UK in 'debt doom loop', top investor Dalio warns
Hedge fund manager Ray Dalio, who founded Bridgewater Associates, was speaking as UK debt as a percentage of GDP (gross domestic product) rose to 101%.
Long-term borrowing costs are higher than they have been at any point this century, giving the Chancellor Rachel Reeves little room to borrow more to fund spending, and thus requiring a focus on raising taxes instead.
Mr Dalio told the 'Master Investor' Podcast with Wilfred Frost she risked alienating the very people who could help get the country out of its fiscal bind - mirroring concerns expressed by the boss of Goldman Sachs last week.
Money latest:
"The debt doom loop is affecting capital flows. So the necessity for creating taxations that then drive people away.
"As the financial problems and the social problems worsen, having the effect of causing people with money to leave.
"That's a problem because, I don't know the exact numbers in the UK, but they're analogous to the US, where 75 % of income taxes are paid by the top 10%.
"So you have this financial deterioration, that precedes social and economic deterioration that has caused migrations all around the world and so on. And there is only one way to deal with that. Both of our countries need a strong leadership of a strong middle. They have to have the war between those of the left and those of the right begin to end because difficult choices are going to have to be made, you know, like our countries had in World War II.
"The deficits for the central government, have to be lowered to about 3 % of GDP. That is what would be sustainable rather than having this compounding effect." The UK deficit is currently 5.1% of GDP, while in the US it is 6%. "They have to do it equally in spending cuts and taxation. And if that is done interest rates will come down not rise."
Dalio outlines the process around the debt cycle in his new book How Countries Go Broke.
And while many people are broadly aware of the debt problems advanced nations now face, he said that bond markets are complacent to the looming risks.
"You get this complacency. So now the question for you or for your audience is, is it priced into the markets? Well, I'll answer the question and say, no, it is not priced into the markets."
is available across multiple podcast platforms
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How is the Dow calculated? Here's a breakdown.
The Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJI) is an index comprised of 30 stocks. Because of its structure, it doesn't always trade in sync with other indexes like the S&P 500 (GSPC) and Nasdaq Composite (IXIC). In the video above, Stocks in Translation Host Jared Blikre explains how the Dow works. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Stocks in Translation here. Today in Stocks and Translation, we're gonna take a look at how the Dow is actually calculated. Now, the Dow was born all the way back in 1896, nearly 130 years ago, before computers, before calculators, so this index of 30 stocks had to be easy to calculate. And for sake of simplicity, only the stock prices used. So the higher the stock price, the greater the weight in the index. And almost every other index, by the way, like the S&P and the Nasdaq, they use a company's market capitalization, but that gives that requires a lot more paperwork and more calculations. So here's the full method. Basically, you sum the prices of all 30 stocks in the index, and then you divide it by a number called the Dow divisor, which corrects for splits and changes in the components of the stocks. So anytime a stock has a stock split in the index, or when one stock is swapped out for another one, that Dow divisor will change. Now, here is a list of the four top stocks by price. Goldman Sachs is right at the top, with $723.65 as of the close yesterday. Microsoft is number two, Caterpillar is number three, Home Depot is number four. Now, United Health has a stock price of about $267 today, but before, uh, just a few months ago, it topped out at about 600, so it actually would have been number two in this list, had it not seen such a big slide. And I went in, and I calculated what the Dow would look like with different configurations here. So the orange line right here, which terminates last, that is the actual Dow. And then when you take out United Health in ye yellow, you have that line up here. And then I also took out Salesforce, Merck, and then Apple, because those were some of the biggest losers this year by percentage terms. And what you end up with is is a material materially higher Dow price without these big drags in it. And some of them can be actually quite big. And I also did another calculation here. I took, uh, the Dow price-weighted, that's the normal price weighting in white here, and then I also calculated it by market cap, starting at the beginning of the year. And when you do it by market cap, and I'm just gonna kind of trace this out here, we actually saw a lot more volatility by the lows. And again, this just includes all 30 stocks. I'm not taking out United Health or any of them. I'm just doing a different alternate calculation. So more volatility with the market cap weight, uh, version that we saw this year. Now, to sum up all the results, here's the market cap weighted 2025 year-to-date return. That came in at 7.3%. The actual price weighted number that everybody uses is 5.4%, and then the Dow minus United Health, that came in all the way up to 9.3%. And then you can take out Salesforce and Merck, and the numbers keep going up, and by the time you take out Apple, you have a Dow that's up 12.4%, and that's more than double the actual return of 5% and change. So something to think about here, uh, there's no guarantee that the Dow will always be calculated like this, but after 130 years, maybe they're just not gonna change. Tune into Stocks and Translation podcast for more jargon-busting deep dives. New episodes can be found every Tuesday and Thursday on Yahoo Finance's website, or wherever you find your podcasts. Related Videos Fed meeting: Why holding rates steady would be the 'right call' Market is seeing 'pockets of speculation,' not 'excessive' froth Berkshire trims VeriSign stake, Novo Nordisk craters, PayPal falls Market's 'fuel' for further P/E expansion is 'nearing empty' Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Goldman Warns: The Market's Missing a Major Risk
Wall Street is partying like tariffs don't matterbut Goldman Sachs' Peter Oppenheimer thinks that optimism might be premature. While investors pour back into US equities, betting on interest rate cuts and a smooth Trump second term, OppenheimerGoldman's chief global equity strategistwarns that markets could be overlooking serious downside risk. There's a degree of complacency, he told Bloomberg, noting that equity valuations are high and risk premia have come down. The tariff overhang might not spark a full-blown recession, but it could still hit stocks harder than markets are pricing in. In his view, now's a good time to get serious about diversification. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 4 Warning Sign with UNH. Oppenheimer made waves last year by calling out stretched US valuations just as AI mania was taking hold. While many strategists doubled down on domestic exposure, he turned the spotlight on long-ignored international markets. That contrarian bet is now paying off: MSCI's all-country ex-US index is up 17% this yeardouble the S&P 500's (SPY) 8.6% gain. Behind the call was a simple thesis: after a decade-plus of US dominance, the relative edge in profitability and returns was starting to fade. Add in geopolitical risk and shifting global growth dynamics, and the case for rebalancing away from the US became harder to ignore. With four decades in the game, Oppenheimer has seen how sentiment can shift fastbut the biggest returns come from spotting slow-moving structural shifts before they go mainstream. He believes today's generation of investorsraised on near-zero interest rates and instant feedback loopsmight be too focused on short-term noise. His advice? Be patient, stay diversified, and don't mistake a rebound for a risk-free rally. Even if the US avoids a tariff-induced recession, broader exposure could be the edge investors need in what's still a volatile and uncertain market. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Sign in to access your portfolio
Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
Here's how much crypto or gold investing legend Ray Dalio says you should have in your portfolio
Hedge fund icon Ray Dalio hasn't been feeling particularly upbeat about the prospects for America's fiscal situation. The founder of Bridgewater Associates, Dalio has lately been sounding the alarm on a brewing US debt crisis he believes is quickly approaching. On an episode of the Master Investor podcast over the weekend, he discussed the current economy with host Wilfred Frost, stating that he thinks investors should allocate roughly 15% of their portfolio for either bitcoin or gold due to the currency debasement he sees unfolding as the US dollar is debased by rapid borrowing and deficit spending. "If you were neutral on everything and optimizing your portfolio for the best return-to-risk ratio, you would have about 15% of your money in gold or bitcoin," he said. Dalio added that while he strongly prefers gold over bitcoin, he believes the real economic issue facing markets and investors is the devaluation of fiat money, a phenomenon which occurs in times of both economic excess and geopolitical tension, both of which apply to America's current situation. Citing previous historic examples, such as the market spasms of the 1970s, Dalio stressed the importance of holding an effective diversifier in your portfolio and holding 15% as a hedge against. However, he also made it clear that he doesn't think investors should "go overweight" in allocating more than 15% to these assets, stating that diversification was more important than trying to play the market. Other financial experts, such as Ric Edelman, have said that it may make sense for investors to have as much as 40% of their portfolios allocated for crypto. But for someone like Dalio, a more measured approach is on brand. "15% of a portfolio is a rather small share — after all, the remaining 85% can be invested however you like," said Arthur Azizov, founder of B2 Ventures. "[Dalio] is simply encouraging people to have a solid foundation, so that in the event of unexpected circumstances, they have a more likely chance of making a profit."
