logo
How pilots cutting engines sparked TWO plane disasters after South Korea & India crashes as calls for cockpit CCTV grow

How pilots cutting engines sparked TWO plane disasters after South Korea & India crashes as calls for cockpit CCTV grow

Scottish Sun3 days ago
FALL FROM THE SKY How pilots cutting engines sparked TWO plane disasters after South Korea & India crashes as calls for cockpit CCTV grow
PILOTS manually cutting the engines were to blame for the two most deadly air crashes of this decade, investigations suggest.
With a total of 420 lives lost in the flick of three buttons, urgent questions are swirling about what can be done to reduce the risk of pilot error or sabotage.
Advertisement
8
The wreckage of a Jeju Air Boeing 737-800 which crashed and burned at Muan International Airport in South Korea in December
Credit: AFP
8
Some 179 people were killed in the disaster
Credit: AFP
8
An Air India plane smashed down into a built-up are in June, and killed all but one of the 242 people on board
Credit: Alamy
8
Former airline pilot Terry Tozer explained what could have contributed to the pilots' actions
Credit: Channel 5 News
The Jeju Air emergency-landing crash killed 179 people in December, and 241 people died when the Air India plane came down shortly after takeoff in June.
Investigators have sensationally revealed there is "clear evidence" that the Jeju Air pilots mistakenly shut down the wrong engine after a bird strike.
The plane was then forced to make an emergency landing at Muan International Airport on December 29, where it slammed into a concrete wall and burst into a fireball.
Meanwhile, the leading theory in the Air India crash is that the pilot manually flipped both guarded fuel switches to the 'cut-off' position — a move aviation experts say could only have been deliberate.
Advertisement
read more on the air disasters
CRASH DISASTER Pilots of doomed South Korean plane 'switched off wrong engine', killing 179
A report from the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau of India (AAIB) revealed a recording of the panicked co-pilot asking which the main pilot shut off the engines.
Terry Tozer, former airline pilot and author of "Confessions of an Airline Pilot – Why Planes Crash", told The Sun that it would have been be possible for the Air India pilot to shut off the engines without the other noticing.
In the cockpit were Captain Sumeet Sabharwal and First Officer Clive Kunder.
Terry said: "The handling pilot, which we know was the First Officer, would have had his hands full.
Advertisement
"He would have had his hands on the controls, but the monitoring pilot [Sumeet] would have his hands free."
What caused fireball South Korea plane crash as 179 confirmed dead in horror explosion
"There is absolutely no procedure or logical reason why you would shut the engines off just after takeoff. That's so blindingly obvious that it doesn't need to be stated.
"So either it happened by accident, which I think a lot of people find extremely hard to believe or it was done deliberately."
Terry said that the switches are "latched", meaning you have to lift them up before you can move them.
Advertisement
Despite the safety mechanism, Terry said it would 'probably' have been possible for one pilot to shut down the engines without the monitoring pilot noticing, because the switches "would be kind of behind his natural line of sight".
The experience pilot also called on investigators to release a key piece of evidence that could clear up what happened in India.
8
Captain Sumeet Sabharwal is thought to have switched both the engines off shortly after take off
A cockpit view of a Boeing 787 Dreamliner aircraft shows the fuel switch;
Advertisement
8
Brit Vishwas Ramesh was the only survivor of the Air India disaster
Credit: Dan Charity
He explained the area microphone on the cockpit voice recorder would have picked up the sound of the switches being flicked.
Terry said: 'So it would have been helpful if the investigators had said whether or not they were able to tell whether a switch type sound was detectable around about the time that they think the switches might have been switched off.'
Speaking about the Jeju crash, Terry said the pilots "obviously" shut down the wrong engine by "mistake" - but revealed they would have been contending with a chaos in the cockpit.
Advertisement
He said: 'They probably would have had all kinds of bells and whistles going off and lots of indications that both engines were in trouble.'
The former pilot said "takes time to analyze whether or not you should shut down one or neither or both" - but this was time the Jeju pilots did not have.
He also said the new revelations about those crucial moments had been revealed in a "very odd manner".
Terry said: "I understand that it was released to the relatives of the victims and in private, prior to release to the general public.
Advertisement
"And then that causes riots and chaos."
8
A family member of a victim of the Jeju air crash mourns at the site
Credit: EPA
8
An engine of the Jeju Air passenger plane wreckage is salvaged days after the crash
Credit: EPA
Advertisement
However, Terry said that whatever happened in the two cockpits, there is one factor that determines passengers' fate above all else.
He said the 'single most important thing' in passenger safety is the "airline culture".
Terry explained: 'If it is a disciplined professional safety culture with a good training regime, then that makes a huge difference.'
Terry recalled a similar occasion when the wrong engine was shut down - the Kegworth air disaster of 1989 - and said that was "definitely a cultural problem in the training department'.
Advertisement
'That may have been a factor with Jeju Air,' he said.
In the wake of the two tragedies, many aviation figures have called for he introduction of cockpit CCTV.
That would clear up immediately how the two engines came to be shut off on the Air India flight - but Terry said pilots would push back.
He said: 'I can see why the investigators might welcome cockpit CCTV.
Advertisement
"We should be doing everything we can to minimize crashes.
'And in any responsible environment, with a good airline and a regulatory environment that is already happening.
"And obviously, if there was a video evidence of what went on on the cockpit. They would know the answers pretty clearly by now.
"But it's something that I think pilots would resist, for the simple reason that they're already scrutinized, trained, checked, examined, monitored, regulated so much."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Delta flight slams on brakes when another plane lands on same runway
Delta flight slams on brakes when another plane lands on same runway

The Herald Scotland

time2 hours ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Delta flight slams on brakes when another plane lands on same runway

The Boeing 737-800 aircraft had 144 passengers on board, including two pilots and four flight attendants, Delta spokesperson Morgan Durrant told USA TODAY. The plane had just started to roll for takeoff when a regional Aeromexico jet flew over the Delta flight and landed in front of it on the same runway, forcing the Delta pilots to hit the brakes. Aeromexico Flight 1691 arrived from the city of Aguascalientes, online tracking shows. "As the flight crew was initiating the takeoff, they observed another aircraft landing in front of their aircraft on the same runway," Durrant said. No injuries were reported. More news: Social media users are proving why nothing beats a Jet2 holiday. What's that? Delta near-collision reported to FAA, NTSB After taking on additional fuel and conferring with Delta safety and flight operations officials, the plane eventually departed for Atlanta at 9:42 a.m. local time and arrived at 3:20 p.m. ET, Durrant said. "Because nothing is more important than the safety of our customers and people, Delta will fully cooperate with authorities as the circumstances around this flight are investigated," Delta released in a statement on Wednesday, July 23. "We appreciate the flight crew's actions to maintain situational awareness and act quickly." According to Delta, the airline reported the incident to the Federal Aviation Administration and National Transportation Safety Board. USA TODAY has reached out to both federal agencies. Natalie Neysa Alund is a senior reporter for USA TODAY. Reach her at nalund@ and follow her on X @nataliealund.

Air India crash victim's family furious after someone else's remains were also sent home in casket
Air India crash victim's family furious after someone else's remains were also sent home in casket

Scottish Sun

time11 hours ago

  • Scottish Sun

Air India crash victim's family furious after someone else's remains were also sent home in casket

Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) THE family of a mum killed in the Air India crash has blasted Indian authorities after someone else's remains were also sent home in her casket. NHS microbiologist Shobhana Patel, 71, died with her husband Ashok, 74, in the crash in June. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 2 Shobhana Patel, 71, died with her husband Ashok, 74, in June's Air India crash Credit: Supplied 2 The crash killed 260 people Credit: Alamy The couple, from Orpington, Kent, were repatriated in different coffins but DNA tests in Britain found other body parts along with Shobhana's. Her son Miten, 40, said: 'I have no idea if the other remains were from more than one person.' One family was sent the wrong body entirely. India's Ministry of External Affairs said: 'All remains were handled with professionalism.' READ MORE ON AIR INDIA CRASH 'BODY MIX-UP' Brit Air India families 'sent the WRONG bodies' after crash killed 260 Lawyer James Healy-Pratt, representing around 20 families, said: 'They have been left in limbo. 'They have no-one to bury because the wrong body was in the casket.' It is thought that only Indian authorities carried out DNA tests on victims with no input from any international agency. Mr Healy-Prat added: 'I am hearing that it was Indian authorities alone who identified remains and then placed them in caskets. 'The families want assurances that their loved ones have not been left behind somewhere in India because they don't have confidence in the system. 'They have had the terrible shock of losing a loved one and then they go through more trauma when they learn it is not only their loved one in the casket, or it may not be their loved one at all.'

Fire breaks out on Air India's flight from Hong Kong after landing in Delhi
Fire breaks out on Air India's flight from Hong Kong after landing in Delhi

The Independent

timea day ago

  • The Independent

Fire breaks out on Air India's flight from Hong Kong after landing in Delhi

Air India grounded an aircraft for inspection after a fire broke out in its auxiliary power unit, or APU, shortly after landing in New Delhi on Tuesday. The fire was detected while passengers were disembarking flight AI315 from Hong Kong, the airline said in a statement. 'The incident occurred while passengers had begun disembarking and the APU was automatically shut down as per system design,' an airline spokesperson said. The APU is installed at the rear of the aircraft and serves as a backup power source. It is primarily used to start the main engines and operate critical onboard systems while the aircraft is on the ground. Passengers de-boarded safely but the aircraft, which landed in Delhi at 12.31pm local time, was damaged, the airline said. Flight tracking service Flightradar24 identified the affected aircraft as an Airbus A321. This was the third Air India scare in two days. A flight from the southern city of Kochi veered off a rain-soaked runway in Mumbai on Monday. All passengers got off safely but the aircraft's engine and runway infrastructure were damaged. The plane was grounded and both pilots de-rostered. A few hours later, flight AI2403 from Delhi to Kolkata aborted take-off at high speed after a technical issue was detected. The pilots stopped the aircraft, and all 160 passengers were safely disembarked. The flight was rescheduled for later in the evening. These incidents come amid heightened scrutiny of flight safety following last month's deadly Air India crash in Ahmedabad that killed 260 people. A preliminary investigation report released a month after the crash revealed the Boeing Dreamliner's fuel control switches flipped from 'run' position to 'cutoff' within seconds of the take-off. The report said that one of the pilots was heard on the cockpit voice recorder asking the other why he had cut off the fuel. The other responded that he hadn't. The report caused an uproar with pilot associations accusing the investigators of indirectly blaming the pilots for the crash. A subsequent report in The Wall Street Journal suggested that pilot error could have played a role in the incident. However, Indian authorities condemned the report as speculative and irresponsible. Meanwhile, Air India said it found no problems with the fuel control switch mechanisms across its Boeing 787 and 737 fleet during inspections carried out after the Ahmedabad crash. India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau expects to give a final report detailing its investigation into the crash within a year.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store