New Chinese Warship Debuts in Contested Waters
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
The Chinese military received a boost in its island-landing capabilities as a new warship capable of projecting power from sea to shore was officially unveiled during a training exercise in the South China Sea, coinciding with the 98th anniversary of its founding.
Newsweek reached out to the Chinese Defense Ministry for further comment via email.
Why It Matters
China operates the world's largest navy by hull count, with over 370 ships and submarines, including amphibious vessels designed to carry helicopters and ground units for landing campaigns—assets well-suited for deployment in the South China Sea and the Taiwan Strait.
In the South China Sea, China's sweeping claims of sovereignty overlap with those of other regional countries, including the Philippines, a treaty ally of the United States. Meanwhile, Beijing has threatened to take Taiwan—a self-governed, democratic island—by force.
The debut of the new Chinese amphibious warship follows the U.S. Navy's deployment of a similar vessel, the USS Tripoli, from the West Coast to Japan in June, ensuring that some of the Pentagon's most capable ships are positioned to respond to any contingency near China.
What To Know
On August 1, the anniversary of the founding of the People's Liberation Army (PLA), the Chinese military announced that its fourth Type 075 amphibious assault ship, CNS Hubei, recently made its debut during a training exercise in the South China Sea.
The Hubei, named after the province in central China and bearing hull number 34, joins its three sister ships in service with the fast-growing East Asian power's naval force: CNS Hainan, CNS Guangxi, and CNS Anhui with hull numbers 31, 32, and 33, respectively.
According to China Central Television, the Hubei and the Hainan formed a naval task group alongside four other vessels for training exercises in the South China Sea in recent days.
The domestically built 40,000-ton Type 075 amphibious warship is capable of supporting simultaneous helicopter takeoffs and landings, while carrying air-cushioned landing craft, tanks, and armored vehicles in its loading compartment, according to the report.
Serving as a large amphibious combat platform, the Type 075 vessel possesses "strong combat capabilities" and "excellent air and sea control capabilities," the report said.
In addition to the four Type 075 amphibious assault ships, China launched its first advanced Type 076 amphibious assault ship, CNS Sichuan, last December. The ship is equipped with a catapult system, similar to that of an aircraft carrier, for launching fixed-wing aircraft.
The Chinese Type 075 amphibious assault ship CNS Hubei participates in a training exercise in the South China Sea on August 1, 2025
The Chinese Type 075 amphibious assault ship CNS Hubei participates in a training exercise in the South China Sea on August 1, 2025
Chinese military
What People Are Saying
The U.S. Defense Department, in a report on Chinese military power: "The [PLA Navy]'s expanding fleet of large modern amphibious warships enable it to conduct a wide range of expeditionary operations wherever [People's Republic of China] interests are threatened or in support of [People's Republic of China] participation in internationally sanctioned operations."
Chinese military affairs expert Song Zhongping told China's Global Times on Friday: "Having four Type 075 amphibious assault ships shows the increasing amphibious combat capabilities of the PLA Navy, which is determined by the demands on defending national sovereignty and territorial integrity, as well as safeguarding national security."
What Happens Next
It remains to be seen whether China will construct additional Type 075 amphibious assault ships or shift its focus to building the more advanced Type 076 amphibious assault ship.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Map Shows Countries With Highest US Visa Overstay Rates
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The State Department is proposing a pilot program that would require some visitors to post a bond of up to $15,000 before being granted a U.S. visa, targeting travelers from countries with high visa overstay rates. A map created by Newsweek shows what countries would be affected if the pilot program were implemented based on the most recent available overstay data. The map highlights nations like Angola, Liberia, Mauritania, Sierra Leone, Nigeria, Cabo Verde and Burkina Faso—all with visa overstay rates above 10 percent in 2023. Why It Matters According to a notice published Monday in the Federal Register, the 12-month program would apply to applicants for business and tourist visas from countries identified as having high rates of visa overstays, poor internal document security or citizenship-by-investment programs that require no residency. The bond would be returned if the traveler departs the U.S. on time, and forfeited if they stay past the allowed date. What To Know The new visa bond program would take effect August 20, according to documents reviewed by Newsweek and a notice previewed Monday on the Federal Register website. The Department of Homeland Security says the goal is to ensure the U.S. government doesn't incur costs when a visitor violates visa terms. "Aliens applying for visas as temporary visitors for business or pleasure and who are nationals of countries identified by the department as having high visa overstay rates ... may be subject to the pilot program," the notice said. According to U.S. Customs and Border Protection data, more than 500,000 people overstayed visas in 2023. By comparison, other countries have far more total overstays, but much lower rates. Colombia had the most total overstays in 2023 with 40,884, followed by Haiti (27,269), Venezuela (21,513), Brazil (20,811) and the Dominican Republic (20,259). Colombia also sent nearly 945,000 visitors to the U.S., resulting in a relatively low overstay rate. The administration of President Donald Trump first introduced a version of the visa bond rule in 2020, but it was never implemented due to the sharp decline in international travel during the COVID-19 pandemic. The revived proposal includes similar criteria and is part of a broader effort to tighten immigration enforcement. The list of countries subject to the bond requirement will be released at least 15 days before the program begins, according to the notice. The State Department said the program would help determine whether the long-standing assumption that visa bonds are too difficult to enforce holds up under modern conditions. What People Are Saying The public notice stated: "The Pilot Program will help the Department assess the continued reliance on the untested historical assumption that imposing visa bonds to achieve the foreign policy and national security goals of the United States remains too cumbersome to be practical." Andrew Kreighbaum, a journalist covering immigration, posted to X, formerly Twitter: "It's getting more expensive for many business and tourist travelers to enter the U.S. On top of new visa integrity fees, the State Department is imposing visa bonds as high as $15,000." What Happens Next Visa bonds are not new, but the State Department has rarely used them. A section of the Foreign Affairs Manual has described the process as impractical, a view the department now says was based on assumption rather than data.
Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
Dutch to Supply Ukraine With €500 Million in Arms From US Reserves
The Netherlands will contribute €500 million ($579 million) to Ukraine's defense as part of a US initiative, making it the first NATO country to donate funds through the new program. The funds will be given under the Prioritized Ukraine Requirements List, agreed by US President Donald Trump and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte in July. Under this program, NATO allies purchase military equipment from US reserves for Ukraine. The Netherlands is the first NATO ally to finance a full package, the country's defense ministry said in a statement Monday.
Boston Globe
2 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Trump's demand to trading partners: Pledge money or get higher tariffs
Advertisement The tactic was on display last week as Trump and his team rolled out a blitz of new trade agreements before a self-imposed Aug. 1 deadline. 'South Korea is right now at a 25% Tariff, but they have an offer to buy down those Tariffs,' Trump wrote on social media Wednesday. 'I will be interested in hearing what that offer is.' The next day, Trump agreed to impose a tariff of 15 percent on imports from South Korea. The lower rate came after South Korea agreed to make $350 billion in investments in the United States and purchase $100 billion of liquefied natural gas. South Korea is not the only country to make such pledges. Japan said it would establish a $550 billion fund for investments in the United States. The European Union indicated that its companies were poised to invest at least $600 billion. Advertisement To trade experts, the commitments raise the question of whether Trump is negotiating with trading partners or trade hostages. 'This is no doubt a global shakedown of sorts,' said Scott Lincicome, vice president of general economics at the right-leaning Cato Institute. 'The fact is that Trump is using US tariff policy to effectively force these terms upon less-than-willing participants.' But the vague nature of these informal commitments suggests that other nations might also be looking for creative ways to escape Trump's tariffs. Although tariffs are relatively straightforward to enforce, investment and purchase commitments are not as easily policed. The EU, for instance, does not have the authority to dictate the type of investments that it has promised, and much of Japan's pledged investments are coming in the form of loans. The investment announcements have also spurred confusion and lacked the usual detail that would accompany such pacts to avoid future disputes. A large majority of the $350 billion South Korean investment would take the form of loans and loan guarantees. South Korean officials expressed confusion over what US officials meant when they said 90 percent of the profits from the investments would go to the American people. A fact sheet announcing the EU's plans allowed for some wiggle room when it said that 'E.U. companies have expressed interest in investing at least $600 billion' in 'various sectors in the U.S.' 'I think there remain a lot of questions, including by the countries who have announced commitments, as to what those commitments actually really mean,' said Michael Froman, president of the Council on Foreign Relations, who served as the top trade negotiator in the Obama administration. 'Is it enforceable? If they don't deliver a certain amount of investment over a particular period of time, do tariffs go back into place?' Advertisement During Trump's first term, the trade deal he struck with China included extensive commitments for Chinese purchases of American farm products that were never met. The agreement did have an enforcement mechanism, but it proved toothless. Some of the initial investment pledges appear to be too big to be true. New data from the Bureau of Economic Analysis showed that in 2024, foreign spending to acquire, start or expand US businesses totaled $151 billion — a small fraction of the new commitments being announced. The $600 billion EU investment commitment matches the total value of the goods that the United States imported from Europe last year. Although the United States has long been a magnet for foreign investment, the longer-term effects of making countries invest under duress are not clear. 'This is the kind of deal you'd more expect to see from an emerging market that can't attract capital on its merits,' said Aaron Bartnick, who worked in the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy during the Biden administration. 'And we may find over time that if the United States insists on acting like an emerging market, our trade partners may start treating us accordingly, with more onerous terms and less favorable rates that American companies and consumers are not accustomed to dealing with.' Regardless of the economic implications, Trump's tactics show no signs of abating, as he regularly claims more than $10 trillion — and climbing — in investments from foreign companies and countries. Advertisement Daniel Ames, a professor at Columbia Business School who teaches negotiation strategy, said that Trump's approach to trade deals appears to be drawn directly from his days as a developer and businessperson. Trump became notorious for destabilizing his negotiating counterparts with severely low bids, dazzling sales pitches and an ability to capitalize on weakness to gain leverage. Ames noted, however, that the EU and countries like Japan and South Korea might also be playing into Trump's sense of vanity when they unveil whopping investment promises that might ultimately be hollow. 'Donald Trump is a gifted storyteller, and I think when his counterparts recognize this, they can play to it,' Ames said. 'If you're negotiating with a narcissist, you look for ways to make them feel like they've won.' This article originally appeared in .
