Southwest CEO who made giant sum stinging flyers with extra fees makes telling admission
In an interview with The New York Times, the airline's CEO, Bob Jordan, was asked how frequently he checks the stock's performance.
The answer likely won't come as a surprise to travelers still frustrated over the airline's decision to end its five-decades-long 'bags fly free' policy.
'I watch it constantly. Daily,' Jordan said.
In March, the company announced it would start charging customers for checked bags for the first time in the company's history.
The day of the announcement, the stock surged 21 percent, boosting the value of Jordan's own shares by an estimated $871,000.
In a statement to DailyMail.com, a Southwest spokesperson defended Jordan's approach.
'As CEO, Bob has a responsibility to Southwest's Customers, Employees, and shareholders,' a spokesperson said. 'Our stock price supports the interests of all three groups.'
The airline's share price has been on a tear. In the past year, the company's stock has risen more than 22 percent.
But that alignment — between stock performance and customer satisfaction — hasn't been so clear to many travelers.
The company's bag-checking reversal came after several other transformational shifts, including new basic economy fare tiers, the end of open seating, and the first mass layoff in Southwest's history.
Many of the changes followed mounting pressure from activist investor Elliott Investment Management, which took a $2 billion stake in the airline in June 2024.
Elliott publicly criticized Southwest's 'outdated' business model — and called for Jordan's removal.
Jordan has framed the changes as a response to post-pandemic customer preferences.
'If you don't follow your customers, you look up one day and your products just aren't attractive any longer,' he told the New York Times.
'The move to bag fees is really about choice.'
On social media, dozens of customers criticized the CEO's comments about customer choice, saying they came off as 'tone deaf' or even 'gaslighting.'
'Southwest used to be an employee-first airline, then they were customer-first,' one flier wrote in a top-voted Reddit post. 'Now they're shareholder-first.'
In March, communications specialists told DailyMail.com that the company's baggage fee rollout was especially rough on customers.
'Every company is focused on the bottom line,' Eric Wein, a California-based communications executive, said.
'But it's surprising that Southwest seemed to have lost sight of its customer loyalty and brand appeal in making some of these rather necessary financial moves.'
But despite the pushback, the financial upside to the policy changes has been hard to ignore.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
New tax break for auto loans could save some buyers thousands of dollars. But will it boost sales?
Millions of people receive a federal tax deduction for the interest they pay on home loans. Under President Donald Trump's new tax-cut law, many people for the first time also could claim a tax deduction for interest on their vehicle loans. The new tax break will be available even to people who don't itemize deductions. But there are some caveats that could limit its reach. The vehicles must be new, not used. They must be assembled in the U.S. And the loans must be issued no sooner than this year, to list just a few qualifications. Here are some things to know about the new auto loan interest tax deduction: Candidate Trump promised an auto loan interest tax break Trump pledged while campaigning last year to make interest on car loans tax-deductible. He said it would make car ownership more affordable and 'stimulate massive domestic auto production.' The idea made it into the big tax-cut bill passed by Congress, which Trump signed into law July 4. The law allows taxpayers to deduct up to $10,000 of interest payments annually on loans for new American-made vehicles from 2025 through 2028. It applies to cars, motorcycles, sport utility vehicles, minivans, vans and pickup trucks weighing less than 14,000 pounds, a threshold referred to as light vehicles. But it only applies to vehicles purchased for personal use, not for fleets or commercial purposes. The tax break can be claimed starting on 2025 income tax returns. But the deduction phases out for individuals with incomes between $100,000 and $150,000 or joint taxpayers with incomes between $200,000 and $250,000. Those earning more cannot claim the tax break. Millions of buyers could benefit, but millions of others will not U.S. automobile dealers sold 15.9 million new light vehicles last year, a little over half of which were assembled in the U.S, according to Cox Automotive. It says around 60% of retail sales are financed with loans. After excluding fleet and commercial vehicles and customers above the income cutoff, an estimated 3.5 million new vehicle loans could be eligible for the tax break this year, if purchasing patterns stay the same, said Jonathan Smoke, chief economist at Cox Automotive. It's the assembly plant, not the automaker's headquarters that matters The tax break applies to vehicles assembled in the U.S., no matter where the company making them is headquartered. All Tesla vehicles sold in the U.S. are assembled in this country. But so are all Acura brands, the luxury model of Japanese automaker Honda. Last year, 78% of Ford vehicles sold in the U.S. were assembled in this country, according to Cox Automotive. But customers wanting the tax break will need to pay attention to specific models. While the Ford Mustang is assembled in Michigan, the Mustang Mach-E is built in Mexico. General Motors assembles all of its Cadillacs in the U.S. But just 44% of its Chevrolets sold last year were assembled in the U.S., and just 14% of Buicks, according to Cox Automotive. That's a lower U.S-assembled rate than Honda (60%), Toyota (52%) and Nissan (48%), which all are headquartered in Japan. Taxpayers could save hundreds of dollars a year The average new vehicle loan is about $44,000 financed over six years. Interest rates vary by customer, so the savings will, too. In general, the tax deduction will decline after the initial year, because interest payments on loans are frontloaded while principal payments grow on the back end. At a 9.3% interest rate, an average new vehicle buyer could save about $2,200 on taxes over four years, Smoke said. The tax savings would be less on a loan at 6.5%, which is the rate figured into calculations by the American Financial Services Association, a consumer credit industry trade group. Some people also could see a reduction in state income taxes Whereas the tax deduction for home loan interest can be claimed only by people itemizing on their tax returns, Congress wrote the deduction for auto loan interest so that it can apply to all taxpayers, including those claiming the standard deduction. On a tax form, the auto loan deduction will come before the calculation of a taxpayer's adjusted gross income. That's an important distinction, because many states use a taxpayer's federal adjusted gross income as the starting point for figuring their state income taxes. If that income figure is lower, it could reduce the state taxes owed. The verdict is out on whether the tax break will boost sales At Bowen Scarff Ford in Kent, Washington, customers started asking about the auto loan tax deduction before Congress had even taken a final vote on the tax-cut bill, said General Manager Paul Ray. So he decided to promote it on the dealer's website. A website ribbon exclaims: 'CAR LOAN TAX DEDUCTION NOW AVAILABLE" while also promoting an electric vehicle tax credit that is ending soon as a result of Trump's tax-cut law. 'I think it's going to help incentivize vehicle purchases through this year," Ray said. Celia Winslow, president and CEO of the American Financial Services Association, concurred: 'For some people deciding — should I buy it, should I not — this could be something that tips the scale.' Others remain skeptical. According to Smoke's math, the average annual tax savings is smaller than a single month's loan payment for a new vehicle. 'I don't think it moves the needle on somebody on the fence of buying a new vehicle or not," Smoke said. "But I think it could influence their decision to finance that vehicle instead of paying cash or instead of leasing a vehicle.'
Daily Record
2 hours ago
- Daily Record
Legal firm behind M&S class action welcomes suspected hackers arrests
It comes after four people were arrested for their suspected involvement in the damaging cyber-attacks against M&S, the Co-op and Harrods. THE legal firm behind a class action against Marks & Spencer say customers need compensation to see real justice after four suspected hackers were arrested. The Sunday Mail told how Thompsons Solicitors are leading a class action against M&S for people who fear their personal information has been stolen. Hackers obtained customer and staff information that could include home addresses, dates of birth, phone numbers and online ordering histories of millions of people in a cyber attack in April. Last week four people were arrested for their suspected involvement in the damaging cyber-attacks against M&S, the Co-op and Harrods. Patrick Mcguire, a Thompsons partner, welcomed the arrests but said it will take financial redress for customers to see any real justice. He added: 'Their loyal customers feel heavily let down by their failures, they are entitled to compensation. 'The only way they can obtain financial justice is through a class action and not through these arrests.' The National Crime Agency said the individuals were arrested on suspicion of blackmail, money laundering, offences linked to the Computer Misuse Act and participating in the activities of an organised crime group. One of the suspects is a 19-year-old man from Latvia while the rest are from the UK. Industry experts have estimated the total bill for UK claims could top £100million. An M&S spokesperson said: 'We wrote to our customers as soon as we could in relation to their personal data, making clear that no useable card or payment details or account passwords had been extracted during the cyber incident.'
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Stark warning about the booming city where it's cheaper to buy a house than rent
A Boston real estate expert has sounded the alarm over the city's deepening housing crisis. Daniel J. O'Leary, founder of the 617 Living Team, told Daily Mail that while rising rent prices are pushing some tenants to consider homeownership, the reality is that many are financially stuck. Boston recently ranked as the most expensive rental market in the United States – surpassing San Francisco and New York – and O'Leary says the gap between rent and mortgage payments is narrowing. 'While we are seeing some renters look to buy for the overall long term equity through home ownership, we are still seeing that many are not in the financial position to do so when looking at the costs associated with down payments and carrying costs of properties due to current home prices and interest rates,' O'Leary said. 'Boston recently landed in the number one spot for the most expensive rental market in the country - and in many neighborhoods rent prices are still more affordable than the monthly mortgage payments of owning a home - especially when looking at full service/amenity driven properties with higher monthly association fees,' he said. He added that the affordability gap is especially glaring in high-demand neighborhoods filled with lifestyle perks and big employers. 'While most of Boston is experiencing the affordability gap, this is most noticeable in some of the more saturated neighborhoods where lifestyle attractions, company headquarters, and education continue to draw residents to the area. Some for example are Back Bay, Beacon Hill, South End, West End and Seaport,' O'Leary explained. Even in areas where monthly mortgage payments rival rent prices, many residents are being priced out due to hefty upfront costs, interest rates, and steep fees - making ownership unattainable. The result is a frustrating Catch-22: renting is unsustainable, but buying is out of reach. The cost of housing in Greater Boston has become such an urgent issue for policymakers that it's now often cheaper to buy real estate than rent it - at least on paper. But despite soaring home prices - the median single-family home now exceeds $865,000 - renters are bearing the brunt of the affordability crisis. New figures from the U.S. Census Bureau, covering the years 2019 through 2023, show that renters in Greater Boston are far more likely to be 'cost-burdened' - defined as spending 30 percent or more of their income on housing - than homeowners. In 172 out of 182 communities in the region with over 1,000 households, renters spent a higher percentage of their income on housing than those who owned their homes. On average, 45.6 percent of renters in Greater Boston were cost-burdened, compared to just 26.7 percent of homeowners. In Boston Proper, the numbers were similar: 46 percent of renters and just 2 percent of homeowners were cost-burdened. And for many, the burden is far heavier - with 24 percent of renters spending over half their income on housing. As the squeeze tightens, thousands of residents are packing up and leaving. In 2023 alone, around 35,000 people fled Greater Boston in search of more affordable places to live, according to Boston Indicators, the research arm of The Boston Foundation. While homeownership can provide more stability and lower long-term housing costs, the upfront financial barriers are keeping many locked into expensive rentals. In some towns, the disparity is even more shocking. In 58 out of 182 towns surveyed, more than half of renters were cost-burdened - compared to just one town, Nahant, where homeowners faced similar strain. The divide is even starker in communities like Strafford, New Hampshire, where 80 percent of renters were cost-burdened versus fewer than 20 percent of homeowners. In Lynnfield, 59 percent of renters were stretched thin, compared to just 19 percent of homeowners. And in Hingham, it was 56 percent of renters versus 19 percent of homeowners. Adding to the strain, rents surged by 16 percent between 2019 and 2023 - with the average one-bedroom jumping from $1,545 to $1,794, according to Apartment List. Meanwhile, wages have struggled to keep pace. Housing prices aren't expected to cool anytime soon. According to a new forecast by national home prices are projected to rise another 3.7 percent in 2025 - continuing a steady upward trend that's been building since 2012. Even sharper increases are expected in 16 major metropolitan areas, particularly in the Southwest. Phoenix is predicted to lead the pack with a 13.2 percent jump, followed by Colorado Springs (12.7 percent) and Tucson (12.4 percent). As prices climb and affordability slips further out of reach, experts say the need for bold policy action has never been more urgent. For now, Bostonians remain trapped in an unaffordable housing market - where owning may technically be cheaper than renting, but only for those who can afford the price of admission.
