US fertility rate drops to a new low, CDC data finds
The data released on Thursday continues a trend in birth rates that has been sliding downward for nearly two decades.
'We're seeing this as part of an ongoing process of fertility delay. We know that the US population is still growing, and we still have a natural increase — more births than deaths,' Leslie Root, a University of Colorado Boulder researcher focused on fertility and population policy, told The Associated Press news agency.
The US fertility rate has gone up and down over the years, reaching 3.5 percent in the early 1960s before dropping to 1.7 percent by 1976 and then rebounding to 2.1 percent in 2007.
Lower fertility rates are common in wealthier countries, and the new figures put the US roughly on par with its Western European counterparts.
The birth rate trends can be influenced by a variety of factors, including economic stability and the affordability of necessities such as housing. Experts pointed to how those influences can place strains on households and affect mental health.
'Worry is not a good moment to have kids,' Karen Guzzo, the director of the Carolina Population Center at the University of North Carolina, told The Associated Press.
Some lawmakers have expressed alarm over declining fertility rates and called on the government to take a more active role in encouraging people to have children and promoting policies that facilitate that goal.
Officials within the administration of US President Donald Trump have floated the idea of changing tax policy to favour people who have children, and Trump issued an executive order meant to reduce barriers to processes such as in vitro fertilisation.
At an event during Women's History Month, Trump even dubbed himself the 'fertility president'.
But the administration has also moved to slash funding for social programmes that experts say can offer an important safety net for working people who want to have a family but may be worried about the financial strain.
Cuts have also affected medical researchers investigating fertility-related treatments.
'The things that they are doing are really symbolic and not likely to budge things for real Americans,' said Guzzo.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
2 days ago
- Al Jazeera
US confirms it will destroy contraceptives previously designated as aid
Washington, DC – The United States has confirmed reports that it will destroy reproductive health supplies previously designated as assistance, sparking fury from advocates and aid groups. The US Department of State said on Friday that the decision stems from US regulations that restrict aid to groups that perform or promote abortions. 'Only a limited number of commodities have been approved for disposal. No HIV medications or condoms are being destroyed,' a State Department spokesperson told Al Jazeera in a statement. Reproductive health advocates decried the US decision on Friday, saying that Washington is incinerating 'life-saving contraceptives' rather than handing them to aid groups to distribute them in poorer countries. Several advocacy groups – including International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF), Sensoa and Countdown 2030 Europe – released a statement calling the US move a 'cruel and ideologically driven'. 'Despite multiple offers from international humanitarian organisations, governments and global health actors to purchase or redistribute these supplies, the US government has refused all alternatives,' the statement said. 'Instead, they are choosing waste and extremist ideology over care, human rights, safety and health.' The groups said they offered to transport, repack, store and distribute the supplies at 'no cost to the US government', but their proposal was turned down. The Reuters news agency had reported that the supplies, set to be destroyed in France, are worth $10m. The State Department spokesperson said the destruction of the commodities, purchased under the administration of former President Joe Biden, will cost $167,000. The US statement added that the administration of President Donald Trump managed to cancel previously placed orders worth $34.1m. Trump has upended US humanitarian aid programmes, all but dismantling the US Agency for International Development (USAID) and cutting assistance to countries and groups across the world. Since running for office the first time in 2015, Trump has presented himself as a staunch opponent of abortion. During his first term, the Republican president appointed three conservative justices to the US Supreme Court, who helped overturn the constitutional right to abortion in 2022. The decision to destroy reproductive health supplies, instead of donating or even selling them, has drawn the ire of critics across the world. Micah Grzywnowicz, regional director of IPPF European Network, said the move shows 'complete lack of basic empathy'. 'It's the height of hypocrisy for a government to preach efficiency and cutting waste, only to turn around and recklessly destroy life-saving supplies when the need has never been greater. This isn't just inefficient — it's unconscionable,' Grzywnowicz said in a statement.. 'This action seriously undermines global public health efforts and limits access to essential care, particularly for communities already facing significant barriers.' Earlier this week, Democratic Congresswoman Judy Chu said she was 'horrified' by the Trump administration's move. 'The Trump admin is burning $10M in taxpayer-funded birth control despite years left before expiration & the UN ready to deliver it to women in need,' Chu said in a social media post. 'This is cruel, disgraceful, and a needless waste of your taxpayer dollars.'
Al Jazeera
3 days ago
- Al Jazeera
US fertility rate drops to a new low, CDC data finds
The fertility rate in the United States has dropped to a new low of 1.6 children per woman, according to new data from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The data released on Thursday continues a trend in birth rates that has been sliding downward for nearly two decades. 'We're seeing this as part of an ongoing process of fertility delay. We know that the US population is still growing, and we still have a natural increase — more births than deaths,' Leslie Root, a University of Colorado Boulder researcher focused on fertility and population policy, told The Associated Press news agency. The US fertility rate has gone up and down over the years, reaching 3.5 percent in the early 1960s before dropping to 1.7 percent by 1976 and then rebounding to 2.1 percent in 2007. Lower fertility rates are common in wealthier countries, and the new figures put the US roughly on par with its Western European counterparts. The birth rate trends can be influenced by a variety of factors, including economic stability and the affordability of necessities such as housing. Experts pointed to how those influences can place strains on households and affect mental health. 'Worry is not a good moment to have kids,' Karen Guzzo, the director of the Carolina Population Center at the University of North Carolina, told The Associated Press. Some lawmakers have expressed alarm over declining fertility rates and called on the government to take a more active role in encouraging people to have children and promoting policies that facilitate that goal. Officials within the administration of US President Donald Trump have floated the idea of changing tax policy to favour people who have children, and Trump issued an executive order meant to reduce barriers to processes such as in vitro fertilisation. At an event during Women's History Month, Trump even dubbed himself the 'fertility president'. But the administration has also moved to slash funding for social programmes that experts say can offer an important safety net for working people who want to have a family but may be worried about the financial strain. Cuts have also affected medical researchers investigating fertility-related treatments. 'The things that they are doing are really symbolic and not likely to budge things for real Americans,' said Guzzo.
Al Jazeera
18-07-2025
- Al Jazeera
US withdraws from WHO pandemic response reforms
Washington, DC – The United States has withdrawn from reforms introduced by the World Health Organisation (WHO) last year to enhance the global response to pandemics, part of a broader push by Washington against international regulations. The administration of President Donald Trump formally rejected on Friday the 2024 amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR) that were put in place in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F Kennedy announced the move in a joint statement, saying that it aims to 'prevent international bureaucrats from shaping US domestic policies'. The legally binding amendments expanded the regulations to enhance the international response to a future pandemic. They included the adoption of a clear definition of what constitutes a pandemic emergency and how it can be triggered, as well as efforts to improve information-sharing between countries across the world and WHO. The amendments also called for allowing poorer nations access to medical products to 'equitably address the needs and priorities of developing countries'. The US officials took issue with several provisions in the reforms. 'Terminology throughout the 2024 amendments is vague and broad, risking WHO-coordinated international responses that focus on political issues like solidarity, rather than rapid and effective actions,' Rubio and Kennedy said in their statements. Lockdowns and vaccine mandates were a contentious political issue in the US during the pandemic, with right-wing activists close to Trump leading the charge in rejecting the measures. At the same time, US conservatives have long been suspicious of multilateral institutions, viewing international rules as an infringement on the US's sovereignty. But advocates of global health regulations argue that pandemics do not stop at borders, and therefore must be confronted with a collaborative, international effort. Shortly after taking office earlier this year, Trump officially announced that the US would pull out of WHO altogether by January 2026. On Friday, Kennedy and Rubio said the amendments 'compel countries to adopt digital health documents'. 'Our Agencies have been and will continue to be clear: we will put Americans first in all our actions and we will not tolerate international policies that infringe on Americans' speech, privacy, or personal liberties,' the officials said. 'These amendments risk unwarranted interference with our national sovereign right to make health policy.' While the reforms require WHO to develop and improve a database for digital health certificates that can be accessed internationally, participants would voluntarily submit information to the documents. During the pandemic, most countries, including the US during Trump's first term, required travellers to show negative COVID tests. The US was absent in May when WHO adopted a separate agreement to enhance pandemic preparedness. COVID, which caused flu-like symptoms and started to spread early in 2020, killed nearly 70 million people across the globe and brought the world to a halt for long stretches of time.
