SBS News in Easy English 9 June 2025
+++
830 Australians have been recognised as part of the King's Birthday Honours. Former Prime Minister of Australia, Scott Morrison, is one of 14 people named as a Companion of the Order of Australia. The title has been offered to every Prime Minister since 1975. Mr Morrison says he is proud.
"I am very humbled by the recognition and thankful to the Australian people who gave me the opportunity to serve as Prime Minister during one of the most difficult periods in Australia's history. Everything from natural disasters to the COVID-19 pandemic, the recession it caused. The threats we faced in the Indo-Pacific and the assertions and coercions of China - and our response to that. But through all of that, the Australian people were absolutely amazing."
A former federal politician who lost her seat at the recent election, says she wants to move into Tasmanian state parliament. Last week, Tasmanian premier Jeremy Rockliff lost his job, when other politicians voted against his leadership - and now there will be a sudden election. Former Liberal M-P Bridget Archer wants to be chosen to represent a seat in the Bass electorate. "I'm not going to be anybody's stooge or anybody's puppet."
"Bridget is a fighter. Bridget, understands the importance of being part of Team Tasmania."
Today is SBS 50th birthday. The national public broadcaster started in 1975 as an experiment to share information about a national health care program, to Australians from non-English speaking backgrounds. Today, SBS broadcasts in 63 languages. NITV began in 2012 - a channel made by, for and about Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. Managing Director of SBS, James Taylor, says there is a lot to celebrate.
"We've got the highest volumes of multilingual content than ever before in our history. And in 60 languages. We're also being acknowledged across a number of other fronts. We've got the Australian streaming platform through SBS On Demand, and we are the podcaster of the year, three years in a row. These are all things to really be celebrated. We're a public good, we are in part funded by the public, and it's really important for us to be delivering more and more value each year to Australians."
In Tennis, defending champion Carlos Alcaraz has defeated Jannik Sinner in the French Open final. This is his fifth Grand Slam trophy. Alcaraz said kind words about his rival, Sinner, who had wanted to win his third major tennis trophy.
"Honestly, I know how hard you're chasing this tournament or every tournament. I'm pretty sure you're going to be champion not once but many, many times. It's a privilege to share the court with you in every tournament, making history with you."
That's the latest SBS News in Easy English.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Lawyer for ATO whistleblower Richard Boyle urges court not to impose convictions
An Australian Tax Office whistleblower has argued he should be spared convictions because he was motivated by public interest, and his actions led to change within the federal agency. Former debt collection officer Richard Boyle went public with concerns about the culture at the ATO in 2018 — marking the start of a years-long legal battle. He had faced 66 charges but over time many were dropped, before he in May pleaded guilty to four counts under a deal struck with prosecutors. At a sentencing hearing on Friday, prosectors said Boyle's offending constituted a serious breach of privacy, and a period of imprisonment was warranted — but they were not opposed to the term being suspended. Boyle was charged after he made a series of allegations on the ABC's Four Corners program, including that his area was instructed to use heavy-handed tactics on taxpayers who owed the tax office money. Over the years since he spoke out, Boyle had made several failed attempts to secure immunity from prosecution using whistleblower protections. He eventually pleaded guilty to disclosing protected information, making a record of protected information, using a listening device to record private conversations and recording another person's tax file number. Defence counsel Steven Millsteed KC said the court should recognise Boyle was not acting out of any nefarious motivation, self-interest or malice. Instead, he was guided by a "sincere belief that he was acting in the public interest". "His conduct, though unlawful, was grounded in a moral courage and a deep commitment to public service," he told South Australia's District Court. Mr Millsteed added that the allegations raised by Boyle "did some public good". "It resulted in the Inspector-General of Taxation conducting an investigation into the ATO's use of garnishee notes, and changes were made in respect of that," he said. In urging the court not to record convictions, Mr Millsteed said the ongoing legal action had taken a toll on Boyle's family, financial situation and mental health. Prosecutor Nick Robinson KC said Boyle's motivations did not change the fact he acted unlawfully. "This is the court of law, not the court of morals," he said. He said Boyle's actions were long-running, criminal and threatened the protection of privacy and commercial interests. Mr Robinson said general deterrence should be factored into his sentence, and urged Judge Liesl Kudelka to record convictions against him. Boyle shook his head from the dock as Mr Robinson disputed the submission that he was remorseful for his actions. Outside court, Whistleblower Justice Fund founder Rex Patrick said the lengthy legal proceedings had taken a toll on Boyle. "Richard has been dragged to hell and back," he said. "The message it sends anyone who's sitting inside the public service who wants to blow the whistle [is] that you should not do this. This is going to wreck your life." Mr Patrick said he hoped Judge Kudelka would record no conviction. "Then Richard can get on with his life," he said. Boyle did not make any comment as he left court with his supporters — some of whom became visibly distressed during the hearing. He will be sentenced later this month.
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Pro-Palestinian Sydney Harbour Bridge march centre of legal challenge in Supreme Court
A gathering of up to 50,000 people in a Sydney park before a march across the city's harbour bridge would pose "significant public safety risks" regardless of whether the event is authorised or unauthorised, a judge has been told. The plans for this Sunday, by a pro-Palestinian advocacy group, are at the centre of a legal challenge by NSW Police, with rally organisers insisting the march would send a "powerful message" about the ongoing situation in Gaza. Supporters gathered outside the state's Supreme Court in the lead-up to a hearing on Friday, where police called Acting Assistant Commissioner Adam Johnson as a witness. The court had attempted to organise an overflow room for observers, after the judge was told about 80 people were waiting outside the courtroom to get in. Under cross-examination by barrister Felicity Graham, representing the organisers, Acting Assistant Commissioner Johnson insisted he had public safety concerns about the event. "Imagine a scenario where the public assembly remains authorised. In that situation are you saying police would not facilitate safe conduct of the event?" she asked. Acting Assistant Commissioner Johnson told the court the bridge would still need to be closed if the gathering was authorised. "It's a certainty that a very large group of people attend even if the public assembly is not authorised, do you agree?, Ms Graham asked. "It's a possibility," the witness replied. He also raised the plans for attendees to first gather at Lang Park, situated on the corner of York, Grosvenor and Lang Streets, and approach the harbour bridge. "Fifty thousand people at Lang Park, whether it's authorised or unauthorised, has significant public safety risks, significant. Crowd crush, and I am personally concerned about that." He added that Lang Park was an "unsuitable location" because it is not a large area and at the moment a grassed portion is fenced off, with the capacity being "very, very limited". "We can't have people spilling onto the roadway and blocking the roadway and footpaths," he told the court. Ms Graham asked: "Let's say 50,000 people gather in and around Lang Park. What will police do in response?" The witness responded: "We have to manage public safety, and it will be a real challenge whether it's prohibited or not prohibited. It's not suitable, the location." NSW Police are seeking a prohibition order over the event, which would not ban people from attending and participating, but would mean that those who did participate would not be afforded protection against offences such as blocking roads or traffic. Just before the hearing began, Josh Lees from the Palestine Action Group told a crowd of supporters and media that the crisis in Gaza had not abated and there is an "urgent and horrific situation". "It's why we called it over the harbour bridge, because we need to do something bigger than what we've already done," he said. Mr Lees said the bridge had been shut previously for "much less significant reasons", including for a movie to be filmed, and said an argument that a closure requires more planning time didn't add up. "We all know whenever there is a significant accident on the harbour bridge, it is shut down at a moment's notice." He said the plans had attracted "unprecedented support" and claimed NSW Police had not accepted alternative plans the group suggested, including delaying the event for several weeks. "Not now, not ever is their stance," he said. Before the court case, Premier Chris Minns said the government recognised that thousands of people wanted to protest and was not questioning the motive. "The last thing we want, and the last thing police want is chaos in Sydney streets," he said. "We recognise people want to protest, we're hopeful depending on the outcome of the court case this afternoon, common sense can prevail and people are given an opportunity to express their voice." The court hearing, before Justice Belinda Rigg, continues.
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
The Tasmanian Liberals' handling of Marinus Link could spell the end of their days in government
Just two weeks ago, on election night, independent Craig Garland indicated he was open to working with the Liberal Party. He even said he could sign a confidence and supply deal with the government, just six weeks after he supported a no-confidence motion in Premier Jeremy Rockliff that ended up triggering an early state election. "I put my hand out to work in a collaborative manner with the government and that's what I'll be continuing to do," Mr Garland said on election night. Two weeks later, not only has Mr Garland ruled out signing a formal agreement with the Liberals, but has again committed to supporting another no-confidence motion to kick them out of power. So, how has the goodwill eroded so quickly? For Mr Garland, it was just one issue: Mr Rockliff's handling of the Marinus Link deal. Despite promising to publicly release the whole-of-state business case into the deal for four weeks before signing off and allowing it to go ahead, the government kept it hidden from public view until after the deal was signed. Labor and crossbench MPs were given limited access to the business case in briefings this week, but only if they signed confidentiality agreements. They couldn't take the business case out of the room, or talk about what they'd learnt. For Mr Garland, it was all contrary to the messages Mr Rockliff had been sending him, that he'd be collaborative, open and transparent. "I thought, 'this is terrible, this is not open, transparent government, it's a continuation of the norm of what I've experienced the last 14 months in parliament'," Mr Garland said. "And that's why I supported the no-confidence motion. Nothing has changed." They're angry words that leave little to the imagination. And they have big repercussions for Mr Rockliff's chances of forming minority government. If the Liberals fail to win a 15th seat by claiming the final undecided seat in Bass, they need four extra MPs on board to form minority government. They've already ruled out working with the Greens — who voted for the no-confidence motion and have made clear that they are much more motivated to work with Labor. So, without Mr Garland, where do the extra numbers come from? Well, if Labor wins that final seat in Bass, the Liberals need all four of the remaining four options — independents Peter George, Kristie Johnston and David O'Byrne, plus Carlo Di Falco from the Shooters Fishers and Farmers Party. But the Liberals' path to power could have slightly more options if independent George Razay or Shooters, Fishers and Farmers candidate Michael Frydrych win in Bass. Then they'd need to get four of the five remaining crossbenchers on board. That's still a pretty tough ask. And throw in that you've just made a number of crossbenchers extremely angry through the lack of transparency with the Marinus Link deal. Both Ms Johnston — who voted for the no-confidence motion in Mr Rockliff — and the newly elected Mr George have been scathing about the process and how little time they had to go through complex documents and wrap their head around one of the biggest infrastructure projects in the state's history. The government argues it had no other option but to keep the Marinus deal under wraps to secure the best deal for the state. And it's right that the fact a decision to go ahead with the project needed to be made during caretaker period was outside its control. But the lack of consultation with MPs, and the failure to release the business case publicly before the deal was signed, is squarely a Liberal decision. And it's a hard sell to suggest the deal was so good for Tasmania that releasing it publicly ahead of time would have led to the federal or Victorian governments trying to re-negotiate. So far, it's failed to win over Mr Garland. And if Ms Johnston and Mr George come to similar conclusions, the Liberals' days in power could be numbered. Labor can form government through a no-confidence motion in Mr Rockliff. If they win the seventh seat in Bass, their 11 members will vote for it, plus Mr Garland. It would then succeed with the support of those who backed the last no-confidence motion: the five Greens, plus Ms Johnston. If it happens, the Liberals will be left on the opposition benches wondering how it all went wrong. And they won't have to look much further than their decision to walk away from a commitment to transparency at the time they could least afford to do it.
