
Here's how the world will end — a risk expert's guide
In his marshalling of existential risks the author Luke Kemp deploys apocalyptic prose. 'It is deceptively easy to think about killer drones, AI and nuclear weapons as being separate, isolatable threats,' he writes before delivering the kicker: 'They are not.' Instead Kemp talks about a 'tree of doom' in which hierarchy, inequality and war are central.
This weighty tome aims to emulate the impact of Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind by Yuval Noah Harari and similar doorstoppers. But that kind of book requires an author to possess exceptional gifts. I find myself wondering how anyone can hold forth authoritatively on such a broad range of topics such as palaeolithic lifestyles, inequality in ancient Rome and the spread of microplastics. The answer, I think, is that you are either a polymath like Felipe Fernández-Armesto, whose book Millennium: A History of the Last Thousand Years succeeded in telling a broad swathe of history, or, like Harari, you are such a great explainer of complex phenomena that people don't look too closely at the details.
Kemp aspires to greater things than his predecessors: an even broader view of how humanity developed and how it soon might end. However, he concedes that the first section, about the emergence of hierarchical societies, contains a lot of educated guesswork. 'We don't know when exactly empires and states came to capture most of the human population … at best, states dominate less than 0.5 per cent of the human timeline.'
In the middle section, about the rise and fall of empires such as imperial China, Kemp is on less shaky ground. There's some great detail here, for example: 'Ten to 25 per cent of men above the age of 17 were deployed for combat in the Roman republic. At its peak Rome had an army of about 400,000 to 500,000 men.' But sic transit gloria mundi — military prowess was not enough to preserve this or other civilisations. Kemp says: 'In every case prior to the collapse [of an empire] there is a slow growth in inequality, oligarchy, corruption and factionalism between elites over the surplus of lootable resources.'
All of this sets the scene for the troubling present, our future dystopia and possible extinction, which forms the final section. Kemp works with the University of Cambridge's Centre for the Study of Existential Risk so this is his bread and butter. He allows for nuance — for different interpretations of the risks arising from climate change, biotech, nuclear weapons and AI — but at the heart of it he believes there is a chance of 'a single gargantuan crash' due to our 'hyperconnected, hyperhomogenous and hyperaccelerated systems'.
•
At this point you can almost imagine Kemp's editor urging him: 'For God's sake, give the reader something to live for!' And he tries. 'Most of the challenges we face are entirely solvable,' he writes. His suggested remedies include banning nuclear weapons, addressing climate change, creating more equal societies and limiting AI.
In a section bravely titled Don't Be a Dick! he argues that we can all make a positive difference by eating less meat, turning down certain jobs and shunning particular types of politics. Yet a few chapters earlier Kemp argues that the idea 'we are all to blame … is a manufactured distraction. The reality is that a mere handful of giant corporations, countries and militaries are responsible for the great majority of catastrophic risk.' So are we individually empowered or not? Here's where Kemp's thesis begins to fray badly because not all of us live in societies where change can be brought about democratically.
If you ask me which country is stripping the world's resources at an unprecedented rate, has the biggest state funding of AI, is most rapidly increasing its stock of nuclear weapons and is home to numerous laboratories containing lethal pathogens, the answer is the same: China. But modern China is hardly mentioned in this book.
Instead Kemp's focus is almost exclusively on the US. I don't doubt there are reasons to watch Google or the Pentagon closely, but with some shareholder and democratic accountability, I fancy we have a better chance of finding out what's going on in these places than we do in some Chinese AI project or biolab. This lack of interest in the sources of risk outside the western world extends to countries like India and Brazil.
A book covering this great swathe of time, societal models, scientific progress and risk requires an Olympian detachment, the ultimate long view. But instead what the reader ultimately gets are the comforting 'progressive' orthodoxies of the 21st-century western academic world.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
9 hours ago
- Reuters
Health Rounds: RSV can boost seniors' heart risks
July 24 (Reuters) - (This is an excerpt of the Health Rounds newsletter, where we present latest medical studies on Tuesdays and Thursdays. To receive the full newsletter in your inbox for free sign up here.) Older adults hospitalized for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) face an elevated risk of developing heart failure and a dangerous heart rhythm problem, a Canadian study found. The risk for heart failure was seen even in individuals without a history of heart problems, researchers reported in the Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, opens new tab. The researchers reviewed data on more than 100,000 adults aged 65 and older hospitalized in Ontario between 2011 and 2020 for either RSV, influenza, urinary tract infection, or a fracture. The proportion of patients with a subsequent cardiovascular event was 18.5% after an RSV-related hospitalization, compared to 17.7%, 12.1% and 8.4% after hospitalizations for influenza, urinary tract infection, or fracture, respectively. In comparisons of patients who were closely matched according to demographics and risk factors, heart failure (10%–11%) was the most common outcome for RSV patients, occurring in 10% to 11%. Next most common was the heart rhythm disorder atrial fibrillation, occurring in 5% to 6% of RSV patients. The risk for those outcomes, as well as for heart attack, 'was at least two to three times higher in patients with a pre-existing cardiovascular condition compared to those without,' the researchers also said. 'Our findings reinforce the importance of RSV vaccination in older adults and suggest that monitoring for signs of heart disease following an RSV illness may be pragmatic,' study leader Chris Verschoor of Health Sciences North Research Institute in Sudbury, Ontario, said in a statement. Sending dye through the small intestine to look for blockages has been sparing a significant proportion of patients from needing to undergo surgery, a new study shows. The dye, Gastrografin from Bracco Diagnostics Inc., is administered to symptomatic patients before an X-ray or CT scan so that surgeons can see the location and severity of any so-called adhesive small bowel obstructions. Researchers reviewed nationwide data on more than 20,000 patients with suspected small bowel obstruction managed in two periods - 2012 to 2016, before Gastrografin was widely used for this purpose, and 2019 to 2023, when using Gastrografin to visualize intestinal blockages was a standard of care. They found nearly a 45% decrease in surgeries for small bowel obstruction in the Gastrografin era, from 13,257 to 7,333. Small bowel obstruction accounts for 15% of hospital admissions in the U.S., with about 20% of cases needing surgery to reconstruct the intestine, the researchers said. The resulting healthcare costs total over $3 billion each year. Despite better small bowel obstruction outcomes overall, post-surgery mortality increased from 4.4% to 5.9% after use of the dye became standard, and reoperations within 30 days rose from 4.7% to 6.2% - likely because surgeries were probably more complex in the later era, the researchers said. Gastrografin testing had weeded out patients with relatively mild obstructions who ultimately didn't need surgery, they added. 'Previously, patients who had a relatively mild adhesive small bowel obstruction would have been operated on, as we didn't have an alternative option,' study leader Dr. Robert McLoughlin from the University of Connecticut School of Medicine in Farmington said in a statement. 'This meant that in the post-Gastrografin era, the surgeries were more complex and challenging, hence the increased morbidity and mortality.' Still, because surgeons have gotten better at managing patients after surgery for small bowel obstructions, patients in the Gastrografin group averaged 6 days in the hospital, versus about 10 days for patients treated before the Gastrografin era, the researchers reported in the Journal of Surgical Research, opens new tab. The current study was not designed to prove that any of the outcomes were the result of Gastrografin use, the article pointed out. McLoughlin recalled that during a discussion with a younger colleague about managing small bowel obstructions, he mentioned that when he was in training, surgeons operated 'on a lot more' of these patients. That recollection prompted the current study, he said. (To receive the full newsletter in your inbox for free sign up here)


The Independent
2 days ago
- The Independent
Google unveils AI that deciphers missing Latin words in ancient Roman inscriptions
Google 's DeepMind has unveiled a new artificial intelligence tool capable of deciphering and contextualising ancient texts, including Roman-era Latin inscriptions. The new AI, named Aeneas, could be a transformative tool that can assist historians expand our understanding of the past, the tech giant said on Thursday. A study published in the journal Nature demonstrated that Aeneas could predict missing parts of Latin inscriptions from the ancient Roman period. Even though writing was common in the Roman world, texts recovered by historians from the time period are often fragmentary, weathered, or defaced. Restoring and dating these texts is nearly impossible without contextual information and hence historians attempt to identify 'parallels' – which are texts with similarities in wording, syntax, standardised formulas or provenance. Aeneas can accelerate this contextualisation process, predict missing text, even when the length is uncertain, researchers say. 'It reasons across thousands of Latin inscriptions, retrieving textual and contextual parallels in seconds that allow historians to interpret and build upon the model's findings,' DeepMind said in a statement. 'Aeneas sets a new state-of-the-art benchmark in restoring damaged texts and predicting when and where they were written,' the AI firm said, adding that the tool also been developed to include visual imagery in its considerations. In the new study, scientists and historians launched a collaborative study to assess inscriptions dating from the seventh century BC to the eighth century AD. Historians found that the context suggestions provided by Aeneas were useful in 90 per cent of cases and improved their confidence in key tasks by 44 per cent. When historians worked with the AI model, they could see better results in restoration and geographical attribution tasks than when Aeneas or the scholars worked alone. The study found that the AI could date events within a 13-year time frame. Researchers hope the AI model can also be adapted to other ancient languages to decipher scripts from papyri to coinage, expanding its capabilities, and help draw connections across a wider range of historical evidence. Aeneas works by taking an inscription's text and image as input. Scientists trained the AI model using a 'large and reliable dataset' that draws from decades of work by historians to create digital collections, including EDR – a searchable resource that provides texts, bibliographic information, and descriptive data for Latin and Greek inscriptions from ancient Italy. Researchers organised these collections into a more accessible dataset of over 176,000 Latin inscriptions from across the ancient Roman world. After processing the text image of an inscription, the AI model relies on some of its specialised internal networks to restore characters and date the text, while geographical attribution also uses images of the inscriptions as input. Aeneas then contextualises the text by retrieving a list of parallels, creating a 'kind of historical fingerprint' of what the text says, its language, when and where it came from, and how it relates to other inscriptions, researchers explained. Scientists found that the AI could restore damaged inscriptions with an accuracy of 73 per cent in gaps of up to ten characters. When Aeneas assessed one of the most famous Roman inscriptions: the Res Gestae Divi Augusti – Emperor Augustus' first-person account of his achievements – it predicted two possible dates, one at around 10-1 BC and a more confident prediction of between 10 to 20 AD, much in line with a long-standing debate among historians. 'These findings are supported by the results of an extensive historian–AI evaluation, in which historians confirmed that Aeneas can seamlessly integrate into research workflows and provide a transformative aid for historical inquiry,' researchers wrote.


The Guardian
2 days ago
- The Guardian
Google develops AI tool that fills missing words in Roman inscriptions
In addition to sanitation, medicine, education, wine, public order, irrigation, roads, a freshwater system and public health, the Romans also produced a lot of inscriptions. Making sense of the ancient texts can be a slog for scholars, but a new artificial intelligence tool from Google DeepMind aims to ease the process. Named Aeneas after the mythical Trojan hero, the program predicts where and when inscriptions were made and makes suggestions where words are missing. Historians who put the program through its paces said it transformed their work by helping them identify similar inscriptions to those they were studying, a crucial step for setting the texts in context, and proposing words to fill the inevitable gaps in worn and damaged artefacts. 'Aeneas helps historians interpret, attribute and restore fragmentary Latin texts,' said Dr Thea Sommerschield, a historian at the University of Nottingham who developed Aeneas with the tech firm. 'That's the grand challenge that we set out to tackle.' Inscriptions are among the most important records of life in the ancient world. The most elaborate can cover monument walls, but many more take the form of decrees from emperors, political graffiti, love poems, business records, epitaphs on tombs and writings on everyday life. Scholars estimate that about 1,500 new inscriptions are found every year. 'What makes them unique is that they are written by the ancient people themselves across all social classes,' said Sommerschield. 'It's not just history written by the victors.' But there is a problem. The texts are often broken into pieces or so ravaged by time that parts are illegible. And many inscribed objects have been scattered over the years, making their origins uncertain. The Google team led by Yannis Assael worked with historians to create an AI tool that would aid the research process. The program is trained on an enormous database of nearly 200,000 known inscriptions, amounting to 16m characters. Aeneas takes text, and in some cases images, from the inscription being studied and draws on its training to build a list of related inscriptions from 7BC to 8AD. Rather than merely searching for similar words, the AI identifies and links inscriptions through deeper historical connections. Having trained on the rich collection of inscriptions, the AI can assign study texts to one of 62 Roman provinces and estimate when it was written to within 13 years. It also provides potential words to fill in any gaps, though this has only been tested on known inscriptions where text is blocked out. In a test run, researchers set Aeneas loose on a vast inscription carved into monuments around the Roman empire. The self-congratulatory Res Gestae Divi Augusti describes the life achievements of the first Roman emperor, Augustus. Aeneas came up with two potential dates for the work, either the first decade BC or between 10 and 20AD. The hedging echoes the debate among scholars who argue over the same dates. In another test, Aeneas analysed inscriptions on a votive altar from Mogontiacum, now Mainz in Germany, and revealed through subtle linguistic similarities how it had been influenced by an older votive altar in the region. 'Those were jaw-dropping moments for us,' said Sommerschield. Details are published in Nature and Aeneas is available to researchers online. In a collaboration, 23 historians used Aeneas to analyse Latin inscriptions. The context provided by the tool was helpful in 90% of cases. 'It promises to be transformative,' said Mary Beard, a professor of classics at the University of Cambridge. Jonathan Prag, a co-author and professor of ancient history at the University of Oxford, said Aeneas could be run on the existing corpus of inscriptions to see if the interpretations could be improved. He added that Aeneas would enable a wider range of people to work on the texts. 'The only way you can do it without a tool like this is by building up an enormous personal knowledge or having access to an enormous library,' he said. 'But you do need to be able to use it critically.'