Kerala HC orders disbursal of pension of former VC Ciza Thomas
'This court cannot ignore the gross injustice meted out to such a distinguished government servant. We will have to protect her pensionary right, which is a property right under the Constitution, and it cannot be denied as such unless by a procedure established by law.
A bench of Justices A Muhamed Mustaque and Johnson John noted that the government exercised its authority and power to 'harass' Thomas for taking up the VC's office at the instance of the chancellor, the then Governor Arif Mohammed Khan.
Kochi, May 30 (PTI) The Kerala High Court held on Friday that the state government withholding the pension of Ciza Thomas, former vice-chancellor of the A P J Abdul Kalam Technological University, was a violation of her fundamental rights and directed that her entire terminal benefits be released within two weeks.
'In view of the above, we direct the official respondents (government) to release the entire terminal benefits due to her within two weeks from today,' the bench said.
It said the question of interest payable on the amount can be left to the Administrative Tribunal to decide.
The bench came to the finding after noting that the disciplinary proceedings initiated against Thomas were quashed by the high court and no judicial proceedings were pending against her.
It said the Kerala Service Rules allow the state government to withhold pension only when departmental proceedings or judicial proceedings are pending.
'In the absence of any pending departmental or judicial proceedings, the government cannot withhold pensionary benefits of Dr Ciza Thomas.
'We note that the government exercised its authority and power in flagrant violation of her fundamental rights and to harass her for taking up the office of the vice-chancellor at the instance of the chancellor, the then governor,' the bench said.
The order came on a plea moved by Thomas seeking a direction to the government to disburse her regular pension, arrears and all other terminal benefits.
According to the court, the only justification given by the government for the delay in disbursing the pensionary benefits was that it has filed a review petition in the Supreme Court against the dismissal of its special leave petition challenging a Kerala High Court order that set aside its show-cause notice to Thomas as part of the disciplinary action initiated against her.
The action was initiated after she retired in March 2023 as the principal of the Government Engineering College, Thiruvananthapuram.
The government was of the view that she violated the Government Servants Conduct Rules by assuming the office of the vice-chancellor. PTI HMP RC
This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Abu Azmi moves HC for quashing FIRs filed over his remarks on Aurangzeb
MUMBAI: Samajwadi Party (SP) MLA Abu Azmi has moved the Bombay high court seeking directions to quash two first information reports (FIR) registered against him in connection with his remarks praising Mughal emperor Aurangzeb. The comments were made when he was questioned by reporters on March 3 during the budget session of the legislative assembly. Samajwadi Party MLA Abu Azmi (PTI) Azmi had said that Aurangzeb was a good administrator, and the country's gross domestic product (GDP) during his regime was 24%, which had attracted the British to India. Aurangzeb did not take a single rupee from the administration, the borders of his kingdom stretched as far as Burma and Afghanistan, and he had Hindu commanders in his army, Azmi had said. The remarks caused an uproar in political circles and two FIRs were registered against Azmi – at Wagle Estate police station on March 3 and at Marine Drive police station on March 7. The complainants alleged that the MLA had hurt religious sentiments as Aurangzeb had destroyed Hindu temples, caused injustice and oppression to the poor and tortured Chhatrapati Shambaji Maharaj. On March 4, Azmi was suspended from the legislative assembly after parliamentary affairs minister Chandrakant Patil moved a resolution. In his plea filed through advocate Mubin Solkar, Azmi said that he had merely expressed his opinion about Aurangzeb based on what he had read, and had never made any derogatory or insulting remarks against Chatrapati Shambaji Maharaj or any other Hindu king. He had responded impromptu to questions posed by reporters and had absolutely no intention to hurt the religious sentiments of Hindus or create any discord between religious groups or communities, he stated in the plea. Azmi further submitted that since some rival political parties were trying to manipulate and exploit his statements to register false FlRs against him, he had sought pre-arrest bail from the sessions court, which was granted on March 11, 2025. The Samajwadi Party MLA urged the high court to quash the FIRs against him and stay the ongoing probes by the Wagle Estate and Marine Drive police stations. The division bench of justices AS Gadkari and Rajesh Patil issued notices on his pleas and scheduled the next hearing after four weeks.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Demanding creation of ‘National Commission for Men', bikers on 16,000-km journey
A group of bikers riding across 20 states on a 16,000-km mission stopped in Chandigarh on Monday with a singular demand: the creation of a National Commission for Men. The campaign, Ride for Men's Commission 2.0, aims to bring national attention to what they describe as growing neglect of men's issues, including mental health, rising male suicides, domestic violence, and the alleged misuse of gender-based laws. The bikers, led by internationally recognised riders Dr Amjadkhan Nadim Shaikh and Sandeep Pawaria, addressed the media at the Chandigarh Press Club. Their second edition of the awareness ride began on May 31 from Faridabad. Riding over 500 km daily, the team is halting in major cities to hold press conferences and public interactions. 'Rain, heat or storm — nothing can stop this mission,' said Dr Shaikh, underscoring the group's resolve despite monsoon disruptions. Pawaria added, 'A Men's Commission must be formed. All are equal, whether man or woman. Yet, men are being disrespected even within their families. This isn't confined to one state; it's a nationwide issue.' The movement is backed by over 40 NGOs across India. Rohit Dogra, a founding member of the Save India Family (Chandigarh chapter), stressed the urgency of institutional action. 'Cruelty against men is three times more than against women. There's a growing gender war in the country, and if the government doesn't act, it will only escalate,' he said. 'We're not against women. We are against gender-biased laws.' Quoting Article 14 of the Constitution, which guarantees equality before the law, Dogra asked why men are excluded from its promise in practice. 'The government speaks of equality under Article 15, which prohibits gender-based discrimination, but there is none for men. Article 21 promises life and personal liberty, yet no one cares about men's life or liberty.' The campaign gained national attention following the Atul Subhash case, in which a man from Maharashtra died by suicide in April this year, allegedly after being falsely accused in a domestic violence case. Men's rights groups claim his case reflects the broader misuse of gender-specific laws and the lack of institutional mechanisms to support male victims. On April 19, members of the campaign held a protest at Jantar Mantar, Delhi, calling for urgent policy intervention and recognition of male abuse survivors. Among those supporting the ride is Shalini Ranyal, a biker and podcaster. 'Through my podcast and this ride, I stand equally for both men and women. Women have laws and NGOs; men have almost nothing. That needs to change,' she said. According to Ranyal, 80 to 90 men and women riders have joined the cause so far. The bikers have already travelled through Lucknow, Ahmedabad, Mumbai, Chennai, Hyderabad, Bengaluru, Patna, Kolkata, Jaipur, and Goa. Their next stretch includes Jammu, Kargil, Leh, Manali, Shimla, and will conclude with their return to Delhi.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Tripura CM slams Congress for Emergency, calls it ‘black chapter'
Agartala: Tripura chief minister Manik Saha on Monday criticised Congress for imposing Emergency in 1975, calling it a "direct attack" on the Constitution and democracy. Addressing a mock parliament of the party, he said the Emergency period (1975–77) was a "black chapter" in Indian history. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now "We have forgotten many things, especially the days of sorrow. But one cannot live without remembering such dark times," he added. Recalling the sequence of events that led to the declaration of Emergency, Saha said, "In 1971, Indira Gandhi contested from Rae Bareli in Uttar Pradesh and won. Her nearest rival, Raj Narain, challenged the result in the Allahabad High Court, alleging misuse of govt machinery and the appointment of a gazetted officer as her election agent. On June 12, 1975, Justice Jagmohan Lal Sinha declared her election null and void. " He added although Indira Gandhi appealed to the Supreme Court, Justice Krishna Iyer allowed her to continue as Prime Minister but barred her from voting or holding any official position. "Subsequently, Indira Gandhi consulted Siddhartha Shankar Ray, the then chief minister of West Bengal and a renowned barrister. Pressure was mounted on President Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed, and finally, Emergency was declared in 1975," Saha said. He said the objective behind organising the mock parliament was to educate the younger generation about the Emergency and its consequences. "They must know how democracy was throttled. It's their responsibility to spread this awareness further," he added. Saha also recalled the situation in Tripura during the Emergency. "The then chief minister Sukhamoy Sengupta misused the Maintenance of Internal Security Act (MISA) to arrest many people, including journalists. Homes were vandalised, dissenters jailed, and press freedom crushed," he said. Drawing a contrast with the present, he said, "Today, we are witnessing what real development means. Under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, efforts are being made to uphold and protect the Constitution."
