
Dragon in the driving seat: As China becomes the epicentre of the electric age, India feels the tremors
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Here's something you should do. Open Google and type Shanghai Auto Show. Then feast on the future of the automobile.No, that is not an exaggeration. From Jetour G900 to Jetour F700 to Xiaomi SU7 Ultra to BYD Denza Z to Chery iCar V23 to Zeekr Mix to SongSan Summer to BAIC ArcFox 77 o to JAC Motors Define-S, it was the shape of the future on display.Among these, the Xiaomi SU7 Ultra was a fourseater car that had destroyed the Nurburgring (a racing circuit in Germany where the world's fastest cars set a time for bragging rights) lap record, bettering Rimac Nevera, a hypercar, and the Porsche Taycan Turbo GT.As tech magazine Wired put it, the autoshow was a warning to the West. Auto journalists from Motortrend , a US magazine, called it 'a mindmelting mass of color and noise, hardware and software wrought as cars and trucks and SUVs that at times defy comprehension and categorization'.The West dominated the era of fossil fuel-chugging cars. China is now defining the electric era in automobiles as its undisputed epicentre. Once clunky, fossil fuel-guzzling machines, cars are now smart and connected. They are akin to an electronic device rather than a mechanical one, and this transformation is most vividly playing out in China.Even as Tesla , the world's preeminent EV automaker, announced its plans to open its showroom in the Maker Maxity Mall at the Bandra Kurla Complex in Mumbai on July 15, India—the world's third largest auto market —would be feeling the heat more from the heft of the Chinese EVs in the coming days. India 's electric passenger vehicle (PV) market, though still nascent at 2.6% of total vehicle sales in 2024, is charging up. Tata still leads with an approximately 35% EV market share in the first half of this year, but the game is evolving fast. Buoyed by the success of the Windsor EV, MG Motor India commands nearly 30% of the EV market. Tata Motors has been the leader of the EV pack for a while, but JSW MG Motor India is snapping at its heels. Its Windsor EV, a minivan, an MPV in the era of SUVs, has become a runaway hit with buyers.Critically, in India, the Chinese have become smart in positioning, and in finding niches that rivals have moved away from.While Indian OEMs continue to prioritise SUVs—54% of all car sales in 2024—Chinese automakers are cleverly targeting under-served segments. MG's Comet (starting at ₹6.17 lakh) and Windsor EVs are gaining ground. It is pertinent that nonSUVs—including compact city cars, MUVs and sedans—together account for 46% of India's auto sales.'Our ABC philosophy—A–segment price, B–segment size, C–segment space—is exactly what the urban consumer wants,' says Anurag Mehrotra, MD of JSW MG Motor India. 'We look for gaps in the market and align our offerings accordingly,' he adds.MG and BYD have adopted a premium, tech forward strategy, targeting urban elites with advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) , 450+ km range, and sharp designs across body types. Tata and Mahindra are primarily focusing on SUVs like the Nexon EV and XUV400 (under ₹15 lakh).It helps that brands like MG and BYD use modular EV platforms like BYD's e-Platform 3.0 to quickly adapt to different market segments. Offering AI powered infotainment, sleek interiors, fast charging capabilities and strong connectivity features, Chinese EVs outclass even premium western rivals—often at a fraction of the cost. Vehicles like the MG ZS EV and BYD Seal aren't just electric, they are software-defined devices catering to India's increasingly tech-savvy buyers.'Chinese companies play the volume and pricing game,' says Rajeev Chaba, veteran auto executive and former chairman of JSW MG Motor. 'They are agile, fast to market and quick to respond to customer needs.'BYD is building a premium electric niche, say its dealers. Its ATTO 3, Seal and newly launched Sealion 7 ( ₹30-55 lakh) are positioned as luxury-tech powerhouses—offering compelling alternatives to western brands atone-fourth the cost. Operating in a more premium price range, they aim to sell 15,000 units in 2025.The Chinese are doing this in India with what is essentially last year's tech. What should make India—and even western carmakers—worry is that China's march up the Indian EV table is happening even as they are prepping even better cars back home.The Shanghai Auto Show 2025 underscored China's global ambitions as well as tech prowess. With 1,400 cars from 26 countries and over 1 million attendees, the show revealed just how far Chinese EV tech has advanced. From ultra-fast chargers to flying cars and in-car theatres, the event showed how far ahead China is.A sample. BYD's 1,000 kW chargers deliver 259 miles in just 5 minutes. CATL has gone even further: 323 miles in 5 minutes at 1,300 kW. Next-gen models with eye-popping power and tech include BYD Denza Z (1,000 hp), Xiaomi SU7 Ultra (1,526 hp), and Jetour G900 (with water propulsion).Then there are breakthroughs in autonomous driving like level-3 self-driving by Xpeng and Zeekr, as well as steer-by-wire and brake-by-wire tech from Nio, IM Motors and Changan.Interiors stand out in Nio ET9 while Huawei AITO M9's in-car projector is unlike anything seen in an automobile. There are affordable EVs too—Xpeng's M03 Mona ($16,800-22,000) and Chery's iCar V23 ($13,000) show China's commitment to mass-market accessibility.As if all this wasn't enough, flying cars—Xpeng's electric vertical take-off and landing (eVTOL) concepts and CATL's urban air mobility plans—revealed China's long-term ambitions.Meanwhile, the western brands looked conservative by comparison. Even high-end players like Volkswagen and Toyota focused on catch-up features, while Chinese models led in innovation, speed-to-market and customer delight.China's dominance in the EV space is no accident. Decades of government policy, fierce domestic competition (supercharged by Tesla's early presence) and a national obsession with technology have helped Chinese automakers surge ahead. Today, China controls 85% of the world's battery manufacturing capacity, giving it an unmatched cost and tech advantage.At its core, China's automotive rise was a carefully cooked recipe with the following ingredients:1.: Subsidies, charging infrastructure and export incentives fuelled an EV-first ecosystem.2.: China moved fast—from concept to showroom in under 24 months.3.: Battery, software and car production happen under one roof.4.From budget hatchbacks to luxury SUVs to eVTOLs, China builds for every customer segment globally.Add to this the alleged instances of corporate espionage on western automotive firms, and the dish is ready.So much so that while earlier innovation flowed from West to East, now it's the reverse. Chinese automakers are setting global standards in EV design, software, battery tech and autonomous driving. 'In many ways, the West is now playing catch-up,' says Ravi Bhatia, president of auto market researcher Jato Dynamics. 'China isn't just innovating faster, it is commercialising at scale.'It would be a relief to Indian and western automakers in the country that geopolitical tensions and India's FDI restrictions have complicated Chinese OEM expansion.If the Chinese were less antagonistic and more conciliatory—like the Japanese in the 1980s—this would be an easy story of success, akin to what Suzuki did with Maruti in the 1980s.Thankfully for other automakers, they are not, and as a result Chinese OEMs face FDI restrictions, due to which they have challenges like 110% import duties on cars built elsewhere.MG's tie-up with JSW and BYD's alliance with MEIL (Megha Engineering & Infrastructures Ltd) are efforts to localise and sidestep such regulatory barriers. MG has invested ₹4,000 crore to expand Indian capacity to 300,000 units. BYD, with ₹1,600 crore invested, eyes India as an export hub for South Asia.Their portfolios remain narrow—MG has three EVs, BYD has four. For now. As and when they do bring their latest to India, aided by partnerships with Indian companies, it would become tougher for Indian automakers. MG has 380 dealerships across 170 cities, aiming for 520 by the end of 2025, while BYD is expanding from 24 to 63 outlets, focusing on high-end metro buyers and B2B.With a slew of western names with Chinese connections, like Leapmotor (via Stellantis) and Geely (through Volvo ), entering the fray, the Indian EV market is entering its most competitive phase yet.As Bhatia puts it, 'Chinese EV makers are leapfrogging. EV's 2.6% share in India is just the beginning. The real battle lies in who defines what a car will be in the next decade.'Players like Tata Motors and Maruti Suzuki face a stark choice: rapidly localise battery and EV production under India's production-linked incentive (PLI) schemes or risk falling behind.'Maruti Suzuki's delayed EV launch with the Grand Vitara, unveiled at the latest auto show, reflects a cautious approach amid India's sluggish EV adoption. Swift action is critical to regain momentum in this niche but growing market,' says Bhatia.They also have to invest in innovation and hire non-traditional talent to reimagine the automobile the way the Chinese have done. What might also help is looking at the market beyond SUVs.While Indian auto companies benefit from strong brand loyalty and a vocal for local appeal, Chinese brands are slowly overcoming scepticism with reliability, tech, value and a variety of body types. That gap will increase if extraordinary effort doesn't go in.They are clearly trying. Tata's Acti.ev and Mahindra's Inglo platforms have cut costs and sped up production. Mahindra is investing ₹12,000 crore by 2027 to ramp up EV and battery manufacturing. It also recently launched BE 6e and XEV 9e in the ₹22-30 lakh price range. Both Mahindra and Tata have lined up several premium electric PV launches for 2025. Tata Motors' premium electric SUV Avinya is expected towards the end of the year.But the broader story is clear: China has redefined what a car can be and what global consumers expect. For Indian and western players alike, the lesson is clear: adapt, localise and innovate even more—or be left behind in the rear-view mirror of a fast-moving Chinese EV.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
Mint Primer: GPT-5 is coming, but can OpenAI retain its edge?
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has hinted at a GPT-5 launch in the coming months, but a host of legal and corporate issues—not to mention lurking Chinese rivals—could steal its thunder. Whether GPT-5 proves a leap or just an upgrade will decide its place in the AI race. Can GPT-5 be a game-changer? OpenAI's most anticipated model is expected to advance reasoning, memory and adaptability through persistent (human-like long-term) memory, better navigation and more autonomous, agent-like behaviour—steps towards artificial general intelligence (AGI). GPT-5 may also unify reasoning and multimodal functions, handling text, images, audio and possibly video with longer context windows and a mixture-of-experts system (that activates only parts of a model needed for a task) for speedier and more efficient responses. OpenAI also plans to drop suffixes like 'mini" and 'o" in favour of a unified GPT series. Can OpenAI's rivals queer the pitch? The AI race is relentless. If OpenAI launched GPT-4o, o3 and o4-mini, its rivals matched its offerings. Google has Gemini 2.5 Pro and Ultra, Meta has Llama 3, Anthropic has Claude 4, and xAI boasts of Grok-4. Meta and Amazon are also building AGI labs and poaching OpenAI talent. Google hired Varun Mohan, the CEO of AI startup Windsurf, which OpenAI failed to acquire. With AGI ambitions rising across the board, OpenAI faces pressure to reaffirm its lead. A delayed or underwhelming GPT-5 could shift the momentum, especially as enterprise users and developers increasingly seek more capable, reliable models. How are users responding to the development? saw 5.24 billion monthly visits, ranking fifth globally, as per Semrush May figures. Google and YouTube led with over 210 billion combined visits, while Meta's Facebook, Instagram and Whatsapp totalled 25 billion. Reddit and X followed with 4.5 billion and 3.9 billion monthly visits, respectively. What else is dogging OpenAI? OpenAI faces lawsuits from The New York Times, India's ANI and authors over training data use, complicating GPT-5 release. Exits of co-founder Ilya Sutskever and researcher Jan Leike signal internal concerns over AGI safety. Meanwhile, faster, cheaper open-weight models like Meta's Llama, Google's Gemma, Mistral's Mixtral and China's DeepSeek offer greater customization. GPT-5 must deliver clear advantages such as autonomy or real-time context to stand out in a market shifting towards open and flexible solutions. How is OpenAI gearing up for the future? Altman says current AI models are already AGI-ready in many ways and generating 'real economic value." To stay ahead, GPT-5 must reduce hallucinations, improve memory and reasoning, and act more autonomously. Meanwhile, OpenAI is developing AI-first hardware and planning a browser to rival Google's Chrome. But concerns over AGI misuse persist. If OpenAI gets the balance right, GPT-5 could mark real AGI progress. Otherwise, it risks becoming just another overhyped release in a changing AI landscape.


Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
Startups prep for exits as Chinese backers find little love
Udaan, Pocket FM and Vedantu have joined the league of startups looking to offer exits to their Chinese backers as the industry's appeal to ease restrictions on such investments has failed to secure a policy shift, according to four people familiar with the matter. Udaan and Pocket FM count Tencent among their investors, while Vedantu's Chinese backers include Legend Capital and the TAL Education Group. There has been a recent spike in discussions around Chinese investors looking to pull out, several Indian investorsMintspoke with confirmed separately. 'We can expect more block deals within listed startup entities as well, as Chinese investors don't want to stay invested given the current geopolitical scenario," said one of the investors. This shift is more visible in highly regulated sectors such as gaming and fintech. The people and investors quoted earlier spoke withMint on the condition of anonymity. In recent months, Antfin have exited or trimmed stakes in firms like Paytm and MakeMyTrip. Last year, Tencent sold its stake in Dream11 parent Sporta Technologies Ltd to Singapore-based Tiga Investment Pte Ltd for $150 million, as the gaming unicorn sought to comply with regulations on Chinese investments. This wave of exits and stake sales follows a long wait among Indian founders, who anticipated that the government may ease rules governing Press Note 3 (PN3)—the 2020 pandemic-era notification that placed investments from neighbouring countries under a more stringent approval route. The move was largely aimed at curbing inflows from China after a deadly clash between Indian and Chinese soldiers in Ladakh's Galwan valley. 'Many (Chinese) funds, and even some board directors, have stepped back," said Rajat Tandon, president of the Indian Venture and Alternate Capital Association (IVCA), a key industry body. 'The entire wind-up of Chinese funds has happened. While their investments in Indian startups still exist, those startups are now actively exploring exit mechanisms." A spokesperson for Tencent said the firm has no plans to exit and remains committed to its investments in India. 'The information regarding Tencent is purely speculative, and we have no comments to offer on it. Pocket FM remains a high-growth company with strong investor confidence and continues to engage with several global investors," a spokesperson for Pocket FM said as the company looks to raise $100 million. Queries emailed to Vedantu, Udaan, Legend Capital and TAL Education Group did not elicit a response at the time of publishing. Some of these companies are struggling to raise successive rounds of capital as the funding tap dried from the pandemic highs, which has now led to investors chasing fewer startups with a profit-oriented mindset and strong fundamentals. Several Chinese investment firms may also offload stakes through initial public offerings of startups as a part of the offer-for-sale component. For instance, Hong Kong-based Hillhouse Capital, alongside other investors, is expected to sell some stake in CarDekho when the company goes public, Mint exclusively reported in September last year. Shrinking Chinese exposure From 2005, close to $16.8 billion in funding has been channelled from China into India, according to China Global Investment Tracker by public policy think tank American Enterprise Institute. Tencent has been among the most active Chinese investors in India, backing firms including Swiggy, Byju's, Dream11, Udaan, and PolicyBazaar. Shunwei Capital has invested in ShareChat, Meesho, Pratilipi, Koo, and Cashify, among others. The investor has reportedly exited Pratilipi and Koo. Alibaba, through Ant Group, had stakes in Paytm and Zomato, which have since been pared down. Hillhouse Capital has backed Zomato and Koo, while Qiming Venture Partners has invested in Pratilipi, partially exiting a few months ago. Since PN3 came into effect, new Chinese investments in India have plunged. From 17 deals worth $5.2 billion in 2021, the number fell to 10 deals worth $780 million in 2022. While this drop reflected the broader slowdown in funding post-2022, the contrast has become starker more recently. Overall, private equity and venture capital funding is showing signs of recovery. Indian startups raised $17.1 billion between January 2024 and June 2025. Yet, Chinese participation has continued to shrink, recording only five deals worth $317 million during the 18-month period, indicating a strategic retreat. What it means The PN3 restrictions not only apply to direct investments but also slow down approvals for Chinese investors acting as limited partners (or LPs) in domestic funds, or to global funds with Chinese exposure, affecting recent deals. LPs are investors who pool in capital but are not involved in managing funds. 'About 85% of the capital in India currently is international. Chinese money, in particular, was quite significant at one point, with a lot of capital ready to be deployed. Now, most Chinese investors have exited. Only a small, single-digit percentage remains," said Tandon. He said IVCA had formally requested the government to limit PN3 to general partners or fund managers, given that LPs typically do not influence fund deployment. 'Since LPs don't play an active role, the PN3 framework should focus on general partners (GPs who manage funds), with all necessary background checks done on fund managers. That's the request we've submitted," he said. Apart from that, IVCA has also sought amendments like defining beneficial ownership (ultimate investor) using a '10% threshold" in line with Indian laws, introducing a 'green channel" for low-risk cases such as repeat investments, listed funds not controlled by land-border countries, and 'minority, non-controlling stakes below 25%". It has also recommended a '45–60 business day" timeline for PN3 approvals to reduce deal uncertainty, he said. Part of this shift stems from the disadvantages startups face when Chinese investors remain on the cap table. 'Any further fundraises by Indian startups from existing Chinese investors remain a challenge, which can materially affect their business plans and growth prospects," said said Vaibhav Kakkar, senior partner at Saraf and Partners. 'Apart from the regulatory hurdles posed by PN3, companies with Chinese ownership may also face negative perception among regulators and the public." The retreat, however, also results in the loss of certain advantages. 'Chinese tech majors historically brought patient capital, playbooks on super-apps, social commerce and embedded fintech, and access to low-cost hardware supply chains—advantages that helped Indian startups," said Siddharth Mody, partner at JSA. While the uncertainty around having a Chinese investor in the cap table complicates follow-on rounds, domestic regulatory pressure and a weaker yuan have also prompted Alibaba's Ant, Tencent and others to monetize offshore bets and repatriate cash, Mody said, emphasising that these factors have made the past year an opportune window for Indian founders to negotiate exits. The vacuum left by the Chinese capital is already being filled. 'For instance, Gulf sovereign-wealth funds such as ADIA have set up dedicated India vehicles worth US$4-5 billion each and are underwriting late-stage rounds, while North-American cross-over funds and large domestic family offices are increasingly active," said Mody '…Importantly, these new investors (non-Chinese/not sharing a border with India) are generally free of PN3 constraints, allowing quicker closings."


India.com
6 hours ago
- India.com
Russia Backs Pakistan's Rusting Pride – And Sends A Message To India
Moscow/New Delhi: In a move that is bound to stir concern in New Delhi, Russia has formally signed a new industrial cooperation agreement with Pakistan – a revival attempt of the long-defunct Pakistan Steel Mills (PSM) in Karachi. Described as a protocol of cooperation, the pact was signed at the Pakistani Embassy in Moscow and promises to restart and expand steel production at a facility that was once the pride of Soviet-Pakistani engineering. This deal marks a new chapter in a forgotten story – one that began more than half a century ago. Back in 1971, it was the Soviet Union that helped lay the foundation of Pakistan's largest industrial complex. Today, after decades of neglect, a trail of mounting losses and shifting political winds, Russia is circling back to finish what it once started. 'This revival, with Russia's help, is more than a business deal. It reflects our shared industrial history and a future we want to build together,' said Pakistan Prime Minister's Special Assistant Haroon Akhtar Khan during his Moscow visit. According to Pakistan's national news agency APP, the signing ceremony also reaffirmed the 'long-standing industrial partnership' between the two nations. The objective is to bring the Karachi-based steel plant back to life and boost its output, possibly restoring thousands of lost jobs and reigniting a sector that has remained idle for far too long. Also In The Race, But Left Behind For months, China too was eyeing the same prize. When Imran Khan's Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) government decided to restart the revival efforts in 2018, it first engaged a Chinese firm for negotiations. However, the talks hit a dead end. The Chinese bid faded, but the Russians, perhaps driven by nostalgia and ownership of the project's origins, never stopped knocking. Russia insisted it was the only logical choice to resuscitate the steel plant it once designed. The Kremlin saw itself not as an outsider but as a returning builder – one who knew the bones of the structure better than anyone else. A Ruin Built From Decay And Delay Once a symbol of industrial ambition, the PSM began its steep descent in 2008. Losses piled up after a slew of politically motivated hirings, combined with the blowback of the global financial crisis. By the end of the 2008-09 fiscal year, the plant had already sunk into a deficit of nearly 17 billion Pakistani rupees. That number ballooned over the next five years, touching 118.7 billion. Even as successive governments, first under the Pakistan's People's Party and later the Pakistan Muslim League (Nawaz), watched the unit bleed. There was no coordinated effort to stop the rot. President Pervez Musharraf's regime had once seen the plant report profits of over 9.5 billion rupees in 2007-08. A decade later, by May 31, 2018, it had sunk to a terrifying 200 billion-rupee hole. The PTI came with promises of revival. What followed was a silent bidding war between Russia and China for control of the broken machine. This new agreement finally puts Moscow in the driver's seat. The Express Tribune reports that Pakistan now hopes this Russian-backed turnaround will not only rescue an industrial dinosaur but also breathe new life into a crucial sector of its crippled economy. Russia, too, appears eager to re-establish its economic footprint in South Asia, starting with steel, in a country once deeply aligned with the United States but now visibly drifting toward Moscow and Beijing.