
Scientists finally solve the mystery of sea turtles' ‘lost years'
A new study, published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B, offers some answers. Marine scientists, led by Kate Mansfield of the University of Central Florida, attached GPS tags to the shells of 114 young turtles in the Gulf of Mexico. The species tracked included endangered green turtles, loggerheads, hawksbills, and Kemp's ridleys.
The process of tagging the turtles involved searching for them amongst floating algae in small boats. While the tags eventually detached due to the rapid shell growth of the young turtles, they transmitted location data for several weeks to months.
'We've had massive data gaps about the early baby to toddler life stages of sea turtles,' Mansfield explained. 'This part of their long lives has been largely a mystery.' The data collected is challenging long-held assumptions about these early life stages. Co-author Katrina Phillips, a marine ecologist at the University of Central Florida, noted that the tags detached because 'the outside of a young turtle's shell sheds as they grow very quickly.'
Scientists long thought that tiny turtles drifted passively with ocean currents, literally going with the flow.
'What we've uncovered is that the turtles are actually swimming,' said co-author Nathan Putman, an ecologist at LGL Ecological Research Associates in Texas.
The scientists confirmed this by comparing location data of young turtles with the routes of drifting buoys set in the water at the same time. More than half of the buoys washed ashore while the turtles did not.
'This tiny little hatchling is actually making its own decisions about where it wants to go in the ocean and what it wants to avoid,' said Bryan Wallace, a wildlife ecologist at Ecolibrium in Colorado.
The tracking data also showed more variability in locations than scientists expected, as the little turtles moved between continental shelf waters and open ocean.
Besides the painstaking work of finding turtles, the trick was developing flexible solar-powered tags that could hang onto shells long enough to send back data.
'For years, the technology couldn't match the dream,' said Jeffrey Seminoff, a marine biologist at NOAA who was not involved in the study.
The findings give biologists a better idea of how young turtles use the Gulf of Mexico, a critical region for four species of endangered sea turtles.
'It's not that the sea turtles were ever lost, but that we had lost track of them,' said Jeanette Wyneken at Florida Atlantic University, who had no role in the research.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Times
20-07-2025
- Times
Here's how the world will end — a risk expert's guide
This is not a book for the anxious. It tells of the collapse of empires and the potential for the implosion of human society. In his marshalling of existential risks the author Luke Kemp deploys apocalyptic prose. 'It is deceptively easy to think about killer drones, AI and nuclear weapons as being separate, isolatable threats,' he writes before delivering the kicker: 'They are not.' Instead Kemp talks about a 'tree of doom' in which hierarchy, inequality and war are central. This weighty tome aims to emulate the impact of Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind by Yuval Noah Harari and similar doorstoppers. But that kind of book requires an author to possess exceptional gifts. I find myself wondering how anyone can hold forth authoritatively on such a broad range of topics such as palaeolithic lifestyles, inequality in ancient Rome and the spread of microplastics. The answer, I think, is that you are either a polymath like Felipe Fernández-Armesto, whose book Millennium: A History of the Last Thousand Years succeeded in telling a broad swathe of history, or, like Harari, you are such a great explainer of complex phenomena that people don't look too closely at the details. Kemp aspires to greater things than his predecessors: an even broader view of how humanity developed and how it soon might end. However, he concedes that the first section, about the emergence of hierarchical societies, contains a lot of educated guesswork. 'We don't know when exactly empires and states came to capture most of the human population … at best, states dominate less than 0.5 per cent of the human timeline.' In the middle section, about the rise and fall of empires such as imperial China, Kemp is on less shaky ground. There's some great detail here, for example: 'Ten to 25 per cent of men above the age of 17 were deployed for combat in the Roman republic. At its peak Rome had an army of about 400,000 to 500,000 men.' But sic transit gloria mundi — military prowess was not enough to preserve this or other civilisations. Kemp says: 'In every case prior to the collapse [of an empire] there is a slow growth in inequality, oligarchy, corruption and factionalism between elites over the surplus of lootable resources.' All of this sets the scene for the troubling present, our future dystopia and possible extinction, which forms the final section. Kemp works with the University of Cambridge's Centre for the Study of Existential Risk so this is his bread and butter. He allows for nuance — for different interpretations of the risks arising from climate change, biotech, nuclear weapons and AI — but at the heart of it he believes there is a chance of 'a single gargantuan crash' due to our 'hyperconnected, hyperhomogenous and hyperaccelerated systems'. • At this point you can almost imagine Kemp's editor urging him: 'For God's sake, give the reader something to live for!' And he tries. 'Most of the challenges we face are entirely solvable,' he writes. His suggested remedies include banning nuclear weapons, addressing climate change, creating more equal societies and limiting AI. In a section bravely titled Don't Be a Dick! he argues that we can all make a positive difference by eating less meat, turning down certain jobs and shunning particular types of politics. Yet a few chapters earlier Kemp argues that the idea 'we are all to blame … is a manufactured distraction. The reality is that a mere handful of giant corporations, countries and militaries are responsible for the great majority of catastrophic risk.' So are we individually empowered or not? Here's where Kemp's thesis begins to fray badly because not all of us live in societies where change can be brought about democratically. If you ask me which country is stripping the world's resources at an unprecedented rate, has the biggest state funding of AI, is most rapidly increasing its stock of nuclear weapons and is home to numerous laboratories containing lethal pathogens, the answer is the same: China. But modern China is hardly mentioned in this book. Instead Kemp's focus is almost exclusively on the US. I don't doubt there are reasons to watch Google or the Pentagon closely, but with some shareholder and democratic accountability, I fancy we have a better chance of finding out what's going on in these places than we do in some Chinese AI project or biolab. This lack of interest in the sources of risk outside the western world extends to countries like India and Brazil. A book covering this great swathe of time, societal models, scientific progress and risk requires an Olympian detachment, the ultimate long view. But instead what the reader ultimately gets are the comforting 'progressive' orthodoxies of the 21st-century western academic world.


South Wales Guardian
10-07-2025
- South Wales Guardian
UK and France agree ‘Entente Technologique' to help protect infrastructure
As part of the flurry of collaborations, researchers from both countries will work together on ground-based positioning, navigation and timing (PNT) technology, which will act as a back-up to satellite-based tech like the GPS. These navigation systems underpin critical infrastructure like the electricity grid, banking, and transport. The threat of sabotage to such networks has risen in recent years, as revealed by attacks on communications networks during the Ukraine war. Technology Secretary Peter Kyle made a joint visit to Imperial College London with French President Emmanuel Macron, ahead of the agreements being signed. Mr Kyle said: 'France and the UK both have huge ambitions for technology to boost economic growth and strengthen national security. 'It is vital we work with natural partners like our French neighbours in these endeavours, particularly as the threats from hostile state actors only grows. 'Today we build on the Entente Cordiale with an Entente Technologique, celebrating and renewing our long-standing and historic partnership so that together we can face down the challenges of tomorrow.' A partnership on supercomputing is also being agreed, led by the Bristol Centre For Supercomputing – home of the Isambard AI – and the French computing centre GENCI, which leads France's AI Factory. Other leading research institutions are also agreeing closer co-operation, including Oxford and Cambridge with some of their leading French counterparts.

South Wales Argus
10-07-2025
- South Wales Argus
UK and France agree ‘Entente Technologique' to help protect infrastructure
As part of the flurry of collaborations, researchers from both countries will work together on ground-based positioning, navigation and timing (PNT) technology, which will act as a back-up to satellite-based tech like the GPS. These navigation systems underpin critical infrastructure like the electricity grid, banking, and transport. The threat of sabotage to such networks has risen in recent years, as revealed by attacks on communications networks during the Ukraine war. Technology Secretary Peter Kyle made a joint visit to Imperial College London with French President Emmanuel Macron, ahead of the agreements being signed. Mr Kyle said: 'France and the UK both have huge ambitions for technology to boost economic growth and strengthen national security. 'It is vital we work with natural partners like our French neighbours in these endeavours, particularly as the threats from hostile state actors only grows. 'Today we build on the Entente Cordiale with an Entente Technologique, celebrating and renewing our long-standing and historic partnership so that together we can face down the challenges of tomorrow.' A partnership on supercomputing is also being agreed, led by the Bristol Centre For Supercomputing – home of the Isambard AI – and the French computing centre GENCI, which leads France's AI Factory. Other leading research institutions are also agreeing closer co-operation, including Oxford and Cambridge with some of their leading French counterparts.