Two firefighters shot dead in Idaho
Authorities gave the update after lifting a shelter-in-place order, though cautioned people to remain wary as the fire was still burning.
Kootenai County Sheriff Bob Norris said a tactical response team had used cell phone date to 'hone in' on a wooded area where they found the suspect's body with a firearm nearby.
'We do believe that the suspect started the fire, and we do believe that it was an ambush and it was intentional,' Norris said at a Sunday night news conference. 'These firefighters did not have a chance.'
Officials did not release his name, nor did they say what kind of gun was found. Locals wave a fire department flag in solidarity with the two firefighters killed in the attack. / Credit: AP
Officials said crews responded to a fire at Canfield Mountain just north of Coeur d'Alene around 1:30pm, and gunshots were reported about half an hour later.
Investigators said the gunman acted alone.
Three victims were brought to Kootenai Health, said hospital spokesperson Kim Anderson. Two were dead on arrival and the third was being treated for injuries, Anderson said. The wounded firefighter was 'fighting for his life' after surgery and was in stable condition.
First responders made urgent calls for help on their radios: 'Everybody's shot up here … send law enforcement now,' according to one dispatch.
Subscribe free to our weekly newsletter for exclusive and original coverage from ITV News. Direct to your inbox every Friday morning.
Governor Brad Little said 'multiple' firefighting personnel were attacked.
'This is a heinous direct assault on our brave firefighters,' Little said on X. 'I ask all Idahoans to pray for them and their families as we wait to learn more.'
Norris said it appeared the sniper was hiding in the rugged terrain and using a high-powered rifle. He said he instructed deputies to fire back.
The Idaho House Republican Leadership said in a statement: 'We are horrified by the murder of two firefighters in Coeur d'Alene, and shocked by such a vicious attack on our first responders. We are praying for them, the injured, their families and their colleagues.'
Coeur d'Alene is a city of 55,000 residents near the border with Washington. Canfield Mountain is a popular hiking and biking area on the city's outskirts, covered with trees and heavy brush and crisscrossed with trails that lead into a national forest.
Want a quick and expert briefing on the biggest news stories? Listen to our latest podcasts to find out What You Need To Know…
Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News
Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
8 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Nicola Sturgeon's husband Peter Murrell's ‘embezzlement' legal costs to be paid by taxpayer after legal aid granted
He appeared in court earlier this year FIGHTING FUND Nicola Sturgeon's husband Peter Murrell's 'embezzlement' legal costs to be paid by taxpayer after legal aid granted NICOLA Sturgeon's husband Peter Murrell has been granted legal aid after being charged with embezzlement. The 60-year-old former SNP chief exec was charged in March as a long running police probe into the party's finances came to an end. Advertisement 4 Peter Murrell has been granted legal aid Credit: Getty 4 The former FM's husband was charged with embezzlement earlier this year Credit: AP 4 It saw the end of the long running Operation Branchform probe into SNP cash Credit: Reuters Operation Branchform was launched in 2021 and probed the fate of £600,000 raised for an independence campaign between 2017 and 2019. The former First Minister's estranged husband appeared at Edinburgh Sheriff Court over the charge. It has now emerged Murrell's application for legal aid was granted, reports The Daily Record. The Scottish Legal Aid board received an application from Murrell's solicitors, which was granted on April 30. Advertisement So far no payments have been made, but officials say Murrell "met the tests" for receiving the cash. Legal aid chiefs would have checked information his salary, cash in his bank accounts and other investments while considering his application. It is currently not known how much Murrell was earning while serving as the Nats chief exec. But when the role was advertised in 2023, Murrell's successor Murray Foote was earning £95,000-a-year. Advertisement And then when the role was again advertised in January, the salary was listed as "competitive". Murrell was granted bail after his first court appearance and no dates have been set by the Crown Office. A spokesperson for the Scottish Legal Aid Board said: 'When assessing an applicant's eligibility for legal aid we look at their financial position at the time of their application to ensure they meet tests set by legal aid legislation. 'This includes information they give us about their salary, the amount of money they have in the bank and any investments, which might be available to fund their own defence privately. Advertisement 'Peter Murrell's application met the tests we have to apply when deciding whether to grant legal aid.' The dramatic Branchform probe saw Murrell arrested in 2023 but then released without charge. It saw an army of cops raid the SNP's party HQ in Edinburgh and swoop on he and Nicola Sturgeon's home in an early morning blitz. Ms Sturgeon and the party's ex-treasurer Colin Beattie were both arrested amid the probe and later found to have committed no wrongdoing. Advertisement The former leader also revealed earlier this year how her marriage to Peter Murrell had ended. Speaking about Murrell's legal aid win, Scottish Labour's Jackie Baillie said: 'Taxpayers will be scratching their heads at why they should have to foot the bill for Peter Murrell - a man who has been charged with embezzlement. "It is also particularly galling that Peter Murrell will be receiving legal aid after the SNP government has repeatedly ignored warnings about the financial pressures raised by lawyers." While Scottish Tory MSP Liam Kerr added: 'It will stick in the throats of hard-pressed Scots that they're picking up the tab for this, especially at a time when his party have squeezed the legal aid budget.' Advertisement
Glasgow Times
18 hours ago
- Glasgow Times
Jury reaches verdict on four out of five counts in Sean ‘Diddy' Combs sex trial
The judge indicated that he would instruct the jury to continue weighing the charge, echoing the sentiments of prosecutors and Combs' defence team that just two days into deliberations was too soon to give up on reaching a verdict on all counts. Judge Arun Subramanian said he had received a note at 4.05pm indicating the jury had reached a partial verdict. The note said the jury was unable to reach a unanimous verdict on the racketeering conspiracy charge because there were jurors with 'unpersuadable views' on both sides. Sean 'Diddy' Combs chose not to testify during his trial (Elizabeth Williams via AP) Judge Subramanian noted that juries had a right to deliver a partial verdict, but he said that given that deliberations had only started on Monday, he would rather they continued for now. The jury was eventually dismissed for the day. Combs' lawyers surrounded him at the defence table soon after the note was sent to the court. The hip-hop mogul appeared morose as they explained to him what was happening. At one point, lead defence lawyer Marc Agnifilo stepped away from the huddle, returned with a piece of paper and handed it to Combs, who read it solemnly. Meanwhile, prosecutors were at their table glued to their phones and laptop computers. Assistant US attorney Maurene Comey suggested the judge give the jury a modified version of what is known as an Allen charge — instructions encouraging them to keep deliberating after reaching an impasse. Racketeering conspiracy — count one on the jury's verdict sheet — is the most complicated of the charges against Combs because it requires the jury to decide not only whether he ran a 'racketeering enterprise', but also whether he was involved in committing some or all of various types of offences, such as kidnapping and arson. Combs' lead defence lawyer Marc Agnifilo handed his client a piece of paper after the partial verdict development (Yuki Iwamura/AP) The charge falls under Rico — the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organisations Act — which is best known for being used in organised crime and drug cartel cases. The jury has been deliberating since Monday. Earlier on Tuesday they asked to review critical testimony from one of the prosecution's most important witnesses: the hip-hop mogul's former longtime girlfriend Casandra 'Cassie' Ventura. Jurors requested the testimony about 75 minutes into their second day of weighing charges that Combs used his fame, wealth and violence to force two girlfriends into drug-fuelled sex marathons with male sex workers known as 'freak-offs' or 'hotel nights'. The panel of eight men and four women asked for Ms Ventura's account of Combs beating, kicking and dragging her at a Los Angeles hotel in 2016 — an assault captured on now-infamous security camera footage. They also asked to see Ms Ventura's testimony about an incident in which she said Combs accused her of taking drugs from him and kicked her off of their yacht at the Cannes Film Festival in France in 2013. On their way back to the US, she said, he threatened to release explicit videos of her having sex. The jury's testimony request came soon after Combs' lawyers and prosecutors began the day haggling with Judge Subramanian over a jury question left over from the end of the first day of deliberations on Monday. The jury asked to review critical testimony from prosecution witnesses Casandra 'Cassie' Ventura (Lionel Cironneau/AP) Jurors wanted clarification about what qualifies as drug distribution, an aspect of the racketeering conspiracy charge that will help determine whether Combs can be convicted or exonerated on the count. Judge Subramanian said he would remind jurors of the instructions he gave them on that part of the case before they started deliberating on Monday. Combs' lawyers had pushed for a more expansive response, but prosecutors argued — and Judge Subramanian agreed — that doing so could end up confusing jurors more. On Monday, the panel deliberated for more than five hours without reaching a verdict. Defence lawyers contend that prosecutors are trying to criminalise Combs' swinger lifestyle and that, if anything, his conduct amounted to domestic violence, not federal felonies. Combs, 55, could face 15 years in prison to life behind bars if he is convicted of all charges. After pleading not guilty, Combs chose not to testify as his lawyers built their arguments for acquittal mostly through lengthy cross-examinations of dozens of witnesses called by prosecutors, including some of Combs' former employees who took the witness stand reluctantly only after being granted immunity.
The Herald Scotland
18 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Jury reaches verdict on four out of five counts in Sean ‘Diddy' Combs sex trial
Judge Arun Subramanian said he had received a note at 4.05pm indicating the jury had reached a partial verdict. The note said the jury was unable to reach a unanimous verdict on the racketeering conspiracy charge because there were jurors with 'unpersuadable views' on both sides. Sean 'Diddy' Combs chose not to testify during his trial (Elizabeth Williams via AP) Judge Subramanian noted that juries had a right to deliver a partial verdict, but he said that given that deliberations had only started on Monday, he would rather they continued for now. The jury was eventually dismissed for the day. Combs' lawyers surrounded him at the defence table soon after the note was sent to the court. The hip-hop mogul appeared morose as they explained to him what was happening. At one point, lead defence lawyer Marc Agnifilo stepped away from the huddle, returned with a piece of paper and handed it to Combs, who read it solemnly. Meanwhile, prosecutors were at their table glued to their phones and laptop computers. Assistant US attorney Maurene Comey suggested the judge give the jury a modified version of what is known as an Allen charge — instructions encouraging them to keep deliberating after reaching an impasse. Racketeering conspiracy — count one on the jury's verdict sheet — is the most complicated of the charges against Combs because it requires the jury to decide not only whether he ran a 'racketeering enterprise', but also whether he was involved in committing some or all of various types of offences, such as kidnapping and arson. Combs' lead defence lawyer Marc Agnifilo handed his client a piece of paper after the partial verdict development (Yuki Iwamura/AP) The charge falls under Rico — the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organisations Act — which is best known for being used in organised crime and drug cartel cases. The jury has been deliberating since Monday. Earlier on Tuesday they asked to review critical testimony from one of the prosecution's most important witnesses: the hip-hop mogul's former longtime girlfriend Casandra 'Cassie' Ventura. Jurors requested the testimony about 75 minutes into their second day of weighing charges that Combs used his fame, wealth and violence to force two girlfriends into drug-fuelled sex marathons with male sex workers known as 'freak-offs' or 'hotel nights'. The panel of eight men and four women asked for Ms Ventura's account of Combs beating, kicking and dragging her at a Los Angeles hotel in 2016 — an assault captured on now-infamous security camera footage. They also asked to see Ms Ventura's testimony about an incident in which she said Combs accused her of taking drugs from him and kicked her off of their yacht at the Cannes Film Festival in France in 2013. On their way back to the US, she said, he threatened to release explicit videos of her having sex. The jury's testimony request came soon after Combs' lawyers and prosecutors began the day haggling with Judge Subramanian over a jury question left over from the end of the first day of deliberations on Monday. The jury asked to review critical testimony from prosecution witnesses Casandra 'Cassie' Ventura (Lionel Cironneau/AP) Jurors wanted clarification about what qualifies as drug distribution, an aspect of the racketeering conspiracy charge that will help determine whether Combs can be convicted or exonerated on the count. Judge Subramanian said he would remind jurors of the instructions he gave them on that part of the case before they started deliberating on Monday. Combs' lawyers had pushed for a more expansive response, but prosecutors argued — and Judge Subramanian agreed — that doing so could end up confusing jurors more. On Monday, the panel deliberated for more than five hours without reaching a verdict. Defence lawyers contend that prosecutors are trying to criminalise Combs' swinger lifestyle and that, if anything, his conduct amounted to domestic violence, not federal felonies. Combs, 55, could face 15 years in prison to life behind bars if he is convicted of all charges. After pleading not guilty, Combs chose not to testify as his lawyers built their arguments for acquittal mostly through lengthy cross-examinations of dozens of witnesses called by prosecutors, including some of Combs' former employees who took the witness stand reluctantly only after being granted immunity.
