Report Confirms Facial Recognition Can Be Used Responsibly To Reduce Retail Crime
Privacy Commissioner Michael Webster has released his review of the FRT trial conducted by Foodstuffs North Island. His report finds that the trial was compliant with the Privacy Act and the technology can be used with appropriate guardrails to protect individuals' privacy.
Facial recognition technology is a powerful tool with the potential to help keep retail staff safe at work and to reduce crime, Retail NZ Chief Executive Carolyn Young says.
'We applaud the huge amount of time and effort that Foodstuffs North Island has put into this trial, to achieve strong outcomes that lead the way for the wider retail sector,' Ms Young says.
'We also acknowledge the work of the Office of the Privacy Commissioner and their public inquiry that ran alongside the FRT trial.'
The results of Foodstuffs North Island's FRT trial clearly showed that the technology had made a measurable impact in reducing harm and improving safety in stores.
'Retailers are crying out for proactive solutions that prevent crime and enhance the safety of their staff and customers. Our members continue to face high rates of violence and crime, putting both their employees and the public at risk, as well as threatening the financial sustainability of retail businesses.
'We know that retailers across Aotearoa New Zealand have been watching the trial with great interest and a number are investigating FRT for their own operations in the near future.'
FRT is not going to be the solution for all businesses or all crime. Retailers may decide that it is not suitable for particular stores or locations, but it is a tool that retailers want to have available to consider alongside other crime prevention tools such as security guards, fog cannons, staff training, body cameras and other technology solutions, Ms Young says.
Retail crime is a significant issue in New Zealand, impacting more than 99% of retailers and costing well over $2.6 billion a year.
Retail NZ has formed a working group comprising a number of large retailers which is developing agreed approaches to crime prevention measures, including FRT.
'We will be taking time to review the details of the Privacy Commissioner's report to understand how we can best support Retail NZ members with guidelines on how to use FRT responsibly,' Ms Young says.
Ms Young is a member of the Ministerial Advisory Group on retail crime which is also developing solutions to tackle retail crime.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
1News
2 days ago
- 1News
Send in the drones: Resident calls for aerial crackdown on dirt bikers
Warfare, shark-spotting, real estate photography. The drone has become a multi-use agent of the sky, and a Rotorua resident wants them used to fight illegal dirt bike activity plaguing the city. However, local authorities warn the seemingly simple solution is anything but. Rotorua Lakes Council and local police have faced increasing difficulty keeping the city's reserves, play areas and sports fields safe from vandalism – particularly from dirt bikes. Earlier this month, police promised a crackdown on the issue. ADVERTISEMENT Resident Ryan Gray believed drones could be the answer. He deals with the problem daily with "loud and obnoxious" riders hooning down a nearby cycleway. "These riders dive onto footpaths and cycleways where cars can't go, and if they're chased, they'll just ride more dangerously," said Gray. "That's where drones come in. You've got CCTV, you've got the tech so why not use it? "The camera sees them, drone goes up, follows them home, you then knock on their door, and you've got them on video." Rotorua resident Ryan Gray wants more done about illegal dirt bike activity plaguing public areas. (Source: Local Democracy Reporting) A video of the issue he posted online recently sparked comments of vigilante action and concerns for innocent bystanders and the riders. "It's not even about catching everyone, it's about deterrence. If people know they'll be caught, they'll think twice. ADVERTISEMENT "Right now, it feels like no one's doing anything, and the community's getting desperate. We shouldn't have to wait for a kid to get killed before police take this seriously." Authorities in the United States, United Kingdom and Australia have trialled similar systems. Their efficacy remains up for debate although, in California, footage of drones chasing and locating nuisance riders has been a hit on social media. In Western Australia, drones have been in use since 2018. They have more than 80 police pilots using them for search and rescue, surveillance, and public safety. This has included crackdowns on problem vehicles. "Western Australia is the single largest policing jurisdiction in the world," said Western Australia Police Sergeant Nathan Gilmour. "The inclusion of drone technology enhances police search capabilities across large distances and over rugged terrain that would unable to be accessed by vehicles or personnel." "Police are guided by Civil Aviation rules and legislation such as the Search and Surveillance Act and the Privacy Act when deploying drones over residential areas," he said. "We also know that these riders often travel considerable distances across town and the drone is also subject to flight time capability and distance from the control point." ADVERTISEMENT Drone use has been banned at Kuirau Park, Rotorua Lakefront Reserve, Village Green, Motutara (Sulphur) Point and Hannah's Bay Reserve. These sites are near an airport, helipad or aerodrome. Generally, operators must fly only in daylight, below 120m, keep drones in sight, and avoid people or private property. Flying near airports or in controlled airspace requires approval. Rotorua Police area prevention manager Inspector Phil Gillbanks. (Source: Local Democracy Reporting) Rotorua Police area prevention manager Inspector Phil Gillbanks said drones may seem like an "easy solution", but there were complicating factors. He believed collating information, public help and a cultural shift in some communities was needed to tackle the dirt bike issue. "We still require the public to step up and come forward with the street addresses that these dirt bike riders are coming and going from regularly," he said. "This anti-social behaviour is a societal problem, not just a police problem. It requires a mindset shift that the community can have an impact on achieving." ADVERTISEMENT Rotorua Lakes Council was also asking the community for help, with its hands tied by the nature of preventive barriers. "We must balance restricting motorcycle/vehicle access with ensuring that reserves and shared paths are accessible for legitimate users like walkers, people on push bikes, people with prams and people using mobility devices," said a council spokesperson. Drones were not seen as the solution. "The council doesn't have the resources to purchase or operate multiple drones to deter dirt bikers. "For anyone using drones, permission is required from owners of land a drone is being flown over, so they aren't necessarily practical for surveillance purposes." By Mathew Nash, Local Democracy Reporter Local Democracy Reporting is local-body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
NZ Herald
3 days ago
- NZ Herald
Qantas cyber attack: Kiwis cannot join Aussie legal complaint but can complain in NZ, expert says
Shaw added: 'In New Zealand if people were impacted by the breach by Qantas they would make a complaint to the Office of the Privacy Commissioner.' He said the office would consider the complaint and ask: 'Is this an actionable privacy breach in New Zealand?' Shaw said a privacy breach in this context meant a person had access to or misused personal information without consent. 'Then the question from there is, if it's a privacy breach, what has somebody suffered effectively?' The Office of the Privacy Commissioner would try to resolve that issue and ask if mediation was possible. 'Ultimately the Human Rights Review Tribunal considers it.' The New Zealand process for data breaches has generated some criticism. Consumer NZ chief executive Jon Duffy earlier this month said Qantas would face much stiffer penalties under Australian privacy regulations than it would if it were a New Zealand company. However, Shaw said the system in New Zealand could punish people or entities for data breaches. 'The system in New Zealand is good. The Privacy Commissioner and the act have real teeth. The criticism I would have is the delay, the delay in having the matter heard by the Human Rights Review Tribunal.' He said the tribunal could award substantial damages. Shaw said Lane Neave was not suing Qantas but New Zealand had some litigation funders and some no-win no-fee practitioners who might consider the case. The Office of the Privacy Commissioner has been approached for comment. Qantas said it was aware Maurice Blackburn in Australia had lodged a complaint on behalf of some affected customers in relation to the cyber incident. 'Our focus continues to be on supporting our customers and providing ongoing access to specialist identity protection advice and resources,' a Qantas spokesman said. 'In an effort to further protect our customers, Qantas has obtained an injunction in the New South Wales Supreme Court which prevents the stolen data from being accessed, viewed, released, used, transmitted or published by anyone, including by any third parties.' Maurice Blackburn said the complaint was made to the Australian privacy commissioner, who did not have jurisdiction over New Zealanders' personal information. Some 1.3 million residential or business addresses were among the affected Qantas data, including hotels for misplaced baggage delivery. Four million customer records stolen in the attack contained names, email addresses and Qantas Frequent Flyer numbers. John Weekes is a business journalist mostly covering aviation and courts. He has reported on Catholic Church abuse and the Abuse in Care Royal Commission of Inquiry since 2019 and on Dilworth survivors since 2021.
NZ Herald
5 days ago
- NZ Herald
Agribusiness and Trade: Serko taps Bengaluru talent after acquisition
'We were looking for a new development hub and wanted to expand our global footprint. When we had the opportunity for the GetThere acquisition, India became our top choice. 'There's a good saturation of the knowledge we need for our business. In particular, we found people with corporate travel knowledge. That comes from Sabre's strong presence there. There are lots of folk working in the same domain as us there so getting people with travel knowledge is easier than in New Zealand. 'We didn't just get engineers, we got people who already understood corporate travel,' Young says. His colleague, Serko chief marketing officer Nick Whitehead says many of the company's leadership team had prior experience working with Indian teams, including himself at Expedia. Young says there is a cultural connection, in part due to the Indian expats working in tech roles in New Zealand. And then there is cricket. 'If you mention cricket, you've got instant rapport,' says Young. 'There's a natural affinity between India and New Zealand.' The company has supported this by encouraging two-way travel — sending New Zealand staff to India and bringing Indian leaders to New Zealand. Whitehead says Bengaluru is a competitive and vibrant tech hub. 'There's fierce competition for talent. We've hired senior leaders from Uber and others, who then attract great talent.' Serko chief marketing officer Nick Whitehead To win in a tight market, Serko had to invest in local branding and recruit top-down. Young says the team is 'phenomenally talented', and the perception of India as a source of only junior, low-cost labour is outdated. That may have been the case 20 years or so ago, not today. Running the Bengaluru hub has allowed Serko to tap into India's expertise in running global operations. Whitehead says: 'They think in terms of global command centres,' noting that India's fast-developing infrastructure and deep technical base provide a strong foundation for scaling. And that is factored into Serko's plans. 'We've got big ambitions to grow substantially, and the experience we've had to date in Bengaluru shows that we can get really good quality talent there. We need good leaders,' says Whitehead. Attracting talent in India means building the company's brand. 'We found everyone there reads the Hindustan Times in the morning, so we advertised in that newspaper. That's not something you'd think of doing here if you want to reach technology candidates. We've also been doing PR in general to become a more visible brand.' For now, India is not a core customer market for Serko, though that is likely to change over time. Whitehead says: 'It's the eighth-largest business travel market in the world, but its structure differs from Western markets — especially in areas like payments and procurement, which remain manual in many cases.' Serko faced some regulatory hurdles. Establishing a local presence required navigating paperwork, bank set-up, and director appointments. Young says this all took a long time, but there was nothing insurmountable. Serko had set up a company in India years ago and was paying a local director because that was easier than shutting down and starting again. It's less than a year since Serko acquired GetThere and the experience has been positive. Young says: 'It's been a great way to expand our global footprint. We've learned a lot, the quality of people has been outstanding, and it's laid a strong foundation for the future.'
