Spend more on defence now to protect Europe from Russia, says Lithuania's defence minister
VILNIUS (Reuters) - Europe must remove borrowing limits for defence spending or face the prospect of war with Russia, Lithuanian Defence Minister Dovile Sakaliene told Reuters on Tuesday.
"Defence now is an existential matter, it's more important than structural reforms", said Sakaliene. "If you cannot provide enough ammo for your soldiers, it doesn't really matter what you say," she said in an interview.
"We have a chance to prevent our citizens from dying in terrifying numbers from Russian bullets and Russian bombs. But we need to disburse funds for strengthening our military, our defence capabilities, right now."
Lithuania, a NATO and EU member, which borders both its former overlord Russia and Moscow's close ally Belarus, has committed to spending 5.5% of its gross domestic product next year on defence, up from 3.9% of GDP earmarked this year.
European Union finance ministers expressed interest on Saturday in the idea of a joint defence fund that would buy and own defence equipment, partly as a way to address concerns of highly-indebted countries because the debt incurred would not be attached to national accounts.
The discussion is part of a European effort to prepare for a potential attack from Russia as EU governments realise they can no longer fully rely on the United States for their security.
Russia's defence minister said in December that Moscow had to prepare for direct conflict with NATO in the next decade.
Under the separate ReArm Europe plan, the EU is looking to boost military spending by 800 billion euros ($876 billion) over the next four years, via loosening fiscal rules on defence investment and joint borrowing for large defence projects against the EU budget.
Sakaliene said the European Union needed to remove all stops on borrowing for defence needs, and provide immediate grants, not only loans, to its members for the purpose.
She said that she could understand U.S. President Donald Trump saying he would not defend NATO allies if they were not paying enough for their own defence.
"This tension, this unpleasant conversation - it is justified... We are where we are because Europe lagged behind, terribly, for years," said Sakaliene.
Despite Trump's words, frontline NATO allies Lithuania, Estonia, Latvia and Poland "do have the United States by our side should any crisis happen", Sakaliene said, because they spend significantly on their defence and closely cooperate with the U.S. militarily.
The minister said she is hopeful NATO allies will commit to at least 4% of GDP spending goal at the Hague NATO summit in June, in the face of the Russian danger.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What Are These OpenAI and SpaceX Stock Tokens Robinhood Is Giving Away?
Robinhood earlier this week announced it would give away to eligible European users small "tokenized" stakes in private companies OpenAI and SpaceX, an offering OpenAI said it did not endorse. Federal regulations currently prohibit investors with assets and income below a specific threshold from investing in private companies, which are subject to less stringent financial disclosure rules. Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev argues tokenizing the equity of private companies will give everyday investors access to the outsized gains that can come from being an early investor in groundbreaking Markets earlier this week said it would offer European users the option to trade 'stock tokens,' and that it would give away $5 worth of 'tokenized' stock in two major private companies, OpenAI and SpaceX, to eligible investors. OpenAI on Wednesday disavowed the offering, writing, 'These 'OpenAI tokens' are not OpenAI equity. We did not partner with Robinhood, were not involved in this, and do not endorse it.' The company urged investors to 'please be careful.' Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev responded in an X post on Wednesday night: 'While it is true that they aren't technically 'equity' (you can see the precise dynamics in our Terms for those interested), the tokens effectively give retail investors exposure to these private assets.' Separately, a spokesperson said that the tokens provide "indirect exposure... and are enabled by Robinhood's ownership stake in a special purpose vehicle." Elon Musk, the CEO of SpaceX, has not commented publicly on the stock tokens. But he did seize the opportunity to take a jab at OpenAI, with which he has sparred in the past. "Your 'equity' is fake," Musk replied to the company's post. So if stock tokens aren't equity, what are they? Stock tokens are effectively the blockchain equivalent of equity; they represent one's transferrable ownership stake in a company. But they differ from regular stock in a few key ways. First, they're traded on a blockchain rather than on public exchanges. Second, they can be stored in the investor's digital wallet, rather than being held by a custodian, like a brokerage. Third, because they are on-chain, they can be used in other decentralized finance activities, like staking. Tenev, the Robinhood CEO, made the case for stock tokenization in a recent appearance on Bloomberg's 'Odd Lots' podcast. Tokenized stocks can be held directly by the investor who owns them, which gives them more flexibility in trading. Stock that's not in the custody of a brokerage can still be traded when that broker experiences technical difficulties; an urgent sell order can be redirected to a different broker and filled. The decentralized nature of blockchain could make it easier for stocks to trade 24/7. As long as computers are processing transactions on the blockchain, traders can buy and sell stocks without using exchanges and clearinghouses with fixed operating hours. Finally, tokenization makes stock available to put in a collateralized lending pool or to stake, giving investors additional sources of passive income. Robinhood is launching tokenized private company stock in Europe because it has less stringent rules governing private market investment. In the U.S., private markets are accessible only to accredited investors—individuals and businesses with enough money that, in the eyes of the government, they don't need the protections that come from regulatory oversight of public markets. Public companies are required by the Securities and Exchange Commission to make regular financial disclosures and provide the public with material business updates. Private companies have more relaxed disclosure rules, primarily because accredited investors are assumed to be rich or savvy enough to take on the additional risk of private investments. Tenev, in a Washington Post op-ed in January, said opening private markets to retail investors was central to Robinhood's tokenization push. 'Tokenizing private-company stock would enable retail investors to invest in leading companies early in their life cycles, before they potentially go public at valuations of more than $100 billion,' he wrote. There is an obvious benefit to everyday investors being able to invest in the hottest start-ups; under existing rules, the outsized gains that come from early investment often accrue to the wealthy and well-connected. Though, public disclosure rules exist to help everyday investors and their advisors make informed decisions and protect them from fraud, and investing in small upstarts is inherently riskier than buying shares of an established public company. Tenev told 'Odd Lots' that stock tokens could become available in the U.S. without new legislation, and that Robinhood has been discussing tokenization with the SEC's Crypto Task Force. 'I think they're pretty keen to make this happen,' he said, referring to rules that would govern the tokens. Read the original article on Investopedia Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Politico
30 minutes ago
- Politico
Trump says no progress on Ukraine in call with Putin
The two leaders also discussed Iran in what the U.S. president said was a "long" call. President Donald Trump boards Air Force One at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland, July 3, 2025. | Cliff Owen/AP By Ben Johansen 07/03/2025 07:34 PM EDT President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin spoke by phone Thursday, but neither side reported any breakthrough on efforts to end the war in Ukraine. Trump, who promised on the campaign trail that he could end the war on his first day in office, has been repeatedly frustrated in his efforts to secure an agreement to end the fighting. 'It was a pretty long call. We talked about a lot of things, including Iran. We also talked about the war with Ukraine and I'm not happy about that,' the president said before boarding Air Force One for a trip to Iowa for an event celebrating the nation's 250th anniversary.


New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Beijing cannot allow Russia to lose Ukraine war because it wants America distracted, top Chinese diplomat told EU: report
Beijing cannot afford to see Russia lose the Ukraine war, because it needs America focused on the Moscow and Kyiv — and away from the Pacific, China's top diplomat told his EU counterpart, according to a new report. Foreign Minister Wang Yi allegedly shocked European officials at a Brussels meeting Wednesday when he dropped all pretenses and said Russia's invasion of Ukraine has been a blessing for China, sources told the South China Morning Post. Wang touted the three-year war for keeping the US focused on Ukraine, claiming that if the war were to end, Washington would start putting its full attention in the Pacific and could enter into conflict with China. Advertisement 4 Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi meeting with EU High Representative Kaja Kallas in Brussels on Wednesday. REUTERS 4 Wang allegedly claimed that Beijing cannot afford to see Russia lose against Ukraine. REUTERS The admission from one of Beijing's top officials, which was not included in either nation's summary of the meeting, came after the EU accused China of assisting in Russia's war effort. The South China Morning Post — Hong Kong's daily newspaper, which is owned by the Alibaba Group — reported the comments. Advertisement Kaja Kallas, EU's high representative for foreign policy, called on China 'to immediately cease all material support that sustains Russia's military industrial complex' and support peace in the Ukraine, according to a statement released by the bloc. The official also 'highlighted the serious threat Chinese companies' support for Russia's illegal war poses to European security.' Beijing maintains that it has not provided any military support to Russia during its invasion of Ukraine, but EU officials claim Chinese companies have given Moscow many of the necessary components needed to build the drones and weapons used in the war. Advertisement 4 Chinese President Xi Jinping has previously said that his partnership with Vladimir Putin has 'no limits.' AP China was one of the nations that failed to condemn Moscow invasion of Ukraine in 2022, with President Xi Jinping standing as an ally of his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin. While Xi has never publicly called for Beijing to support Russia's war effort, the Chinese leader has previously said their partnership has 'no limits' and blamed the invasion on western aggression. Wednesday's meeting in Brussels also saw the EU demand that China end restrictions on rare earth mineral exports, which Europe warned could endanger the global supply chain. Advertisement 4 The Brussels meeting is set to lay the groundwork for the EU-China summit taking place next month. REUTERS China placed export restrictions on seven rare minerals and magnets — including samarium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, lutetium, scandium, and yttrium — all of which are vital for global defense, energy and automotive sectors. The EU is also urging China to use its influence as Iran's main oil buyer to pressure Tehran to make a deal over its nuclear program to stabilize the Middle East. The meeting was set to lay the groundwork for the summit scheduled for next month between EU and Chinese leaders.