logo
Face yoga is everywhere, but does it actually work?

Face yoga is everywhere, but does it actually work?

CNN21-06-2025

Wellness
Winding down
Fashion and beautyFacebookTweetLink
Follow
Get inspired by a weekly roundup on living well, made simple. Sign up for CNN's Life, But Better newsletter for information and tools designed to improve your well-being.
Puckering, puffing, scrunching and stretching your face may look silly, but in some spaces, it's the serious business of face yoga.
The trendy facial workout involves a series of exaggerated poses and repetitive movements meant to target the muscles in the face, trading full-bodied yoga moves such as 'downward dog' for the lip-pouting 'duckface' and other expressions.
Popular for being both cost-effective and product-free, face yoga testimonies can be found all over social media, with some influencers and self-proclaimed gurus promising a 'natural facelift' effect capable of toning, slimming and reducing fine lines on the face.
But how much are these promised benefits a stretch of the truth? And how much is backed by science?
Here's what a yoga instructor, a dermatologist and the author of one of the few face yoga studies out there have to say.
The face is made up of layers of skin, fat and muscle sitting on top of the skull.
Underneath the top layer of skin, or dermis, there is a layer of subcutaneous fat pads, which sit on top of the muscles, explained Dr. Anetta Reszko, a New York-based dermatologist and clinical assistant professor of dermatology at Weill Cornell Medical College. These muscles help us smile, frown, chew and make other facial expressions.
'The fat and the muscles work together to give the face volume,' Reszko said. 'But over time, as we age, or if we don't use those muscles because of Botox, they can atrophy (and) become smaller.'
This atrophy can cause the fat pads on top of the muscles to fall, giving the face a more sagging or hollow appearance, Reszko said.
'The idea behind facial yoga is you're working below that level, growing the muscle layer below the fat,' said Dr. Murad Alam, the vice chair of the department of dermatology and professor at Northwestern University's Feinberg School of Medicine in Chicago. 'As you grow the muscle, that would restore some shape to the face.'
Alam, who is also a practicing dermatologist, conducted one of the few known studies to test this face yoga hypothesis in 2018 on a small cohort of middle-aged adults.
After 20 weeks of daily, 30-minute exercises, a panel of dermatologists observed improved facial fullness among the 16 participants who completed the program, the study reported.
'The place where we noticed the biggest change was the cheeks,' Alam said. 'Which makes sense, because the cheek muscles are among the biggest facial muscles, so if you exercise them, the growth of them is going to be the most noticeable.'
Due to the limited sample size and lack of direct measurements, further clinical trials would be needed to affirm this volumizing effect, Alam noted. Generally, medical research without a drug or device is difficult to fund, he said.
'Is this a replacement for cosmetic procedures? Not really, because the amount of improvement was not as significant and (other cosmetic) aspects of aging weren't studied,' Alam said. 'But it's potentially useful to people who absolutely do not want any cosmetic procedures because they're concerned about the safety or the cost or the inconvenience.'
In Reszko's dermatology practice, she recommends face yoga exercises for increasing blood and lymphatic fluid circulation in the face.
Our faces have hundreds of lymph nodes that use fluid to drain waste and fight infection, Reszko said. During sleep, lymphatic fluid can accumulate in the face from lying down, causing a 'puffy' appearance immediately upon waking.
Moving, stretching and massaging the face for 10 to 15 minutes every day could help reduce puffiness, Reszko said, referencing other techniques such the traditional Chinese gua sha stones that are meant to serve a similar purpose. This drainage can be especially helpful for patients who recently underwent cosmetic surgery or those with chronic allergies, she said.
Increasing blood flow to the face may also make the skin appear more flushed and hydrated as well, Reszko said, but this effect is usually temporary.
If you tend to hold tension in your neck, shoulders, jaw, forehead or anywhere else on the face, face yoga also could be helpful to relax the muscles, said Annelise Hagen, a yoga instructor and self-proclaimed pioneer of the technique who authored the book 'The Yoga Face.'
'Tension is a huge enemy for a lot of us. We are making these faces without realizing it all the time.' Hagen said. 'A lot of the work I do is just trying to teach people how to notice and be more mindful, relax and take a breath.'
For Hagen, face yoga is more than just a workout or a cosmetic bio-hack — it's a way to be more in tune with your face.
In her classes, she may encourage people to lift the corners of their mouth for a neutral, 'smiling Buddha face.' Or for the neck and jaw, she'll do the 'lion's breath,' opening her mouth wide, sticking out her tongue, rolling back her eyes and exhaling.
'When you're approaching the face from a yogic perspective, it's about being mindful of what we do with the face and acknowledging that it's kind of a manifestation of something inside,' Hagen said. 'Some people may approach it differently, but anything that can make you feel more serene, calm and better about the face that you're in, I think is legitimate.'
Generally, face yoga exercises are harmless, Alam said. To cause wrinkling, frown lines, bruising or other trauma to the face, a person would have to apply painful force.
On the other hand, if someone is serious about taking up a daily face yoga routine, Reszko suggests avoiding movements that rub or stretch the delicate under-eye area. The skin around the eyes tends to be thinner and more sensitive than the rest of the face.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The natural cell-ution of aesthetics
The natural cell-ution of aesthetics

News24

time40 minutes ago

  • News24

The natural cell-ution of aesthetics

We live in a world where everyone wants to be young forever and thanks to dedicated surgeons that is now possible through using your own stem cells. Stem cells harvesting can enhance your aesthetic while making it look natural. Stem cell therapy has gained immense popularity in recent years, with cosmetic surgery patients seeking options that offer more than traditional cosmetic enhancements. By utilising the body's own regenerative cells, cosmetic surgeons can achieve more natural-looking results, while also minimising recovery times and reducing the risk of complications. So, what is stem cell harvesting? Stem cell harvesting involves collecting stem cells, typically from adipose (fat) tissue, which can then be re-injected into the body to promote healing and rejuvenation. These cells have the remarkable ability to differentiate into various cell types, aiding in tissue repair and regeneration. As a result, patients undergoing procedures such as face lifts, liposuction and reconstruction/enhancement of buttocks, breasts and burns. Benefits of stem cell use in cosmetic surgery: Natural results: Stem cell therapy allows for more organic-looking enhancements, as the body recognises and integrates these cells. Accelerated healing: The regenerative properties of stem cells can significantly reduce downtime, allowing patients to return to their daily activities sooner. Minimise Scarring: Procedures utilising stem cells often results in less scarring compared to traditional methods. Versatile applications: From facial rejuvenation,hair restoration and body contouring, stem cells can be applied in various cosmetic procedures, providing versatile treatment options. Read more | 11 foods that may be making you struggle to lose weight 'The technology around stem cells is already changing the world of medicine, offering a better life for so many people around the world. That technology is also being incorporated into plastic surgery. It's without a doubt become a focal point for my team and I this year' says Dr Weyers. Dr Deon Weyers, South Africa's leader in plastic surgery, has recently begun this offering of cutting-edge stem cell harvesting techniques to his patients and is one of the first to do so in South Africa What are some of the advantages to stem cells in the world of plastic surgery? 'Benefits include their ability to transform into most cell types, thereby repairing damaged tissue. Because of this, researchers think they may have a role in treating a range of medical conditions. The growth factors, genetic messengers and tissue cells are good for all types of the skin but also injured tissue such as skin that is affected by aging, injury, cancer. These substances can help repair, rejuvenate and protect.'

Spend $1, Get $3 Back From Washington: The Medicaid Funding Conundrum
Spend $1, Get $3 Back From Washington: The Medicaid Funding Conundrum

Forbes

timean hour ago

  • Forbes

Spend $1, Get $3 Back From Washington: The Medicaid Funding Conundrum

Computer graphics of dollar banknotes stream flying around United States Capitol. Colorful twilight ... More sky with clouds in backgrounds. Finance, banking, monetary policy and quantitative easing concept. The great wave off Kanagawa homage to Hokusai. As the U.S. Senate deliberates the One Big Beautiful Bill, a key healthcare issue sparking debate is how to divide Medicaid costs, which serve low-income Americans, between state and federal taxpayers. Since 2014, Medicaid spending has surged 76%, reaching $872 billion in 2023—only 15% less than Medicare's budget, which serves seniors and Americans with disabilities. Medicaid's budget has grown faster than Medicare (66%), Social Security (60%), and the U.S. GDP (57%). Policymakers aiming to curb federal spending naturally focus on Medicaid. Medicaid costs are shared between the federal and state governments. One commonly used state funding practice—provider taxes—raises fiscal concerns for the federal government, according to the Government Accountability Office. Here's how it works: A state levies a provider tax on hospitals and other healthcare providers, based on revenue or other measures of size. It then claims this tax revenue (e.g., $1 billion) as its share of Medicaid funding and receives $3 billion in federal matching funds. The state returns most of the combined $4 billion to hospitals and uses the reminder for self-directed purposes related to Medicaid. It's a lucrative investment for hospitals—pay $1, get nearly $3 back. For states, it's an even better deal: a windfall of federal dollars with no real cost. But this game is rigged against federal taxpayers, who are left footing the bill. Worse still, both hospitals and states are now incentivized to expand provider taxes for bigger payoffs, further burdening federal taxpayers. The Government Accountability Office found that provider taxes drive a substantial and rapidly growing share of Medicaid spending, undermining accountability to federal taxpayers and limiting resources for patients in need. Moreover, as health policy expert Ann Kempski and I wrote in Health Affairs Forefront, this harms employers and workers. Directly, hospitals raise commercial prices to maximize Medicaid payments. Indirectly, large hospitals gain a competitive edge over smaller facilities and independent physicians, accelerating market consolidation and driving up commercial prices. States can achieve federal matching rates exceeding 12:1 for social needs, such as purchasing air conditioners for Medicaid beneficiaries. By offering such strong incentives, the federal government is effectively urging states to pursue these windfalls. It would be almost fiscally irresponsible for states not to do so. The root cause undermining Medicaid's program integrity is the separation between management and funding: federal taxpayers do not administer the program but generously foot the bill, giving states every incentive to overspend in order to receive even more. Various solutions have been proposed to address the Medicaid funding conundrum, including federalizing the program, delinking federal payments from state contributions, reducing matching rates, freezing provider taxes, and capping service payments. Solutions that tackle the root cause—the separation between management and funding—would generate greater federal savings but face stronger resistance due to their fiscal impact on states and providers, compared to those that merely treat the symptoms. Soon, we'll find out where the political winds in Washington settle.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store