Belarus opposition leader calls for Radio Free Europe to stay on air
"Free media are our link between the truth, between the people in exile and the people in the country," she said in a speech in the Lithuanian parliament on Tuesday. "If these media die, they will be replaced by propaganda media."
Tikhanovskaya, who lives in exile in the European Union, was referring to the dramatic moves by the new administration in Washington.
"RFE/RL is threatened with closure following funding cuts by US President Donald Trump's administration. Several European countries, led by the Czech Republic, are discussing ways in which RFE/RL can be preserved," she said.
RFE/RL began broadcasting during the Cold War and has had an office in Lithuania from which it covers neighbouring Belarus since the beginning of 2023.
The dissemination and use of its news has been a criminal offence in Belarus since Minsk declared the broadcaster an "extremist organization" in 2021.
In August 2020, Belarusian leader Alexander Lukashenko, in office since 1994, was again declared the winner of the presidential election, unleashing mass protests that were brutally suppressed. The opposition, however, saw Tikhanovskaya as the real winner.
The EU no longer recognizes Lukashenko as head of state. He is considered to be completely dependent on Russian President Vladimir Putin.
RFE/RL's Vilnius office is staffed by Belarusian journalists who went into exile like Tikhanovskaya after the 2020 elections.
They produce television and radio programmes in Belarusian, which are also broadcast online.
The programmes are broadcast from the RFE/RL broadcasting centre in Prague, where the station has been based since 1995. The centre also makes programmes in Russian, Ukrainian and other languages, reaching nearly 50 million people in 23 countries every week, the broadcaster said.
Since taking office, Trump has drastically cut funding for numerous government offices that focus on domestic and international affairs alike. This, combined with Washington's pivot to Russia, is deeply worrying to many in Europe, particularly as the Kremlin's war on Ukraine rages on.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
21 minutes ago
- New York Post
Third round of Ukraine-Russia peace talks end in less than a hour with no cease-fire after Trump threatens Putin with sanctions
WASHINGTON — Ukrainian and Russian officials ended their third round of peace negotiations in under an hour Wednesday — falling short of establishing a cease-fire but agreeing to a prison swap. The talks took place in Istanbul just over a week after President Trump threatened Russian President Vladimir Putin with 'very severe tariffs' if he doesn't commit to a cease-fire in Ukraine within 50 days. The anticipated talks lasted about 40 minutes, according to Russian news agency TASS. 4 Putin aide Vladimir Medinsky, second from left, at the peace talks in Istanbul on July 23, 2025. Getty Images The two sides agreed to have a prisoner exchange of 1,200 people, National Security and Defense Council Secretary Rustem Umerov said, The Kyiv Independent reported. 'We are working on priority issues. Our priority is always people, cease-fire and meeting of leaders,' Umerov said after the talks. The Ukrainian side also proposed a meeting between Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and Putin. If such a sitdown happens, it would be the first time the leaders would speak since the start of the war on Feb. 24, 2022. Putin aide Vladimir Medinsky said topics of discussion would first have to be identified for Putin to agree to a face-to-face negotiation, per The Kyiv Independent. Medinsky said Moscow instead put forth having three online working groups to address political, military and humanitarian topics. 4 In this photo provided by the Ukrainian Emergency Service, responders work to extinguish a fire following a Russian attack in Odesa on July 22, 2025. AP 4 President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelensky attends the parliament session in Kyiv on July 17, 2025. AP Zelensky has repeatedly expressed his desire to meet with Putin, but the Russian side has been tepid and has only sent lower-level officials so far. The three negotiations thus far have successfully led to several prisoner exchanges, but have not brought about an end to the brutal war, as Moscow continues to drone strike Ukrainian cities. The Kremlin indicated its desire to stick to its 'goals' before going into the negotiations, with Putin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov telling reporters on Sunday that Moscow is steadfast on holding up their interests. 'The main thing for us is to achieve our goals. Our goals are clear,' Peskov said. Peskov was likely referring to a 'peace memorandum' that the Russian delegation handed to their Ukrainian counterparts during the second round of talks on June 2. The demands included Ukraine officially recognizing Russia's annexation of Crimea, and the full Russian annexation of Kherson, Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia and Luhansk oblasts. Under the demands, Ukraine would have to remove its troops from the four oblasts — and then demobilize the entire country, end all aspirations of joining NATO and other military alliances, make Russian the official language of Ukraine and ban additional Western military supplies and intelligence sharing. Meanwhile, Zelensky has stressed that Ukraine needs to have security guarantees in place to ensure Moscow doesn't invade again. He's also maintained that Crimea is a part of Ukraine. 4 A resident inspects a part of a damaged car at the site of the Russian drone strike, amid in Odesa, Ukraine, on July 22, 2025. REUTERS The three rounds of talks began after increasing pressure from Trump, who has promised to bring about the end of the war. Trump announced July 14 that the US would be sending weapons to Ukraine via NATO, which would be funding the 'billions' worth of equipment. The announcement included a mounting threat toward Putin — secondary sanctions on Russia if no peace was met in 50 days. Putin has not publicly acknowledged Trump's threat, while Zelensky told The Post in a July 16 interview that he would like to see Trump ramp up the pressure more. 'Putin has wasted President Trump's time,' Zelensky charged. 'I would very much like to see the United States, the Congress and the president put some pressure on this situation with sanctions and so the sooner, the faster it can be done, the better.'
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Thousands march in Ukraine after Zelensky curbs top anti-corruption agencies
Thousands are marching across Ukraine for the first time since Russia's invasion to protest President Volodymyr Zelensky after he signed a bill to curb the country's top anti-corruption agencies. The controversial move allows a politically appointed prosecutor general to have more power over Ukraine's National Anti-Corruption Bureau (NABU) and the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office (SAPO), threatening the independence of the two agencies tasked with weeding out decades of corruption in Kyiv. Critics have now taken to the streets to protest the bill, which may even threaten the people's dream of joining the European Union. 6 Ukrainians came out en masse in Kyiv to protest the bill restricting anti-corruption institutions' independence. Global Images Ukraine via Getty Images 6 Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky defended the law as a way to eliminate 'Russian influence' in the top anti-corruption agencies. Getty Images Zelensky, who has enjoyed popular support since Russia launched its full-scale invasion in 2022, is facing his first wartime protest at home after the bill was fast-tracked through parliament and presented before him on Tuesday night. The president has defended the move as a necessary step to rid the two agencies of 'Russian influence' and to address why some cases have been stalled for years. 'There is no rational explanation why criminal proceedings worth billions have been 'hanging' for years,' Zelensky said in a statement. 'And there is no explanation why the Russians can still get the information they need.' 6 Critics say the bill undermines the agencies born from the 2014 Revolution of Dignity to tackle the corruption that's long plagued Kyiv. Global Images Ukraine via Getty Images 6 The demonstrations are the first of their kind since Ukraine was attacked by Russia in 2022. Global Images Ukraine via Getty Images The approval of the law came following federal raids against NABU employees and an investigation into SAPO's handling of state secrets, with two people arrested on Monday over 'suspicion of working for Russian special services.' Opponents, however, slammed the bill's passage as a way of putting political pressure on what should be independent agencies that targeted some of Zelensky's close allies, including former Deputy Prime Minister Oleksiy Chernyshov. Critics have previously accused Zelensky of refusing to face the alleged corruption going on inside his inner circle, which opponents say has hurt Kyiv's ability to fight back against the Russian invasion. 6 A protester flashes the Ukrainian Constitution during the protest. Global Images Ukraine via Getty Images The move also earned backlash from Marta Kos, the EU's commissioner for enlargement, who said she was 'seriously concerned' and warned that restricting the anti-corruption agencies would only hurt Ukraine's chances of joining the bloc. 'The dismantling of key safeguards protecting NABU's independence is a serious step back,' she wrote on X. 'Independent bodies like NABU & SAPO, are essential for [Ukraine]'s EU path. Rule of Law remains in the very center of EU accession negotiations,' she added. 6 The people are demanding that Ukraine's National Anti-Corruption Bureau and the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office remain independent. Global Images Ukraine via Getty Images Ukraine's history with widespread corruption has been one of the reasons why the country has not been accepted into the EU and NATO. NABU and SAPO were established following Ukraine's Revolution of Dignity in 2014, which saw leaders promise the public to weed out corruption in Kyiv after ousting pro-Russian President Viktor Yanukovych. NABU is in charge of investigating corruption allegations, with SAPO tasked with prosecuting the cases once enough evidence is gathered. Zelensky said his administration will be holding a meeting next week to form an action plan on how the two agencies will be moving forward, insisting that they will be allowed to act in a method that ensures 'justice and the effectiveness.'
Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
Trump team hurls accusations at Obama over 2016 election interference
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard Wednesday continued to accuse former President Obama's administration of a "manipulation of intelligence" around Russia's interference in the 2016 election. The big picture: Nearly a decade after he won, President Trump remains fixated on disproving the thoroughly investigated and widely held conclusion that Russia interfered to aid his campaign. Back in 2020, the Republican-led Senate Intelligence Committee — including now-Secretary of State Marco Rubio — concluded that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help Trump win but did not hack election infrastructure to manipulate cast ballots. State of play: Gabbard released a document Wednesday that she alleges undermines previous findings from the Obama-era intelligence community that Russia favored a Trump win in 2016. She wrote that the Obama administration was "promoting the LIE that Vladimir Putin and the Russian government helped President Trump win the 2016 election." Gabbard released another memo last week, with which she accused the Obama administration of a "treasonous conspiracy" to sabotage Trump's presidency in 2016. Driving the news: During a White House press briefing Wednesday, Gabbard again accused Obama and his national security team of directing "the creation of an intelligence community assessment that they knew was false." She alleged, "They knew it would promote this contrived narrative that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help President Trump when selling it to the American people as though it were true." White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt doubled down on the claims, saying, "The truth is that Trump never had anything to do with Russia" and alleging that "the worst part of this is Obama knew that truth." Zoom out: Asked for comment Wednesday, Obama spokesperson Patrick Rodenbush referred Axios to his Tuesday statement where he called the allegations "outrageous" and "bizarre." He said in that statement, "Nothing in the document issued last week undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election but did not successfully manipulate any votes." In response that statement, Gabbard said Wednesday that Obama's office is "trying to deflect away from their culpability in what is a historic scandal." Asked if the Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity protects Obama from any possible prosecution, Leavitt said Trump "wants to see all those who perpetuated this fraud against our country, who betrayed our country and the Constitution to be thoroughly investigated and held accountable."
