Five dead, six missing in China chemical plant blast
The blast occurred a few minutes before noon on Tuesday, shaking part of a chemical plant operated by Shandong Youdao Chemical in the city of Weifang.
Videos circulating on Chinese social media and verified by Reuters showed plumes of orange and black smoke billowing into the sky. Windows of nearby buildings were ripped from their hinges by the explosion, one of the videos showed.
More than 200 emergency workers responded to the blast, according to a statement issued by China's emergency response authority on Tuesday afternoon.
Drone video posted by The Beijing News, a government-run publication, showed smoke emerging from the chemical plant and from a second, unidentified facility nearby.
Baidu Maps, a navigation app, shows other manufacturing companies next to Youdao's plant, including a textile company, a machinery company and a firm that makes industrial coating materials.
The Weifang Ecological Environment Bureau dispatched staff to test the site of the blast but said there were no results yet available. The bureau advised nearby residents to wear face masks in the meantime, Beijing News reported.
Shandong Youdao Chemical is owned by Himile Group, which also owns listed Himile Mechanical, shares of which closed down nearly 3.6 per cent on Tuesday.
Youdao was established in August 2019 in the Gaomi Renhe chemical park in Weifang, according to the company's website. The plant covers more than 47 hectares and has more than 300 employees.
The company develops, produces and sells chemical components for use in pesticides and pharmaceuticals.
Blasts at chemical plants in China in recent years have included one in the northwest region of Ningxia in 2024 and another in the southeastern province of Jiangxi in 2023.
Two massive explosions at warehouses containing hazardous and flammable chemicals in the port city of Tianjin in 2015 killed over 170 people and injured 700. That incident prompted the government to tighten laws covering chemical storage.
An explosion in 2015 at another chemical plant in Shandong killed 13 people.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Advertiser
9 hours ago
- The Advertiser
Diplomats in Australia owe $1.3 million in unpaid traffic fines
Unlike the rest of us, it seems people who work for the consulates of other countries in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) have diplomatic immunity when it comes to traffic fines. According to The Epoch Times, staff of foreign embassies in Canberra routinely ignore demands to pay penalties for driving offences and currently owe the ACT government $1.3 million in unpaid traffic fines. These fines range from around $200 for a parking ticket, $674 for illegally using a disabled space, and in some cases more than $2000 for offences including driving through a stop sign and speeding. Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now. As in most Australian states and territories, failure to pay a traffic fine by the due date in the ACT incurs a late fee, and then cancellation of your driver's licence or the registration of the vehicle involved in the offence. The Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade says all diplomatic and consular staff are required to pay all traffic and parking fines promptly, and driver's licences held by mission and post staff and their dependents can be suspended if they rack up enough demerit points or unpaid fines. In the ACT, the penalty for driving without a licence is a $7500 fine, six months in prison, or both, while driving an unregistered vehicle will currently set you back $3200. But these ramifications apparently don't concern diplomats in Australia, who have reportedly racked up unpaid traffic fines in the ACT for almost 30 years. The oldest is said to date back to 1996, when someone from the Danish embassy exceeded the speed limit by less than 15km/h and failed to pay the $34 fine. Staff from the United Arab Emirates (UAE) are the worst offenders with a total of $106,584 owed, followed by Nepal ($82,452) and both Iraq and Malaysia, which each owe almost $52,000. However, according to an ACT government database, the largest amounts are owed by "unknown embassies" and "relate to diplomatic persons or missions", which have notched up $421,302 in fines, and to "de-identified missions" with three or fewer staff, which owe a total of $403,622. The Epoch Times reports the six largest fines of $2412 have all been incurred by "unknown embassies" for speeding, and that the UAE embassy has accrued the highest number of expensive speeding tickets (13), at $2134 each. The UAE also tops the list of the largest number of unpaid offences at 37, all bar two of which are red light camera offences, and all of which occurred in 2022. At the other end of the scale, staff of the Chinese embassy have just one outstanding fine, issued last year and also for a red light camera infringement. Exacerbating the total value of unpaid traffic fines incurred by consulate staff in Canberra is the fact penalties for most offences have increased in the ACT in recent times, as they have in most other states and territories. But that doesn't account for the fact the current $1.3 million figure is more than 2000 per cent higher than the $60,000 amount reportedly owed in 2019, suggesting that Canberra embassy staff are incurring – and not paying – traffic fines at a higher rate than ever. Content originally sourced from: Unlike the rest of us, it seems people who work for the consulates of other countries in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) have diplomatic immunity when it comes to traffic fines. According to The Epoch Times, staff of foreign embassies in Canberra routinely ignore demands to pay penalties for driving offences and currently owe the ACT government $1.3 million in unpaid traffic fines. These fines range from around $200 for a parking ticket, $674 for illegally using a disabled space, and in some cases more than $2000 for offences including driving through a stop sign and speeding. Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now. As in most Australian states and territories, failure to pay a traffic fine by the due date in the ACT incurs a late fee, and then cancellation of your driver's licence or the registration of the vehicle involved in the offence. The Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade says all diplomatic and consular staff are required to pay all traffic and parking fines promptly, and driver's licences held by mission and post staff and their dependents can be suspended if they rack up enough demerit points or unpaid fines. In the ACT, the penalty for driving without a licence is a $7500 fine, six months in prison, or both, while driving an unregistered vehicle will currently set you back $3200. But these ramifications apparently don't concern diplomats in Australia, who have reportedly racked up unpaid traffic fines in the ACT for almost 30 years. The oldest is said to date back to 1996, when someone from the Danish embassy exceeded the speed limit by less than 15km/h and failed to pay the $34 fine. Staff from the United Arab Emirates (UAE) are the worst offenders with a total of $106,584 owed, followed by Nepal ($82,452) and both Iraq and Malaysia, which each owe almost $52,000. However, according to an ACT government database, the largest amounts are owed by "unknown embassies" and "relate to diplomatic persons or missions", which have notched up $421,302 in fines, and to "de-identified missions" with three or fewer staff, which owe a total of $403,622. The Epoch Times reports the six largest fines of $2412 have all been incurred by "unknown embassies" for speeding, and that the UAE embassy has accrued the highest number of expensive speeding tickets (13), at $2134 each. The UAE also tops the list of the largest number of unpaid offences at 37, all bar two of which are red light camera offences, and all of which occurred in 2022. At the other end of the scale, staff of the Chinese embassy have just one outstanding fine, issued last year and also for a red light camera infringement. Exacerbating the total value of unpaid traffic fines incurred by consulate staff in Canberra is the fact penalties for most offences have increased in the ACT in recent times, as they have in most other states and territories. But that doesn't account for the fact the current $1.3 million figure is more than 2000 per cent higher than the $60,000 amount reportedly owed in 2019, suggesting that Canberra embassy staff are incurring – and not paying – traffic fines at a higher rate than ever. Content originally sourced from: Unlike the rest of us, it seems people who work for the consulates of other countries in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) have diplomatic immunity when it comes to traffic fines. According to The Epoch Times, staff of foreign embassies in Canberra routinely ignore demands to pay penalties for driving offences and currently owe the ACT government $1.3 million in unpaid traffic fines. These fines range from around $200 for a parking ticket, $674 for illegally using a disabled space, and in some cases more than $2000 for offences including driving through a stop sign and speeding. Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now. As in most Australian states and territories, failure to pay a traffic fine by the due date in the ACT incurs a late fee, and then cancellation of your driver's licence or the registration of the vehicle involved in the offence. The Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade says all diplomatic and consular staff are required to pay all traffic and parking fines promptly, and driver's licences held by mission and post staff and their dependents can be suspended if they rack up enough demerit points or unpaid fines. In the ACT, the penalty for driving without a licence is a $7500 fine, six months in prison, or both, while driving an unregistered vehicle will currently set you back $3200. But these ramifications apparently don't concern diplomats in Australia, who have reportedly racked up unpaid traffic fines in the ACT for almost 30 years. The oldest is said to date back to 1996, when someone from the Danish embassy exceeded the speed limit by less than 15km/h and failed to pay the $34 fine. Staff from the United Arab Emirates (UAE) are the worst offenders with a total of $106,584 owed, followed by Nepal ($82,452) and both Iraq and Malaysia, which each owe almost $52,000. However, according to an ACT government database, the largest amounts are owed by "unknown embassies" and "relate to diplomatic persons or missions", which have notched up $421,302 in fines, and to "de-identified missions" with three or fewer staff, which owe a total of $403,622. The Epoch Times reports the six largest fines of $2412 have all been incurred by "unknown embassies" for speeding, and that the UAE embassy has accrued the highest number of expensive speeding tickets (13), at $2134 each. The UAE also tops the list of the largest number of unpaid offences at 37, all bar two of which are red light camera offences, and all of which occurred in 2022. At the other end of the scale, staff of the Chinese embassy have just one outstanding fine, issued last year and also for a red light camera infringement. Exacerbating the total value of unpaid traffic fines incurred by consulate staff in Canberra is the fact penalties for most offences have increased in the ACT in recent times, as they have in most other states and territories. But that doesn't account for the fact the current $1.3 million figure is more than 2000 per cent higher than the $60,000 amount reportedly owed in 2019, suggesting that Canberra embassy staff are incurring – and not paying – traffic fines at a higher rate than ever. Content originally sourced from: Unlike the rest of us, it seems people who work for the consulates of other countries in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) have diplomatic immunity when it comes to traffic fines. According to The Epoch Times, staff of foreign embassies in Canberra routinely ignore demands to pay penalties for driving offences and currently owe the ACT government $1.3 million in unpaid traffic fines. These fines range from around $200 for a parking ticket, $674 for illegally using a disabled space, and in some cases more than $2000 for offences including driving through a stop sign and speeding. Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now. As in most Australian states and territories, failure to pay a traffic fine by the due date in the ACT incurs a late fee, and then cancellation of your driver's licence or the registration of the vehicle involved in the offence. The Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade says all diplomatic and consular staff are required to pay all traffic and parking fines promptly, and driver's licences held by mission and post staff and their dependents can be suspended if they rack up enough demerit points or unpaid fines. In the ACT, the penalty for driving without a licence is a $7500 fine, six months in prison, or both, while driving an unregistered vehicle will currently set you back $3200. But these ramifications apparently don't concern diplomats in Australia, who have reportedly racked up unpaid traffic fines in the ACT for almost 30 years. The oldest is said to date back to 1996, when someone from the Danish embassy exceeded the speed limit by less than 15km/h and failed to pay the $34 fine. Staff from the United Arab Emirates (UAE) are the worst offenders with a total of $106,584 owed, followed by Nepal ($82,452) and both Iraq and Malaysia, which each owe almost $52,000. However, according to an ACT government database, the largest amounts are owed by "unknown embassies" and "relate to diplomatic persons or missions", which have notched up $421,302 in fines, and to "de-identified missions" with three or fewer staff, which owe a total of $403,622. The Epoch Times reports the six largest fines of $2412 have all been incurred by "unknown embassies" for speeding, and that the UAE embassy has accrued the highest number of expensive speeding tickets (13), at $2134 each. The UAE also tops the list of the largest number of unpaid offences at 37, all bar two of which are red light camera offences, and all of which occurred in 2022. At the other end of the scale, staff of the Chinese embassy have just one outstanding fine, issued last year and also for a red light camera infringement. Exacerbating the total value of unpaid traffic fines incurred by consulate staff in Canberra is the fact penalties for most offences have increased in the ACT in recent times, as they have in most other states and territories. But that doesn't account for the fact the current $1.3 million figure is more than 2000 per cent higher than the $60,000 amount reportedly owed in 2019, suggesting that Canberra embassy staff are incurring – and not paying – traffic fines at a higher rate than ever. Content originally sourced from:
The Advertiser
9 hours ago
- The Advertiser
'Exploited' investors lose fortune, $280m fines mulled
Brokerages found to have profited handsomely from vulnerable customers who lost millions of dollars on highly risky investment products could be hit with $280 million fines. Investors lost $83 million by investing in complex, high-risk over-the-counter derivatives pushed by foreign exchange broker Union Standard International Group and its two authorised representatives between 2018 and 2020. Union Standard and the two representatives EuropeFX and TradeFred committed hundreds of contraventions of corporations and financial law through systemic misconduct that targeted inexperienced consumers, the Federal Court found in December. The complex products allowed customers to speculate on the change in value of an underlying asset, such as foreign exchange rates, stock market indices, single equities, commodities or crypto-assets. The court found some customers were "flying blind during most, if not all, of the time" that they traded derivatives with EuropeFX. The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) is now seeking fines totalling $287.1 million against the three firms. EuropeFX, the only one not in liquidation, should face a $114.1 million penalty, ASIC barrister Luke Livingston SC argued during a hearing on Tuesday. The firm's revenue was directly linked to customers' trading losses, he said. "In short, the more its customers lost, the more revenue it earned," he told Justice Michael Wigney. The judge found in his December decision that all three firms had profited "handsomely" from their conduct. Union Standard and TradeFred - both unrepresented at the hearing - should be fined $143.5 million and $29.4 million, Mr Livingston said. EuropeFX has pushed for a lower penalty of $40 million, claiming ASIC's proposed fine was "double punishment". ASIC argued the lower amount was insufficient to deter similar unlawful conduct in the future. EuropeFX's barrister Michelle Painter SC said her client should be hit with a lower penalty than Union Standard as that was the firm issuing the financial products in the first place. The company claimed at a prior hearing on liability that it had relied on Union Standard to train its staff properly. Justice Wigney rejected those allegations. EuropeFX's account managers unlawfully gave personal financial advice, pressured customers into depositing more funds and made misleading statements regarding investments, he found. The firm also tried pressuring customers who had threatened to go to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority into accepting modest settlements instead, he said. "EuropeFX's conduct was so far outside societal norms of acceptable behaviour in respect of the provision of financial services as to warrant condemnation as conduct that is offensive to conscience," he said at the time. The judge also found Union Standard did not warn customers based in China they would breach Chinese law by investing in its products. Several Union Standard directors have been banned from providing financial services based on their conduct at the firm or other companies. The hearing continues. Brokerages found to have profited handsomely from vulnerable customers who lost millions of dollars on highly risky investment products could be hit with $280 million fines. Investors lost $83 million by investing in complex, high-risk over-the-counter derivatives pushed by foreign exchange broker Union Standard International Group and its two authorised representatives between 2018 and 2020. Union Standard and the two representatives EuropeFX and TradeFred committed hundreds of contraventions of corporations and financial law through systemic misconduct that targeted inexperienced consumers, the Federal Court found in December. The complex products allowed customers to speculate on the change in value of an underlying asset, such as foreign exchange rates, stock market indices, single equities, commodities or crypto-assets. The court found some customers were "flying blind during most, if not all, of the time" that they traded derivatives with EuropeFX. The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) is now seeking fines totalling $287.1 million against the three firms. EuropeFX, the only one not in liquidation, should face a $114.1 million penalty, ASIC barrister Luke Livingston SC argued during a hearing on Tuesday. The firm's revenue was directly linked to customers' trading losses, he said. "In short, the more its customers lost, the more revenue it earned," he told Justice Michael Wigney. The judge found in his December decision that all three firms had profited "handsomely" from their conduct. Union Standard and TradeFred - both unrepresented at the hearing - should be fined $143.5 million and $29.4 million, Mr Livingston said. EuropeFX has pushed for a lower penalty of $40 million, claiming ASIC's proposed fine was "double punishment". ASIC argued the lower amount was insufficient to deter similar unlawful conduct in the future. EuropeFX's barrister Michelle Painter SC said her client should be hit with a lower penalty than Union Standard as that was the firm issuing the financial products in the first place. The company claimed at a prior hearing on liability that it had relied on Union Standard to train its staff properly. Justice Wigney rejected those allegations. EuropeFX's account managers unlawfully gave personal financial advice, pressured customers into depositing more funds and made misleading statements regarding investments, he found. The firm also tried pressuring customers who had threatened to go to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority into accepting modest settlements instead, he said. "EuropeFX's conduct was so far outside societal norms of acceptable behaviour in respect of the provision of financial services as to warrant condemnation as conduct that is offensive to conscience," he said at the time. The judge also found Union Standard did not warn customers based in China they would breach Chinese law by investing in its products. Several Union Standard directors have been banned from providing financial services based on their conduct at the firm or other companies. The hearing continues. Brokerages found to have profited handsomely from vulnerable customers who lost millions of dollars on highly risky investment products could be hit with $280 million fines. Investors lost $83 million by investing in complex, high-risk over-the-counter derivatives pushed by foreign exchange broker Union Standard International Group and its two authorised representatives between 2018 and 2020. Union Standard and the two representatives EuropeFX and TradeFred committed hundreds of contraventions of corporations and financial law through systemic misconduct that targeted inexperienced consumers, the Federal Court found in December. The complex products allowed customers to speculate on the change in value of an underlying asset, such as foreign exchange rates, stock market indices, single equities, commodities or crypto-assets. The court found some customers were "flying blind during most, if not all, of the time" that they traded derivatives with EuropeFX. The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) is now seeking fines totalling $287.1 million against the three firms. EuropeFX, the only one not in liquidation, should face a $114.1 million penalty, ASIC barrister Luke Livingston SC argued during a hearing on Tuesday. The firm's revenue was directly linked to customers' trading losses, he said. "In short, the more its customers lost, the more revenue it earned," he told Justice Michael Wigney. The judge found in his December decision that all three firms had profited "handsomely" from their conduct. Union Standard and TradeFred - both unrepresented at the hearing - should be fined $143.5 million and $29.4 million, Mr Livingston said. EuropeFX has pushed for a lower penalty of $40 million, claiming ASIC's proposed fine was "double punishment". ASIC argued the lower amount was insufficient to deter similar unlawful conduct in the future. EuropeFX's barrister Michelle Painter SC said her client should be hit with a lower penalty than Union Standard as that was the firm issuing the financial products in the first place. The company claimed at a prior hearing on liability that it had relied on Union Standard to train its staff properly. Justice Wigney rejected those allegations. EuropeFX's account managers unlawfully gave personal financial advice, pressured customers into depositing more funds and made misleading statements regarding investments, he found. The firm also tried pressuring customers who had threatened to go to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority into accepting modest settlements instead, he said. "EuropeFX's conduct was so far outside societal norms of acceptable behaviour in respect of the provision of financial services as to warrant condemnation as conduct that is offensive to conscience," he said at the time. The judge also found Union Standard did not warn customers based in China they would breach Chinese law by investing in its products. Several Union Standard directors have been banned from providing financial services based on their conduct at the firm or other companies. The hearing continues. Brokerages found to have profited handsomely from vulnerable customers who lost millions of dollars on highly risky investment products could be hit with $280 million fines. Investors lost $83 million by investing in complex, high-risk over-the-counter derivatives pushed by foreign exchange broker Union Standard International Group and its two authorised representatives between 2018 and 2020. Union Standard and the two representatives EuropeFX and TradeFred committed hundreds of contraventions of corporations and financial law through systemic misconduct that targeted inexperienced consumers, the Federal Court found in December. The complex products allowed customers to speculate on the change in value of an underlying asset, such as foreign exchange rates, stock market indices, single equities, commodities or crypto-assets. The court found some customers were "flying blind during most, if not all, of the time" that they traded derivatives with EuropeFX. The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) is now seeking fines totalling $287.1 million against the three firms. EuropeFX, the only one not in liquidation, should face a $114.1 million penalty, ASIC barrister Luke Livingston SC argued during a hearing on Tuesday. The firm's revenue was directly linked to customers' trading losses, he said. "In short, the more its customers lost, the more revenue it earned," he told Justice Michael Wigney. The judge found in his December decision that all three firms had profited "handsomely" from their conduct. Union Standard and TradeFred - both unrepresented at the hearing - should be fined $143.5 million and $29.4 million, Mr Livingston said. EuropeFX has pushed for a lower penalty of $40 million, claiming ASIC's proposed fine was "double punishment". ASIC argued the lower amount was insufficient to deter similar unlawful conduct in the future. EuropeFX's barrister Michelle Painter SC said her client should be hit with a lower penalty than Union Standard as that was the firm issuing the financial products in the first place. The company claimed at a prior hearing on liability that it had relied on Union Standard to train its staff properly. Justice Wigney rejected those allegations. EuropeFX's account managers unlawfully gave personal financial advice, pressured customers into depositing more funds and made misleading statements regarding investments, he found. The firm also tried pressuring customers who had threatened to go to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority into accepting modest settlements instead, he said. "EuropeFX's conduct was so far outside societal norms of acceptable behaviour in respect of the provision of financial services as to warrant condemnation as conduct that is offensive to conscience," he said at the time. The judge also found Union Standard did not warn customers based in China they would breach Chinese law by investing in its products. Several Union Standard directors have been banned from providing financial services based on their conduct at the firm or other companies. The hearing continues.
West Australian
11 hours ago
- West Australian
'Exploited' investors lose fortune, $280m fines mulled
Brokerages found to have profited handsomely from vulnerable customers who lost millions of dollars on highly risky investment products could be hit with $280 million fines. Investors lost $83 million by investing in complex, high-risk over-the-counter derivatives pushed by foreign exchange broker Union Standard International Group and its two authorised representatives between 2018 and 2020. Union Standard and the two representatives EuropeFX and TradeFred committed hundreds of contraventions of corporations and financial law through systemic misconduct that targeted inexperienced consumers, the Federal Court found in December. The complex products allowed customers to speculate on the change in value of an underlying asset, such as foreign exchange rates, stock market indices, single equities, commodities or crypto-assets. The court found some customers were "flying blind during most, if not all, of the time" that they traded derivatives with EuropeFX. The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) is now seeking fines totalling $287.1 million against the three firms. EuropeFX, the only one not in liquidation, should face a $114.1 million penalty, ASIC barrister Luke Livingston SC argued during a hearing on Tuesday. The firm's revenue was directly linked to customers' trading losses, he said. "In short, the more its customers lost, the more revenue it earned," he told Justice Michael Wigney. The judge found in his December decision that all three firms had profited "handsomely" from their conduct. Union Standard and TradeFred - both unrepresented at the hearing - should be fined $143.5 million and $29.4 million, Mr Livingston said. EuropeFX has pushed for a lower penalty of $40 million, claiming ASIC's proposed fine was "double punishment". ASIC argued the lower amount was insufficient to deter similar unlawful conduct in the future. EuropeFX's barrister Michelle Painter SC said her client should be hit with a lower penalty than Union Standard as that was the firm issuing the financial products in the first place. The company claimed at a prior hearing on liability that it had relied on Union Standard to train its staff properly. Justice Wigney rejected those allegations. EuropeFX's account managers unlawfully gave personal financial advice, pressured customers into depositing more funds and made misleading statements regarding investments, he found. The firm also tried pressuring customers who had threatened to go to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority into accepting modest settlements instead, he said. "EuropeFX's conduct was so far outside societal norms of acceptable behaviour in respect of the provision of financial services as to warrant condemnation as conduct that is offensive to conscience," he said at the time. The judge also found Union Standard did not warn customers based in China they would breach Chinese law by investing in its products. Several Union Standard directors have been banned from providing financial services based on their conduct at the firm or other companies. The hearing continues.
