Why Delhi International Open chess champion Abhijeet Gupta opts for title wins over ELO points
This has to do a lot with his willingness 'to risk it all for the bigger gains,' an approach which comes with its own price as this philosophy has cost Gupta a few titles right at the finishing line.
But he is happy with his choices. 'I don't mind losing those final rounds a few times to win once,' Gupta tells The Indian Express. 'Winning that one tournament means more to me than finishing second in five. Coming fifth in five tournaments does not excite me,' he says.
However, at the final round of the 21st Delhi International Open at Tivoli Gardens in Chhatarpur on Saturday, ironically, it was his uncharacteristic caution that did the job. Possibly influenced by losing 70 Elo points in recent weeks, he adopted a more conservative approach against IM Aronyak Ghosh. With second-placed GM Aditya Samant breathing down his neck, Gupta faced a vital choice: play safe with a draw or risk his podium finish by pushing for victory.
Opting for pragmatism over risk, Gupta secured a quick draw through three-fold repetition in just five minutes against Ghosh. His 8.5-point finish meant Samant needed to win against top seed SL Narayanan in his last-round clash to force tiebreaks. This possibility, however, disappeared when Samant managed only a draw from almost a losing position. The Rajasthan GM's conventional approach paid dividends, netting him the Rs. 7 lakh top prize (substantial by Open events standards) and another cherished title.
'Having high ratings is useful as you get invitations to tournaments but winning tournaments are more important,' says Gupta after the win. 'Tomorrow you might not remember my peak rating was 2667 or how many times I breached 2700 but you'll remember I won these many Commonwealths, I won World Juniors, Delhi Open…' he adds.
At 35, Gupta finds himself at a career crossroads where he is past his peak yet still competitive. His recent Delhi Open title brought relief after a gruelling stretch that began with April's Reykjavik Open, during which he lost nearly 70 Elo points. While his peak rating of 2667 (achieved in 2012) remains distant, with his current live rating hovering in the mid-2500s, these numbers mean a little to him.
'My upbringing was such that neither I nor anyone close to me ever fixated on ratings,' he says. 'If I'm playing a tournament, I'm only playing for the win. Perhaps that's the reason which forced me to play seven back-to-back Open events where I performed poorly just because I had to win one,' he says.
Gupta draws parallels between his seven back-to-back tournament schedule and a bullet chess game: 'It's very similar for any athlete I feel. You can compare it with playing bullet chess, you keep playing until you win one game. That's the mentality.'
What has helped Gupta lately is his family. His six-month-old daughter and his wife, who accompanied him to the event, have allowed him to channel his energy more efficiently. He believes they keep him from procrastinating and help him prepare for matches more effectively, as he must now divide his time for his daughter as well.
When asked to reflect on his career and what he might do differently in hindsight, he says, 'Hindsight is a wonderful thing. There are many things I wouldn't have done—like playing all those open events back-to-back, which cost me 70 rating points. But looking back, I wouldn't say I'm unhappy with how my career has progressed.'
Behind champion Gupta, five players tied for second place with eight points each. This group included Belarus' Mihail Nikitenko and Vietnam's Nguyen Duc Hoa — both recording the most wins in the tournament — along with India's GM Diptayan Ghosh, Aronyak Ghosh, and Aditya Samant. Nikitenko claimed second place through superior tiebreaks, while second-seeded Diptayan Ghosh secured third position.
Category C witnessed a two-way tie between Tamil Nadu's Dinesh Kumar H and local lad Naitik Sethi, both finishing with an impressive 9.0/10 score. Dinesh claimed the top prize of Rs 4 lakh thanks to better tiebreaks, while Sethi took home Rs 3 lakh for second place. Another Tamil Nadu player, Sibi M, finished third and won Rs. 2 lakh.
1. GM Abhijeet Gupta (India) – 8.5 Pts
2. GM Mihail Nikitenko (Belarus) – 8 Pts
3. GM Diptayan Ghosh (India) – 8 Pts
4. IM Aronyak Ghosh (India) – 8 Pts
5. GM Aditya S Samant (India) – 8 Pts
6. GM Duc Hoa Nguyen (Vietnam) – 8 Pts
7. GM SL Narayanan (India) – 7.5 Pts
8. GM Mamikon Gharibyan (Armenia) – 7.5 Pts
9. GM Manuel Petrosyan (Armenia) – 7.5 Pts
10. GM Luka Paichadze (Georgia) – 7.5 Pts
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
6 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Padraig Harrington claims Senior Open for third major title
Ireland's Padraig Harrington carded a 3-under 67 to finish at 16-under 264 and claim the ISPS Handa Senior Open at Berkshire, England on Sunday. HT Image The victory marks Harrington's second major win in four weeks and makes him only the fifth player to win The Open and the Senior Open. "You want to do things that stand out, and having won a real Open, coming out, winning the Senior Open ... it adds a validation," Harrington said. "... I'm kind of on a high of winning, but then there will be that deep sense of satisfaction knowing that you've done both." Harrington won The Open in 2007 and 2008, and was on the cusp of winning the Senior Open in consecutive years. He finished second in 2022 and 2023, losing the latter in a playoff, before breaking through this year. The Dublin native entered the day with a two-shot lead, but never got complacent. "I don't want to relax, that has cost me in the past," Harrington said. "... I get ahead of myself, and you know, sometimes when it's an easy shot, easy tee shot, I can lose focus. "So I want to stay hyped up. And to be honest, I think today, because I wasn't comfortable with my swing, I never let my guard down. I was always into it and focused all day." Harrington, 53, started Sunday with an eagle on No. 1. He also tallied three birdies and two bogeys on the day, beating out Denmark's Thomas Bjorn and Justin Leonard, who finished at 13 under. Bjorn rolled in four birdies from No. 9 to No. 14, threatening Harrington's lead. He then bogeyed on 16, putting Harrington out of reach and finishing at 3-under 67. Leonard notched four birdies and two bogeys on the day for a 2-under 68. He carded 5-under 65 on Friday and Saturday. "It wasn't quite as sharp as I was the last couple days. You know, just not able to really hit it close enough to putt pressure," Leonard said. "I felt like if I could have been 3- or 4-under on the front nine, then, you know, we're kind of neck and neck." Scott Hend (65) finished fourth at 12 under, while fellow Australian Cameron Percy (65) and South Africa's Ernie Els (66) tied for fifth at 11 under. --Field Level Media
Indian Express
9 hours ago
- Indian Express
Koneru Humpy and Divya Deshmukh play out a second classical draw. Now what to expect in the tiebreakers of World Cup final?
If the FIDE Women's World Cup 2025 wasn't already a physically exhausting and mentally draining tournament, it became all the more so on Sunday after Divya Deshmukh and Koneru Humpy took their all-Indian final clash into an extra day in Batumi, Georgia. The second classical game of their final ended in a draw, pushing the decider to a tiebreak on Monday. While the first leg was a tale of missed opportunities for Divya, the second leg saw a different approach from Humpy, who opted for a non-risky opening with White. She began with knight to f3 from the right flank, choosing a well-known English opening, sticking to her strength, which is positional chess, in the hope of grinding Divya down later in the game. The players quickly exchanged all minor pieces, except for Humpy's dark-squared bishop, which she retained in exchange for Divya's knight, with queens still on the board for counterplay. GM Pravin Thipsay analysed Humpy's opening choice: 'It was expected that Humpy would try to press for an advantage, and that's what happened. She began with the English opening but eventually transposed into the regular Queen's Gambit Declined, the Semitarash variation,' Thipsay told The Indian Express. Explaining Humpy's middle-game strategy, Thipsay added: 'I expected her to play for a better pawn structure, as she excels at exploiting weaknesses. But on move 9, she had a choice between a bishop-over-knight advantage or a superior pawn structure and she opted for the former. In my opinion, a pawn structure advantage would have suited her better.' By the 22nd move, the players entered an endgame with equal pawns, though Humpy sought an edge with her active bishop, placing it on long diagonals. She even sacrificed a central pawn to keep the position sharp and pressure Divya into an error. 'Divya exchanged one of Humpy's knights for a bishop on move 9, and on the 12th move, she gave up her second bishop for a knight, leading to a complex but roughly equal position in a symmetrical pawn structure,' said Thipsay. 'Double bishops are generally better than double knights, but this was a semi-open position with central pawns. I've played this structure many times, and the advantage isn't significant. Divya correctly exchanged rooks, and by the 20th move, a draw seemed inevitable.' 'But Humpy took bold decisions,' he added. 'She sacrificed a pawn on move 23, putting Divya in a tricky spot. Divya missed the best 24th move, which would have forced a draw. After that, Humpy had chances, especially on move 28, where she could have regained the pawn with some advantage.' However, Humpy allowed Divya's position to improve before regaining her pawn, by which point she also forced Divya to end the game by perpetual checks. In the all-Chinese battle for third place, Tan Zhongyi prevailed over top seed Lei Tingjie, clinching her spot in the 2026 Candidates Tournament. Though both players are drained after nearly a month of relentless chess, one can still expect a high-octane tiebreak clash, with neither player likely to back down until the very end. Humpy holds an edge in shorter time controls as a two-time and reigning World Rapid Champion. However, the odds aren't entirely skewed as Divya has never lost to her in Rapid chess. In their two recorded rapid encounters, Divya has one win and one draw. Things will change though, if the tiebreak heads to the Blitz round, the gulf between the two players widens. Humpy, the 2022 World Blitz Championship runner-up, has dominated Divya in this format, winning four of their five blitz games. Five-time World Champion Viswanathan Anand analysed their strengths ahead of the tiebreak. He said, 'On paper, Humpy has better results, but Divya has more momentum. Humpy's wins have been shakier, but since the 2024 Olympiad (where Humpy didn't play) she's won the Women's World Rapid Championship, the Pune Grand Prix, and performed strongly at Norway Chess. Divya, though, must be relieved this tournament is finally here. Everyone's been waiting for her breakthrough, and both seem pleased with how things are unfolding,' Anand said on ChessBase India YouTube stream. This will be Humpy's second Candidates appearance in a row after her second-place finish in 2023. 'It's a great result (two Indians in the World Cup final), but what I like is this twin thing that on the one hand, we have Harika and Humpy as two veterans of the game but on the other hand, the last Candidates was Vaishali and now we're guaranteed a spot for Humpy and Divya so I like this combination of one youngster and one of the veterans,' Anand remarked. Praising India's first female Grandmaster, he added, 'What Humpy is doing is incredible. I feel bad calling her a veteran, but this is amazing stuff. She has come from a break, so her ability to relaunch herself, so to speak and even she's specialising in the faster format, she's doing quite well there. If you look at her openings, it's all current. In that sense, she shows that not only she's able to play but she's also fully in touch with all the current developments in chess.'
Indian Express
16 hours ago
- Indian Express
Humpy or Divya – whoever wins will pocket $50,000, as compared to Open section World Cups rewarding $1,10,000 to champion
Either Koneru Humpy or Divya Deshmukh will earn, amongst other things like Elo ranking points, a prize cheque of $50,000 for winning the ongoing FIDE World Cup for women in Georgia. The coastal host city is beautiful with it's lovely food and cheese, and known for its chess mad populace, has seen the emergence of women's chess stars from India who both made final beating Chinese opponents. However, a pay disparity is their reality. Prize money for winner at FIDE World Cup (for open section – both men and women allowed) is $1,10,000. For the women's World Cup winner, it's $50,000 which is less than half, though both sets of tournaments are organised by FIDE. Chess remains far from pay parity for both events, and it can only be speculated how this gets justified. Typically, while an open World Cup has over 200 players, women's world cup might have just over 100 players. The women's only event resultantly witnesses one less round. The prize money at the 2023 World Cup, where R Praggnanandhaa lost to Magnus Carlsen in the final, saw the Norwegian pocket $1,10,000. However, the time control for both World Cups is the same. And unlike tennis – which too adopted pay parity – both sets of players in open and women's spend the same time. The time control for each game shall be: 90 minutes for the first 40 moves, followed by 30 minutes for the rest of the game with an increment of 30 seconds per move starting from move 1, as per FIDE rules. While women can play in the open World Cup if they qualify, many choose not to. At the open World Cup that will be hosted at Goa, women's World champion Ju Wenjun has a spot guaranteed because she is the women's world champion. However it remains to be seen if she will opt to travel and contend. The pay disparity can be gauged from these numbers – the total prize fund for FIDE World Cup (Open) in 2023 was USD 1,834,000 while total prize fund for FIDE Women's World Cup in 2023 and 2025 combined was USD 676,250, less than a third of the open events. Chinese star Ju Wenjun earned €300,000 ($ 403,080) after winning Women's World Championship this year while runner up Tan Zhongyi took home €200,000 ($ 268,720) for losing the world championship. In comparison, Gukesh earned $1,350,000 and Ding Liren took $1,150,000. The open winner (always men) take home three times more the dough than the women. At the FIDE Grand Swiss 2025 edition, where open and women's events will happen side by side, the prize fund has been set at one million euros. The total will be split between the Open and Women's events, with €700,000 allocated to the Open section — evenly divided between the Rapid and Blitz tournaments — and €300,000 for the Women's section, also split equally.
