Adams demands Columbia release Mamdani's admission records in which he ID'd himself as Asian and African American: ‘Deeply offensive'
Mamdani, a 33-year-old Muslim immigrant from Uganda who is the frontrunner in the city's mayoral race, applied to the Ivy League in 2009 and checked the two boxes for 'Asian' and 'African American' because he felt that either alone didn't encompass his identity, he told the New York Times Thursday.
The Queens lawmaker was not yet a US citizen at the time and was naturalized in 2018. He holds dual citizenship in the US and Uganda, the outlet reported.
In another portion of the application — which was ultimately rejected — that allowed him to elaborate on his identity, Mamdani clarified that he was Ugandan.
3 Mayor Eric Adams criticized Zohran Mamdani for claiming he was Asian and African American in his rejected Columbia application in 2009, when he was not yet a US citizen.
ZUMAPRESS.com / MEGA
3 Zohran Mamdani's 2009 admission records with Columbia University were leaked.
AFP via Getty Images
Adams was appalled by Mamdani's actions, especially for skirting around the system in 'an insult to every student who got into college the right way.'
'The African American identity is not a checkbox of convenience. It's a history, a struggle and a lived experience. For someone to exploit that for personal gain is deeply offensive,' Hizzoner, who is black, said in a statement.
His campaign went a step further, accusing Mamdani of possibly having taken away an admission offer from a true African American applicant.
'It's now clear that Zohran Mamdani misrepresented his racial identity to gain admission to Columbia University, and at the time, he wasn't even a US citizen. This is not just dishonest — it's possibly fraudulent. It may have taken a place away from a qualified African American applicant and misused a process designed to correct real, systemic inequities,' campaign spokesperson Todd Shapiro charged in the statement.
'We need answers. Because the people of New York deserve to know whether the man asking for their vote built his career on a possibly fraudulent foundation.'
3 A 'hacktivist' stole sensitive information from Columbia University late last month.
GHI/Education Images/Universal Images Group via Getty Images
Mamdani's application was leaked to the Times after a 'hacktivist' reportedly stole sensitive information from more than 2 million members of the university, including applications.
The Adams campaign ordered Columbia University to make Mamdani's admissions records public, perform an investigation into whether it violated university policy, and clarify whether his status as a non-citizen impacted their decisions.
Mamdani's father, Mahmood Mamdani, is a professor of anthropology, political science and African studies at Columbia University. He joined the faculty in 1999.
Mamdani is the clear frontrunner in November's general election, an American Pulse survey released Thursday shows.
He nabbed 35% of voters polled, while ex-Gov. Andrew Cuomo pulled in 29%. Republican Curtis Sliwa had 16% while incumbent Adams, who is running as an independent, came in with 14% while fellow independent candidate, Jim Walden, had 1%.
The Post has reached out to Mamdani's campaign.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
an hour ago
- Chicago Tribune
Trump and GOP target ballots arriving after Election Day that delay counts and feed conspiracy fears
ATLANTA — President Donald Trump and other Republicans have long criticized states that take weeks to count their ballots after Election Day. This year has seen a flurry of activity to address it. Part of Trump's executive order on elections, signed in March but held up by lawsuits, takes aim at one of the main reasons for late vote counts: Many states allow mailed ballots to be counted even if they arrive after Election Day. The U.S. Supreme Court last month said it would consider whether a challenge in Illinois can proceed in a case that is among several Republican-backed lawsuits seeking to impose an Election Day deadline for mail ballots. At least three states — Kansas, North Dakota and Utah — passed legislation this year that eliminated a grace period for receiving mailed ballots, saying they now need to be in by Election Day. Even in California, where weekslong vote counting is a frequent source of frustration and a target of Republican criticism, a bill attempting to speed up the process is moving through the Democratic-controlled Legislature. The ballot deadline section of Trump's wide-ranging executive order relies on an interpretation of federal law that establishes Election Day for federal elections. He argues this means all ballots must be received by that date. 'This is like allowing persons who arrive 3 days after Election Day, perhaps after a winner has been declared, to vote in person at a former voting precinct, which would be absurd,' the executive order states. It follows a pattern for the president, who has repeatedly questioned the legitimacy of such ballots even though there is no evidence they are the source of widespread fraud. The issue is tied closely to his complaints about how long it takes to count ballots, his desire for results on election night and his false claims that overnight 'dumps' of vote counts point to a rigged election in 2020, when he lost to Democrat Joe Biden. But ballots received after Election Day, in addition to being signed and dated by the voter, must be postmarked by the U.S. Postal Service indicating they were completed and dropped off on or before the final day of voting. Accepting late-arriving ballots has not been a partisan issue historically. States as different as California and Mississippi allow them, while Colorado and Indiana do not. 'There is nothing unreliable or insecure about a ballot that comes back after Election Day,' said Steve Simon, the chief election official in Minnesota, which has an Election Day deadline. In his executive order, most of which is paused by the courts, Trump directs the attorney general to 'take all necessary action' to enforce federal law against states that include late-arriving ballots in their final counts for federal elections. He also directs the U.S. Election Assistance Commission to condition federal funding on compliance. Republicans in five states have passed legislation since the 2020 election moving the mail ballot deadline to Election Day, according to the Voting Rights Lab, which tracks election legislation. Earlier this year, GOP lawmakers in Kansas ended the state's practice of accepting mail ballots up to three days after Election Day, a change that will take effect for next year's midterms. Problems with mail delivery had prompted Kansas to add the grace period in 2017. Kansas state Sen. Mike Thompson, a Republican who chairs the committee that handles election legislation, compared the grace period to giving a football team extra chances to score after the game clock expires. 'We need this uniform end to the election just so that we know that all voters are operating on the same time frame,' he said. California has long been a source of complaints about the amount of time it takes for ballots to be counted and winners declared. 'The rest of the country shouldn't have to wait on California to know the results of the elections,' U.S. Rep. Bryan Steil, a Wisconsin Republican who chairs the Committee on House Administration, said during an April hearing. He said California's 'lax election laws' were to blame for the delays. The nation's most populous state has the largest number of registered voters in the country, some 22.9 million, which is roughly equivalent to the number of voters in Florida and Georgia combined. California also has embraced universal mail voting, which means every registered voter automatically receives a ballot in the mail for each election. The deadline for election offices to receive completed ballots is seven days after Election Day as long as they are postmarked by then. A survey of some 35,000 Los Angeles County voters during last fall's election found that 40% waited until Election Day to return their ballot. Election officials say the exhaustive process for reviewing and counting mail ballots combined with a large percentage of voters waiting until the last minute makes it impossible for all results to be available on election night. Under state law, election officials in California have 30 days to count ballots, conduct a postelection review and certify the results. Dean Logan, Los Angeles County's chief election official, told Congress in May that his team counted nearly 97% of the 3.8 million ballots cast within a week of Election Day in 2024. Jesse Salinas, president of the state clerks' association, said his staff in Yolo County, near Sacramento, already works 16-hour days, seven days a week before and after an election. Assemblyman Marc Berman introduced legislation that would keep the state's 30-day certification period but require county election officials to finish counting most ballots within 13 days after the election. They would be required to notify the state if they weren't going to meet that deadline and give a reason. 'I don't think that we can stick our heads in the sand and pretend like these conspiracies aren't out there and that this lack of confidence doesn't exist, in particular among Republican voters in California,' said Berman, a Democrat. 'There are certain good government things that we can do to strengthen our election system.' He acknowledged that many counties already meet the 13-day deadline in his bill, which awaits consideration in the Senate. 'My hope is that this will strengthen people's confidence in their election system and their democracy by having some of those benchmarks and just making it very clear for folks when different results will be available,' Berman said.
an hour ago
Musk says he's forming a new political party after split with Trump
BRIDGEWATER, N.J. -- Elon Musk said he's carrying out his threat to form a new political party after his fissure with President Donald Trump, announcing the America Party in response to the president's sweeping tax cuts law. Musk, once an ever-present ally to Trump as he headed up the slashing agency known as the Department of Government Efficiency, broke with the Republican president over his signature legislation, which was signed into law Friday. As the bill made its way through Congress, Musk threatened to form the 'America Party' if 'this insane spending bill passes.' 'When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste & graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy,' Musk said Saturday on X, the social media company he owns. 'Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom.' The formation of new political parties is not uncommon, but they typically struggle to pull any significant support away from the Republican and Democratic parties. But Musk, the world's richest man who spent at least $250 million supporting Trump in the 2024 election, could impact the 2026 elections determining control of Congress if he is willing to spend significant amounts of money. His reignited feud with the president could also be costly for Musk, whose businesses rely on billions of dollars in government contracts and publicly traded company Tesla has taken a hit in the market. It wasn't clear whether Musk had taken steps to formally create the new political party. Spokespeople for Musk and his political action committee, America PAC, didn't immediately comment Sunday. As of Sunday morning, there were multiple political parties listed in the Federal Election Commission database that had been formed in the the hours since Musk's Saturday X post with versions of 'America Party' of 'DOGE' or 'X' in the name, or Musk listed among people affiliated with the entity. But none appeared to be authentic, listing contacts for the organization as email addresses such as ' wentsnowboarding@ ″ or untraceable Protonmail addresses. Musk on Sunday spent the morning on X taking feedback from users about the party and indicated he'd use the party to get involved in the 2026 midterm elections. Last month, he threatened to try to oust every member of Congress that voted for Trump's bill. Musk had called the tax breaks and spending cuts package a 'disgusting abomination," warning it would increase the federal deficit, among other critiques. 'The Republican Party has a clean sweep of the executive, legislative and judicial branches and STILL had the nerve to massively increase the size of government, expanding the national debt by a record FIVE TRILLION DOLLARS,' Musk said Sunday on X. His critiques of the bill and move to form a political party mark a reversal from May, when his time in the White House was winding down and the head of rocket company SpaceX and electric vehicle maker Tesla said he would spend 'a lot less' on politics in the future. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who clashed with Musk while he ran DOGE, said on CNN's "State of the Union" on Sunday that DOGE's 'principles' were popular but 'if you look at the polling, Elon was not.' 'I imagine that those board of directors did not like this announcement yesterday and will be encouraging him to focus on his business activities, not his political activities,' he said.
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Democrats still clueless, Mamdani's insulting child care ‘fix' and other commentary
Liberal: Democrats Still Clueless In the 'half a year since their catastrophic loss to their arch-nemesis Trump,' frets the Liberal Patriot's Ruy Teixeira, Democrats' 'favorability rating is still dreadful, they have only a modest lead in the generic congressional vote for 2026' and their chances of 'taking back the Senate are slim.' The 'drive to reinvent the party seems to have stalled out' as leaders remain 'in denial about how serious their wounds are.' They haven't 'staked out a middle ground' that adopts popular Trump actions, but instead remain 'deeply convinced that Trump is perhaps the worst person to ever walk the earth and find it difficult to relate to voters whose views are more mixed' — 'that a breaking point from Trump's actions will inevitably be reached where voters will wake up and realize Democrats were right all along.' Libertarian: Zo's Insulting Child Care 'Fix' Advertisement Socialists like Zohran Mamdani 'pretend they want to support mothers and motherhood. But they don't understand what type of help mothers need at all,' fumes Reason's Liz Wolfe. Mamdani 'promises to implement free child care.' But then 'if you're a mother who wants to take care of your own kids, your household — through your tax dollars — will be forced to subsidize those who use the state-run day care system.' Will moms who stay home or 'rely on grandparents, a nanny, or any sort of local child care collective' get 'any tax credit or subsidy'? Advertisement Families vary, but 'Mamdani and other socialists like him are saying that one form of child care is above all others and that New Yorkers should be forced to pay for it.' Democrat: Return to Basics Zohran Mamdani is 'a charismatic, smart and effective campaigner' who has 'tapped into' widespread anxiety about 'bills, rent and job security,' admits Tom Suozzi in The Wall Street Journal — but his 'lofty promises' of free housing and transit lie 'far beyond his authority' and will have to be 'paid for by huge tax increases.' Better 'another way' based on 'stronger unions, revitalized manufacturing, and a labor market that rewards hard work over wealth accumulation.' Mamdani didn't win because New Yorkers love socialism, but 'because too many voters think the rest of the Democratic Party no longer stands for them.' Advertisement And that will keep haunting the national party. Culture critic: Rowling Right on Pronouns The pronoun trend is 'a fast track to declaring your side in a culture war,' fires Stella O'Malley at Spiked. 'Harry Potter author JK Rowling' is 'certainly no hostage to this trend,' as she flames: 'When you tell a woman she must pretend a man is a woman, you're asserting the right to control her speech and perception of reality.' Advertisement Says O'Malley: 'What Rowling understands is that pronouns carry an entire worldview,' so 'using 'he' instead of 'she' can feel like firing the first shot in a culture war.' 'For the linguistically sensitive, a misused pronoun registers as a breach of reality.' 'Rowling is right — pronouns are not just a matter of politeness. Grammar is being used to smuggle in an ideology.' Campus watch: Columbia Prez's Telling Texts Leaked text messages show interim Columbia President Claire Shipman has 'all the instincts of a dodo bird,' snark The Washington Free Beacon's editors. The texts show her thoughts on 'anti-Israel and antisemitic protests that have roiled the Ivy League school for the past two years.' After students violated University policy (which would eventually 'lead the student encampment and occupation of a university building'), she called to 'unsuspend the groups before the semester starts' and for the school to 'do some things with Rashid' — that is, events promoting virulently anti-Israel 'Rashid Khalidi, the former Palestine Liberation Organization flack' and longtime Columbia prof. Her 'first response to Oct. 7 and the campus crisis it spawned was to push an outspoken Jew off the Columbia board and fill the spot with an Arab.' Advertisement So 'Columbia trustees might wonder' if the school needs 'new leadership.' — Compiled by The Post Editorial Board
