WHO pushes countries to raise prices on sugary drinks, alcohol and tobacco by 50%
The United Nations health agency said the move would help cut consumption of the products, which contribute to diseases such as diabetes and some cancers, as well as raising money at a time when development aid is shrinking and public debt rising.
"Health taxes are one of the most efficient tools we have," said Jeremy Farrar, WHO assistant-director general of health promotion and disease prevention and control. "It's time to act."
The WHO launched the push, which it called "3 by 35" at the U.N. Finance for Development conference in Seville, Spain.
The agency said that its tax initiative could raise $1 trillion by 2035 based on evidence from health taxes in countries such as Colombia and South Africa. The WHO has backed tobacco taxes and price rises for decades, and has called for taxes on alcohol and sugary drinks in recent years, but this is the first time it has suggested a target price rise for all three products.
WHO Director-General Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus told the conference that the taxes could help governments "adjust to the new reality" and bolster their own health systems with the money raised. Many low and middle-income countries are coping with cuts to aid spending led by the United States, which is not attending the Seville conference. The U.S. is also in the process of withdrawing from the WHO.
As an example, the initiative would mean a government in a middle-income country raising taxes on the product to push the price up from $4 today to $10 by 2035, taking into account inflation, said WHO health economist Guillermo Sandoval.
Nearly 140 countries had already raised tobacco taxes and therefore prices by over 50% on average between 2012 and 2022, the WHO added.
Sandoval said the WHO was also considering broader taxation recommendations, including on ultra-processed food, after the agency finalizes its definition of that type of food in the coming months. But he added that the agency expected pushback from the industries involved.
"It's deeply concerning that the World Health Organization (WHO) continues to disregard over a decade of clear evidence showing that taxing sugar-sweetened beverages has never improved health outcomes or reduced obesity in any country,' said Kate Loatman, executive director of the International Council of Beverages Associations, adding that the industry was working on options to support health.
"The World Health Organization's suggestion that raising taxes will prevent alcohol-related harm is misguided,' said Amanda Berger, senior vice president of science and research at the Distilled Spirits Council, adding that it would not prevent alcohol abuse.
The International Food and Beverage Alliance's Secretary General, Rocco Renaldi, said in a statement that it welcomed the WHO's drive to strengthen health systems but "warns against grouping sugar-sweetened beverages alongside inherently harmful goods like tobacco."
The tax initiative is backed by Bloomberg Philanthropies, the World Bank and the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, and involves support for countries who want to take action.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Japan Times
2 days ago
- Japan Times
Study finds smartphone bans in Dutch schools improved focus
A ban on mobile phones and other electronic devices in Dutch schools has improved focus among students, a study commissioned by the Dutch government found. Three-quarters of the 317 surveyed high schools reported that the ban has had a positive effect on students' concentration. Additionally, nearly two-thirds noted an improvement in the social climate within their schools, and one-third observed better academic performance among students. "Less distraction, more attention to the lesson, and more social students. No more mobile phones in the classroom is having wonderful positive effects. It's great that schools are putting their shoulders to the wheel on this," State Secretary for Primary and Secondary Education Marielle Paul said. The ban has been in place since January 1, 2024, and also applies to primary schools. Typically, students only begin bringing phones to school in the final years of primary school and the survey, released late on Thursday, found the impact there was minimal. Most schools allow exceptions for devices needed for medical support, such as hearing aids connected to a mobile device.
Japan Times
3 days ago
- Japan Times
WHO pushes countries to raise prices on sugary drinks, alcohol and tobacco by 50%
The World Health Organization is pushing countries to raise the prices of sugary drinks, alcohol and tobacco by 50% over the next 10 years through taxation, its strongest backing yet for taxes to help tackle chronic public health problems. The United Nations health agency said the move would help cut consumption of the products, which contribute to diseases such as diabetes and some cancers, as well as raising money at a time when development aid is shrinking and public debt rising. "Health taxes are one of the most efficient tools we have," said Jeremy Farrar, WHO assistant-director general of health promotion and disease prevention and control. "It's time to act." The WHO launched the push, which it called "3 by 35" at the U.N. Finance for Development conference in Seville, Spain. The agency said that its tax initiative could raise $1 trillion by 2035 based on evidence from health taxes in countries such as Colombia and South Africa. The WHO has backed tobacco taxes and price rises for decades, and has called for taxes on alcohol and sugary drinks in recent years, but this is the first time it has suggested a target price rise for all three products. WHO Director-General Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus told the conference that the taxes could help governments "adjust to the new reality" and bolster their own health systems with the money raised. Many low and middle-income countries are coping with cuts to aid spending led by the United States, which is not attending the Seville conference. The U.S. is also in the process of withdrawing from the WHO. As an example, the initiative would mean a government in a middle-income country raising taxes on the product to push the price up from $4 today to $10 by 2035, taking into account inflation, said WHO health economist Guillermo Sandoval. Nearly 140 countries had already raised tobacco taxes and therefore prices by over 50% on average between 2012 and 2022, the WHO added. Sandoval said the WHO was also considering broader taxation recommendations, including on ultra-processed food, after the agency finalizes its definition of that type of food in the coming months. But he added that the agency expected pushback from the industries involved. "It's deeply concerning that the World Health Organization (WHO) continues to disregard over a decade of clear evidence showing that taxing sugar-sweetened beverages has never improved health outcomes or reduced obesity in any country,' said Kate Loatman, executive director of the International Council of Beverages Associations, adding that the industry was working on options to support health. "The World Health Organization's suggestion that raising taxes will prevent alcohol-related harm is misguided,' said Amanda Berger, senior vice president of science and research at the Distilled Spirits Council, adding that it would not prevent alcohol abuse. The International Food and Beverage Alliance's Secretary General, Rocco Renaldi, said in a statement that it welcomed the WHO's drive to strengthen health systems but "warns against grouping sugar-sweetened beverages alongside inherently harmful goods like tobacco." The tax initiative is backed by Bloomberg Philanthropies, the World Bank and the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, and involves support for countries who want to take action.
Japan Times
6 days ago
- Japan Times
Trump's plan for USAID cuts risks 14 million additional deaths, study warns
Deep cuts to the U.S. Agency for International Development and its potential dismantling under U.S. President Donald Trump could result in about 14 million additional deaths by 2030, according to a study released in a prominent medical journal. The report published Monday in The Lancet, which analyzed data from 133 low- and middle-income countries from 2001 to 2023, estimates that USAID-funded programs helped prevent more than 91 million deaths over the past two decades, including 30 million among children. If the cuts continue, researchers project 1.8 million excess deaths in 2025 alone, with a total of 14 million by 2030 — including 4.5 million children under the age of five. "U.S. aid cuts — along with the probable ripple effects on other international donors — threaten to abruptly halt and reverse one of the most important periods of progress in human development,' the study said. "This crisis would stem from a conscious and avoidable policy choice — one whose burden would fall disproportionately on children and younger populations, and whose consequences could reverberate for decades,' it said. The analysis follows Trump's Jan. 20 executive order suspending most foreign aid programs. The dismantling of USAID was among the administration's first major moves after Trump tapped Elon Musk to lead a broad effort to reduce government spending. Nearly all of the agency's 10,000 staffers have since been forced out. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has defended the cuts as necessary to fix past failures and root out progressive ideology. In 2023, the U.S. accounted for 43% of all government humanitarian funding worldwide, up from 39% a decade earlier. USAID managed more than $35 billion in foreign assistance in fiscal 2024, while its operating budget — including salaries and overhead — was about $2 billion. The study found that countries receiving higher levels of USAID support saw a 15% drop in overall mortality and a 32% decline in child mortality. Disease-specific improvements included a 65% reduction in HIV/AIDS deaths, 51% in malaria and 50% in neglected tropical diseases. Though best known for its health initiatives, USAID also funds education, water and sanitation, nutrition and poverty programs. The study noted that these investments have long-term health impacts. For example, improved sanitation alone can reduce child mortality by 17%. Shutting down USAID could cost more than $6 billion, including hundreds of millions in legal fees tied to lawsuits over layoffs and program cancellations, according to a draft State Department assessment.
