logo
Lawmakers clash over proposed affordable housing bill

Lawmakers clash over proposed affordable housing bill

Yahoo18-04-2025
EAST HARTFORD, Conn. (WTNH) — State lawmakers are clashing over a piece of proposed legislation aimed at boosting affordable housing development.
The bill, H.B. 6944, would require every municipality in Connecticut to create an affordable housing plan every five years. Towns and cities would then have to post these plans for affordable housing development on their websites.
2 Connecticut cities spend higher percentage of income on rent nationally: WalletHub
House Majority Leader and State Rep. Jason Rojas (D-9th) told News 8 on Friday that the bill would be a crucial next step in furthering affordable housing development.
'It'll actually provide objective information to towns and communities and give them a number from which they can plan for,' Rojas said.
Rojas has been one of the strongest advocates in attempting to address the state's patchwork of local zoning laws. Democrats supporting the legislation are arguing that these regulations and red tape are stifling economic growth.
'Right now the marketplace, constrained by government regulation, is not allowing the marketplace to build the kind of housing that families in Connecticut need,' he said.
In this regard, Rojas argued, Connecticut is lagging behind red states where forceful economic and housing development are being more strongly embraced by state legislatures.
'Listen, Republicans across the rest of the country are on board with this,' he said. 'You go to a lot of red states, they're doing a lot better job of allowing housing to be built. They're a lot more economically vibrant than we are.'
Two features of the bill in particular have drawn the ire of state Republicans. One of these issues that Republicans have highlighted is that the Secretary of the Office of Policy and Management would be in charge of reviewing and approving plans.
Republicans like State Rep. Joe Zullo (99th), who sits on the Planning & Development Committee, are criticizing this approach, arguing it instead primarily serves to bolster state power and overreach regarding local zoning rules.
'You know, in concept, the idea of towns taking the lead is a great idea,' Zullo said. 'The problem is that this proposal is more like follow the leader. And the leader is a big state bureaucratic institution seeking to impose all of their mandates on local municipalities.'
Another criticism among Republicans regarding the proposed bill is that individuals or groups — any 'interested party' — can file a complaint with the state Superior Court if a municipality is not following its plan.
Zullo and state Republicans are claiming this could lead to less progress and more lawsuits.
'Everybody wants to create more housing, we want to solve and eradicate homelessness. The problem is the approach, and I think there's a deafness to the issue of local control,' he added.
Rojas pushed back on the idea that the proposed bill introduces negative enforcement measures.
'Any time you want to have a policy outcome, there needs to be an accountability measure,' Rojas said. 'And that's what we're talking about here. You can call it a stick. I call it accountability.'
The debate over the bill is part of a larger focus on affordable housing in Connecticut.
Advocates have previously estimated that the state has a shortage of roughly 94,000 available and affordable homes for low-income renters.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bove vote dogged by new whistleblower complaints
Bove vote dogged by new whistleblower complaints

The Hill

time12 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Bove vote dogged by new whistleblower complaints

Senate Democrats are seeking clarification about whether there is an ongoing investigation into Justice Department official Emil Bove after three different whistleblowers came forward with information ahead of his confirmation vote for a lifetime appointment to the bench. The request from Sens. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) and Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) comes as a third whistleblower filed a complaint against Bove, alleging the nominee misled the Senate Judiciary Committee. Bove, previously one of Trump's personal defense lawyers, serves in the No. 3 role at the Justice Department and has been nominated to sit on the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals. After clearing an initial procedural hurdle, a vote on his nomination could come as soon as Tuesday night. Schiff and Booker ask the Justice Department's Office of Inspector General to confirm for lawmakers whether they have ignited an investigation into Bove. 'As the Senate approaches a final vote this week on Mr. Bove's nomination to serve as United States Circuit Judge for the Third Circuit, it is imperative that Senators exercise their constitutional duty of advice and consent with full knowledge of Mr. Bove's actions,' they wrote. 'We therefore request that you clarify for Senators whether your office is undertaking any investigations of or related to Mr. Bove. In the event these whistleblower complaints and other reports have not already prompted investigations by your office, we urge you to undertake a thorough review of these disclosures and allegations.' They argue the three different whistleblower complaints 'paint a picture that Mr. Bove likely violated laws and Department regulations, and abused his authority while acting as one of the Department's most senior officials.' According to The Washington Post, a third whistleblower has forwarded new allegations about Bove's role in ending the prosecution of New York Mayor Eric Adams (D) on bribery charges. Prosecutors who worked the case refused to drop the charges and sign onto the dismissal notice, prompting a wave of resignations. Bove said during his confirmation hearing that the Trump administration needed Adams's cooperation on immigration matters, prompting cries from Democrats that the move was a clear quid pro quo. 'Policy reasons made it appropriate to drop the charges,' Bove said at the time. He has already been accused by whistleblower Erez Reuveni of suggesting the Justice Department defy any court orders blocking the Trump administration from deporting migrants to a foreign prison under the Alien Enemies Act, saying DOJ might have to tell the courts 'f–k you.' A second whistleblower has stepped forward with information they say corroborates Reuveni's allegations. A judge has since begun a probe into whether the Justice Department defied his order to halt or turn around flights carrying Venezuelan men deported under the Alien Enemies Act, finding probable cause to hold the Trump administration in criminal contempt for willfully disobeying his order to immediately halt deportations. Bove has said he could not recall whether he used the expletive but said during his confirmation hearing that he 'certainly conveyed the importance of the upcoming operation.' Details are scarce on the third whistleblower complaint. 'A new whistleblower, whose disclosures have not been publicized, has strong evidence that Emil Bove was not truthful to the Senate Judiciary Committee during his confirmation hearing for his nomination to serve on the Third Circuit Court of Appeals,' Peter Carr, a spokesman for Justice Connection said in a statement. The group, a DOJ alumni group that assists whistleblowers, was asked to release a statement on the whistleblower's behalf. 'The whistleblower has tried to share this information with Republican senators for weeks and they have not provided any response. We urge the senators to hear from this whistleblower before the final vote on his nomination.' The Justice Department did not respond to a request for comment. GOP members have not stopped by Booker's office to review the documents provided by the latest whistleblower, the Post reported. Committee members asked Bove questions on a number of topics. Beyond whether he encouraged defiance of court orders, he was also asked about leading the effort to fire prosecutors who worked on Jan. 6 cases and collecting a list of FBI agents who worked on investigations into rioters. Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) backed Bove out of the committee, saying that while he will not confirm those who condoned Jan. 6, he did not feel the nominee had condoned the riots. Bove advanced after an initial round of voting where Sens. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) and Susan Collins (R-Maine) were the only GOP members to vote against him. Democrats previously demanded a hearing with Reuveni, but the panel's Republicans blocked it. 'Another whistleblower has come forward with evidence that raises serious concerns with Emil Bove's misconduct,' Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), the top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee said. 'This is another damning indictment of a man who should never be a federal judge—and Senate Republicans will bear full responsibility for the consequences if they rubber stamp Mr. Bove's nomination.'

Watch live: Peter Welch unveils legislation to combat Trump ‘sick tax'
Watch live: Peter Welch unveils legislation to combat Trump ‘sick tax'

The Hill

time12 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Watch live: Peter Welch unveils legislation to combat Trump ‘sick tax'

Sen. Peter Welch (D-Vt.) will speak Tuesday afternoon on recently introduced legislation targeting President Trump's 'sick tax,' a provision in the GOP-led spending and tax package that will require Medicaid enrollees to pay more out of pocket when visiting a health care provider. Welch, along with other Democrats, has in recent weeks pushed back against sweeping cuts and reforms to Medicaid included in the 'big, beautiful bill' that Trump signed into law on July 4. 'As a result, seniors, children, people with disabilities, and working families already fighting to make ends meet will be forced to pay an out-of-pocket cost before they can receive vital health care services,' the Vermont Democrat wrote in a statement introducing the Repealing the Trump Sick Tax Act. 'This 'sick tax' imposed by President Trump and Congressional Republicans will force Medicaid enrollees to choose between paying their bills and receiving vital care every time they need to see a provider,' he added. Welch's remarks are scheduled to begin at 3:30 p.m. EDT. Watch the live video above.

Greene calls Gaza humanitarian crisis a ‘genocide'
Greene calls Gaza humanitarian crisis a ‘genocide'

The Hill

time12 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Greene calls Gaza humanitarian crisis a ‘genocide'

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) called the humanitarian crisis in Gaza a 'genocide' in a social media, appearing to be the first Republican in Congress to use the term to describe the situation. 'It's the most truthful and easiest thing to say that Oct 7th in Israel was horrific and all hostages must be returned, but so is the genocide, humanitarian crisis, and starvation happening in Gaza,' Greene said in a post on X on Monday night. Her comment came as part of a larger response criticizing fellow Republican Rep. Randy Fine (R-Fla.), one of three Jewish Republicans in the House who joined the chamber after a special election earlier this year. Greene dug into Fine over his recent social media posts about the conflict, including denying that there is starvation in Gaza. 'There is no starvation. Everything about the 'Palestinian' cause is a lie,' Fine said in a post on Sunday. Last week, Fine posted: 'Release the hostages. Until then, starve away.' Trump on Monday said there was 'real starvation' happening in Gaza and that the U.S. would do more to address it. 'I can only imagine how Florida's 6th district feels now that their Representative, that they were told to vote for, openly calls for starving innocent people and children,' Greene said, before going on to make her comment about the genocide. 'But a Jewish U.S. Representative calling for the continued starvation of innocent people and children is disgraceful. His awful statement will actually cause more antisemitism,' Greene said. Fine's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment, and he has not yet responded on social media. Greene's stance marks a major break with her party, and an escalation of her criticism of Israel — and U.S. financial support for Israel — as the war in Gaza drags on. Over the weekend she posted that 'what has been happening to innocent people and children in Gaza is horrific.' Earlier this month, Greene introduced an amendment to cut funding to Israel's missile defense, which failed in a 6-422 vote. Greene has previously been accused of antisemitism, most famously over a 2018 Facebook post that has come to be known as the 'Jewish space laser' post — though Greene never used that phrase. In the post, Greene in which she floated that a 'laser beam or light beam' from 'space solar generators' could be to blame for wildfires in California, also mentioning the 'Rothschild Inc.' Greene later said she did not know the Rothschilds have long been at the center of antisemitic conspiracy theories. Greene also voted against an antisemitism awareness bill last year, saying it would define antisemitic behavior to include remarks about Jews killing Jesus, which she said went against the Bible.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store