New Tech Adapted From Solar Cells Could Make Drug Development Faster, Cheaper
The tech takes diverse solutions of proteins, even complex solutions with multiple proteins at once, and passes them over a series of silicon nanowires that can bind to certain proteins. They claim that it can identify and quantify an array of different proteins in less than 15 minutes, requires less of the sample solution to work, and provides more accurate results.
Let's talk about how it works.
Both this method of quantifying proteins and traditional ones share the basic type of approach: antibodies. The legacy test, and still the mainstay in modern laboratories, is called ELISA, or Enzyme-linked ImmunoSuppressant Assay. It works by washing liquid mixtures of proteins over a plate coated with antibodies that bind to a specific protein—yet again, using evolved biological molecules to do jobs we still struggle to do, directly.
If you've ever taken a biochemistry lab course, you've likely encountered ELISA test. Credit: GETTY IMAGES
If present, the protein of interest will bind to the specifically chosen antibody and become stuck to the plate, which is then washed again with another antibody that also binds to this same protein. This second antibody attachment comes with a marker, though, which can be activated to become visible. So, the more color, the more of the protein of interest.
The problem is that ELISA requires a fair amount of training and time, and it also requires a fair volume of the solution being tested. The color-based analysis is also only a blunt way of quantifying the signal, meaning that its sensitivity often leaves something to be desired.
It's an old style of chemical test, both literally and figuratively messy and requiring expertise to scry the results. This innovation offers the same path forward as solutions to similar situations in the past, such as DNA sequencing and electrochemistry.
This new tech also works through binding of antibodies, but this time they are bound to silicon nanowires that easily conduct electricity. It's actually an adaptation of a design for a solar photovoltaic cell, and still involves exposure to light; scientists wash their sample solution over the antibody-bound nanowires, and again end up with it bound to antibodies.
The new tech works based on how proteins bound to a nanowire disrupt that nanowire's regular reaction to light. Credit: Advanced Silicon Group
This time, though, the next step is to hit the experiment with light. That's because the protein-bound nanowires will create a current from this light more readily than the non-protein-bound nanowires. This allows researchers to use the strength of the current created to quantify the protein—and because the antibody used was chosen to bind to only the protein of interest, we know that the concentration is of interest.
This level of current allows much more specific results, and ones that can be quantified by a computer, rather than by a chemist. Automation might be controversial in some industries—but most people are in favor of any innovation that leads patients to receive more, better drugs.
'We're making it 15 times faster and 15 times lower cost to test for proteins,' the researchers told MIT News. 'That's on the drug development side. This could also make the manufacturing of drugs significantly faster and more cost-effective. It could revolutionize how we create drugs in this country and around the world.'
The new approach is quicker and much less messy, requiring less training in laboratory processes. Credit: Advanced Silicon Group
Faster, cheaper, better protein sensing would assist scientists in searching for specific proteins in potential sources for new therapies, and in patient fluid samples. On the other hand, it could also help drug manufacturing move much more quickly, and more efficiently hone in on the best methods that create the purest products.
The technology could also be used for direct diagnosis of certain ailments that have protein-based markers for identification; the researchers themselves suggest lung cancer as a potential first target.
Check out all ExtremeTech's coverage of drug development.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
NASA Acting Chief Duffy Issues Directive to Speed Up Moon Reactor Plans
NASA's acting administrator Sean Duffy plans to accelerate the construction of a nuclear reactor that could be used on the moon and alter the way NASA will partner with industry to replace the aging International Space Station. The plans, outlined in directives distributed inside NASA and seen by Bloomberg on Monday, mark the first major policy changes by Duffy after US President Donald Trump appointed him to the role as acting head of the space agency.


Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
China ‘closer than ever' to surpassing American-made AI models
Fox News chief political anchor Bret Baier reports on the global artificial intelligence race on 'Special Report.'


Forbes
2 hours ago
- Forbes
Ph.D. Candidates Are Not Overqualified, They Are Underrated
'You're overqualified for this role.' It's a phrase far too familiar to Ph.D. holders navigating the job market. Despite their deep expertise, many find that corporate America often misunderstands, underestimates, or overlooks the value they can bring to businesses, especially when the preference leans toward more traditional credentials, such as the M.B.A. In an era of accelerated technological disruption and knowledge-based industries, companies can no longer afford to ignore the untapped potential of Ph.D. talent. Ph.D. is short for Doctor of Philosophy. Its roots trace back to 18th-century Germany, where the Prussian model of education was designed to train individuals to produce new knowledge, not just practice or regurgitate current knowledge. The U.S. adopted this model in the 19th and 20th centuries, and today the Ph.D. is a common offering at many universities, focused on pushing the boundaries of what we know. What separates a Ph.D. from other graduate degrees isn't just subject matter expertise, it's the process of their studies, which entails a long and rigorous journey. On average, earning a Ph.D. takes about five years, and can extend up to eleven. Candidates conduct original research, publish findings, and defend their dissertations in front of experts in their fields. The result is a scholar trained to solve problems no one has solved before. These are exactly the kinds of thinkers businesses need when thinking about new innovations and approaches to challenges. Historically, Ph.D.s were seen as a pipeline to the professoriate. But that narrative is changing. Nearly half (48%) of all Ph.D. recipients now pursue careers in industry, while just 33% remain in academia. In STEM fields, that number is even higher. Over half of Ph.D.s in science and engineering fields enter industry, and for engineers, it's closer to 79%. These shifts aren't just preferences—they reflect evolving professional ambitions. And there's a new variable reshaping the Ph.D. talent pool: government layoffs. Recent cuts in federal agencies have displaced over 51,000 federal workers. The result is a wave of highly trained Ph.D. researchers with policy insight, scientific rigor, and real-world experience entering the private job market. However, future supply of researchers may be a risk. Research universities (where most are trained) rely on government grants and have had to scale back due to federal cuts, meaning less funds for Ph.D. students. For employers, this is a talent acquisition opportunity hiding in plain sight. These professionals bring expertise in data analysis, project management, and scientific reasoning while working within tight budgets (i.e. government). These are skills that are increasingly vital as companies across industries seek to become more innovative and tech-forward. Whether in product design, Research & Development (R&D), sustainability, or strategy, Ph.D. holders can help companies not just compete, but innovate. Yet too often, Ph.D. applicants are dismissed as 'too academic' or 'overqualified.' This stems from outdated assumptions and an incomplete understanding of what Ph.D. training entails. Yes, Ph.D.s are highly educated—but many also bring real-world experience: managing budgets, writing grants, collaborating across institutions, and mentoring diverse teams. These are not your thought-of ivory tower theorists; they are applied thinkers ready to drive change. There's another aspect worth noting. Ph.D. pathways are difficult to access, especially for students without generational wealth or academic lineage. While federal numbers on graduate completion are limited, some research purports that only 56% of Ph.D. students actually complete their 3% of first-generation undergraduate students ever enroll in a Ph.D. program. That's a missed opportunity for both social mobility and corporate innovation. To tap into this hidden talent, employers must take action. That means building or supporting recruitment pipelines—like the McNair Scholars Program, Científico Latino, The Ph.D. Project, and Leadership Brainery. These initiatives are working to ensure that students from even the most challenging backgrounds can become the next generation of knowledge creators and innovators. If innovation is the lifeblood of 21st-century business, then Ph.D. talent is part of the circulatory system. These individuals know how to ask the right questions and pursue rigorous answers, skills that go far beyond academic settings. Companies that recognize and embrace this kind of thinking will be better positioned to lead in an increasingly complex and competitive world. So the next time a résumé crosses your desk bearing the letters 'Ph.D.,' don't ask whether the candidate is overqualified. Ask whether your company is ready to think bigger. Help us widen the pipeline. Support Leadership Brainery in creating equitable pathways to graduate education. Donate today! Interested in engaging with us or have an idea for a future topic? Submit this brief form.