logo
1981 Ford Escort XR3 Test: The Grass Is Definitely Greener

1981 Ford Escort XR3 Test: The Grass Is Definitely Greener

Car and Driver21-06-2025
From the November 1981 issue of Car and Driver.
If one needed any reassurance that a new day has dawned at the Ford Motor Company, the fact that Ford president Don Petersen has been seen tooling around in this lovely little red street rac­er ought to provide it. This is a type of car that is unthinkable in most of De­troit's board rooms today. It is exciting, aggressive, compromised entirely in the direction of driving fun, and—within the Procrustean confine of Detroit's automotive orthodoxy—frivolous ... "We can't wast our time on stuff like that," goes the litany. "People will think we're not serious about fuel economy. Tell the guys in Research and Development that we need a full status update on the new decal package!"
There are two Ford Motor Companies, one in North America and one ev­erywhere else. The one in the United States is and has been taking gas lately, and it has been decided by the people who preside over Ford's fortunes to bring the two closer together, to make the North American one more like the Everywhere Else one. The Fiesta was an early step in that direction. The Escort/Lynx was another. The Escort has been a resounding success in the market ­place, but less so among the critics. It won the coveted European Car of the Year Award in spite of the fact that au­tomotive writers (the people who vote this particular prize) both here and abroad had serious reservations about its ride and handling. But there is a truth in the automobile business, truer than other truths: it says that the good cars are the ones that sell. The Escort sells. Now we have driven one that also goes.
View Photos
Aaron Kiley
|
Car and Driver
The XR3 (shown here) that we man­aged to borrow from Mr. Petersen is the sportiest Escort Europeans can buy. It weighs 2000 pounds, while our own long-term-test (American) Escort weighs 2140 pounds, and its 1598-cu­bic-centimeter engine produces 96 horsepower at 6000 rpm, 98 pound feel of torque at 4000 rpm. This ratio of weight to power results in zero-to- 60 times on the order of 10 seconds and a quarter-mile time of 17.2 at 79 mph, considerably faster than any­thing an American could buy in the same size and price class. It's wonder­ful. You'll find the hood release on the underside of the steering column. Pop the hood and look inside. What you see is a neat little overhead-cam four with a two-throat Weber carburetor, a smooth cast-iron exhaust manifold feeding twin downtubes, the necessary cooling and electrical gizmos, and that's all, folks. Hardly, any of the stuff that the EPA has forced us to cram under the hood of our cars so that we may breathe from our exhaust pipe in relative safety; just the important bits.
View Photos
Aaron Kiley
|
Car and Driver
But the engine compartment is only about the third thing you admire on the XR3. First there's the exterior. Ford­-Europe opted for a much cleaner, more discreet overall look for its Escort, and the XR3 benefits from that, especially at the front. Then there's a nice deep air dam under the narrow European bump­er, and a rubbery black "What'll it be, fellas" serving-tray spoiler on the rear deck. Fat Pirelli P6 tires on wide-rim 928-ish alloy wheels complete the pic­ture. As a visual experience, the XR3 attracts a lot of attention. Overtaking, waiting at crosswalks, stopped at traffic lights, it never failed to capture the hearts and minds of the overtaken and/or bystanders. And it isn't just a matter of zoomy looks, either. The aerodynam­ic aids bring the drag coefficient down to 0.38; a stock U.S. Escort's is 0.40, which was already an excellent aerody­namic performance. (Though how this is possible, with the enormous outside mirrors that jut out from the XR3's doors, will forever remain a mystery of modern science.)
One's next impression is of the interi­or, which would look good in a Porsche and would be a quantum leap upward for most American cars. Gray cloth with red stripes covers the seats; the rear be­ing a folding bench for extra load space, and the fronts being Recaro look-alikes for extra creature comfort and security. The steering wheel is very small in di­ameter, padded, and almost as fat as the Pirelli outside. Everything about these furnishings exhorts one to sit down, start the engine, and bury the loud ped­al in the floorpan—which one invariably does, at least the first couple of times. But there's more. The windows go up and down electrically, and the Whit­man's Sampler-sized outside mirrors are adjusted the same way. The sunroof is as nearly perfect as one of those can be. It features tinted glass, it is manually operated, and it both slides fore-and-aft and pops up at the rear, depending upon whether you want sunshine or ventilation. There is also a sliding lou­vered screen to blank it off completely, if that is your pleasure. There is an AM/FM-radio/cassette system as well, but it plays through two raspy speakers and doesn't really measure up to the other interior appointments.
View Photos
Aaron Kiley
|
Car and Driver
On the road, the XR3 is a mixed blessing. It is quick, but not really fast. Ten-second zero-to-60 times and a 108-mph top speed aren't go­ing to separate anybody's retinas, but they're certainly brisk in a car of this type. The handling is sort of standard front-wheel-drive-with-fat-sticky-tires understeer—which is a vast improve­ment over the soft-riding American Es­corts—and the roadholding, on smooth surfaces, is excellent. We generated a lateral acceleration of 0.75 g on the Chrysler Proving Ground's 282-foot skidpad, and the car felt stable and reas­suring. Lift-throttle or brake-induced oversteer was still there, but to a useful degree: a good driver can correct his line by steering the rear wheels with his right foot.
Only on bumpy roads does the XR3 behave like an American-made Escort—but even then there is a differ­ence. The same vigorous pitching and uncontrolled vertical body movements tried to upset the car, as they would on a regular Escort, but the XR3's Bilstein shocks are just as vigorous in their con­trol of those movements. The result is that the XR3 stays on course, but the rear wheels patter over the rough stuff, occasionally lose contact with the pavement, and are snubbed rather viciously whenever they threaten to leave the ground entirely, as on the far side of a frost heave taken at, say, 50 or 60 mph. As unpleasant as this occasionally is, it is a vast improvement over the bump-induced instability and gener­al rough-road raggedness that we've found so troublesome in U.S. Escorts. That this he-man version of our Escort should share its bad habits at all was apparently unavoidable, given the basic similarity of chassis and suspensions.
View Photos
Aaron Kiley
|
Car and Driver
The combination of unassisted steer­ing, small steering-wheel diameter, for­ward weight bias, and fat, sticky tires makes for very heavy steering in the XR3. A few minutes on our slalom course or a lot of parallel-parking prac­tice every day would be a real upper­-body builder. The car goes where it's pointed without a moment's hesitation, but it makes you work for every degree of steering deflection. In this sense it is decidedly sporty. The brakes are good, but not great. The disc-drum combina­tion suffers from premature rear lock­up, which lengthens stopping distance appreciably. The car's personality and general level of performance certainly cry out for discs at all four corners. The clutch, unlike the one on the XR3's American cousin, is a good one. It's smooth, it takes up predictably and gradually, and it accepts heavy-footed driving and quick shifts without protest. As in most front-wheel-drive cars, the shift linkage is less than perfect, but as front-wheel-drive cars go it is accept­able. The engine is strong and smooth, but noisy, starting off at a reasonable noise level and becoming increasingly tiresome as one approaches the 6300-rpm redline. This, however, is a small price to pay in a country where we are afflicted with so many little engines making lots of noise and not much horsepower.
View Photos
Aaron Kiley
|
Car and Driver
The bad news about this little XR3 that Mr. Petersen lent us is that you and I will never be able to buy one, unless we sell the farm and move to Europe. The good news is that our friends at Ford are going to build an American version that we can probably buy in 1984. It will have the U.S. car's clunky grille, headlamps, and bumpers, unfor­tunately, and it will suffer to some de­gree from the horsepower drain that drags down the performance of all American engines these days, but we'd expect much of the character of the XR3 to survive. Equally good news—as reported in the other parts of this Es­cort/Lynx extravaganza—is that much of the lamentable ride and handling be­havior we've complained about in these cars is being set right in 1982. Perhaps the best news of all is that cars like the XR3 are beginning to show up in De­troit's corporate parking garage at last, and just in time.
View Photos
Aaron Kiley
|
Car and Driver
Specifications
Specifications
1981 Ford Escort XR3
Vehicle Type: front-engine, front-wheel-drive, 4-passenger, 2-door hatchback
PRICE
Base: $10,900 (Great Britain)
ENGINE
inline-4, iron block and aluminum head
Displacement: 98 in3, 1598 cm3
Power: 96 bhp @ 6000 rpm
TRANSMISSION
4-speed manual
DIMENSIONS
Wheelbase: 94.4 in
Length: 159.8 in
Curb Weight: 2000 lb
C/D TEST RESULTS
60 mph: 10.0 sec
90 mph: 28.2 sec
1/4-Mile: 17.2 sec @ 79 mph
Top Gear, 30–50 mph: 8.9 sec
Top Gear, 50–70 mph: 8.9 sec
Top Speed: 108 mph
Braking, 70–0 mph: 195 ft
C/D FUEL ECONOMY
Observed: 27 mpg
EURO CYCLE FUEL ECONOMY
City: 33 mpg
C/D TESTING EXPLAINED
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

GM CFO looks to strategic pricing, costs to blunt $1.1B tariff impact
GM CFO looks to strategic pricing, costs to blunt $1.1B tariff impact

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

GM CFO looks to strategic pricing, costs to blunt $1.1B tariff impact

This story was originally published on CFO Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily CFO Dive newsletter. Dive Brief: General Motors executives highlighted trade deals between Canada, Mexico and South Korea as important to its outlook as it navigates what CFO Paul Jacobson called a 'dynamic' tariff environment, with the automaker reporting a $1.1 billion net tariff impact for its second quarter ended June 30. The impact was slightly lower than expected, with the Detroit-based automaker anticipating such costs will therefore be slightly higher for its next quarter, Jacobson said Tuesday during the company's Q2 earnings call. GM has continued to import vehicles from South Korea, as they are 'contribution-margin positive and they're very much in demand,' CEO Mary Barra said. 'We're not speculating on what those are going to look like going forward, but there is a possibility and a likelihood, if you will, that ultimately a tariff rate gets set at a lower level, which would ultimately bring that impact down,' Jacobson said regarding deals with the three countries. Dive Insight: GM is one of several automakers looking to mitigate the effects from tariff uncertainty as the Trump administration presses on with a trade war involving key trade partners. That includes a back-and-forth between Canada and Mexico regarding levies on steel imports, which the U.S. hiked to 50% in May, CFO Dive sister publication Supply Chain Dive previously reported. The Trump administration in recent days has negotiated a new trade framework with Indonesia and reached terms for a tariff agreement with Japan, which would set a 15% levy on imports from the country including for cars and auto parts, Supply Chain Dive reported. South Korea, a critical exporter of semiconductors, automobiles and smartphones, is set to hold high-level talks with the U.S. on July 25 in an attempt to reach a compromise, Bloomberg reported. The talks are scheduled to occur before Aug. 1, when the U.S. plans to impose a 25% tariff on critical imports. Exports made up 40% of South Korea's gross domestic product last year. Tariffs on South Korea imports would constitute a significant portion of the overall trade impact GM forecasts for 2025, Jacobson said Tuesday. The company anticipates from $4 billion to $5 billion in gross impact from import duties during 2025, he said in response to analyst questions. The automaker expects roughly $2 billion will involve South Korea. GM is taking steps to blunt some of the disruption, including making some 'short-term shifts' in production to the U.S., Barra said in response to questions. The company expects to be able to mitigate around 30% of its projected gross tariff impact through 'strategic actions such as manufacturing adjustments, targeted cost initiatives and consistent pricing,' Jacobson said. 'Over time, we remain confident that our total tariff expense will come down as bilateral trade deals emerge, and our sourcing and production adjustments are implemented,' Jacobson said. While the automaker continued to handle tariff uncertainty and other challenges — for example, increased competition contributed to moderation for its fleet pricing in the quarter, according to its earnings report — GM also reported strong growth across its brands, contributing to record revenue of $91 billion for the first half of the year. The automaker saw particularly robust demand for its electric vehicles: Q2 EV sales rose by 111% year-over-year, representing 16% of the U.S. EV market, according to its earnings presentation. Chevrolet EVs — which are now the second top selling such vehicle in the U.S — rose by 146% YoY for the quarter. 'I want to be clear that our EV journey is about giving consumers choice. And over the last few years, a steady number of consumers are choosing electric vehicles,' Jacobson said of GM's EV offerings, noting the automaker sees 'significant growth potential.' With the company having built out a 'robust' portfolio of EVs, 'our investment focus has turned to driving down costs and improving profitability,' he said. The results come as the broader EV market continues to face challenges of its own. As part of the massive tax-and-spending bill recently signed into law by President Donald Trump, for example, a $7,500 EV tax credit for purchasers will end in September, which could lead to a spike in prices for such vehicles and undermine demand, CNBC reported. 'While we are still seeking further clarification on certain aspects, we anticipate these changes to have a minimal impact on our 2025 results,' Jacobson said of EV regulations. Recommended Reading Costco CFO says 50 cent wage increase poses expense 'headwind' Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Get Ready To Thank Tariffs For Making Cheap Cars More Expensive
Get Ready To Thank Tariffs For Making Cheap Cars More Expensive

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Get Ready To Thank Tariffs For Making Cheap Cars More Expensive

Brace yourself for an alarming statistic. A whopping 92 percent of new vehicles sold in the U.S. priced under $30,000 are imports. The eight percent that aren't do not exactly constitute a rounding error, but you would not be unfairly criticized if you argued that basically all America's cheap cars come from someplace else. The stat comes from and the site's Industry Insights Report for the first half of 2025, which concludes that the Trump administration's tariffs are "disproportionately affecting" the cheap car market. For the record, the only American-made cars that cost less than 30 grand are not domestic models: we're talking about the stalwart Honda Civic and Toyota Corolla. OK, technically speaking these are "American" cars because they're made in U.S. factories, but the ugly truth is that cheap vehicles from Ford and GM are imports from Mexico, China, and South Korea. According to the study, the supply of these inexpensive rides is going to dry up, triggering price increases as tariffs kick in through the second half of the year. You might ask yourself why the U.S. market relies so heavily on imports to stock the under-$30,000 segment. The answer is high labor costs in America, but that isn't the whole story. Cheap cars aren't very profitable, if they're profitable at all. GM, Ford, and Stellantis (owner of the Jeep, Chrysler, Dodge, and RAM brands) would rather sell you a more expensive pickup truck or large SUV than a compact sedan and are happy to make those vehicles in U.S. plants. Read more: These Are Your Favorite Factory Exhaust Designs Why Are All The Cheap Cars Imported? For decades, the manufacturing of small, cheap vehicles has effectively been outsourced to other countries. This has enabled American companies to remain in the segment. Tariffs are upsetting this arrangement. For auto executives, the way forward is mostly bad. Years ago, I covered a briefing at the Detroit Auto Show by then-FCA CEO Sergio Marchionne, and he was completely unflinching in his assessment of the affordable small-car market in the U.S. It was for the foreign carmakers to dominate, as in his view they had figured out how to make an acceptable margin. When interest rates were low, this arrangement actually wasn't a major issue – buyers simply financed their way into more expensive vehicles, and for years the average transaction price on new cars and trucks has been trending up (although lately its been in moderate retreat). But interest rates aren't low anymore. And with tariffs, cheap cars are about to get more expensive. There was a run on new-car sales in early 2025 when tariffs were announced, as consumers sought to snap up vehicles before the import taxes hit and the automakers rolled out incentives to move the metal off dealer lots. That phase now appears to be ending, and the U.S. market is preparing to accept a new normal. The question is whether more domestic manufacturing will come online or whether carmakers will reduce production as prices invariably rise and demand flags. Could The U.S. Market Remake Itself? I don't see a scenario in which cheap vehicles suddenly aren't imported in droves. So if tariffs aren't dialed back, the entry-level tier is set up for a world of hurt. It's depressing to consider this outcome after decades of Americans enjoying the world's most competitive market and having access to all manner of choice when it comes time to purchase a new set of wheels. Supporters of Trump's tariffs will insist that the policy will force automakers to increase U.S. production, build factories here, and ultimately hire more U.S. workers. But students of Trump's actual motives understand that what he and his trade advisors might actually want is to compel exporters to eat the tariffs, effectively paying a substantial toll for access to the U.S. market. That idea relies on prices somehow not going up, and of course Trump has jawboned the car companies to shield consumers from the well-understood economics of tariffs. They might play along. But that would mean they'll lose even more money on inexpensive cars than they are already. The logical response would be to reduce supply. In the near term, we're likely to see fewer sub-$30,000 cars available as tariffs make life far more unpleasant for the segment. Want more like this? Join the Jalopnik newsletter to get the latest auto news sent straight to your inbox... Read the original article on Jalopnik.

Tesla's stock is tumbling after Elon Musk failure to shift the narrative
Tesla's stock is tumbling after Elon Musk failure to shift the narrative

CNN

time7 hours ago

  • CNN

Tesla's stock is tumbling after Elon Musk failure to shift the narrative

Elon Musk's big promises apparently no longer seem to be enough for many Tesla investors. Shares of Tesla (TSLA) fell 9% on Thursday following another dismal earnings report, released after the bell Wednesday. Tesla's earnings and revenue both fell by double-digit percentages following the biggest sales drop in the company's history. The automaker also faces a number of financial headwinds, including the loss of a $7,500 tax credit for US EV buyers starting in October, and the vanishing market for regulatory credit sales, which has earned Tesla $11 billion since 2019. But Tesla CEO Elon Musk barely talked about that on the earnings call Wednesday, although he did acknowledge the company 'probably could have a few rough quarters.' Instead, he talked about his grand vision for the future, including Tesla's long-promised robotaxi service; and its humanoid robot, Optimus, which is still in development. The lack of details about the company's plans to solve problems in the near term disappointed some investors and analysts. 'Investors have been very forgiving of Tesla for several quarters now, despite obvious headwinds to their business,' Garrett Nelson, analyst at CFRA Research, told CNN Thursday. 'But I think its investors are taking a more realistic view of the story at this point. Some of his brilliance has been his ability to keep investors focused on the long term and ignoring the near term and intermediate term. Now, headwinds are difficult to ignore.' Nelson downgraded the company's stock to a neutral rating in April. But even some of the Tesla bulls on Wall Street are saying that the time for Musk to take action is running out. 'The street is losing some patience,' Wedbush Securities tech analyst Dan Ives told CNN Thursday, although he said he still believes in the autonomous vehicle and artificial intelligence vision laid out by Musk and Tesla. Musk has made big promises about his robotaxi service, including that it would be in service within a year as early as 2019. Tesla's robotaxis finally rolled out in June this year, albeit in a limited portion of Austin, Texas, to friends and fans of the company, and with an employee sitting beside the empty driver's seat. However, that limited rollout wasn't enough to stop Musk from making extraordinary claims on Wednesday that the service would be available to half the nation's population by year's end. To achieve that, Tesla will need to get regulatory permission to operate in two states per week through the rest of the year, including New York, which does not allow autonomous vehicles on its roads. Morningstar analyst Seth Goldstein said that while he does believe Tesla will eventually be successful in its robotaxi venture, 'the software will require further testing' and he does not expect a full robotaxi product until 2028. But Musk has a history of making grand promises that do not pan out. Like the Cybertruck – the only new vehicle Tesla has offered in the last six years. Musk said Tesla was supposed to be delivering 250,000 vehicles annually by this year. But full-year sales of the Cybertruck and Tesla's two other expensive models were less than 80,000. Sales of the three plunged 52% in the most recent quarter. Tesla also started the year forecasting it would achieve higher sales following its first annual sales drop in its history in 2024. But after two quarters of record sales declines, most investors now assume that it will not meet that goal either. And with Musk himself barely mentioning car sales during an hour-long conference call, it doesn't appear that is enough for shareholders any longer. 'We are mixed on Tesla's ability to meet its robotaxi timelines, cost targets, and scale,' wrote Ben Kallo, an analyst for Baird, in a note to clients late Wednesday. 'So far Tesla has received a pass due to how ambitious/revolutionary these products are, but we think continued sluggishness in the auto business could cause more focus on the near term.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store