 million. We'll expect a proportional bounce for other schools, so the Saban Effect is a 38 percent income bump based on the wins and booster buzz he'd provide.
Because fiscal years don't overlap cleanly with football seasons, the numbers are squishy. But almost every national champion since 2005 has ranked among the top 10 in football expenses around its title run. A 38 percent increase in football revenue still wasn't enough to jolt the budgets of Boston College, Cal, Oregon State and Rutgers consistently to that level. We'll assume they can't give Saban the resources he demands, so they're the next group to go.
Because elite talent doesn't always lead to championships, we also have to consider how well that talent was developed. The NFL Draft is an imperfect but instructive barometer.
Average NFL Draft picks
Since Saban's 2011 title team, most national champions have produced about 30 picks over the next three drafts. A reasonable floor was 18 (the number of draftees from Trevor Lawrence's 2018 Clemson team).
If the Saban Effect alone provides 10.8 picks over three seasons, the team itself must produce 7.2. That's an average of 2.4 picks per year. If a program hasn't been able to clear that relatively low bar since 2000, it probably lacks the infrastructure required for Saban to lift the team to the top.
This factor knocks out Arizona, Kansas State, Kentucky, Mississippi State, Missouri, Oklahoma State, Texas Tech and West Virginia, the flagship school of Saban's home state. Our list is down to 35, with Arizona State (2.46 picks per year) barely squeaking through.
Like five-star recruiting, this final category is simple and somewhat arbitrary. It's hard to think a team is capable of winning a national championship if it has never flashed championship potential. Both Alabama and LSU won titles before Saban, and both had a 10-win season in the four years before his arrival.
Advertisement
Our proof-of-concept bar is lower. We mandated at least one AP top-10 finish since 1992 (the year of Alabama's last pre-Saban crown). That means we must say goodbye to Pitt and North Carolina State, the latter of which has never finished in the top 10.
Their exits leave us with this final list of 33 programs (plus Alabama) that could have won a national championship with the peak version of Nick Saban:
Arizona State, Arkansas, Auburn, Clemson, Florida, Florida State, Georgia, Iowa, Louisville, LSU, Miami, Michigan, Michigan State, Nebraska, North Carolina, Notre Dame, Ohio State, Oklahoma, Ole Miss, Oregon, Penn State, South Carolina, Stanford, TCU, Tennessee, Texas, Texas A&M, UCLA, USC, Utah, Virginia Tech, Washington and Wisconsin.
Not surprisingly, the group includes every national champion since Colorado and Georgia Tech split the crown in 1990.
The Spartans, who haven't won a national title since 1966, are the most intriguing option because Saban coached there from 1995-99. He went 25-22-1 over his first four seasons before a 9-2, top-10 breakthrough that springboarded him to LSU.
You can use his mixed Michigan State tenure as evidence that Saban couldn't build a champion without the elite resources, tradition and recruiting pull of a marquee program like LSU or Alabama. In that case, the list is probably smaller than 33.
You can also reach the opposite conclusion. Perhaps Saban simply needed time to amass enough talent to revamp a program that had only one top-10 finish in the previous quarter century. Or maybe the early struggles at his first head coaching job in a major conference provided the teachable moments that turned him into the greatest coach ever.
What if he stayed in East Lansing for the long haul? That's a what-if for another day.
Advertisement
Of our final 33 contenders, nine have not claimed a national championship in the AP poll era (since 1936). Oregon and Virginia Tech have both played for a title since the BCS began, so set them aside, too.
Our answer, then, is on this worst-of-the-best list: Arizona State, Louisville, North Carolina, South Carolina, Stanford, Utah and Wisconsin. By our numbers, the weakest remaining option is …
Louisville!
The Cardinals are the only one without a top-five finish since 1990 and had the lowest average FPI. Their recruiting rankings were virtually tied with Utah at the bottom of the top tier, and the Sun Devils were the only contender with lower NFL Draft production. Louisville's perch in the ACC also provides a power conference starting point with an easier route to the Playoff.
Pair a Saban defense with 2016 Heisman Trophy winner Lamar Jackson, and a national title doesn't seem outlandish.
To add a human element to the debate, we surveyed 17 of The Athletic's college sports staffers for their thoughts. Baylor and Texas Tech (12 votes each) are the top contenders that didn't crack our above list. Multiple staffers said Saban could have won titles at Maryland and Virginia. Scott Dochterman picked Louisville as Saban's worst potential championship for the reasons cited above. Other answers included:
West Virginia: 'He would sign all his boys from his hometown and turn them into studs that crushed everyone with their toughness and physicality.' — Grace Raynor
Stanford: 'I'm really intrigued by if he could have won at Stanford in their heyday (which was not that many years ago) … Could he have made Christian McCaffrey even more dominant?' — Lindsay Schnell
South Carolina: 'The Gamecocks' only three top-10 seasons came under one Hall of Fame coach (Steve Spurrier), and another (Lou Holtz) never fared better than the Outback Bowl. But both were in their final years. If Spurrier could win 11 games three times during the Saban era while nearing retirement, it's not a stretch to think peak Saban could have elevated the Gamecocks to an even higher level and won a national title.' — Matt Baker
Advertisement
Michigan State: 'Ironically, Michigan State is probably the worst program that I thought Saban could lead to a national championship, which he left to go win a national championship at LSU. Also, everyone in the SEC could/would win it all with Saban other than Mississippi State and Vanderbilt.' — Pete Sampson
Washington: 'And even that I thought was a stretch. I firmly believe that in college football its nature over nurture when it comes to the ability to contend for a national title. Even the greatest coach of all-time needs the right conditions. Saban himself recognized that. Which is why he ended up at Alabama in the first place.' — Ralph D. Russo
Of the 68 Power 4 teams, 17 schools received unanimous support for being able to win a national title under Saban: Alabama, Auburn, Clemson, Florida, Florida State, Georgia, LSU, Michigan, Notre Dame, Ohio State, Oklahoma, Oregon, Penn State, Tennessee, Texas, Texas A&M and USC.
Apologies to the six schools that received zero votes: Kansas, Northwestern, Purdue, Rutgers, Vanderbilt and Wake Forest.
Who do you think is the worst program Saban could have led to a national title? What other No Wrong Answers topics would you like to see? Let us know in the comments.
(Illustration: Dan Goldfarb / The Athletic; photo: Joe Robbins / Icon Sportswire / Getty, iStock; graphics: Thomas Oide / The Athletic)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Social media reacts to Alabama players signing undrafted NBA free agent deals
Over the course of this past Wednesday and Thursday night, the Alabama Crimson Tide did not see any of their four draft-eligible players selected in the two rounds of the 2025 NBA draft. Yes, throughout both the first-and-second rounds, none of Alabama's four draft-eligible prospects - Mark Sears, Grant Nelson, Clifford Omoruyi, and Chris Youngblood - heard their names called, and instead entered undrafted free agency late Friday night. Since, it has not taken those four Alabama players long to find a new home at the professional level either, as all have signed an undrafted free agent deal as of Friday, June 27. Let's take a look at some reactions on social media to Alabama's draft prospects landing with NBA teams on free agent deals. Contact/Follow us @RollTideWire on X, and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Alabama news, notes and opinion.


USA Today
2 hours ago
- USA Today
Clemson's offensive, defensive rankings in EA's College Football 26 revealed
Clemson fans looking forward to EA Sports College Football 25 should have plenty to smile about when they fire up the game. In the latest round of team ratings, EA Sports has Clemson starting the year ranked No. 7 overall with an 88 team rating. That's thanks to a balanced roster that boasts the fifth-best offense in the game (89) and a top-10 defense (No. 10, 90). On top of that, Memorial Stadium will be one of the toughest places to play in the virtual world — EA previously ranked Death Valley as the sixth-hardest environment in the game, giving the Tigers a solid home-field boost when you're trying to protect a lead or swing momentum. Clemson's in-game schedule won't be a cakewalk, either. Right out of the gates, players will face No. 10 LSU, who comes in with an 86 team rating and strong balance themselves — the Tigers from Baton Rouge have the No. 6 offense and No. 8 defense. Other ranked matchups on Clemson's slate include SMU (No. 19 overall, 84 team rating, No. 15 offense), Duke (No. 23 overall, 84, No. 16 defense) and South Carolina (No. 24 overall, 82, No. 25 offense and No. 22 defense). The full Top 25 has Alabama leading the pack at 89 overall, followed by a cluster of contenders like Texas, Ohio State, Penn State, Notre Dame and Georgia — all tied with an 88 overall rating alongside Clemson and Texas A&M. On offense, only Texas, Penn State, Ohio State and Arizona State are rated higher than Clemson's 89. Defensively, only nine teams in the game have a better unit than the Tigers, with Alabama leading that group at a stout 96. All told, Clemson is shaping up to be one of the most well-rounded teams in the game — which should make them an entertaining pick for fans eager to chase a virtual national title this season. Contact us @Clemson_Wire on X, and like our page on Facebook for ongoing coverage of Clemson Tigers news and notes, plus opinions.


USA Today
3 hours ago
- USA Today
Alabama basketball starter, expected 2025-26 leader, lands in first 2026 NBA mock drafts
Alabama basketball received some of the best news it could have hoped for when guard Labaron Philon announced at the end of May that he was returning to Tuscaloosa for his sophomore season rather than remain in the 2025 NBA draft class. Philon's return gives Nate Oats' team a needed boost after the Crimson Tide lost impact starters Mark Sears, Grant Nelson and Clifford Omoruyi from its 2024-25 roster due to eligibility. RELATED: Where Alabama players signed as undrafted NBA free agents As the Dallas Mavericks made official what everyone had known for months with the selection of Duke's Cooper Flagg at No. 1 overall in this week's draft, national outlets like ESPN, CBS Sports, Bleacher Report, et al, were already finalizing way-too-early 2026 NBA draft projections. That's where Philon comes in. After decommitting from Kansas and joining Alabama as a 4-star recruit and the No. 32 overall player in the nation by 247Sports and ESPN, the Mobile native played in all 37 games for the Crimson Tide in 2024-25. He averaged 10.6 points and 3.3 rebounds with 3.8 assists and 1.4 steals. Philon averaged almost 25 minutes a night last season and tied a season-high with 21 points in the Crimson Tide's rout of Kentucky in the SEC Tournament. He shot 42.5 percent from the field a season ago. In Bleacher Report's first 2026 NBA mock draft on Friday, Philon landed at No. 27 overall with analyst Jonathan Wasserman saying: "He'll return to Alabama to improve his shooting, which is a potential needle-mover for a point guard who already excels at getting to his spots, setting up teammates and scoring with unteachable touch inside the arc." Philon also landed on ESPN's first 2026 NBA mock draft in roughly the same spot. Analysts Jonathan Givony and Jeremy Woo have Philon at No. 28 overall, one spot ahead of Florida Gators big man Alex Condon. Philon being a late-round projection heading into 2025-26 could work to his advantage. He had a fair amount of confidence in his draft stock after telling ESPN's Jeff Borzello in May that the door was closed on a return to Alabama. There's obvious talent in his shot and overall play, but a sophomore season in college basketball's toughest conference could make Philon as battle-tested for the NBA as almost anyone in 2026