
Ex CJI Chandrachud overstaying in official house, Supreme Court seeks removal
In a communication on July 1 to the Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs , the apex court administration said the designated residence for the sitting Chief Justice of India Bungalow No. 5 on Krishna Menon Marg be vacated and returned to the court's housing pool, sources said.
The letter requested the MoHUA secretary to take possession of the bungalow from the former CJI without any further delay as not only the permission that was granted to him for retention of the accommodation expired on May 31, 2025 but also the period of six months provided under the 2022 Rules on May 10, 2025.
Under Rule 3B of the Supreme Court Judges Rules, 2022, a retired Chief Justice of India can retain type VII bungalow, a level below the 5, Krishna Menon Marg bungalow, for a maximum period of six months post-retirement.
Justice Chandrachud, who has served as the 50th CJI between November 2022 and November 2024, is currently occupying the official residence of Chief Justice of India nearly eight months after demitting office.
Former Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna, who succeeded Justice Chandrachud, chose not to move into the official accommodation during his six months tenure. Even incumbent CJI BR Gavai opted to continue living in a previously allotted bungalow.
On December 18, last year, Justice Chandrachud has written to then CJI Khanna requesting him to allow him continue residing in the 5, Krishna Menon Marge residence till April 30, 2025, saying although he has been allotted Bungalow No. 14 on Tughlak Road in accordance with 2022 rules, renovation work at the new residence was going on.
Then CJI Khanna gave his nod pursuant to which MoHUA approved the retention of the type VIII bungalow at Krishna Menon Marg by Justice Chandrachud from December 11, 2024, to April 30, 2025 on payment of licence fees of around ₹5,000 per month.
The ministry conveyed the approval to the Supreme Court administration by a letter of February 13, 2025.
Subsequently, Justice Chandrachud made an oral request to then CJI Khanna to continue residing in the same residence till May 31, 2025, which was also approved by the then CJI with a condition that no further extension would be granted as several new judges had to put in guest houses or have to make alternate arrangements for accommodation in the national capital.
The July 1 letter of apex court administration further flagged the breach of both the timelines and the legal framework, and said the Krishna Menon Marg residence was permitted due to "special circumstances", the understanding was that it would be vacated after the agreed-upon extension till May-end.
It requested the Centre to take possession of the official CJI bungalow without any further delay and inform the Supreme Court.
The communication of this nature to the government is a rarity for vacating the official CJI residence that too from the former CJI.
According to sources, many CJIs have been informally granted extension to stay in the official residence for a limited time of a couple of months, till they make appropriate arrangements for their accommodation post retirement.
Sources confirm that Justice Chandrachud in his earlier communications has informed the apex court about the delay in moving out of the 5, Krishna Menon Marg residence in view of making the Tughlak Road Bungalow liveable for his family especially his two daughters with special needs, who are undergoing treatment at AIIMS.
Sources also confirm that Justice Chandrachud has written to then CJI Khanna in April informing him that he was in process of shortlisting of an accommodation in accordance with the special needs of his daughters and urged extension of time for vacating the official residence till June 30.
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Bihari guest workers in TN left clueless on electoral rollrevision
Amid the furore surrounding the 's special intensive revision (SIR) of the electoral rolls in Bihar, ahead of the assembly election scheduled to take place later this year, the fates of lakhs of guest workers keen on exercising their voting right hangs in the balance. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Under the exercise, around four crore of the eight crore voters in Bihar will have to submit documents proving their citizenship to enumerators by July 25, failing which their names will be excluded from the rolls. Analysts have pointed out that a huge chunk of the electorate comprising illiterate and underserved voters might not have one of the 11 documents that the Commission demands (including domicile and caste certificates) as proof of citizenship, and might not be in a position to furnish them before the deadline. The development has shocked 4.5 lakh people from Bihar in , of which an estimated 2 lakh are in Chennai. They include workers in the construction, hospitality, and logistics industries as well as college students. While the Supreme Court had suggested last week that the EC accept Aadhaar, its own identity card, and ration card as documents for voter re-verification, there seems to be an air of uncertainty regarding the way forward. "Since the announcement, we have been flooded with calls," says Mukesh Kumar Thakur, Secretary of Bihar Association, Chennai, and also Secretary of the Bihar Foundation, Chennai Chapter. "Some people have voter ID cards from Bihar, while their Aadhaar and ration cards have a Chennai address. They're worried that their names might get struck off owing to duplication. We have instructed them to approach their ward members. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now " Many workers are relying on relatives from their native constituencies to send them the necessary forms. Sanjay Kumar Jha, a logistics worker from Ambattur, who has lived in Chennai for 25 years with his family, plans on travelling to Bihar to get his verification done, as his Aadhaar bears a Chennai address, while the voter ID is of Bihar. In a majority of cases, workers have not been intimated about how to proceed with the revision process. Rajdev Kumar, a hotel employee in the city, fears the absence of awareness among guest workers could lead to mass exclusion from the electoral rolls. A similar fear has enveloped guest workers in other parts of TN. "Only a few among the daily wage workers from Bihar are educated, and they might be in a position to provide school or birth certificates. I have been working in Tamil Nadu for 15 years and all I have as proof are my Aadhaar and PAN cards," explained Rajesh Sah, employed at a private factory near Thaneerpandal road, Coimbatore. Others lament that the deadline for furnishing the necessary details is too short. With inputs from Anushka Juliet, Deepak Karthick, Vivanesh Parthiban


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Creating fear to stop people helping law is a terror act: Supreme Court
Supreme Court NEW DELHI: Indicating that an offence cannot be said to be a terror act only if an accused is convicted under an anti-terror law, Supreme Court on Tuesday said creating an atmosphere of fear to prevent people from taking the side of law by killing an army informer is also a terrorist act despite anti-terror law not being invoked in the case. A bench comprising Justices Ahsanuddin Amanullah and S V N Bhatti did not agree that the killing of three civilians, including the army informer, in J&K with an AK-47 was not a terror act because the conviction was not secured under an anti-terror law, and expressed its reservation in entertaining a remission plea of a convict who has spent 27 years in jail in the case. Prisoner Ghulam Mohammad Bhat took the stand that he was not convicted under an anti-terror law, but only under the Indian Penal Code for murder, and therefore, his act cannot be termed a terrorist act. The J&K government told SC that a convict undergoing life imprisonment for a terror act was not entitled for remission under state policy. Senior advocate Colin Gonsalves, appearing for the prisoner, said Bhat was convicted only under IPC section 302 (murder) and the Arms Act, and not under the then anti-terror legislation TADA. "Nothing was proved in court to attract TADA provisions. The trial court or the HC never found it to be a terrorist act," he said. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Is it legal? How to get Internet without paying a subscription? Techno Mag Learn More Undo Additional solicitor general K M Natraj, appearing for the J&K government, submitted that explosive devices, including a weapon to launch grenades, were also reportedly recovered from the scene of incident and it was an act of terror, it was not a simple murder. Agreeing with Gonsalves, the bench said, "If you want to create fear among people to ensure that no one approaches authorities against the illegal act then it is a terror act and we cannot close our eyes. "This was done to create havoc to ensure that no one dares to side with the law, then it certainly carries the characteristics of a terrorist act and remission cannot be granted under the policy. You have to challenge the remission policy. " SC, however, allowed Gonsalves's plea to be allowed to challenge the J&K remission policy within the ongoing proceedings.


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
PMO greenlights GST revamp; All eyes on council
The Prime Minister's Office has given in-principle go-ahead for a significant recast of the goods and services tax ( GST ) framework, setting the stage for the first major overhaul of the levy rolled out eight years ago, people familiar with the development said. A proposal in this regard may be moved for the consideration of the GST Council , the apex decision-making body for the indirect tax, at its upcoming meeting in August after the monsoon session of parliament. The finance ministry will reach out to states to build a political consensus on taking the reforms forward. It has already begun inter-ministerial consultations with key stakeholder departments on the proposed move, said the people cited. The revamp will cover both slab changes and procedural simplification to give relief to consumers as well as businesses, they said. A ministerial panel has been mandated by the GST Council to look at the rate rationalisation but it has made little headway. Industry has over the past few months made a strong case to the government for a recast of the GST framework including rates, slabs and procedures, while flagging numerous pain points. Fewer Slabs Proposed Lawmakers across party lines have also highlighted issues related to GST and the need to address them. GST currently has five key slabs — nil, 5%, 12%, 18%, 28% — and two — 0.25% and 3% — for bullion. The 5% slab has about 21% of all goods under GST. The 12% slab has 19% of items, while the 18% slab has 44% of items. The highest rate of 28% covers 3% of total goods. A key proposal being examined is scrapping the 12% slab and moving items to the 5% or 18% slabs. Detailed discussions have been held at the highest level in the government and policymakers are of the view that a simplified GST regime could give a further boost to the economy, said one of the persons. The time is opportune for the recast with the tax structure stabilising and macroeconomic fundamentals being in robust health, he said. Given that free trade agreements with advanced economies are on the cards, the government is keen to ensure that local industry does not face any constraints in scaling up to take advantage of the accords. A revamp of the income tax law is already imminent with the bill slated for the monsoon session. A compensation cess is levied on some so-called sin goods, including cigarettes and automobiles, in the top 28% slab, introduced to compensate states for any possible revenue loss due to GST transition for five years until June 2022. The cess was extended until March 31, 2026, to repay the interest and principal on the ₹2.69 lakh crore that the Centre had borrowed on behalf of states during the Covid period to meet the deficit in the cess fund. A separate ministerial panel has been tasked by the GST Council to look at the use of the surplus in the cess fund and the way ahead on that front.