Fact check: Texas floods – cloud seeding theories dismissed – DW – 07/08/2025
Over 100 people have now been confirmed dead following flash floods in central Texas over the weekend, including 27 young campers and staff at a local girls' summer camp.
Unfortunately, despite meteorological professionals explaining in news outlets all over the world how and why such devastating flooding occurs, parts of social media have become breeding grounds for disinformation.
One popular conspiracy theory which has been given credence by current and former US political figures—including Republican Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene and former National Security Advisor General Mike Flynn—concerns "cloud seeding" — the practice of chemically inducing rainfall from clouds in areas affected by drought.
DW Fact Check takes a look.
Claim: Cloud seeding over parts of Texas two days before the floods caused or contributed to the disaster
DW Fact Check: False
As of Tuesday, over 2.6 million people had viewed a post on X by a well-known conspiracy theorist account which suggested a link between the deadly floods and cloud seeding operations conducted two days earlier by Rainmaker, a weather modification start-up funded partly by US software billionaire Peter Thiel.
In another post, viewed over 2.8 million times, the same account claimed that the state of Texas is "running seven massive cloud seeding programs" in an attempt to "enhance rainfall across millions of acres" and questioning: "Did they push the clouds too far and trigger this flood?"
Accompanying the post was a video originally published on TikTok on May 2 in which the user questioned whether "blue rain" at a camping site in Texas was linked to "chemtrails" or, in the video description, "cloud seading" (sic). The video had been viewed over 3.1 million times by Tuesday.
The claims gained traction among certain right-wing US politicians including Christian nationalist and conspiracy theorist Marjorie Taylor Greene who said in a post on X, viewed over 8.3 million times, that she would be introducing a bill to Congress to "end the dangerous and deadly practice of weather modification and geoengineering."
General Mike Flynn, former National Security Advisor to US President Donald Trump during his first term, further peddled the theory to his 2.1 million followers on X here and here.
Cloud seeding is a weather modification technique used to induce rainfall.
It involves dispersing insoluble salts such as silver iodide among existing clouds, either via aircraft, drone or shot up from the ground. Water vapor particles in the clouds are thereby "tricked" into forming larger droplets around the silver iodide particles, eventually becoming large and heavy enough to fall as rain.
"Cloud seeding itself cannot create rain out of nothing," adds Edward Gryspeerdt, a Research Fellow at the Department of Physics at Imperial College London (ICL), pointing out to DW: "Cloud seeding aims to identify clouds that are not currently raining, but are very close to doing so."
The first attempts at cloud seeding were made by US scientists at the General Electric Research Laboratory in the 1940s. Today, the method is used in various countries across the world to relieve drought, including in China and the Middle East.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Rainmaker, the company at the center of the Texas flooding claims, is contracted across the western United States by various municipalities and state governments to produce more water in regions impacted by drought, including in California, Arizona, Oklahoma, Colorado and Texas, its CEO Augustus Doricko confirmed on an X Space hosted by a conservative influencer on Monday, July 7.
The most recent operation in the vicinity of Kerr County, where the floods took place, was on July 2 – two days before the floods, hence the speculation that the cloud seeding activity could have exacerbated the heavy rainfall.
"The flooding, unequivocally, had nothing to do with Rainmaker's activities or any weather modification activities," insisted Doricko, 20 minutes into Monday's X Space – a claim backed up scientific consensus.
"Cloud seeding might be able to modify a cloud that already exists, but a large thunderstorm requires a huge amount of water and energy," explains ICL's Gryspeerdt. "Cloud seeding cannot provide either of these — it only creates small modifications to existing clouds."
Travis Herzog, award-winning chief meteorologist at broadcaster AB13 in Houston, Texas, concurs, stating in a Facebook post on July 6: "Cloud seeding cannot create a storm of this magnitude or size. In fact, cloud seeding cannot even create a single cloud. All it can do is take an existing cloud and enhance the rainfall by up to 20% — and even that is on the high end. It is physically impossible for [cloud seeding] to have created this weather system."
"Cloud seeding played ZERO role in [the] deadly Texas floods – rudimentary, basic physics explains that," agreed Matthew Cappucci, an atmospheric scientist and senior meteorologist at MyRadar, a leading Florida-based weather app.
"In dry environments, adding cloud condensation nuclei can help clouds drop subtly more rain," Cappucci added in one of several posts on the subject on X. "You don't spontaneously make 4 trillion gallons of water appear in Texas."
What's more, CEO Doricko claimed, given the almost two-day gap between Rainmaker's last operation over Kerr County, any rain-inducing silver iodide particles dispersed on July 2 would have long since dispersed into entirely inconsequential densities — a statement which is also backed up by scientific consensus.
"The horizontal winds at cloud level would have moved the air volume that was cloud seeded at least 1,000 kilometers away from the location of the cloud seeding between 2 and 4 July," explained Dr. Sandra Yuter, Distinguished Professor of Atmospheric Sciencesat North Carolina State University, speaking to DW.
Dr. Yuter's calculation was based on average horizontal wind dispersal speeds of approximately 10 m/s (36 km/h, 22.3 mph), after consulting nearby weather balloon data from July 3.
Given that the state of Texas is about 1,320 kilometers (820 miles) wide at its broadest point, Dr. Yuter concludes: "Any cloud seeding on July 2 in the vicinity of Kerr County would not have changed the rainfall from the storms that hit the region on July 4."
ICL's Edward Gryspeerdt concludes that "the floods in Texas were driven by record amounts of atmospheric moisture over a region that is known for flash floods" and warns that, as the atmosphere warms due to climate change, such extreme rainfall events are likely to become worse:
"Climate models predict that while Texas may become slightly drier on average due to climate change, the intensity of rainfall will likely increase, suggesting that these types of thunderstorms will become more common in the future."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Int'l Business Times
7 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Death Toll In Texas Floods Climbs To 108, With More Rain Expected
Hundreds of rescuers on Tuesday continued their search for people swept away by catastrophic Texas floods that killed more than 100 people, officials said, amid threats of more heavy rain. As of Tuesday morning, authorities in worst-hit Kerr County had recovered the bodies of 87 victims, Sheriff Larry Leitha told reporters. The deceased include at least 27 girls and counselors who were staying at a youth summer camp on the Guadalupe River over the Fourth of July holiday weekend. "At present, five Camp Mystic campers and one counselor still remain unaccounted for," Leitha added. At least 108 flood-related deaths were reported across central Texas, according to local officials. During a Cabinet meeting, President Donald Trump said he would travel to Texas with First Lady Melania Trump on Friday, and credited his strong ties with the state's Republican governor as having helped the rescue effort. "We brought in a lot of helicopters from all over... They were real pros, and they were responsible for pulling out a lot of people. And we got them there fast, and Texas had some good ones too, but the response has been incredible," Trump said. Trump, who previously said that disaster relief should be handled at the state level, earlier this week signed a major disaster declaration, activating fresh federal funds and freeing up resources. Ben Baker with the Texas Game Wardens said search and rescue efforts involving helicopters, drones and dogs were extremely difficult because of the water and mud. "When we're trying to make these recoveries, these large piles can be very obstructive, and to get in deep into these piles, it's very hazardous," Baker said. "It's extremely treacherous, time-consuming. It's dirty work, the water is still there." He added that special attention was being paid to the first responders' mental state, particularly given that the bodies of children were being recovered. In the town of Hunt, the epicenter of the disaster, an AFP team saw recovery workers combing through piles of debris with helicopters flying overhead, as hopes dimmed for finding any survivors. Javier Torres, 24, was digging through mud as he searched for the body of his grandmother, after having located the remains of his grandfather. He also discovered the bodies of two children, apparently washed up by the river. Officials warned that with more heavy rain forecast, recovery efforts would be rendered even more difficult. "We've had some reports of maybe some additional water coming in, obviously, that's going to impact the search and recovery efforts," said Baker. He said the weather may impact aerial patrol patterns, but "it won't deter them." Meanwhile, questions intensified over whether Trump's funding cuts had weakened warning systems, and over the handling of the rescue operation. During an at-times tense news conference, Baker skirted a question on the speed of the emergency response. "Right now, this team up here is focused on bringing people home," he said. Shel Winkley, a weather expert at the Climate Central research group, blamed the extent of the disaster on geography, the remnants of tropical storm Beryl, and exceptional drought, when dry soil absorbs less rainfall. "This part of Texas, at least in the Kerr County flood specifically, was in an extreme to exceptional drought. So that's the worst drought conditions that you can have, and we know that since May, temperatures have been above average," Winkley told reporters. The organization's media director, Tom Di Liberto, said staffing shortages at the National Weather Service had contributed to the disaster. "What happens, and this is shared not only in Texas but weather forecast offices across the country, is that the people with the most experience dealing with these extreme (events), but also communicating it, have left in a lot of places, so you can't necessarily replace that experience," Di Liberto said. A search and recovery team prepares a fan boat to launch on Guadalupe River in Ingram, Texas AFP Debris lays along the Guadalupe River after flash flooding in central Texas with more than 100 fatalities reported AFP
DW
10 hours ago
- DW
Fact check: Texas floods – cloud seeding theories dismissed – DW – 07/08/2025
Conspiracy theorists have blamed the devastating flash floods in Texas on cloud seeding, a technique used to chemically induce rainfall. Scientists have dismissed the theories as baseless. A DW Fact Check. Over 100 people have now been confirmed dead following flash floods in central Texas over the weekend, including 27 young campers and staff at a local girls' summer camp. Unfortunately, despite meteorological professionals explaining in news outlets all over the world how and why such devastating flooding occurs, parts of social media have become breeding grounds for disinformation. One popular conspiracy theory which has been given credence by current and former US political figures—including Republican Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene and former National Security Advisor General Mike Flynn—concerns "cloud seeding" — the practice of chemically inducing rainfall from clouds in areas affected by drought. DW Fact Check takes a look. Claim: Cloud seeding over parts of Texas two days before the floods caused or contributed to the disaster DW Fact Check: False As of Tuesday, over 2.6 million people had viewed a post on X by a well-known conspiracy theorist account which suggested a link between the deadly floods and cloud seeding operations conducted two days earlier by Rainmaker, a weather modification start-up funded partly by US software billionaire Peter Thiel. In another post, viewed over 2.8 million times, the same account claimed that the state of Texas is "running seven massive cloud seeding programs" in an attempt to "enhance rainfall across millions of acres" and questioning: "Did they push the clouds too far and trigger this flood?" Accompanying the post was a video originally published on TikTok on May 2 in which the user questioned whether "blue rain" at a camping site in Texas was linked to "chemtrails" or, in the video description, "cloud seading" (sic). The video had been viewed over 3.1 million times by Tuesday. The claims gained traction among certain right-wing US politicians including Christian nationalist and conspiracy theorist Marjorie Taylor Greene who said in a post on X, viewed over 8.3 million times, that she would be introducing a bill to Congress to "end the dangerous and deadly practice of weather modification and geoengineering." General Mike Flynn, former National Security Advisor to US President Donald Trump during his first term, further peddled the theory to his 2.1 million followers on X here and here. Cloud seeding is a weather modification technique used to induce rainfall. It involves dispersing insoluble salts such as silver iodide among existing clouds, either via aircraft, drone or shot up from the ground. Water vapor particles in the clouds are thereby "tricked" into forming larger droplets around the silver iodide particles, eventually becoming large and heavy enough to fall as rain. "Cloud seeding itself cannot create rain out of nothing," adds Edward Gryspeerdt, a Research Fellow at the Department of Physics at Imperial College London (ICL), pointing out to DW: "Cloud seeding aims to identify clouds that are not currently raining, but are very close to doing so." The first attempts at cloud seeding were made by US scientists at the General Electric Research Laboratory in the 1940s. Today, the method is used in various countries across the world to relieve drought, including in China and the Middle East. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Rainmaker, the company at the center of the Texas flooding claims, is contracted across the western United States by various municipalities and state governments to produce more water in regions impacted by drought, including in California, Arizona, Oklahoma, Colorado and Texas, its CEO Augustus Doricko confirmed on an X Space hosted by a conservative influencer on Monday, July 7. The most recent operation in the vicinity of Kerr County, where the floods took place, was on July 2 – two days before the floods, hence the speculation that the cloud seeding activity could have exacerbated the heavy rainfall. "The flooding, unequivocally, had nothing to do with Rainmaker's activities or any weather modification activities," insisted Doricko, 20 minutes into Monday's X Space – a claim backed up scientific consensus. "Cloud seeding might be able to modify a cloud that already exists, but a large thunderstorm requires a huge amount of water and energy," explains ICL's Gryspeerdt. "Cloud seeding cannot provide either of these — it only creates small modifications to existing clouds." Travis Herzog, award-winning chief meteorologist at broadcaster AB13 in Houston, Texas, concurs, stating in a Facebook post on July 6: "Cloud seeding cannot create a storm of this magnitude or size. In fact, cloud seeding cannot even create a single cloud. All it can do is take an existing cloud and enhance the rainfall by up to 20% — and even that is on the high end. It is physically impossible for [cloud seeding] to have created this weather system." "Cloud seeding played ZERO role in [the] deadly Texas floods – rudimentary, basic physics explains that," agreed Matthew Cappucci, an atmospheric scientist and senior meteorologist at MyRadar, a leading Florida-based weather app. "In dry environments, adding cloud condensation nuclei can help clouds drop subtly more rain," Cappucci added in one of several posts on the subject on X. "You don't spontaneously make 4 trillion gallons of water appear in Texas." What's more, CEO Doricko claimed, given the almost two-day gap between Rainmaker's last operation over Kerr County, any rain-inducing silver iodide particles dispersed on July 2 would have long since dispersed into entirely inconsequential densities — a statement which is also backed up by scientific consensus. "The horizontal winds at cloud level would have moved the air volume that was cloud seeded at least 1,000 kilometers away from the location of the cloud seeding between 2 and 4 July," explained Dr. Sandra Yuter, Distinguished Professor of Atmospheric Sciencesat North Carolina State University, speaking to DW. Dr. Yuter's calculation was based on average horizontal wind dispersal speeds of approximately 10 m/s (36 km/h, 22.3 mph), after consulting nearby weather balloon data from July 3. Given that the state of Texas is about 1,320 kilometers (820 miles) wide at its broadest point, Dr. Yuter concludes: "Any cloud seeding on July 2 in the vicinity of Kerr County would not have changed the rainfall from the storms that hit the region on July 4." ICL's Edward Gryspeerdt concludes that "the floods in Texas were driven by record amounts of atmospheric moisture over a region that is known for flash floods" and warns that, as the atmosphere warms due to climate change, such extreme rainfall events are likely to become worse: "Climate models predict that while Texas may become slightly drier on average due to climate change, the intensity of rainfall will likely increase, suggesting that these types of thunderstorms will become more common in the future."
DW
10 hours ago
- DW
Kenya: Tensions after more deadly protests – DW – 07/08/2025
Unrest on the anniversary of the 1990 Saba Saba pro-democracy uprising led to 11 deaths this week. As calm returned to most parts of the country, the situation remained tense in northeastern Embu County. Despite a relative calm after unrest in Nairobi and other parts of Kenya on Monday, businesses remained closed and roadblocks in place. In Embu, to the northeast of the capital, protesters gathered once more on Tuesday after a lawmaker was arrested, says DW's Andrew Wasike. "Angry residents have lit bonfires and barricaded roads with stones, paralysing traffic in parts of the town," Wasike says. The protesters are accusing government of political persecution and demanding the release of lawmaker Gitonga Mukunji. The authorities reportedly accused the lawmaker of inciting citizens to protest on the 35th anniversary of the pro-democracy Saba Saba uprising. Meanwhile, in the central city of Kiambu on Tuesday, the case of a girl killed by a stray bullet during the Saba Saba Day unrest was fueling public anger on Tuesday. "Protesters took to the streets by the hundreds to call for justice for the family of the 12-year-old," Wasike says. According to police, over 560 people were arrested in the Saba Saba Day unrest where protesters called on President William Ruto to resign. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Over the past year, Kenya has seen waves of deadly anti-government protests. On June 25, at least 19 people were killed and over 400 injured in clashes between protesters and police. Isabel Brenda, a senior elections and governance advisor at the Electoral Law and Governance Institute for Africa, is critical of the government's response. "The government's reaction is very unfortunate because the government, of course, has panicked and is resorting to authoritarianism and over-policing, which unfortunately has led to loss of lives, which I think is rather very unfortunate," Brenda told DW. Many of the protesters are youth, or so-called GenZs, who say they are frustrated by corruption, economic hardship and poor governance. Protesters this week reiterated their calls for an end to police brutality, and for equality and opportunities. "There's serious unemployment gaps and issues with young people. The cost of living is very high. So, these are some of the issues that are really pressing Kenyan citizens," says Brenda. Shops were torched and ransacked in the unrest. "Look, everything is burnt," one Nairobi shopkeeper told Reuters this week "So please, the government try to talk to the GenZs. Because all that is happening is because of the GenZs." Some business owners say the unrest is threatening their livelihoods. "Things are so tough in our country right now. Sometimes you come from morning until evening, and you've not sold. And these are things that we've invested in for so long. We are appealing for calm," a trader told Reuters. According to Brenda, the decentralized nature of the protests has contributed to the volatility. "The GenZs you know they are leaderless; they are party less, they are tribeless. They don't believe in going into ethnic cocoons," she told DW. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video In the runup to Saba Saba Day, Interior Minister Kipchumba Murkomen said the government was committed to protecting life and property. "Our security agencies are on high alert to deal decisively with criminals and other elements of ill intent who may seek to infiltrate peaceful processions to cause havoc, mayhem, or destruction of property," Murkomen said. Brenda warns that the government risks underestimating the scale of the public discontent. "I will echo what I think the country is feeling in terms of the government not listening to its people. It's tone deaf. These are young people who are saying that we are tired of bad governance, and we want changes," she said. "I mean, you cannot bury your head in the sand simply because you are unhappy with what young people are saying. I would rather you remove your head from the sand and listen to what is being said. Come to the table, find solutions." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
