
1 in 6 cancer drugs in four African nations are defective – DW – 06/27/2025
Across Africa, cancer medications have been found to be substandard or falsified. It means that people are being given medicines that may not work, or that might even may cause harm.
An alarming number of people across Africa may be taking cancer drugs that don't contain the vital ingredients needed to contain or reduce their disease.
It's a concerning finding with roots in a complex problem — how to regulate a range of therapeutics across the continent.
An American and pan-African research group published the findings this week in . The researchers had collected dosage information, sometimes covertly, from a dozen hospitals and 25 pharmacies across Ethiopia, Kenya, Malawi and Cameroon.
They tested nearly 200 unique products across several brands. Around 17% — roughly one in six — were found to have incorrect active ingredient levels, including products used in major hospitals.
Receiving insufficient dosages of these ingredients could allow a patient's tumors to keep growing, and possibly even spread.
Similar numbers of substandard antibiotics, antimalarial and tuberculosis drugs have been reported in the past, but this is the first time that such a study has found high levels of falsified or defective anticancer drugs in circulation.
"I was not surprised by these results," said Lutz Heide, a pharmacist at the University of Tübingen in Germany who has previously worked for the Somali Health Ministry and has spent the past decade researching substandard and falsified medicines.
Heide was not part of the investigative group, but said the report shed light on a problem not previously measured.
"I was delighted that, finally, someone published such a systemic report," Heide said. "That is a first, really significant systematic study of this area."
"There are many possible causes for bad-quality products," the investigation's senior researcher Marya Lieberman of the University of Notre Dame, US, told DW.
Those causes can include faults in the manufacturing process or product decay due to poor storage conditions. But some drugs are also counterfeit, and that increases the risk of discrepancies between what's on the product label and the actual medicine within.
Spotting substandard and falsified products can be difficult though. Usually, a medical professional or patient is only able to perform a visual inspection — literally checking a label for discrepancies or pills and syringes for color differences — to spot falsified products.
But that's not a reliable method. In the study, barely a quarter of the substandard products were identified through visual inspection. Laboratory testing identified the rest.
Fixing the problem, Lieberman said, will require improving regulation and providing screening technologies and training where they're needed.
"If you can't test it, you can't regulate it," she said.
"The cancer medications are difficult to handle and analyze because they're very toxic, and so many labs don't want to do that. And that's a core problem for the sub-Saharan countries where we worked. Even though several of those countries have quite good labs, they don't have the facilities that are needed for safe handling of the chemo drugs established."
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Nearly a decade ago, the World Health Organization (WHO) found around 1 in 10 medicines used in low and middle-income countries were substandard or falsified. Independent research conducted since has backed those figures up, sometimes finding rates that are potentially twice as high.
"This could lead to treatment failure, adverse reactions, disease progression," health economist Sachiko Ozawa told DW.
Ozawa contributed to the investigation on anticancer drugs and has separately researched other cases of defective medicines.
"For the community, there's also economic losses in terms of wasted resources,' she said. 'So countries may be spending a lot of money on medications that are not going to be effective."
While high-income countries can monitor supply chains and have stringent regulatory systems in place to identify and withdraw suspect products, the infrastructure to do that is far from common in other regions.
In those places, poor access to affordable medication often drives patients to less-regulated marketplaces. Inadequate governance and regulation, as well as a scarcity of surveillance and diagnostic equipment to test pharmaceuticals, are all contributing to the problem in Africa.
"In high-income countries, I think there's a much more secure supply chain where you know the manufacturers are vetted, it has to go through very stringent regulatory processes to get approval...it gets tested more frequently," Ozawa said.
The WHO told DW that following the report's findings, it was working with the four impacted countries to address the problem.
"We are concerned with the findings the article has highlighted. WHO is in contact with national authorities of 4 impacted countries and obtaining relevant data," it said in a statement. "We expect to assess full information to evaluate the situation, which often takes time and capacity. But we're committed to address these issues working with the relevant countries and partners."
It also reiterated its ongoing call for countries to improve their regulatory frameworks to "prevent incidents of substandard and falsified medicines, including in settings of cancer programmes."
In 2017, the WHO's review of substandard and falsified medicines offered three solutions based around prevention, detection and response.
Stopping the manufacture and sale of those medicines is the primary preventative measure, but where defective products make it to market, surveillance and response programs can prevent poor quality medicines from reaching patients.
Regulatory reform sought by experts and authorities takes time though. More immediate solutions are being developed in the form of better screening technologies.
Lieberman is working on a "paper lab" — a type of test that can be used by trained professionals to chemically test the quality of a product before it's administered to a patient. Other laboratory technologies are also under development.
One comforting point is that while a significant proportion of the medication circulating in medical facilities in the four African countries was defective, the majority of the products tested met required standards.
" [With] two-thirds of the suppliers, all the products [were] good quality, so there are good quality suppliers," Heide said. "But a few of them really have a suspiciously high number of failing samples."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


DW
a day ago
- DW
1 in 6 cancer drugs in four African nations are defective – DW – 06/27/2025
Across Africa, cancer medications have been found to be substandard or falsified. It means that people are being given medicines that may not work, or that might even may cause harm. An alarming number of people across Africa may be taking cancer drugs that don't contain the vital ingredients needed to contain or reduce their disease. It's a concerning finding with roots in a complex problem — how to regulate a range of therapeutics across the continent. An American and pan-African research group published the findings this week in . The researchers had collected dosage information, sometimes covertly, from a dozen hospitals and 25 pharmacies across Ethiopia, Kenya, Malawi and Cameroon. They tested nearly 200 unique products across several brands. Around 17% — roughly one in six — were found to have incorrect active ingredient levels, including products used in major hospitals. Receiving insufficient dosages of these ingredients could allow a patient's tumors to keep growing, and possibly even spread. Similar numbers of substandard antibiotics, antimalarial and tuberculosis drugs have been reported in the past, but this is the first time that such a study has found high levels of falsified or defective anticancer drugs in circulation. "I was not surprised by these results," said Lutz Heide, a pharmacist at the University of Tübingen in Germany who has previously worked for the Somali Health Ministry and has spent the past decade researching substandard and falsified medicines. Heide was not part of the investigative group, but said the report shed light on a problem not previously measured. "I was delighted that, finally, someone published such a systemic report," Heide said. "That is a first, really significant systematic study of this area." "There are many possible causes for bad-quality products," the investigation's senior researcher Marya Lieberman of the University of Notre Dame, US, told DW. Those causes can include faults in the manufacturing process or product decay due to poor storage conditions. But some drugs are also counterfeit, and that increases the risk of discrepancies between what's on the product label and the actual medicine within. Spotting substandard and falsified products can be difficult though. Usually, a medical professional or patient is only able to perform a visual inspection — literally checking a label for discrepancies or pills and syringes for color differences — to spot falsified products. But that's not a reliable method. In the study, barely a quarter of the substandard products were identified through visual inspection. Laboratory testing identified the rest. Fixing the problem, Lieberman said, will require improving regulation and providing screening technologies and training where they're needed. "If you can't test it, you can't regulate it," she said. "The cancer medications are difficult to handle and analyze because they're very toxic, and so many labs don't want to do that. And that's a core problem for the sub-Saharan countries where we worked. Even though several of those countries have quite good labs, they don't have the facilities that are needed for safe handling of the chemo drugs established." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Nearly a decade ago, the World Health Organization (WHO) found around 1 in 10 medicines used in low and middle-income countries were substandard or falsified. Independent research conducted since has backed those figures up, sometimes finding rates that are potentially twice as high. "This could lead to treatment failure, adverse reactions, disease progression," health economist Sachiko Ozawa told DW. Ozawa contributed to the investigation on anticancer drugs and has separately researched other cases of defective medicines. "For the community, there's also economic losses in terms of wasted resources,' she said. 'So countries may be spending a lot of money on medications that are not going to be effective." While high-income countries can monitor supply chains and have stringent regulatory systems in place to identify and withdraw suspect products, the infrastructure to do that is far from common in other regions. In those places, poor access to affordable medication often drives patients to less-regulated marketplaces. Inadequate governance and regulation, as well as a scarcity of surveillance and diagnostic equipment to test pharmaceuticals, are all contributing to the problem in Africa. "In high-income countries, I think there's a much more secure supply chain where you know the manufacturers are vetted, it has to go through very stringent regulatory processes to get gets tested more frequently," Ozawa said. The WHO told DW that following the report's findings, it was working with the four impacted countries to address the problem. "We are concerned with the findings the article has highlighted. WHO is in contact with national authorities of 4 impacted countries and obtaining relevant data," it said in a statement. "We expect to assess full information to evaluate the situation, which often takes time and capacity. But we're committed to address these issues working with the relevant countries and partners." It also reiterated its ongoing call for countries to improve their regulatory frameworks to "prevent incidents of substandard and falsified medicines, including in settings of cancer programmes." In 2017, the WHO's review of substandard and falsified medicines offered three solutions based around prevention, detection and response. Stopping the manufacture and sale of those medicines is the primary preventative measure, but where defective products make it to market, surveillance and response programs can prevent poor quality medicines from reaching patients. Regulatory reform sought by experts and authorities takes time though. More immediate solutions are being developed in the form of better screening technologies. Lieberman is working on a "paper lab" — a type of test that can be used by trained professionals to chemically test the quality of a product before it's administered to a patient. Other laboratory technologies are also under development. One comforting point is that while a significant proportion of the medication circulating in medical facilities in the four African countries was defective, the majority of the products tested met required standards. " [With] two-thirds of the suppliers, all the products [were] good quality, so there are good quality suppliers," Heide said. "But a few of them really have a suspiciously high number of failing samples."


DW
a day ago
- DW
Can't Feel Nothing - How the Internet Warps Our Emotions – DW – 06/27/2025
Is the internet making us emotionally numb? Online trolls and influencers expertly manipulate people's feelings, leading many to disconnect from their emotions. Scientists explain how the internet influences what we feel — and whether we feel at all. A man lies in bed, illuminated by the blue-white light of his smartphone screen. As he scrolls through endless social media feeds, he sees adorable pets, outraged opinion pieces, and haunting images from conflict zones - but he feels absolutely nothing. With curiosity and humor, director David Borenstein travels to Europe, Asia, the U.S., and Russia to investigate how bad things really are. Who is pulling the strings when the internet makes us angry, sad, horny or just plain indifferent? Is there any way to reclaim our emotions? Borenstein portrays a range of perspectives, including an American internet troll, a burnt-out star from the Asian influencer industry, a Russian state propagandist, and an online dominatrix. Scientific research into human emotions sheds light on how our emotional responses are being manipulated. The result is an alarming diagnosis of our digital era — paired with a bold attempt to search for solutions. DW English FRI 27.06.2025 – 01:15 UTC FRI 27.06.2025 – 04:15 UTC SAT 28.06.2025 – 13:15 UTC SUN 29.06.2025 – 19:15 UTC MON 30.06.2025 – 09:15 UTC MON 30.06.2025 – 16:15 UTC MON 30.06.2025 – 21:15 UTC WED 02.07.2025 – 12:15 UTC Lagos UTC +1 | Cape Town UTC +2 | Nairobi UTC +3 Delhi UTC +5,5 | Bangkok UTC +7 | Hong Kong UTC +8 London UTC +1 | Berlin UTC +2 | Moscow UTC +3 San Francisco UTC -7 | Edmonton UTC -6 | New York UTC -4


Int'l Business Times
2 days ago
- Int'l Business Times
Alma Mater Europaea University on the Quiet Migration: American Brainpower Heads to Europe for Doctoral Education
A subtle yet significant shift is taking place in the American higher education system. More students and early-career researchers are looking beyond domestic borders and toward Europe for their doctoral studies, drawn by more streamlined academic structures, affordability, and a desire to escape the turbulence that continues to shape campus climates across the nation. Alma Mater Europaea University, a forward-looking European university, aims to respond to the demands of a modern, globalized knowledge economy. With campuses in Vienna, Austria, Slovenia, and elsewhere, the university serves students from 30 countries. It offers academic programs in various disciplines, from artificial intelligence and physical therapy to strategic communication and the humanities, among others. Alma Mater Europaea, initiated by the European Academy of Sciences and Arts, an association of leading scholars, including 37 Nobel Prize winners, represents a new breed of university. It offers pathways that respond to the frustrations and aspirations of a generation increasingly skeptical of the traditional PhD journey. This trend toward international doctoral migration is part of a broader restructuring of the global higher education landscape. Daily searches by American students for study opportunities abroad skyrocketed from around 2,000 to nearly 11,000 after a change in authority. A corresponding 12% increase in applications from American students to British universities from last year, signifying the highest figure since 2006, further illustrates the momentum behind this movement. "This uptick reflects concerns over affordability, length, and structure of PhD programs, as well as dissatisfaction with domestic research conditions," says Jurij Toplak, Head of Alma Mater Europaea, Vienna Campus. Graduation photo. Indeed, financial feasibility is a primary catalyst. Alma Mater Europaea University has observed that PhD programs in the US typically span five to seven years, with funding that's usually reliant on competitive teaching and research assistantships. On the contrary, many European doctoral programs are completed within three years and offer tuition-free or low-cost enrollment, particularly in countries like Germany, Austria, and the Netherlands. These programs frequently include salaried research positions or are designed to accommodate professionals who wish to maintain their careers while pursuing advanced study. "Europe's doctoral model appeals to students because research is emphasized from day one, and redundant coursework is minimized. This means they can focus their energies on their academic passions instead of worrying about financial troubles," Toplak shares. Interestingly, it was reported that job searches abroad by US scientists surged. Forty-one percent of these inquiries were directed toward Canada, thirty-two percent toward Europe, and twenty percent toward China. Meanwhile, European countries are sensing the opportunity and are proactively courting this talent. Alma Mater Europaea is not passively benefiting from this shift. It's actively shaping it. The university has developed innovative doctoral offerings that resonate with the motivations of today's mobile scholars. Its newly launched PhD in Applied Artificial Intelligence exemplifies this approach. Tailored for working professionals across disciplines, the three-year, fully accredited program is delivered primarily online, with in-person sessions in both Europe and the US once a year. Students have the freedom to pursue research that connects to their careers. It can be AI in healthcare, law, finance, or public policy. "This is not a one-size-fits-all doctorate," Toplak emphasizes. The diversity within the PhD in Applied AI is remarkable. Luca Andriollo, a practicing orthopedic surgeon in Italy, is currently writing his dissertation on AI-assisted robotic surgery. He shares: "Doctoral students here are not computer scientists. Each of us researches AI in our own field of expertise. A lawyer researches legal aspects of AI, a startup owner is developing his AI business solution, and I research AI in medicine. I chose a modern program, offering study on my chosen topic and from any time zone." Claudio Rossi, another student from Portugal, echoes these sentiments, saying: "I chose the PhD in Applied AI at Alma Mater Europaea because of its interdisciplinary design, flexibility to study while working, and the program's openness to different approaches to AI, including philosophical and ethical perspectives." These testimonials reflect the university's core philosophy. Alma Mater Europaea is committed to interdisciplinary, globally attuned education, with a curriculum that invites students to explore the technical dimensions of their field and consider broader societal implications. It stands out for its layered, holistic model that mirrors the complexities of the real world, offering a much-needed antidote to the compartmentalization that's usually evident in academic silos. Ultimately, Alma Mater Europaea provides a compelling alternative to those who are re-evaluating the costs, sacrifices, and returns of advanced education. It offers a streamlined, affordable, and intellectually rigorous doctoral experience that doesn't require individuals to step away from a career but rather integrate seamlessly into it. Toplak states: "Alma Mater Europaea doesn't treat education as an ivory tower but a tool for global contribution." That ethos resonates at a time when students are not only chasing credentials but pursuing purpose.