Antimicrobial resistant superbugs could kill millions, cost $2 trillion yearly by 2050: Report
Antimicrobial-resistant superbugs could lead to substantial global mortality and economic losses of approximately $2tn annually by 2050, according to a study, quoted by the Guardian.
Analysis from a UK government-sponsored research reveals that rising antimicrobial resistance (AMR) could result in yearly global GDP losses of $1.7 trillion over the next 25 years without decisive intervention.
The Center for Global Development's research indicates severe economic impact on the US, UK and EU economies. Recent reductions in aid funding appear counterproductive, particularly as the UK government has eliminated Fleming fund support for AMR prevention in developing nations.
Similarly, the US has confirmed $9 billion in foreign aid reductions, with European nations following suit.
Anthony McDonnell, who led the research at the Center for Global Development, explained that initial projections were based on historical resistance trends. He noted that significant aid reductions by the US (80%), UK (from 0.5% to 0.3% of GNI), France, and Germany could accelerate resistance rates to worst-case scenarios.
He emphasised that no country, regardless of their AMR control success, should be complacent. Without protecting AMR programmes from funding cuts, global resistance rates could escalate to match severely affected nations, resulting in increased mortality worldwide and substantial economic consequences.
The study, covering 122 countries, projects annual GDP losses by 2050 could reach $722 billion in China, $295.7 billion in the US, $187 billion in the EU, $65.7 billion in Japan, and $58.6 billion in the UK under pessimistic scenarios.
The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation forecasts a 60% increase in AMR-related deaths by 2050, with annual mortality reaching 1.34 million in the US and 184,000 in the UK. Drug-resistant infections are expected to rise significantly.
Antibiotic-resistant infections double treatment costs due to increased hospitalisations, extended stays, expensive alternative treatments, and complex care requirements.
The research estimates global AMR treatment costs could rise by $176bn annually, with UK costs increasing from $900m to $3.7bn and US costs from $15.5bn to $57bn.
The study indicates workforce reductions of 0.8% in the UK, 0.6% in the EU, and 0.4% in the US due to resistant infections.
However, increased investment in addressing superbugs could boost annual economic growth by $156.2bn in the US and $12bn in the UK by 2050.
Dr Mohsen Naghavi from IHME warned that without immediate action, current medicines might become ineffective, potentially making simple infections lethal, according to The Guardian.
This requires governmental policy changes, new drug development, and public education about antibiotics' ineffectiveness against viruses.
A UK government representative highlighted their 10-year health strategy addressing AMR, citing progress in reducing antibiotic use in meat production and developing new treatment incentives whilst maintaining international cooperation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
2 hours ago
- Economic Times
Can genetics predict obesity? New study may help spot risk in kids before it is too late
Synopsis A new study introduces ancestry-specific polygenic risk scores that double the effectiveness of predicting adult obesity risk compared to current methods. Analyzing genetic data from over 5 million individuals, the tool identifies those at risk early in childhood. While genetics play a role, lifestyle and environmental factors remain crucial in addressing the global obesity epidemic. iStock A new study introduces ancestry-specific polygenic risk scores that double the effectiveness of predicting adult obesity risk compared to current methods. (Image :iStock) Imagine knowing whether your child may be at risk for obesity—not years after weight gain begins, but long before it shows. A groundbreaking new study published in Nature Medicine suggests this could soon be possible, thanks to a genetic tool called polygenic risk scores (PGS).Led by over 600 scientists from 500 institutions worldwide, and drawing data from The Genetic Investigation of ANthropometric Traits (GIANT) consortium and 23andMe, the study analyzed genetic information from more than 5 million individuals. Their goal? To develop a more precise way to predict a person's likelihood of developing obesity, starting from childhood. Current obesity risk tools largely rely on family history, diet, and lifestyle. But this study's new ancestry-specific and multi-ancestry polygenic risk scores proved about twice as effective in predicting obesity in adulthood compared to existing people of European ancestry, for example, the score accounted for 17.6% of an individual's risk of developing a high Body Mass Index (BMI)—a key indicator of obesity. The study included a broad participant base: 70% had European ancestry, 14.4% were Hispanic, 8.4% East Asian, 4.6% African, and 1.5% South while the tool is promising, it isn't a crystal ball. 'Obesity is not only about genetics,' said Dr. Ruth Loos, study co-author and professor at the University of Copenhagen's Novo Nordisk Foundation Center, in an interview with NBC News. 'Genetics alone can never accurately predict obesity… other factors, such as lifestyle, need to be part of the predictions.' The urgency behind such research is clear. Obesity is now considered one of the world's fastest-growing public health threats. According to World Health Organization (WHO) data: In 2022, 2.5 billion adults were overweight, including over 890 million with obesity. Childhood obesity is skyrocketing—35 million children under five were overweight in 2024, and over 390 million adolescents aged 5–19 were overweight in 2022. Obesity was a factor in 3.7 million global deaths in 2021 alone. Perhaps more troubling is the shift in obesity prevalence from wealthier nations to low- and middle-income countries, where children face a 'double burden' of both undernutrition and rising obesity rates. The WHO warns that these children often live in environments where high-calorie, nutrient-poor foods are cheap and accessible, but healthier choices and safe spaces for exercise are is much more than a number on a scale. It increases the risk of nearly 200 diseases, including type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, asthma, and certain cancers. For children, the stakes are even higher: obesity not only impacts their physical and mental health but also academic performance and social wellbeing due to stigma and childhood obesity often carries into adulthood, setting the stage for chronic illness and shorter lifespans. 'Children with obesity are very likely to be adults with obesity,' notes the WHO. While genetic scores like the one developed in this study could revolutionize early detection, experts caution that there's no one-size-fits-all solution. Dr. Karen Hacker, director of the CDC's National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention, told USA TODAY that effective obesity prevention must address broader social determinants of health—including access to healthcare, nutritious food, physical activity, and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends multifaceted strategies: from medication and surgery for treatment, to policy-driven efforts ensuring access to healthy food, safe physical environments, and stigma-free support systems.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Can genetics predict obesity? New study may help spot risk in kids before it is too late
Imagine knowing whether your child may be at risk for obesity—not years after weight gain begins, but long before it shows. A groundbreaking new study published in Nature Medicine suggests this could soon be possible, thanks to a genetic tool called polygenic risk scores (PGS). Led by over 600 scientists from 500 institutions worldwide, and drawing data from The Genetic Investigation of ANthropometric Traits (GIANT) consortium and 23andMe, the study analyzed genetic information from more than 5 million individuals. Their goal? To develop a more precise way to predict a person's likelihood of developing obesity, starting from childhood. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category PGDM Public Policy Degree Artificial Intelligence Project Management Finance healthcare Digital Marketing Technology Leadership Data Science others MBA MCA Others Data Analytics CXO Healthcare Cybersecurity Data Science Management Product Management Operations Management Design Thinking Skills you'll gain: Financial Analysis & Decision Making Quantitative & Analytical Skills Organizational Management & Leadership Innovation & Entrepreneurship Duration: 24 Months IMI Delhi Post Graduate Diploma in Management (Online) Starts on Sep 1, 2024 Get Details What the Study Found Current obesity risk tools largely rely on family history, diet, and lifestyle. But this study's new ancestry-specific and multi-ancestry polygenic risk scores proved about twice as effective in predicting obesity in adulthood compared to existing assessments. In people of European ancestry, for example, the score accounted for 17.6% of an individual's risk of developing a high Body Mass Index (BMI)—a key indicator of obesity. The study included a broad participant base: 70% had European ancestry, 14.4% were Hispanic, 8.4% East Asian, 4.6% African, and 1.5% South Asian. But while the tool is promising, it isn't a crystal ball. 'Obesity is not only about genetics,' said Dr. Ruth Loos, study co-author and professor at the University of Copenhagen's Novo Nordisk Foundation Center, in an interview with NBC News. 'Genetics alone can never accurately predict obesity… other factors, such as lifestyle, need to be part of the predictions.' You Might Also Like: This one food habit could shield you from arthritis, obesity and diabetes. Science backs what Indian kitchens always knew The Global Obesity Epidemic The urgency behind such research is clear. Obesity is now considered one of the world's fastest-growing public health threats. According to World Health Organization (WHO) data: In 2022, 2.5 billion adults were overweight, including over 890 million with obesity. Childhood obesity is skyrocketing—35 million children under five were overweight in 2024, and over 390 million adolescents aged 5–19 were overweight in 2022. Obesity was a factor in 3.7 million global deaths in 2021 alone. Perhaps more troubling is the shift in obesity prevalence from wealthier nations to low- and middle-income countries, where children face a 'double burden' of both undernutrition and rising obesity rates. The WHO warns that these children often live in environments where high-calorie, nutrient-poor foods are cheap and accessible, but healthier choices and safe spaces for exercise are not. Why Early Detection Matters Obesity is much more than a number on a scale. It increases the risk of nearly 200 diseases, including type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, asthma, and certain cancers. For children, the stakes are even higher: obesity not only impacts their physical and mental health but also academic performance and social wellbeing due to stigma and bullying. Importantly, childhood obesity often carries into adulthood, setting the stage for chronic illness and shorter lifespans. 'Children with obesity are very likely to be adults with obesity,' notes the WHO. You Might Also Like: Are you really obese? Experts challenge BMI as only measure of obesity, propose new guidelines for better health What Can Be Done? While genetic scores like the one developed in this study could revolutionize early detection, experts caution that there's no one-size-fits-all solution. Dr. Karen Hacker, director of the CDC's National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention, told USA TODAY that effective obesity prevention must address broader social determinants of health—including access to healthcare, nutritious food, physical activity, and education. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends multifaceted strategies: from medication and surgery for treatment, to policy-driven efforts ensuring access to healthy food, safe physical environments, and stigma-free support systems.
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Tranquilisers, heart disease, COPD: Obama-era report drops bombshells about Hillary Clinton's health woes in 2016
TL;DR: The Hillary Health Angle A newly declassified report reveals Russia had access to secret DNC information about Hillary Clinton's health. The intel claimed Clinton was suffering from psychological and physical ailments—kept hidden from even her own advisors. Obama and Democratic leaders reportedly found her condition 'extraordinarily alarming,' fearing it would damage her election chances. These findings, previously redacted, raise fresh questions about what Russia knew—and why they withheld it during the 2016 race. The backstory This week, US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard released a once-classified House Intelligence Committee report that sheds new light on the 2016 election and what foreign intelligence services—particularly Russia's SVR (Foreign Intelligence Service)—knew about the Democratic Party's inner workings. While much of the 2016 Russia-related discourse focused on the alleged ties between Donald Trump and Moscow, the newly unredacted sections suggest that Russia had obtained damaging information about Hillary Clinton—but chose not to leak it. What the SVR knew According to the report, by September 2016, Russian intelligence had successfully accessed Democratic National Committee (DNC) communications that revealed internal concerns about Hillary Clinton's mental and physical health. The key findings included: Obama-era panic: The report claims that President Obama and senior Democratic leaders were alarmed by Clinton's deteriorating health, calling it 'extraordinarily alarming' and believing it posed a 'serious negative impact' on her campaign. This concern, it states, was kept in 'strictest secrecy,' with even top campaign advisors kept in the dark. Psychological condition: Russian SVR sources allegedly accessed DNC documents describing Clinton as suffering from 'intensified psycho-emotional problems,' including: Uncontrolled fits of anger, aggression, and cheerfulness A dependency on 'heavy tranquilizers' A mindset 'obsessed with a thirst for power' Physical health ailments: The report cites SVR knowledge that Clinton had: Type 2 diabetes Ischemic heart disease Deep vein thrombosis Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) Why didn't Russia leak it? One of the most startling revelations is that Russia chose not to leak the most damaging information it had about Clinton—despite later being accused of favouring Trump. Analysts now suggest the Kremlin may have expected a Clinton victory and refrained from leaking health-related details that could backfire diplomatically. Another possibility: Russia intended to retain that information as post-election leverage. How the report came out The original report was compiled by the House Intelligence Committee during the Trump administration. However, much of it remained classified or heavily redacted during both the Biden and Obama years. Tulsi Gabbard, now serving as DNI under President Trump, authorised its full release, citing transparency and the 'right of the public to know what really happened in 2016.' Why this matters now The revelations add to a growing narrative that the Russia-Trump collusion story was selectively told, with key pieces of context deliberately withheld. At the heart of the controversy lies a question with global implications: If Russia had more damaging information about Clinton than Trump—why did American intelligence, media, and political leadership build an entire election scandal around the latter? The new disclosures also: Undermine the Steele Dossier's credibility, already widely discredited Suggest that foreign adversaries had deeper visibility into Democratic infighting than previously acknowledged Put renewed scrutiny on how Obama-era officials handled intelligence dissemination What Clinton's team has said So far, Hillary Clinton has not issued a statement responding to the newly released material. Her team has previously described health-related rumours as 'baseless right-wing conspiracy theories.' However, the newly cited DNC internal communications appear to show private admissions that contradict public denials. Final takeaway This is no longer just a debate about emails or hacked servers. The declassified House report paints a picture of: A Democratic Party deeply divided and alarmed about its nominee's health A foreign power with access to that panic And a narrative that may have been shaped more by politics than truth FAQ Q: Who released this new information? A: The full report was declassified by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, who now serves under President Trump. Q: What agency is said to have obtained this intel? A: Russia's SVR (Foreign Intelligence Service) allegedly intercepted internal DNC communications revealing concerns about Hillary Clinton's health. Q: Is there any independent verification of Clinton's alleged illnesses? A: No medical records have been released to confirm the specific claims listed (e.g., diabetes, COPD), but the report cites internal DNC discussions and SVR intercepts as sources. Q: Why didn't Russia leak this if they were interfering? A: Some analysts now believe Russia expected Clinton to win and withheld the most damaging material for potential post-election leverage. Q: What is the political impact of this revelation? A: It calls into question the narrative that Trump was the sole beneficiary of Russian meddling, and raises concerns about transparency within the Obama and Biden intelligence communities.
