US and EU strike trade deal with EU paying 15pc tariff
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen travelled to Scotland for talks with US President Donald Trump. Photo: Reuters
The United States struck a framework trade deal with the European Union on Sunday, imposing a 15 percent US import tariff on most EU goods, but averting a spiralling battle between two allies which account for almost a third of global trade.
The announcement came after European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen travelled for talks with US President Donald Trump at his golf course in western Scotland to push a hard-fought deal over the line.
"I think this is the biggest deal ever made," Trump told reporters after an hour-long meeting with von der Leyen, who said the 15 percent tariff applied "across the board".
"We have a trade deal between the two largest economies in the world, and it's a big deal. It's a huge deal. It will bring stability. It will bring predictability," she said.
The deal, that also includes US$600 billion of EU investments in the United States and significant EU purchases of US energy and military equipment, will indeed bring clarity for EU companies.
However, the baseline tariff of 15 percent will be seen by many in Europe as a poor outcome compared to the initial European ambition of a zero-for-zero tariff deal, although it is better than the threatened 30 percent rate.
The deal mirrors parts of the framework agreement the United States clinched with Japan last week.
"We are agreeing that the tariff... for automobiles and everything else will be a straight across tariff of 15 percent," Trump said. However, the 15 percent baseline rate would not apply to steel and aluminium, for which a 50 percent tariff would remain in place.
Trump, who is seeking to reorder the global economy and reduce decades-old US trade deficits, has so far reeled in agreements with Britain, Japan, Indonesia and Vietnam, although his administration has failed to deliver on a promise of "90 deals in 90 days."
He has periodically railed against the European Union saying it was "formed to screw the United States" on trade.
Arriving in Scotland, Trump said that the EU wanted "to make a deal very badly" and said, as he met von der Leyen, that Europe had been "very unfair to the United States".
His main bugbear is the US merchandise trade deficit with the EU, which in 2024 reached US$235 billion, according to US Census Bureau data. The EU points to the US surplus in services, which it says partially redresses the balance. Trump also talked on Sunday about the "hundreds of billions of dollars" that tariffs were bringing in.
On July 12, Trump threatened to apply a 30 percent tariff on imports from the EU starting on August 1, after weeks of negotiations with the major US trading partners failed to reach a comprehensive trade deal.
The EU had prepared countertariffs on 93 billion euros (US$109 billion) of US goods in the event there was no deal and Trump had pressed ahead with 30 percent tariffs.
Some member states had also pushed for the bloc to use its most powerful trade weapon, the anti-coercion instrument, to target US services in the event of a no-deal. (Reuters)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AllAfrica
an hour ago
- AllAfrica
EU capitulates to Trump in vassal-state trade deal
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen agreed to a framework deal with the US whereby the EU will be charged 15% tariffs on most imports, commit to purchasing US$750 billion in US energy exports and invest $600 billion in the US economy, some of which will be military purchases. US tariffs on EU steel and aluminum exports will remain at 50% while the EU agreed not to tariff the US at all. The alternative to this lopsided arrangement was for Trump to impose his threatened 30% tariffs by August 1. The EU's macroeconomic strength was greatly weakened over the past 3.5 years as a result of the anti-Russian sanctions that it imposed in solidarity with the US on what had hitherto been its cheapest and most reliable energy supplier. It was therefore already at a critical disadvantage in any prospective trade war. The EU's failure to reach a major trade deal with China since Trump's return to office, evident during their most recent summit late last week, made Sunday's outcome a fait accompli in hindsight. The end result is that the EU just subordinated itself as the US's largest-ever vassal state. The US's 15% tariffs on most imports will reduce EU production and profits, thus making a recession more likely. The bloc's commitment to purchasing more expensive US energy will become more onerous in that event. Likewise, its pledge to buy more US arms will undermine the 'ReArm Europe Plan', with the combined effect of the aforesaid concessions further ceding the EU's already reduced sovereignty to the US. This, in turn, can embolden the US to press for better terms in its ongoing trade negotiations with other countries. On the North American front, Trump envisages reasserting the US' hegemony over Canada and Mexico via economic means, which can enable him to more easily expand 'Fortress America' southward. If he succeeds in subordinating Brazil, then everything between it and Mexico will naturally fall in line. This series of deals, along with last week's one with Japan, would bolster Trump's hand with China and India. He ideally hopes to replicate his Japanese and European successes with those two Asian anchors of BRICS, which together represent around a third of humanity, but it can't be taken for granted that he will. Trump's best chance of coercing them into similarly lopsided arrangements requires him to place the US in the most advantageous geo-economic position possible during their talks; hence, the need to rapidly build 'Fortress America' through a series of trade deals, and then prove that his tariff threats aren't bluffs. As explained in this analysis, this variable and the US's Kissingerian triangulation policy most significantly determine the future of their trade talks. If he fails, then Trump might not impose 100% tariffs on China and/or India, but some would still be expected. Nevertheless, with Japan, the EU and likely 'Fortress America' on his side, this 'Global West' could insulate the US from some of the consequences. The grand strategic importance of the EU subordinating itself as the US's largest-ever vassal state is therefore that it places the US on the path of restoring its unipolar hegemony via sequential trade deals as it likely sets its sights on the Americas next before finally taking on Asia. There's no guarantee that the US will succeed, and a series of lopsided trade deals with major economies would only partially restore US-led unipolarity, but Trump's moves still represent a possibly existential threat to multipolarity. This article was first published on Andrew Korybko's Substack and is republished with kind permission. Become an Andrew Korybko Newsletter subscriber here.
AllAfrica
7 hours ago
- AllAfrica
Road to Palestinian state must pass through Saudi Arabia
War makes bystanders feel powerless. Throughout the so-far 22 months of brutal conflict that began with Hamas's slaughter and abduction of Israelis in October 2023, Europeans have looked and felt impotent. This has only partly been because they have also been divided; mainly, it has been because their words, brave or not, proved irrelevant. The question now is whether the decision by France's President Emmanuel Macron to join 11 other EU countries in giving diplomatic recognition to a Palestinian state will be yet another demonstration of European powerlessness and irrelevance. There is a chance that this French initiative could prove different. That chance does not depend much on European unity or disunity, but rather on whether France and others can build a partnership with Arab states, led by Saudi Arabia, that is powerful and determined enough to force Israel and the United States to change course. The chance currently looks a small one, but it may be worth taking. The timing of President Macron's announcement was no accident. On July 28-29, France and Saudi Arabia are scheduled to co-chair a ministerial conference at the United Nations in New York on the Palestinian question, which is intended to be followed by a conference of heads of state in New York in September, alongside the UN General Assembly. The French initiative is intended to inject momentum and an air of diplomatic seriousness into a process that otherwise looked destined to fail. It may still fail. But the small chance that it could make progress depends on France and others convincing the Arab leaders, especially Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Muhammad bin Salman, that by working together, they might be able to make the Americans take them seriously. Which really depends on Saudi Arabia's crown prince showing the courage and determination to press America's Donald Trump to take the idea of a Palestinian state seriously. The terrible truth about the past 22 months of conflict, chiefly in the Palestinian enclave of Gaza, is that none of the powers involved — neither the Hamas militia, which has governed Gaza since 2006, nor Israel nor Israel's main arms-supplier, the United States — has shown that it cares much about the fate of the roughly 2 million Palestinians living in Gaza nor the roughly 3 million living in the other Palestinian territory occupied by Israel since 1967, known as the West Bank. The 60,000 Palestinians who have died in the conflict have just been seen as collateral damage by everyone concerned. Last week, Israeli and American negotiators withdrew from ceasefire talks with Hamas held in the Arab state of Qatar. It is not yet clear why the talks broke down, but it appears that in return for releasing the 50 remaining Israeli hostages that it holds (of whom 20 are thought to be alive, and 30 dead) Hamas demanded the release by Israel of a large number of Palestinian prisoners. The fact that all sides are delaying a ceasefire over a mere numbers game suggests a lack of seriousness about stopping the fighting. Amid that lack of seriousness, an already deep divide over the idea of a separate Palestinian state has deepened further. The notion of a 'two state solution' to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict dates back many decades, but for a long period beginning in the 1990s it took on an aura of consensus, with the main issue being one of how the Israelis and Palestinians could come to an agreement on borders, on the sensitive status of Jerusalem, and on how the Palestinian state would be governed. However, in recent years, but especially since the October 7, 2023, Hamas attacks, the very idea of a two-state solution has come into question. Previous American administrations, including that of President Joe Biden at the time of Hamas's attacks, had continued to say they were in favor of a Palestinian state even without doing anything serious to advance the idea. But now the Trump administration no longer even talks about it. The divide now is between, on one side, those who argue that creating a sovereign Palestinian state within Gaza and the West Bank represents the only path to a sustainable peace, for it would at last allow Palestinians to govern and police themselves and end their colonial status. And on the other side those, led by the Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, who argue that the experience of Gaza shows that a Palestinian state would be a recipe for perpetual war, as it would provide a base from which Hamas-like militias could and would seek to destroy their Israeli neighbors. In reality, both of these propositions contain truth, as does a third proposition, that the status quo of Israeli occupation is itself unsustainable. It is always going to be hard for Israelis and Palestinians to live peacefully alongside each other having fought almost constantly since Israel was founded in 1948, whether in one state or two. The prospect for a more peaceful future must depend on how both states are governed and policed. This is where the rich Arab states, led by Saudi Arabia, could play a crucial role. But it is a role they have sought to avoid until now. If Gaza is to be rebuilt and if any Palestinian state is to be viable, Arab money and intervention will be essential. Yet in the past, the Arabs have been just like the Europeans: powerless bystanders offering words but few actions. Unless and until the United States decides again to promote the idea of a Palestinian state and therefore to pressure Israel to take the idea seriously, there is little prospect of such a state being created. Diplomatic recognition by France, like the earlier recognition by Ireland, Spain and others, will not change the reality, which is that a Palestinian state does not exist. The only thing currently that could stand a chance of changing that reality would be if Saudi Arabia were to make a serious effort to change America's view, perhaps by making the re-adoption of a two-state solution a condition for any other deals Trump wants to make with the Arab states. With their old enemy Iran now severely weakened, this could be a moment when the Saudis feel able to take a diplomatic risk. Which is why President Macron has made his own move, in the hope of strengthening the Saudis' nerve. Other Europeans, including Britain's Sir Keir Starmer and Italy's Giorgia Meloni, should offer him support. The point is worth repeating: it is a small chance, but one that is worth taking. This article first appeared on Bill Emmott's Global View Substack and is republished with kind permission. Read the original here.
RTHK
8 hours ago
- RTHK
US-EU trade deal lifts local stocks
US-EU trade deal lifts local stocks Stocks rose after a trade agreement between the United States and the European Union lifted sentiment. File photo: RTHK The Hang Seng Index gained 70 points, or 0.28 percent, to open at 25,458 points on Monday. Across the border, the benchmark Shanghai Composite Index rose 0.57 percent to 3,594 while the Shenzhen Component Index was up 0.02 percent at 11,176. Stocks rose after a trade agreement between the United States and the European Union lifted sentiment and provided clarity in a pivotal week headlined by the US Federal Reserve and the Bank of Japan policy meetings. Countries are looking to finalise trade deals ahead of an August 1 deadline, with talks between the US and China set for Monday in Stockholm. (Agencies)
