Expert weighs in on Nigel Farage funding for Scotland comments
Dr Neil McGarvey, a top politics lecturer at Strathclyde University, told The National that Farage's comments suggested the Reform UK leader had not thought 'deeply' about the constitutional question.
He said: 'I don't think Farage has thought it through very coherently, if I'm being honest.
'I would actually struggle to label Farage a Unionist; he's not really thought in any way deeply about the Union and the implications of what he's said for the Union.'
READ MORE: Douglas Ross accused of 'bullying witnesses' in key Holyrood committee
While the Barnett formula is often taken to mean the whole process by which Holyrood is funded, it is only one part, explained McGarvey, with the baseline block grant making up the largest part.
The Barnett formula, devised in the 1970s before the first Scottish devolution referendum, is used to calculate how much money Scotland gets as a proportion of UK spending in devolved areas.
(Image: PA)
McGarvey, who has written about right-wing politics in Scotland and the Union, said that he would describe Farage as holding a 'One Britain philosophy', which he defined as an 'English-stroke-British nationalist approach to governance, that we should all be governed as one'.
The academic argued that because of The Vow – a last-ditch attempt to shore up No votes in the 2014 referendum, which included a pledge to keep the Barnett formula while bringing in more powers – both sides in the referendum had cast their ballots for different kinds of constitutional change.
He said: 'You could say, from an SNP perspective, if you reopen the whole debate about Barnett, you're reopening the constitutional debate.'
READ MORE: Britain was 'extension of Scotland', suggest medieval texts uncovered by historian
And McGarvey argued that Farage may find unlikely bedfellows in the SNP over his comments about the Barnett formula, which saw the Reform UK leader saying that Holyrood should be 'able to raise a bit more of its own revenue'.
He said this put Farage in similar territory to those in the SNP who would argue for the Scottish Parliament to have 'full fiscal autonomy', which would see it given complete control over tax and public spending short of full independence.
Farage's comments were met with outrage not only from pro-independence parties but from the Conservatives, who said his argument amounted to wanting to scrap what they call the 'Union dividend'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ITV News
15 minutes ago
- ITV News
PM's plan to recognise Palestinian state could 'harm' hostages, families say
British families of hostages taken by Hamas have urged the prime minister to change course on the governments plans to recognise the state of Palestine, saying the policy could "even hurt" those still being held in Gaza. Earlier this week, Starmer said the UK would take the step of recognising Palestine in September ahead of the UN General Assembly unless Israel meets certain conditions. Members of four British families met with Foreign Office officials on Thursday night seeking clarification on whether conditions would also be placed on Hamas, their lawyers said in a statement. 'However, it was clear from the meeting last night that the British government's policy will not help the hostages, and could even hurt them,' they said. 'We do not say this lightly, but it was made obvious to us at the meeting that although the conditions for recognising a Palestinian state would be assessed 'in the round' in late-September, in deciding whether to go ahead with recognition, the release or otherwise of the hostages would play no part in those considerations. 'In other words, the 'vision for peace' which the UK is pursuing… may well involve our clients' family members continuing to rot in Hamas dungeons.' Starmer said the UK would only refrain from recognising Palestine if Israel allows more aid into Gaza, stops the expansion of settlements in the West Bank, agrees to a ceasefire, and signs up to a long-term peace process over the next two months. While he also called for Hamas to immediately release all remaining Israeli hostages, sign up to a ceasefire, disarm and 'accept that they will play no part in the government of Gaza', he did not explicitly say these would factor into whether recognition would go ahead. The families have a range of views on what the future political settlement should look like but their priority is to keep the hostages 'above political games,' their lawyers said. They are now urging the prime minister to 'change course before it is too late'. 'At a minimum, the British hostage families request that the government confirm that without the hostages being released, there can be no peace, and that this will be an important part of its decision as to whether to proceed with recognition and its current plan.' The families of Ms Damari and freed hostage Eli Sharabi were among those who met with the Foreign Office. Also present were relatives of Nadav Popplewell, who died while held captive, as well as those of Oded Lifshitz, who died, and Yocheved Lifschitz, who was released. Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds has said that the UK will not get into a 'to and fro' with Hamas over the recognition plans and that 'we don't negotiate with terrorists, Hamas are terrorists'. US President Donald Trump disagrees with Starmer plans, as well as those of France and Canada, which have also pledged their countries will recognise Palestine. 'He feels as though that's rewarding Hamas at a time where Hamas is the true impediment to a ceasefire and to the release of all of the hostages,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said. The Foreign Commonwealth and Development Office has been contacted for comment.
The Sun
16 minutes ago
- The Sun
Foreign criminals are vanishing from our courts and reoffending under fake names, ex-prosecutor claims
FOREIGN criminals are vanishing from British courts mid-trial and reoffending under fake names, a former top prosecutor has claimed. Reform UK 's rising star Laila Cunningham, who recently quit the CPS, said illegal migrants are slipping through the cracks and warned Britain is now 'importing crime'. 2 2 The mother-of-seven and London councillor is now leading Nigel Farage's national crime campaign - having defected from the Tories. Speaking to The Sun, Ms Cunningham said overstayers and undocumented migrants often used 'long lists of aliases' to dodge justice - with some simply vanishing during trial. Recalling a shocking case, she said: 'He robbed a woman coming off the Eurostar, took her suitcase and left. He was an illegal asylum seeker, the mitigation is that he can't work. "So they ordered what you call a probation report. And they said, we are going to adjourn it until after lunch. He never came back, and he is untraceable. "And this happens all the time." Explaining how others simply lie about their age to stay in the country, she added: "I have had a guy with literally a receding hairline, white hairs, and he said he's 16. And then you have to argue in court if he really is 16. Legal Aid pays for an age assessor and he keeps committing crimes. "I definitely think that if you do commit a crime, your asylum application should be denied immediately." Ms Cunningham also said she felt forced out of the Crown Prosecution Service after speaking publicly about grooming gangs, a lack of policing, and her decision to join Reform. She revealed bosses raised three complaints, including that she had spoken critically about parts of the Muslim community. The Westminster councillor said: 'I said that Muslim communities have really let Muslims down. And I said, 'But I am Muslim. It's just me speaking in a personal capacity.'' Her comments come as Ministry of Justice figures show 1,731 foreign nationals are now in UK prisons for sex crimes - up nearly 10 per cent in a year. A total of 10,722 foreign offenders and suspects are currently behind bars - the highest figure in over a decade - costing the taxpayer an estimated £580 million annually. Backing 30,000 more police, zero-tolerance policing and automatic deportations, Ms Cunningham added: 'Criminals have to fear the law again. 'The old parties sold us out - Reform is the only one putting British people first.' A Crown Prosecution Service spokesperson said: "Councillor Cunningham resigned from her position as a CPS prosecutor.' They also stressed Ms Cunningham quit before HR action was initiated.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Scottish Tories eye Reform electoral pact
Senior Scottish Conservatives have discussed striking an electoral pact with Reform UK for the Holyrood elections next spring. One figure backing a deal told The Telegraph it could help avoid splitting the vote on the Right and kick the SNP out of power in Scotland. The deal, which would not need to be made public, would see the Tories either not stand candidates or go easy in areas where Reform is better placed to win and vice versa. It comes as Nigel Farage 's party sits above the Conservatives in third place in opinion polls for the Scottish Parliament elections next May. A pact does not have the backing of Russell Findlay, the Scottish Tory leader, whose team released a statement ruling out the possibility when approached by The Telegraph. But the fact a deal is being considered at senior levels in the party underscores the scale of Reform's popularity surge north of the border and the concerns it has triggered among Tories. In Scotland, Reform now has 15 councillors, 14 of whom used to be Conservatives. It is in marked contrast to other political parties previously run by Mr Farage, such as the UK Independence Party (Ukip), which struggled to get a foothold north of border. One Tory MSP has privately spoken of a defection 'watch list' in Holyrood of those suspected of switching to Reform. Mr Farage also waved away the idea he would agree to any such pact, telling The Telegraph: 'No chance. The Tories are dying in Scotland and I've got no desire to do a deal with them whatsoever.' The idea of some form of agreement, public or private, between the Conservatives and Reform has become a common discussion point in Westminster. Average UK-wide voting polls have Reform in first place on 30 per cent of the vote, with the Tories in a distant third on 17 per cent. Labour is in second place on 22 per cent. Kemi Badenoch, the Conservative leader, has ruled out a pre-vote deal with Mr Farage, but speculation continues with the next general election not due until 2029. The recent by-election result for the Scottish Parliament seat of Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse underscored the challenges of Right-wing parties splitting the vote. Labour won the seat with 32 per cent of the vote, followed by the SNP on 29 per cent. Reform came third on 26 per cent. Had the Tories, who got 6 per cent, not stood a candidate, it is possible Reform would have beaten Labour and taken the seat, though pollsters often caution against hard conclusions when predicting voter behaviour. Mr Farage has agreed to election pacts before. The Brexit Party, the precursor to Reform which Mr Farage led, had criticism of the Tory handling of the issue of Europe as its heart. Yet he still agreed not to stand candidates against sitting Conservatives at the 2019 general election to help Boris Johnson win and get a Brexit deal through the Commons, securing the UK's departure from the European Union. Despite interest in some quarters of the Scottish Conservative Party, other figures strongly played down the possibility of a pact. One Scottish Tory politician who has spent years in influential positions said: 'Churchill's phrase comes to mind, 'You don't negotiate with a tiger when your head's in its mouth'. We're in competition with Reform – we're not in partnership with them.' The source said Scottish Tory supporters had brought up the prospect of a deal with Reform but that there was little chance it would be adopted by the leadership. Another senior Scottish Tory said: 'Why would Reform do a deal? I can see why we might be interested in it, but why would they?' There have long been suspicions on the Right of coordination between Labour and the Liberal Democrats at general elections to maximise the chances of Tory defeats. The Lib Dems surged from winning 11 MPs at the 2019 general election to 72 MPs at the 2024 general election with almost no increase in overall vote share. The party's strategists have talked about how they ruthlessly focused on a small number of winnable seats rather than competing hard everywhere. Labour was likely to have benefited from the decreased campaigning in non-target seats. But there are reasons why striking some form of deal would be less likely in elections for the Scottish Parliament than the UK-wide Parliament in Westminster. The electoral system for the Scottish Parliament has a proportional element, meaning as well as individual constituency races a party wins some MPs for their overall vote totals. Reform, whose strategists hope to get between 10 and 20 MSPs next spring, is expected to get their victories almost entirely via this way, known as 'the list', rather than winning constituencies. That could provide a disincentive to strike a deal with the Tories, given a lower overall vote total would likely mean fewer MSPs thanks to this proportion element of the election. In polling for next spring's Scottish Parliament elections, Reform is on around 17 per cent, above the Tories on around 12 per cent. The SNP is top, followed by Labour. A year ago, it looked likely that Labour could win power in Scotland but a support slump since Sir Keir Starmer took office last summer means the SNP is now well-placed to remain in office. A Scottish Conservative spokesman said: 'Nigel Farage has said he is content with the SNP winning another five years in power and Reform stood multiple pro-independence candidates in the general election, so no, this won't be happening. 'The Scottish Conservatives want to get the SNP out of power, while Reform will gladly help the nationalists.'
