Italy PM Meloni warns against 'trade war within the West'
"A trade war within the West would weaken us all in the face of the global challenges we are confronting together," Ms. Meloni said in a statement released by her office.
"Europe has the economic and financial strength to assert its position and reach a fair and sensible agreement," she said.
"Italy will do its part. As always," she added, as the EU holds off on a response in the hopes of reaching an agreement.
Mr. Trump announced on Saturday that products imported into the United States from the European Union and Mexico would be subject to 30 percent tariffs starting August 1.
Since then, Italian opposition parties have criticized Ms. Meloni and her far-right party Brothers of Italy, while opposition Five Star Movement leader Giuseppe Conte accusing her of "bowing her head" to Washington's threats.
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen stated that Brussels would not retaliate against U.S. tariffs on steel and aluminium for now, hoping to secure a deal to avoid broader 30-percent levy on all its exported products.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
2 hours ago
- India.com
India, US Finalise Interim Trade Deal: GM Crops Rejected, Tariffs Realigned – What It Means For Exports, Innovation And Farmers
New Delhi: India and the United States are set to sign an interim trade agreement this week, covering key areas such as agriculture, processed foods and industrial tariffs. The deal has been finalised after months of negotiations between both countries. India has agreed to reduce tariffs on certain U.S. agricultural imports, including apples, nuts like blueberries and blackberries and selected processed food products. However, New Delhi has made it clear that there will be no agreement on genetically modified (GM) crops. According to officials, GM crops remain a red line due to domestic concerns and upcoming trade talks with the European Union (EUFTA). The deal includes a tariff structure where Indian goods entering the United States will face an average tariff of 11.5%, while U.S. goods entering India will face a 7% tariff. India has also refused a blanket tariff approach on automobiles. Instead, it has asked for separate slabs based on vehicle type and category. The United States is said to have accepted this proposal. There is also no agreement on dairy products. The United States had pushed for broader access to India's dairy market, but India has not accepted this, citing the potential impact on small farmers and rural incomes. Only processed dairy items will be allowed under the agreement. The deal comes at a time when the US is revising its trade approach with several countries. President Donald Trump has announced higher tariffs on exports from the European Union (EU), Japan, South Korea, Mexico and other nations, starting August 1. India is seen as a key trade partner in this changing environment. Meanwhile, a report by SBI Research suggests that India could benefit from this realignment. The study says India has a comparative advantage in chemical exports, including pharmaceuticals. If New Delhi captures just 2% of the U.S. chemical import market, this could add 0.2% to India's GDP. The report also highlights opportunities in the textile and apparel sectors. If India increases its share in the U.S. apparel market by 5%, it could add another 0.1% to GDP. India is also reviewing its Free Trade Agreement (FTA) with ASEAN countries. The aim is to address tariff gaps and prevent large-scale dumping of goods from countries like China through ASEAN partners. However, the SBI report also warns about potential risks to the Indian dairy sector. If the sector were opened to U.S. dairy imports, milk prices could fall by 15%, causing an estimated income loss of Rs 1.03 lakh crore to farmers. It could also result in a Rs 51,000 crore loss to India's gross value added (GVA), with major effects on rural employment. Final talks on the interim deal are expected to conclude this week. Officials from the Ministry of Commerce and Industry have already reached Washington for the signing. The agreement is part of broader trade discussions that may continue in the coming months.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
US to send missiles to Ukraine that could reach targets deep inside Russia — even Moscow now within reach
Why is Donald Trump suddenly taking a harder stance on Russia? Live Events What kinds of missiles is Ukraine getting? How has Russia responded to the latest U.S. military aid? FAQs (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel President Donald Trump has supposedly given the go-ahead for Ukraine to send long-range missiles that can hit deep into Russian territory, even Moscow. This shows that he is taking a more aggressive stance toward Russia. The change in Donald Trump's tone toward Vladimir Putin is very clear. He is getting more and more frustrated with failed ceasefire talks and ongoing Russian offensive weapons, along with Patriot defense systems , are meant to put pressure on Putin after failed attempts to end the fighting. Trump says that the EU will pay the U.S. back for the the US will provide Ukraine with missiles that can strike Moscow, according to a report. The offensive weapons would include long-range missiles capable of reaching Moscow and other locations far inside Russian Trump's declaration that he would send Ukraine Patriot air defense missiles, two people with knowledge of the plans told Axios on Monday that US President Donald Trump intends to arm Ukraine with offensive weapons."Russian President Vladimir Putin has Trump furious. "He's going to make a very aggressive announcement tomorrow," Republican Senator Lindsey Graham told to Trump, Ukraine needs Patriot air defense missiles to protect itself because Putin "talks nice but then he bombs everybody in the evening." Trump announced his intention to send the missiles to Ukraine on Sunday, as per a report by The Jerusalem stated that the European Union would pay for the Patriots he intends to send to Ukraine, but he did not specify how many of to Putin's resistance to Trump's efforts to negotiate a ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine, the US president has become more and more disillusioned with the Russian leader.'We will send them Patriots, which they desperately need, because Putin really surprised a lot of people. But there's a little bit of a problem there.' At Joint Base Andrews outside of Washington, Trump told reporters, "I don't like it.""Basically, we're going to send them a variety of extremely advanced military hardware. We want it that way, so they will pay us 100% for that," Trump arms and ammunition supplies to Ukraine have continued and continue to do so, according to confirmation from the Kremlin. Dmitry Peskov, the spokesperson for the Kremlin, stated that Russia was prepared for the third round of peace talks and was awaiting Ukraine's clarification on the timing, adding that Kyiv was not in a rush, as per a report by the Jerusalem According to US officials, the offensive weapons being sent to Ukraine have the potential to reach deep into Russia, including Trump says the European Union will fully reimburse the United States for Patriot systems and other military equipment.
The Hindu
3 hours ago
- The Hindu
The importance of India and Europe walking in step
In a world increasingly marked by disorder and divergence, as foreign policy mavens cast about for new policy initiatives, the India-Europe relationship stands as a compelling case for diplomatic renewal — rooted in civilisational depth, yet animated by contemporary relevance. If history has often rendered them distant participants in each other's geopolitical imagination, the present moment demands — and enables — a more purposeful engagement. Prime Minister Narendra Modi's G-7 diplomacy and External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar's renewed focus on Europe reflect a conscious pivot towards a continent in flux. This is not merely a recognition of Europe's enduring economic weight or cultural capital; it is an astute reading of the evolving global chessboard, where yesterday's alliances are fraying, and new solidarities are emerging across the hemispheres. An order upended, a partnership emerging The transatlantic realm, long anchored by American leadership, finds itself adrift amidst United States President Donald Trump's iconoclasm. His transactional world view, scepticism towards the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, disdain for traditional allies, and dalliance with adversaries such as Russian President Vladimir Putin have unnerved Washington's most steadfast partners. The G-7, once the de facto board of directors for global governance, convened last month not in consensus, but in contention. For Canada, the United Kingdom, Germany, and France — each recalibrating their foreign policies — the strategic logic of looking eastward has grown sharper. Canada, disentangling itself from overdependence on the U.S., now seeks deeper integration with Europe and emerging powers such as India (the hiccup over its mollycoddling of Khalistani extremists notwithstanding). The U.K., shedding its Brexit-era illusions, embraces renewed continental ties. And Germany, awakened from strategic somnolence, has embarked on a path of defence investment and industrial reinvention. In this milieu, Europe is striving not simply to stay relevant but to become a pole of power in its own right. The rhetoric of 'strategic autonomy', once French fancy, is now echoed in Berlin, Warsaw, and Brussels alike. From French President Emmanuel Macron's nuclear umbrella to Germany's constitutional recalibration for military spending, and the Weimar Triangle's assertiveness in central Europe, the project of European reinvention is well underway. India's external engagement, long characterised by prudence and non-alignment, is morphing into a more assertive posture of 'multi-alignment'. In a world veering toward bipolar rivalry between the U.S. and China, India and Europe, both aspirational middle powers, find common cause in championing a multipolar order that is anchored in international law, inclusive institutions and plural values. This convergence plays out on several fronts. The India-European Union (EU) engagement now unfolds on two levels. Institutionally, the EU and India are expanding their long-standing dialogue in areas of shared and exclusive competencies — from trade and technology to security and climate change. Bilaterally, ties with major member states — France, Germany, Italy and, increasingly, the Nordic and Eastern European nations — are acquiring greater strategic depth. Economic ties as a corridor of opportunity Few statistics capture the potential of this moment better than the startling rise in bilateral trade and investment. Between 2015 and 2022, EU foreign direct investment in India grew by 70%, with France's investments alone skyrocketing by 373%. In the last three years, EU imports from India have doubled, underscoring New Delhi's growing economic magnetism. Yet, India and Europe are still only scratching the surface. The much-anticipated India-EU Trade and Investment Agreements must now be fast-tracked with an 'early harvest' accord that shows some sensitivity to India's green transition. The European Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, laudable in spirit, must be reinterpreted through the lens of equity. Climate ambition must never become climate protectionism. The India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC) can become a modern Silk Road linking geographies not only in trade, but also in enterprise, energy, and innovation. It is an answer to the Indo-Pacific's demand for infrastructure that is transparent, sustainable and sovereign in spirit. Perhaps the most exciting frontier lies in technology. India and Europe both view digital architecture not as a proprietary domain of Big Tech but as public infrastructure for the global good. As Mr. Modi observed at the AI Action Summit, the partnership can span the entire digital lifecycle — from innovation to governance, from standards to regulation. Europe's leadership in deep tech, digital manufacturing, and semiconductors dovetails with India's dynamism in software, digital public goods and scalable platforms. Together, they can lead in clean energy innovation, biotechnology, ocean sustainability, food security and resilient health-care systems. To harness this, both sides must invest in human mobility. A comprehensive mobility agreement for students, scientists and scholars will enrich talent pools, ease Indian unemployment and fertilise bilateral innovation. In the age of ideas, cross-border thinkers are as valuable as cross-border capital. Strategic alignment now extends to defence and counter-terrorism. Europe remains an important source of armaments for India, and as both sides seek self-reliance — India under Atmanirbhar Bharat, Europe through ReArm 2025 — there is scope for unprecedented co-development and technology transfer. Maritime cooperation, cyber security, space collaboration, and joint responses to terrorism offer a template for trust. Europe must also adopt a firmer line on Pakistan's enabling of Islamist extremism — an issue that has scarred both sides. Technical cooperation is not enough; political will must follow. In a world where great powers often behave as if might is right, middle powers such as India and Europe must act as custodians of a rules-based order. Not as relics of a liberal utopia, but as realists pursuing stability through coalitions, not coercion. Their shared belief in multilateralism, in resisting hegemonic binaries and in empowering the Global South with inclusive frameworks, sets them apart from more prescriptive paradigms. This ethic must shape their joint leadership in forums from the United Nations to the World Trade Organization (WTO), and from the Quad (Australia, India, Japan, U.S.) to the Artificial Intelligence (AI) governance tables. Changing minds, not just policies Finally, let us not underestimate the power of perception. Public sentiment, media narratives and political attention must align with strategic intent. Relationships flourish not merely through summits and statistics, but through empathy, imagination and sustained effort. Europe must move beyond stereotypes of India as a reluctant partner; India must appreciate Europe's complex transitions with greater nuance. The Raisina Dialogue in Marseille (June 2025), the President of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen's symbolic visit to Delhi (February 2025), and India's diplomatic investment in the Mediterranean and Nordic regions, are all promising steps. If the last decade taught us that history has a sense of humour (think of our relations with the two iterations of the Trump Administration), the coming one demands we have a sense of purpose. India and Europe, long circling one another, must now walk in step knowing that their shared values and strategic compulsions form a partnership not of convenience, but conviction. For in each other, they may just find not a mirror, but a window to a more stable, inclusive and equitable world. Shashi Tharoor is a former Under-Secretary General of the United Nations, a fourth-term Member of Parliament (Congress), Lok Sabha, for Thiruvananthapuram, Chairman of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on External Affairs, and the Sahitya Akademi Award-winning author of 27 books, including 'Pax Indica: India and the World of the 21st Century' (2012)
