‘Flight 149' Director Hopes Evidence Uncovered During Filming Will Help Hostages Win Legal Case Against UK Government & British Airways
EXCLUSIVE: The director of Sky's Flight 149: Hostage of War about one of the darkest events of the Gulf War hopes the doc will help a group of former hostages win their legal case against the UK government and British Airways.
Emmy-nominee Jenny Ash said her team uncovered evidence during the research phase that she had wanted to use in the feature doc but was dissuaded from doing so by lawyers for the hostages, who said they wanted to save it for the upcoming trial.
More from Deadline
Trailers For 'The Traitors India' & 'Flight 149' Doc; Disney+ Readies Sunghoo Park Anime - Global Briefs
First Pics Land Of Tom Hollander & Niamh Algar In Sky's 'The Iris Affair'; 'White Man Walking' To Storyville; BBC Adapting 'Crookhaven'; Adam Curtis Unveils Next Project; 'Patience' Season 2 - Global Briefs
'Britannia' Theft Lawsuit Thrown Out Of Court; Producer Laments Wasted Time & Money
Flight 149, which launches June 11, recounts one of the most extraordinary – and until recently, officially denied – chapters of the Gulf War. Just after Saddam Hussein's forces had stormed Kuwait in 1990, a British Airways flight from London to Malaysia touched down in Kuwait and the passengers and crew were held as hostages by Hussein for weeks as they became pawns in an international crisis. Hostages alleged they were subject to rape, mental abuse, mock executions and living in unsanitary conditions with little food. An image of one of the youngest hostages, Stuart Lockwood, having his hair stroked by Hussein is etched in many people's memory.
For three decades the UK government denied the public had been misled over Flight 149 until November 2021 when they finally admitted the Foreign Office were warned before the flight about the Kuwaiti invasion. The government, however, refuses to acknowledge that the flight was being used for a secret intelligence mission. Passengers and crew last year sued the government and British Airways for 'deliberately endangering them' and a recent Financial Times article revealed that British Airways denies the charges and is preparing to fight the lawsuit, with the airline's legal team describing the claims as an 'abuse of process'.
'This whole chapter of the Gulf War has been shrouded in secrecy,' Ash told Deadline. 'This is something the government denied for 30 years until they had no choice. I really hope this film will help [the hostages] win the case and bring them the justice they deserve. They deserve compensation but more than anything they just want to be told the truth and get an apology from both the government and British Airways.'
Ash's team worked closely with the hostages' lawyers and in some instances were told to hold newly-uncovered evidence back for the upcoming trial. 'There was a bit of give and take,' she added.
An unlikely inspiration
It was an unlikely figure that first got Ash thinking about Flight 149. Virgin boss Richard Branson was involved with helping a charter plane rescue some of the hostages and Ash met Branson more than three decades on while working on a branded content project.
'We were making conversation during a coffee break and I asked him what he was most proud of in his career, expecting him to talk about a rocket going into space or some such, but instead he talked about this rescue flight going into Baghdad,' Ash explained. 'I vaguely remembered Stuart Lockwood having his hair stroked by Saddam but I'd totally forgotten about that chapter of history. That got me talking to hostages about how they felt they had been gaslit for years.'
The idea percolated with Ash for some time and at one point she was developing a factual drama about the tragedy with Mr Bates vs the Post Office network ITV.
But the project was given fresh impetus following the British government's 2021 apology and it was eventually commissioned as a straight documentary feature by Sky, before premiering at the recent SXSW. 'Having that present tense narrative was really useful and made us feel it was the perfect time to tell a story of a miscarriage of justice,' she added. 'It felt like the post office [scandal]. People have been silenced and gaslit.'
Ash and her team took a three-pronged approach to Flight 149: telling the stories of the hostages, charting the 'political cat and mouse game that played out on the world stage which feels resonant today,' and covering the 'quite complicated legal case' that rumbles on as Deadline goes to press.
For the third prong, Ash, who was Emmy nominated for 2010's America: The Story of the US and has made docs on Osama bin Laden and the Nuremberg trials, wanted to imbue a sense of drama by constructing a stylized legal office and then having the lawyers – a small firm called McCue Jury & Partners that has previously taken on Vladimir Putin and Andrew Tate – interview the hostages.
She worked with Sex Education cinematographer Jamie Cairney to bring this sense of drama and help tease out experiences that were almost 'metaphysical' for the hostages. One, for example, discusses how 'the sand became a character in his head.'
'In this genre it's important to do drama in a literal way, it's got to be fragments of memory,' added Ash. 'A lot of the hostages' experiences were really nightmareish and we wanted to get inside their heads.'
On researching the 'political cat and mouse game' that was the Gulf War, Ash spent time in Kuwait 'visiting dusty garages, talking to people and finding all this footage from the Kuwaiti resistance.'
Her cause was helped by a production team including Mark Henderson, who himself was kidnapped two decades ago in South America, and Syrian producer Mowaffaq Safadi who introduced 'the Middle Eastern side of the story' and a Kuwaiti perspective.
'I didn't just want a Western perspective,' added Ash. 'People didn't realize what a deep betrayal it was when Iraq invaded Kuwait because the two were like brothers. People have traditionally seen Kuwait as this very rich people who were victims in this invasion and the truth is there was this incredible Kuwaiti resistance and amazing stories.'
Flight 149 is produced by Drum Studios in association with Sky Studios.
Best of Deadline
2025-26 Awards Season Calendar: Dates For Tonys, Emmys, Oscars & More
Everything We Know About 'Nobody Wants This' Season 2 So Far
List Of Hollywood & Media Layoffs From Paramount To Warner Bros Discovery To CNN & More
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Atlantic
an hour ago
- Atlantic
How to Assess the Damage of the Iran Strikes
In August 1941, the British government received a very unwelcome piece of analysis from an economist named David Miles Bensusan-Butt. A careful analysis of photographs suggested that the Royal Air Force's Bomber Command was having trouble hitting targets in Germany and France; in fact, only one in three pilots that claimed to have attacked the targets seemed to have dropped its bombs within five miles of them. The Butt report is a landmark in the history of 'bomb damage assessment,' or, as we now call it, 'battle damage assessment.' This recondite term has come back into public usage because of the dispute over the effectiveness of the June 22 American bombing of three Iranian nuclear facilities. President Donald Trump said that American bombs had 'obliterated' the Iranian nuclear program. A leaked preliminary assessment from the Defense Intelligence Agency on June 24 said that the damage was minimal. Whom to believe? Have the advocates of bombing again overpromised and underdelivered? Some history is in order here, informed by a bit of personal experience. From 1991 to 1993 I ran the U.S. Air Force's study of the first Gulf War. In doing so I learned that BDA rests on three considerations: the munition used, including its accuracy; the aircraft delivering it; and the type of damage or effect created. Of these, precision is the most important. World War II saw the first use of guided bombs in combat. In September 1943, the Germans used radio-controlled glide bombs to sink the Italian battleship Roma as it sailed off to surrender to the Allies. Americans developed similar systems with some successes, though none so dramatic. In the years after the war, precision-guided weapons slowly came to predominate in modern arsenals. The United States used no fewer than 24,000 laser-guided bombs during the Vietnam War, and some 17,000 of them during the 1991 Gulf War. These weapons have improved considerably, and in the 35 years since, 'routine precision,' as some have called it, has enormously improved the ability of airplanes to hit hard, buried targets. Specially designed ordnance has also seen tremendous advances. In World War II, the British developed the six-ton Tallboy bomb to use against special targets, including the concrete submarine pens of occupied France in which German U-boats hid. The Tallboys cracked some of the concrete but did not destroy any, in part because these were 'dumb bombs' lacking precision guidance, and in part because the art of hardening warheads was in its infancy. In the first Gulf War, the United States hastily developed a deep-penetrating, bunker-busting bomb, the GBU-28, which weighed 5,000 pounds, but only two were used, to uncertain effect. In the years since, however, the U.S. and Israeli air forces, among others, have acquired hardened warheads for 2,000-pound bombs such as the BLU-109 that can hit deeply buried targets—which is why, for example, the Israelis were able to kill a lot of Hezbollah's leadership in its supposedly secure bunkers. The aircraft that deliver bombs can affect the explosives' accuracy. Bombs that home in on the reflection of a laser, for example, could become 'stupid' if a cloud passes between plane and the target, or if the laser otherwise loses its lock on the target. Bombs relying on GPS coordinates can in theory be jammed. Airplanes being shot at are usually less effective bomb droppers than those that are not, because evasive maneuvers can prevent accurate delivery. The really complicated question is that of effects. Vietnam-era guided bombs, for example, could and did drop bridges in North Vietnam. In many cases, however, Vietnamese engineers countered by building 'underwater bridges' that allowed trucks to drive across a river while axle-deep in water. The effect was inconvenience, not interdiction. Conversely, in the first Gulf War, the U.S. and its allies spent a month pounding Iraqi forces dug in along the Kuwait border, chiefly with dumb bombs delivered by 'smart aircraft' such as the F-16. In theory, the accuracy of the bombing computer on the airplane would allow it to deliver unguided ordnance with accuracy comparable to that of a laser-guided bomb. In practice, ground fire and delivery from high altitudes often caused pilots to miss. When teams began looking at Iraqi tanks in the area overrun by U.S. forces, they found that many of the tanks were, in fact, undamaged. But that was only half of the story. Iraqi tank crews were so sufficiently terrified of American air power that they stayed some distance away from their tanks, and tanks immobilized and unmaintained for a month, or bounced around by near-misses, do not work terribly well. The functional and indirect effects of the bombing, in other words, were much greater than the disappointing physical effects. Many of the critiques of bombing neglect the importance of this phenomenon. The pounding of German cities and industry during World War II, for example, did not bring war production to a halt until the last months, but the indirect and functional effects were enormous. The diversion of German resources into air-defense and revenge weapons, and the destruction of the Luftwaffe's fighter force over the Third Reich, played a very great role in paving the way to Allied victory. At a microlevel, BDA can be perplexing. In 1991, for example, a bomb hole in an Iraqi hardened-aircraft shelter told analysts only so much. Did the bomb go through the multiple layers of concrete and rock fill, or did it 'J-hook'back upward and possibly fail to explode? Was there something in the shelter when it hit, and what damage did it do? Did the Iraqis perhaps move airplanes into penetrated shelters on the theory that lightning would not strike twice? All hard (though not entirely impossible) to judge without being on the ground. To the present moment: BDA takes a long time, so the leaked DIA memo of June 24 was based on preliminary and incomplete data. The study I headed was still working on BDA a year after the war ended. Results may be quicker now, but all kinds of information need to be integrated—imagery analysis, intercepted communications, measurement and signature intelligence (e.g., subsidence of earth above a collapsed structure), and of course human intelligence, among others. Any expert (and any journalist who bothered to consult one) would know that two days was a radically inadequate time frame in which to form a considered judgment. The DIA report was, from a practical point of view, worthless. An educated guess, however, would suggest that in fact the U.S. military's judgment that the Iranian nuclear problem had suffered severe damage was correct. The American bombing was the culmination of a 12-day campaign launched by the Israelis, which hit many nuclear facilities and assassinated at least 14 nuclear scientists. The real issue is not the single American strike so much as the cumulative effect against the entire nuclear ecosystem, including machining, testing, and design facilities. The platforms delivering the munitions in the American attack had ideal conditions in which to operate—there was no Iranian air force to come up and attack the B-2s that they may not even have detected, nor was there ground fire to speak of. The planes were the most sophisticated platforms of the most sophisticated air force in the world. The bombs themselves, particularly the 14 GBU-57s, were gigantic—at 15 tons more than double the size of Tallboys—with exquisite guidance and hardened penetrating warheads. The targets were all fully understood from more than a decade of close scrutiny by Israeli and American intelligence, and probably that of other Western countries as well. In the absence of full information, cumulative expert judgment also deserves some consideration—and external experts such as David Albright, the founder of the Institute for Science and International Security, have concluded that the damage was indeed massive and lasting. Israeli analysts, in and out of government, appear to agree. They are more likely to know, and more likely to be cautious in declaring success about what is, after all, an existential threat to their country. For that matter, the Iranian foreign minister concedes that 'serious damage' was done. One has to set aside the sycophantic braggadocio of Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, who seems to believe that one unopposed bombing raid is a military achievement on par with D-Day, or the exuberant use of the word obliteration by the president. A cooler, admittedly provisional judgment is that with all their faults, however, the president and his secretary of defense are likely a lot closer to the mark about what happened when the bombs fell than many of their hasty, and not always well-informed, critics. *Photo-illustration by Jonelle Afurong / The Atlantic. Source: Alberto Pizzoli / Sygma / Getty; MIKE NELSON / AFP / Getty; Greg Mathieson / Mai / Getty; Space Frontiers / Archive Photos / Hulton Archive / Getty; U.S. Department of Defense
USA Today
2 hours ago
- USA Today
When is the reunion for 'The Secret Lives of Mormon Wives' Season 2? How to watch
Fans of #MomTok don't have to wait for a new season to see more of "The Secret Lives of Mormon Wives," thanks to its first ever reunion episode. The reality show follows a group of TikTok influencer moms and their Mormon friend group as they navigate relationships, careers and religion on the heels of a scandal around "soft swinging" − couples sharing partners with limited sexual contact. The show's second season aired in May after the inaugural batch of episodes were released last year. Hulu previously confirmed to USA TODAY that more episodes are on the way later this year. However, the streaming service also announced earlier in June that the show will have its first reunion special following Season 2. Here's what to know about "The Secret Lives of Mormon Wives" Season 2 reunion. 'The Secret Lives of Mormon Wives' reunion release date "The Secret Lives of Mormon Wives" Season 2 reunion is set to be released on July 1 on Hulu. The special will feature "secrets and scandals, never-before-seen footage, and a surprise announcement," according to Hulu. New 'SLOMW' season What we know so far about 'The Secret Lives of Mormon Wives' Season 3 How to watch 'The Secret Lives of Mormon Wives' reunion The reunion episode will be available to stream on Hulu. The streaming service offers subscriptions ranging from $9.99 a month to $18.99 a month for standard plans. Other packages including live television are between $82.99-$95.99 a month. New users can also sign up for a free trial. Watch here: Streaming deals, bundles and free trials on Disney+, Peacock, Sling TV Who will be on 'The Secret Lives of Mormon Wives' reunion? Most of the stars of "The Secret Lives of Mormon Wives," including the husbands featured on the show, will be included in the reunion episode. The show will be hosted by Nick Viall, a podcast host and former star of "The Bachelor." Here's who will be in attendance at the reunion, according to photos released by Hulu: Did Demi Engemann go to the 'Secret Lives of Mormon Wives' reunion? One member of #MomTok was notably absent from the promotions of "The Secret Lives of Mormon Wives" reunion. Demi Engemann, who ended Season 2 with several unsettled conflicts with her fellow castmates, appeared to skip out on filming for the episode. In an Instagram story posted on June 9, Engemann said she was invited to the reunion but filming was on "short notice" and she had a scheduling conflict. "I tried to have production move it to another day and they couldn't swing it sadly," she wrote in the Instagram story. However, a Hulu spokesperson confirmed to USA TODAY that Engemann will be part of the reunion, though it's unclear in what capacity. She was also briefly shown in the reunion trailer. Watch 'The Secret Lives of Mormon Wives' reunion trailer Melina Khan is a national trending reporter for USA TODAY. She can be reached at We occasionally recommend interesting products and services. If you make a purchase by clicking one of the links, we may earn an affiliate fee. USA TODAY Network newsrooms operate independently, and this doesn't influence our coverage.
Gizmodo
2 hours ago
- Gizmodo
‘Tron: Ares' Will Have Nine Inch Nails at Their Most Industrial Rock
More than anything, folks are excited for Tron: Ares because of its soundtrack. In a first for the duo in their time as film composers, Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross are going by 'Nine Inch Nails' for their work on the threequel, and that means they're leaning fully into their rock band history. Speaking to Empire Magazine, Reznor said the Ares soundtrack features 'not one second of orchestra.' In fact, he went so far as to call the music not just different from the first two films (respectively scored by Wendy Carlos and Daft Punk), but one that 'takes a bigger swing for what music can do in cinema without sounding fucking pompous.' This was an active goal for the pair, who've previously worked on Ninja Turtles: Mutant Mayhem, Soul, and The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo, and Naughty Dog's upcoming sci-fi adventure Intergalactic: The Lost Prophet. What type of sound are the two cooking up? According to Reznor, the Tron: Ares score will be 'precise and unpleasant at times' without falling 'atonal and punishing' territory. He and Ross wanted to focus on the undertones of the film's story, which centers on Jared Leto's Ares leaving the digital space for the human world. As such, the duo keyed in on 'artificial characters' like Ares and Jodie Turner-Smith's Athena 'being infused with feelings and emotions and a sense of questioning their purpose and their replaceability, their lack of soul, in some ways.' Sounds like a lot, and given Disney's recent track record, we'll probably get to hear some of it before Tron: Ares arrives in theaters on October 10. Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what's next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.
