Trump administration set to incinerate contraceptives worth $10M destined for sub-saharan Africa
The destruction is linked to Trump's reinstatement of the 'Mexico City Policy' (also called the 'global gag rule'), which prohibits providing aid to organisations that perform or promote abortions.
Multiple organisations offered to take the contraceptives at no cost to the US government - including MSI Reproductive Choices and the International Planned Parenthood Federation - but these offers were repeatedly rejected.
The US administration's decision to destroy nearly $10 million worth of women's contraception products has sparked furious condemnation from doctors and aid groups, who have slammed the move as a wasteful attack on women's rights.
The contraceptives are being stored in Belgium and are reportedly planned to be incinerated in France. Both European countries are under pressure to prevent the destruction.
What has the US announced?
On 18 July, British newspaper the Guardian cited two US Congress sources as saying that President Donald Trump's administration planned to destroy $9.7 million worth of contraceptives, which are mostly long-acting such as IUDs and birth control implants.
The contraceptives - intended for some of the world's poorest countries, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa - are stored in a warehouse in the Belgian city of Geel.
They are to be incinerated at the end of July, according to the Guardian report.
A US State Department spokesperson told AFP this week that "a preliminary decision was made to destroy certain" birth control products from "terminated Biden-era USAID contracts".
Trump's administration dismantled USAID, the country's foreign aid arm, after returning to the White House in January, replacing former president Joe Biden.
The State Department spokesperson said the destruction will cost $167,000 and "no HIV medications or condoms are being destroyed."
Why?
The spokesperson pointed AFP to a policy that prohibits providing aid to non-governmental organisations that perform or promote abortions.
The Mexico City Policy, which critics call the "global gag rule", was first introduced by President Ronald Reagan in 1984, and has been reinstated under every Republican president since.
The Trump administration has also slashed foreign aid, with the Senate this month approving a package that cut around $8 billion in international funding, much of it intended for USAID.
Research has estimated that the USAID cuts will lead to the deaths of 14 million people by 2030.
Earlier this month, the US also incinerated nearly 500 metric tons of high-nutrition biscuits which were meant to keep malnourished children in Afghanistan and Pakistan alive.
Trump has also repeatedly moved to restrict abortion access in the United States, taking credit for the Supreme Court overturning the nationwide right to abortion in 2022.
The US State Department also suggested to the Guardian that the contraceptives were nearing the end of their shelf life.
However media reports have since said that the products expire between April 2027 and September 2031.
What are the alternatives?
Belgium's foreign ministry told AFP that it has "initiated diplomatic efforts with the United States embassy in Brussels" about the contraceptives.
The government "is exploring all possible avenues to prevent the destruction of these products, including temporary relocation solutions," it added.
The international organisation MSI Reproductive Choices said it had offered to "purchase, repackage, and manage logistics at our expense, ensuring the products reach those in need".
However, this offer was repeatedly rejected, it said in a statement.
The International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF) made a similar offer at "no cost to the US government" that was also turned down.
What are people saying?
New Hampshire's Democratic Senator Jeanne Shaheen pointed to the Trump administration's stated goal of reducing government waste, saying the contraceptives plan "is the epitome of waste, fraud and abuse".
Shaheen and Democratic Senator Brian Schatz have introduced a bill aiming to prevent further US aid being wasted.
The IPPF said the contraceptives plan is "an intentional act of reproductive coercion".
Doctors Without Borders called it a "callous waste".
MSI advocacy director Sarah Shaw said it was "an ideological assault on reproductive rights, and one that is already harming women".
The head of the French Family Planning group, Sarah Durocher, observed that last year France became the first country to enshrine the right to abortion in its Constitution.
"France has a moral responsibility to act," she said.
French Green leader Marine Tondelier signed an open letter calling on President Emmanuel Macron to stop the contraceptives from being destroyed.
"Our country cannot be complicit, even indirectly, in retrograde policies," the letter read.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump says Epstein ‘stole' underage victim Virginia Giuffre from his Mar-a-Lago spa leading to feud
President Donald Trump on Tuesday said he ended his friendship with notorious pedophile Jeffrey Epstein because the disgraced financier 'stole' an underaged girl by hiring her away from a job at his Mar-a-Lago club. Speaking aboard Air Force One while returning from his five-day golf holiday in Scotland, Trump was asked about comments he'd made over the weekend suggesting that he'd banned the disgraced financier from his Palm Beach club for hiring away employees. He confirmed that Epstein 'took people that work from me' and did so again despite being admonished not to poach Mar-a-Lago workers by Trump. 'He took people that work for me, and I told him, don't do it anymore. And he did it. I said, Stay the hell out of here,' he said. Pressed further on whether the workers poached by Epstein included Virginia Giuffre, a Mar-a-Lago pool attendant who was recruited and groomed by Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell and raped by Epstein on numerous occasions after being ostensibly hired as a 'masseuse,' Trump confirmed that the employees who factored in the dispute leading to the end of his friendship with Epstein included young women. 'I told him, I said, Listen, we don't want you taking our people, whether it was spa or not spa. I don't want him taking people. And he was fine. And then not too long after that, he did it again. And I said, out of here,' he said, describing Epstein as having 'stolen' his spa workers. Asked point-blank if one of them was Giuffre, who died by suicide earlier this year, he replied: 'I think she worked at the spa. I think so. I think that was one of the people.' 'Yeah, he stole her,' he said. Trump added that Giuffre, who also accused other powerful men of raping her during the time she was associated with Epstein, 'had no complaints' about him. The president's new claim about the reasons why he ended a years-long friendship with Epstein contradicts previous statements made by him over the years with respect to why he cut off contact with the notorious sex offender, who was arrested in March 2019 on federal sex trafficking charges and died by suicide in a Manhattan jail cell while awaiting trial. He previously said he cut off contact with Epstein because he was a 'creep,' citing a 2009 conviction for soliciting underage prostitutes. Trump and people close to him have routinely cited the end of his friendship with Epstein when attempting to distance the president from the disgraced sex trafficker. The last few weeks of Trump's presidency have been consumed by scandal over his administration's handling of longstanding calls from his supporters to release files associated with the cases of Epstein and Maxwell, who is currently serving a two-decade sentence for sex trafficking charges in a Florida prison. Asked about the matter on Monday during a bilateral meeting with Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, Trump went on an extended rant during which he accused Democrats of having fabricated the whole issue for political gain. He called the bipartisan clamor for the documents 'a hoax that's been built up way beyond proportion' and accused his predecessor of having tampered with the infamous case files. 'Those files were run by the worst scum on Earth. They were run by Comey, they were run by Garland, they were run by Biden, and all of the people that actually ran the government, including the auto pen. Those files were run for four years by those people. If they had anything, I assume they would have released it,' he said. He also said that he turned down an invitation to Jeffrey Epstein's notorious island, characterizing the decision as "one of my very good moments." 'I never had the privilege of going to his island, and I did turn it down, but a lot of people in Palm Beach were invited to his island,' he said. ' I turned it down. I didn't want to go to his island." Solve the daily Crossword
New York Post
21 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump confirms Epstein ‘stole' women from Mar-a-Lago spa: ‘Taking people that work for me is bad'
WASHINGTON — President Trump detailed his falling out with late pedophile Jeffrey Epstein for the first time Tuesday, telling reporters the convicted sex offender used Trump's Mar-a-Lago club spa as a hunting ground for young women. 'Everyone knows the people that were taken, and it was the concept of taking people that work for me is bad,' Trump, now 79, said as he flew back to Washington after spending five days in Scotland. 'But that story has been pretty well out there, and the answer is yes, they were.' 3 Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump at Mar-a-Lago in 1997. Getty Images Advertisement The US president said Monday that he booted Epstein — who died in his Manhattan jail cell on Aug. 10, 2019, while awaiting federal trial on sex trafficking charges — from Mar-a-Lago because the financier 'stole people that worked for me.' 'I have a great spa, one of the best spas in the world, at Mar-a-Lago. And people were taken out of the spa, hired by him,' Trump recounted. 'When I heard about it, I told him, I said, 'Listen, we don't want you taking our people,' whether it was spa or not spa, I don't want him taking people. And he was fine. And then not too long after that, he did it again. And I said, 'Out of here.'' 3 Deborah Blohm, Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Gwendolyn Beck at a party at Mar-a-Lago in 1995. Getty Images 3 President Trump boards Air Force One in Scotland on July 29. AFP via Getty Images Advertisement Among the victims Epstein and his accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell met at Mar-a-Lago was Virginia Giuffre, who made global headlines when she claimed she had sex with the UK's Prince Andrew at the age of 17. 'I think she worked at the spa. I think so. I think that was one of the people. Yeah, he stole her,' Trump said of Giuffre, who took her own life this past April. 'And by the way, she had no complaints about us, as you know. None whatsoever. Giuffre, who went public with her accusations against Epstein in 2011, had worked as a spa attendant at Mar-a-Lago, where her father was a maintenance manager. At some point in 2000, Giuffre, then 16, met Maxwell, who offered her a job working for Epstein as a traveling masseuse.
Gizmodo
21 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
The U.S. May Change Strategy in Its Battle With China for AI Dominance
This weekend, Shanghai was host to China's annual 'World Artificial Intelligence Conference,' a government-organized AI showcase packed with tech giants from both China and the U.S. including Huawei, Tesla, and Amazon. The theme was 'Global Solidarity in the AI Era,' and Chinese Premier Li Qiang opened the conference with a sweeping proposal: the establishment of a global AI cooperation organization, potentially headquartered in Shanghai. The Chinese foreign ministry has since released an action plan calling for international collaboration in AI through open-source communities and joint research. While China's AI messaging is starting to sound like 'AI for all,' the United States is still split on its own battle tactic. The Trump administration has welded an isolationist trade approach globally, and particularly with China when it comes to AI and technology. But with recent policy changes, that hardline has seemed to soften as Washington is split between two camps on how to approach the battle for AI dominance with China: that is, whether to continue with a heavily protectionist approach or join China's calls for solidarity. Beijing's invitation to rally behind a Chinese vision of AI cooperation landed in the middle of a tense year in AI geopolitics. The United States has been the global leader in AI development, but domestic confidence in America's competitive edge was shaken earlier this year. Following the meteoric success of Chinese AI company Deepseek's low-cost yet high-performance model, the Trump administration took a hard line on advanced technology exports to China. The administration attempted to slam the brakes on Beijing's hardware access by further tightening existing export controls on advanced Nvidia chips to China, in an effort to curb the country's rapid innovation, starve its AI ecosystem, and preserve U.S. dominance. But the ban hasn't gone exactly to plan. A Financial Times report from last week revealed that roughly $1 billion worth of Nvidia's banned advanced B200 chips had been smuggled into China in the three months since the export controls went into effect. The administration changed course on the ban and quietly retreated from its hard-line stance earlier this month, when Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang announced that the company would resume selling its older H20 chips legally to China. Notably, the FT found that Chinese black market demand for the smuggled B200s faced a noticeable drop after the relaxation of the H20 ban, suggesting that Chinese companies would rather take legal access to older chips over the highest technology illegally (companies who buy smuggled chips can't take advantage of important Nvidia customer support when installing them in their own data centers). The implications of this finding could throw the logic of blanket export bans into question. China isn't proposing global solidarity in AI development out of the goodness of its heart. Open cooperation and joint research not only helps the development of AI technology in China, but it is also a soft power play by China. By centering this cooperation in Shanghai and under Chinese terms and values, Beijing is trying to cement its position in the global AI trade, potentially achieving global AI dominance over the U.S. But Trump has made it clear that he wants America to win that battle. 'America is the country that started the AI race, and as President of the United States, I'm here to declare that America is going to win it,' Trump said while announcing the measures last week. The U.S. government's fears are twofold when it comes to AI and China: losing economic edge and jeopardizing national security. Currently, the Chinese AI industry is dependent on American chipmakers like Nvidia. Skeptics of blanket export bans say that if China has no access to advanced American AI technology, it will have no choice but to develop its own. And if China builds a true rival to Nvidia and gains self-sufficiency in AI hardware, the U.S. may lose its grip on the global AI market. At the center of these concerns is Chinese tech giant Huawei, which is already developing AI computing systems that rival Nvidia's most advanced products. Advocates of this approach in Washington hope to have more control over the scale of innovation in China by flooding the market with American products. And especially by controlling what chips go into the country, the U.S. could help curb the proliferation of more advanced chip technology in China. The Trump administration's recent move to ease restrictions on older Nvidia chip models could be following this logic, and might be bearing its fruits already, at least according to the Financial Times' findings. It's two steps forward and one step back. Although the U.S. has seemed to relax the rules on chip exports into China, the Trump administration is eager to continue the government's hard line based on the President's AI Action Plan that was unveiled last week. 'Advanced AI compute is essential to the AI era, enabling both economic dynamism and novel military capabilities,' the administration wrote in the action plan. 'Denying our foreign adversaries access to this resource, then, is a matter of both geostrategic competition and national security. Therefore, we should pursue creative approaches to export control enforcement.' Proponents of stricter export controls have sizable national security concerns when it comes to China's AI development. Chinese AI companies proved that you don't need the latest hardware to make AI that outperforms benchmarks, with the release of both Deepseek and Alibaba-backed Kimi K2 this year. Even though newer chips are kept out of China while the older ones dominate chip sales, that does not necessarily mean that state-of-the-art AI models that rival or even exceed American ones can't be developed. Going even beyond just market competition, these models could pose security risks when deployed for use in the Chinese military. While China and the U.S. are not in direct military conflict, tensions are high between the two superpowers, particularly over China's territorial claims in Taiwan and the South China Sea and American involvement in the region. All of this comes as U.S. and China trade envoys are meeting in Stockholm this week to discuss what exactly the long game is here. The countries are expected to decide on a tariff agreement or opt for yet another extension of the previously granted truce that is set to expire on August 12. The outcome of these talks, no matter what, is likely to have implications going even beyond what's stated on paper. It could very well set the stage for the next phase of the war over global AI dominance.
