Don't hike tax again, pleads Currys boss: Alex Baldock warns Chancellor another raid will hurt jobs and lead to higher prices
Chief executive Alex Baldock said the Government should 'think very carefully before they make the situation any worse'.
But shares in Currys soared as he insisted the UK's biggest electronics retailer could 'swim against the tide'.
Baldock's warning came as experts poured cold water on Labour's claims to have fixed the economy since coming to power.
Leading economists warned of the inevitability of tax rises after Keir Starmer's welfare bill humiliation blew a £5billion hole in the public finances.
'Recent policy decisions mean that in the absence of tax hikes or alternative spending cuts, fiscal rules would be broken in the autumn,' Bruna Skarica, chief UK economist at Morgan Stanley, said.'We think tax hikes look most likely.'
But Baldock warned that would result in fewer jobs, less investment and higher prices for consumers.
He said Currys cut back on hiring after Reeves raised employer national insurance contributions and the minimum wage.
Baldock said: 'We want to be helping to grow the economy and bring investment into the UK.... retailers would like to do it and would be able to do more of it with a more helpful policy environment.
'The tax burden retailers already suffer is dampening the contribution we could make, any further tax burden would further dampen growth, investment and employment and increase prices.'
The National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR) spelled out the Chancellor's predicament, saying she had sowed uncertainty with a prolonged gap between the election and her first Budget and an 'erosion of confidence'.
As public finance figures worsened, firms worried about further tax rises, making them reluctant to invest and hire.
And with U-turns, from winter fuel payments to welfare, as well as plans to hike defence spending, Reeves must find money from somewhere. Ben Caswell, economist at NIESR, said it was likely to mean 'significant tax rises' with current policies 'not sustainable'.
Currys yesterday reported annual profits of £162million, 37 per cent up on a year earlier. Group revenue rose 3 per cent to £8.7billion in the 12 months to May 3.
UK sales were driven by demand for Currys' mobile phone and computing businesses. It also reported that health and beauty products were growing fast.
The recent heatwave has boosted sales of fans, air conditioning units and barbecues. The balance sheet is the strongest in a decade, with net cash of £184million.
Currys reinstated its dividend for the first time in two years as it proposed a payout of 1.5p per share. Shares closed 7.1 per cent, or 8.4p, higher at 126.9p.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
10 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Isa allowance cut could mean it is harder to get a mortgage
It could become harder to get a mortgage if the Government reduces the cash Isa allowance, a lender has warned. It has been reported that the Chancellor, Rachel Reeves, is considering cutting the amount people can save tax-free. They can currently put £20,000 in an Isa each tax year and not pay any tax on the interest, but this could potentially be reduced to £10,000 or even £4,000. According to the reports, the Chancellor is expected to announce the policy during her Mansion House speech later this month. But such a move could have a knock-on effect on the housing market, because banks and building societies use the money they hold in savings accounts such as Isas to fund customers' mortgages. Andrew Craddock, chief executive at Darlington Building Society, is urging the government to reconsider the move. He said that, if less is paid into Isas, this could reduce the number of home loans lenders are able to hand out and also potentially lead to higher rates. This would particularly be the case if people invested more money instead of putting it in savings, as the Government is said to want to encourage them to do. It would be a particular challenge for building societies, which are member-owned and therefore don't have as many options as banks for raising extra cash. 'Cash Isas underpin the UK mortgage market, providing a vital source of funding for building societies, which is lent out as mortgages to support the UK's housing market,' said Craddock. 'By making cash Isas less attractive, savers will likely explore other options, and it is difficult to see how building societies could sustain current lending levels if cash Isa deposits were significantly reduced.' He added that the Government would be 'effectively choking mortgage availability for many first-time buyers and those who struggle to find a mortgage with mainstream high street lenders.' Building societies and mutual-owned banks were responsible for 52 per cent of total mortgage market growth in the six months to March 2025, according to the Building Societies Association. Allowance cut would hit poorer savers A reduction in the Isa allowance could also disproportionately affect lower-income savers. Almost half of all cash Isas are held by individuals earning less than £20,000 per year, the Building Societies Association has said. 'It is disappointing that the Government looks set to reduce the tax-free cash Isa allowance, at a time when we are all working hard to encourage people to build up their financial resilience,' Craddock added. 'Cash Isas are used by those who want to earn interest on their funds without taking the risk of investing and enjoy the benefits of tax-free saving whilst knowing exactly where their money is. 'Most typically, this is older savers and those on lower incomes.' How to find a new mortgage Borrowers who need a mortgage because their current fixed rate deal is ending, or they are buying a home, should explore their options as soon as possible. Buy-to-let landlords should also act as soon as they can. Quick mortgage finder links with This is Money's partner L&C > Mortgage rates calculator > Find the right mortgage for you What if I need to remortgage? Borrowers should compare rates, speak to a mortgage broker and be prepared to act. Homeowners can lock in to a new deal six to nine months in advance, often with no obligation to take it. Most mortgage deals allow fees to be added to the loan and only be charged when it is taken out. This means borrowers can secure a rate without paying expensive arrangement fees. Keep in mind that by doing this and not clearing the fee on completion, interest will be paid on the fee amount over the entire term of the loan, so this may not be the best option for everyone. What if I am buying a home? Those with home purchases agreed should also aim to secure rates as soon as possible, so they know exactly what their monthly payments will be. Buyers should avoid overstretching and be aware that house prices may fall, as higher mortgage rates limit people's borrowing ability and buying power. What about buy-to-let landlords Buy-to-let landlords with interest-only mortgages will see a greater jump in monthly costs than homeowners on residential mortgages. This makes remortgaging in plenty of time essential and our partner L&C can help with buy-to-let mortgages too. How to compare mortgage costs The best way to compare mortgage costs and find the right deal for you is to speak to a broker. This is Money has a long-standing partnership with fee-free broker L&C, to provide you with fee-free expert mortgage advice. Interested in seeing today's best mortgage rates? Use This is Money and L&Cs best mortgage rates calculator to show deals matching your home value, mortgage size, term and fixed rate needs. If you're ready to find your next mortgage, why not use L&C's online Mortgage Finder. It will search 1,000's of deals from more than 90 different lenders to discover the best deal for you. > Find your best mortgage deal with This is Money and L&C Be aware that rates can change quickly, however, and so if you need a mortgage or want to compare rates, speak to L&C as soon as possible, so they can help you find the right mortgage for you.
The Guardian
39 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Rachel Reeves needs wider headroom against fiscal rules, ex-Bank of England deputy says
The former Bank of England deputy governor Charlie Bean has urged Rachel Reeves to create much wider headroom against her fiscal rules – a decision likely to require significant tax rises or spending cuts. Bean suggested that the current slim margin of less than £10bn, had led the chancellor to 'fine-tune' the government's tax and spending plans to meet the Office for Budget Responsibility's (OBR) forecasts five years ahead. 'Government spending is about one and a quarter trillion, so £10bn is a small number … and it is a small number in the context of typical forecasting errors,' he told BBC Radio 4's Today programme. He added: 'She should aim to operate with a larger margin of headroom, so previous chancellors have typically operated with headroom of the order of £30bn. 'Because she has chosen about a third of that … it is very easy for numbers to go in the wrong direction and she finds she has to neurotically fine-tune taxes to control the OBR forecast that is several years ahead.' Bean, who is also a former member of the OBR's budget responsibility committee, added: 'The original sin is that she should not have chosen to operate with such a tight margin of error.' Reeves increased taxes by a historic £40bn in her budget last October. However, with most of the proceeds earmarked for public services, she left herself on track to meet her strict fiscal rules with a relatively slim margin of £10bn. That 'headroom' was set to be wiped out before the spring statement in March, prompting the scramble for savings that led to the £5bn cuts to disability benefits, which Labour dropped this week after a backbench revolt. Reeves's team privately acknowledge that the small headroom of less than £10bn she left herself against the forecasts has contributed to the challenges of the past 12 months – but argue that she had little choice given the poor fiscal inheritance left by the Tories. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion The chancellor is widely expected to have to increase taxes in her autumn budget, to close the gap created by U-turns on disability benefits and the winter fuel allowance, and because of the prospect of weaker economic forecasts. She insisted she was 'cracking on with the job' on Thursday, after a tumultuous day on Wednesday in which bond markets dumped UK government debt amid speculation about the chancellor's future. Creating an additional £20bn of fiscal headroom, as Bean suggested, would require tax rises equivalent to 2p on the basic and higher rates of income tax.
The Independent
40 minutes ago
- The Independent
‘What must the world think?': Edinburgh airport slammed as ‘filthy' by Scottish quango chief
Edinburgh Airport is so 'filthy' it compromises Scotland 's international reputation, a leading Scottish chief executive has said. After a negative experience at Scotland's busiest airport, Francesca Osowska, chief executive of the Scottish Funding Council (SFC), took to social media to express her disgust. 'Another top class performance by @EDI_Airport,' she began sarcastically. 'Arrivals hall is filthy, toilets dirty and despite the Porto flight arriving before the Dubai flight, guess which bags were delivered first? Another one hour + wait for bags.' The former triathlete, who was awarded an OBE for services to government and the Commonwealth Games in the Queen's New Year Honours in January 2015, added: ''Where Scotland meets the world'. What must the world think?' she finished. A second X user agreed with Ms Osowska's comments, writing: 'The Arrivals Hall at EDI is an embarrassment. 'Filthy, industrial, uninviting, soulless, chaotic, impersonal. I could not agree more. Please don't ask me about the road link in or the £5 drop off charge!!' And a third added: 'And the trek to passport control and the lengthy queues there add to the terrible experience for international arrivals. A national embarrassment.' Baggage handling and other ground services are outsourced to contractors who work with airlines and are not provided by the airport. In response to the comments, a spokesperson for Edinburgh Airport told The Times: 'Constructive feedback is important. We survey more than 50,000 of our passengers every month, and those scores are overwhelmingly positive. 'But, as with any business or organisation – including ones in the public sector like the Scottish Funding Council – we know we won't always get it right. 'The complex nature and range of partners involved in airport operations are often misunderstood. While it's easy to share personal frustrations in 240 characters, it's not as easy to explain those intricacies. 'We're happy to engage constructively and offer clarity wherever we can.' The Independent has reached out to Edinburgh Airport for comment. Ms Osowska's comments come just days after a Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) report named Edinburgh Airport as 'needing improvement' in the accessibility assistance offered to passengers with reduced mobility (PRM). The transport hub was marked down for failing to meet 'the standards for the provision of assistance in a timely manner'. The CAA said this was 'primarily due to operational issues caused by a change of contractor for its service provider earlier in the year'. A spokesperson for Edinburgh Airport said: 'As the CAA's report states, this rating was given to the airport during a particularly challenging time for our PRM operation, due to a change of provider, staff shortages, and a surge in demand for the service. 'Our goal remains to return to and maintain a 'good' or 'very good' rating.'
