
The Private Prison Industry Looks Forward to Soaring Profits Thanks to Trump's Budget
The victory was in the works for years. A private prison company handed consulting and lobbying gigs to Trump's allies, its political action committee was the first to max out its donation to Trump, and industry executives had already made plans to reopen shuttered prisons — laying the groundwork for what they promised investors would be an incarceration bonanza.
In the 2024 election cycle, employees and PACs affiliated with the publicly traded industry behemoths GEO Group and CoreCivic contributed overwhelmingly to Republicans and Trump.
Republicans received 92 percent of $3.7 million in contributions affiliated with GEO Group and 96 percent of the $785,000 in contributions affiliated with CoreCivic, according to OpenSecrets, a nonpartisan, nonprofit research group that tracks official disclosures. When Trump won, the two companies gave $500,000 each to his inaugural committee.
'The private prison corporations were keenly aware of the implications of the then-Trump campaign's platform for mass deportations.'
Even though the industry kept profiting from the Biden administration — despite a supposed ban on private prisons — one advocate said it was clear to her why companies went all-in on Trump.
'The private prison corporations were keenly aware of the implications of the then-Trump campaign's platform for mass deportations,' said Eunice Hyunhye Cho, a senior staff attorney at the American Civil Liberties Union's National Prison Project. 'There is no doubt that these private prison companies were keenly aware of the potential profits to be made under such a scheme.'
Before the federal budget bill passed, private prison executives on earnings calls with investors were exultant about their upcoming business opportunities under the law — and held regular meetings with the Trump administration to pitch new plans on how to lock people up.
Now, the White House hopes to get the bill's funding out the door quickly, in order to expand the middle part of a deportation pipeline that stretches from arrests at Home Depots to flights abroad.
In a statement, the White House rejected the idea that the budget bill or any of Trump's immigration policies were shaped by industry.
'The only people who influence the President's decision-making are the American people. But leave it to the Fake News Intercept to pathetically and desperately try to attack agenda that the American people voted for – deportations of criminal illegal aliens,' Abigail Jackson, an administration spokesperson, wrote in an email.
Days after his inauguration in 2021, Biden made a splash by announcing that the federal Bureau of Prisons, or BOP, would no longer house incarcerated people in private prisons.
The supposed ban only affected a few thousand of the BOP's roughly 150,000-person population, and the private prison companies soon managed to find workarounds.
More importantly, Biden's order did not touch the much larger number of people held in immigration detention, which is reserved mostly for people accused of committing civil violations such as illegal presence in the U.S.
Three years into Biden's administration, about 90 percent of people in immigration detention were housed in private facilities. There were about 40,000 people in immigration detention by the end of his term.
Many were detained in facilities owned or operated by CoreCivic and GEO Group. Both companies also have subsidiaries profiting off other parts of the immigration system, ranging from an electronic monitoring company GEO Group bought in 2010 to a transportation company owned by CoreCivic.
Although they continued doing business with the Biden administration, private prison companies bristled at his at his attitude toward the industry.
In addition to the millions in campaign cash the private prison industry funneled to Trump and Republicans, there were jobs for major figures in Trump's orbit. Tom Homan, the former acting director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, had a consulting gig with GEO Group that was only made public this year. Pam Bondi, the former Florida attorney general, picked up work as a lobbyist for the company in 2019, shortly before she joined Trump's defense team at his first impeachment. Trump in his second term tapped Homan to serve as 'border czar' and Bondi as U.S. attorney general.
While many industries with government work try to cozy up to former officials, Lauren-Brooke Eisen, the senior director of the Brennan Center's Justice Program and author of a book on the industry, said private prisons cultivated unusually close relationships.
'There's sort of always a revolving door between the private sector and the government, but what we're seeing here is, we're also seeing people with super close ties,' she said.
In a statement, GEO Group did not directly address questions about the donations to the Trump campaign or its ties to high-ranking administration officials.
'We are proud of the role our company has played for 40 years to support the law enforcement mission of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement,' a company spokesperson wrote. 'Over the last four decades, our innovative support service solutions have helped the federal government implement the policies of seven different Presidential Administrations.'
CoreCivic, meanwhile, said that it welcomed 'the opportunity to support any political leaders who are open to the solutions our company provides to serious national challenges, including providing safe, humane care for people going through the civil immigration process and helping those in our criminal justice system prepare to return to our communities with the skills they need to be successful.'
The donation to the inaugural committee, CoreCivic spokesperson Ryan Gustin said, 'is consistent with our past practice of civic participation in and support for the inauguration process, including contributions to inauguration activities for both Democrats and Republicans.'
The White House rejected out of hand the idea that campaign contributions, or the work that top officials conducted for the industry while out of office, had anything to do with crafting the specifics of the budget bill.
'The One, Big, Beautiful bill provides the funding necessary to fulfill the President's promise to carry out the largest mass deportation operation in history. CoreCivic and GEO Group have received contracts under both Democrat and Republican administrations,' Jackson wrote.
After Trump's first term, Homan hung up a shingle for a consulting firm that told prospective clients it had a 'track record of opening doors,' resulting in big state and federal contracts.
As border czar, Homan has said he will not be involved in making decisions about individual contracts. Bondi has promised to consult ethics officials if any conflicts of interest come up, and a Justice Department spokesperson said she 'played no role in the provisions for additional funding for immigration detention.'
Such denials do not sway Cho, the ACLU lawyer whose work includes representing people in immigration detention.
'Whatever those responses are doesn't belie the fact that these companies clearly are purchasing influence in order to benefit politically and financially,' she said.
Citing reporting from The Intercept, Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., in May called on Bondi to recuse herself from 'any and all' activities tied to immigration detention that could directly or indirectly benefit GEO Group.
The administration has brushed off such critiques as it pushes ahead with its mass deportation plans. The Department of Homeland Security, which oversees ICE, says the budget law will allow it to secure 80,000 new detention beds and bring its total population over 100,000.
GEO Group said in November that Trump's plans could help it fill 18,000 empty beds, translating into $400 million in additional annual revenue. CoreCivic said in February that it had pitched the federal government on plans for housing an extra 28,000 people.
The companies will face competition from states like Florida, which is relying on federal reimbursements to build tent camps at places such as the so-called 'Alligator Alcatraz' facility in the Everglades intended to house 3,000 people.
'The $45 billion represents such an unprecedented broadening for federal prison funding for immigration.'
Cho said she does not think such state facilities pose a business threat to the private prison companies, in large part because there is so much money to go around.
'Even state detention systems often depend on private prison companies for operation,' she said. 'The $45 billion represents such an unprecedented broadening for federal prison funding for immigration.'
In recent weeks, the major private prison companies have continued to make announcements about their growing capacity – for detention and profit. CoreCivic announced last month that it had spent $67 million on a detention center in Virginia that it expects to produce an extra $40 million in annual revenue.
If Homan has his way, many of the new detention centers springing up to fill the administration's demand will be under looser state regulations instead of more stringent federal standards.
'It is really scary that we are seeing a reduction of oversight, along with this idea that we should loosen the standards, with this huge increase in funding.'
Stories of suffering behind bars are already proliferating as the detention population grows. Eisen noted that one of the Trump administration's first actions at the DHS was to decimate an oversight office meant to investigate allegations of wrongdoing.
'It is really scary that we are seeing a reduction of oversight, along with this idea that we should loosen the standards, with this huge increase in funding,' she said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
22 minutes ago
- The Hill
Van Hollen: ‘A big lie' that UN aid for Gaza has been ‘systematically' stolen by Hamas
Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) said Sunday there is no truth to claims that United Nations aid for Palestinians in Gaza has been 'systematically' stolen by Hamas. 'This is a big lie, the claim that when the U.N. organizations were delivering food to Palestinians, civilians, that it was being systematically diverted to Hamas,' Van Hollen told CBS News's Margaret Brennan on 'Face the Nation.' 'I want to say loudly and clearly, this is a big lie,' the Maryland senator added. On Sunday, Trump said Hamas is stealing food that was meant for people in Gaza, saying to reporters on multiple occasions that goods are being stolen as he was pressed on the hunger crisis in the region. Trump, alongside President of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen in Turnberry, Scotland, was questioned about his response to the images of starving children in Gaza. 'When I see the children and when I see, especially over the last couple of weeks people are stealing the food, they're stealing the money, they're stealing the money for the food. They're stealing weapons, they're stealing everything,' the president said. 'It's a mess, that whole place is a mess. The Gaza Strip, you know it was given many years ago so they could have peace. That didn't work out too well,' Trump continued. House Speaker Mike Johnson echoed Trump on Sunday's 'Meet the Press' on NBC News. 'This is important to note: Israel, since this war began, has supplied over 94,000 truckloads full of food. It's enough food to feed 2 million people for two years trying to get that into Gaza. But Hamas has stolen the food, a huge amount,' Johnson said. He also criticized 'the system,' calling it 'broken,' adding that beginning tomorrow, the Israeli military will open 'new channels of distribution to get it [food] to those people who are desperately in need.' Former President Obama said on Sunday that 'aid must be permitted to reach people in Gaza.' 'There is no justification for keeping food and water away from civilian families,' the former president added in a post on the social platform X on Sunday.

Boston Globe
22 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
'Relieved': Educators await Trump administration to release $6 billion in frozen funding
Advertisement The Trump administration announced the funding freeze on June 30, a day before the money was supposed to be sent to school districts in both New England and across the nation. It was another move toward the White House's goal to dismantle the Education Department, as President Trump argues that classrooms are teaching left-wing ideology. In Massachusetts, the freeze translated into $108 million withheld, leaving many districts scrambling to ensure they could still provide services during the summer months and the upcoming fall semester, with some cancelling summer programs entirely. In addition to training educators Advertisement Ray Hart, executive director of the Council of the Great City Schools, a nationwide association of urban districts that includes Boston, said in a statement they're 'relieved' about the administration releasing the funds 'for the benefit of schoolchildren throughout our nation.' In Rhode Island, education commissioner Angélica Infante-Green said, 'On behalf of Rhode Island's students, families, and teachers,' it is 'relieved to hear that the congressionally approved education funding is set to be released.' The Education Department 'will begin dispersing funds to states next week,' said Madi Biedermann, a spokesperson for the department, in a statement Friday. Biedermann said the Office of Management and Budget completed its review of the grants and directed the Education Department to release the funding. The move comes after the District of Columbia and 24 states, including Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Maine, 'It is impossible for states to effectively budget for an upcoming school year ... when the president takes the football away from us, like Lucy in a Charlie Brown cartoon,' said Peter Neronha, Rhode Island Attorney General, at a press conference announcing the lawsuit earlier this month. Related : A coalition of school districts and teachers' unions, including the Rhode Island Federation of Teachers and Health Professionals, Susan Collins, a Republican senator from Maine, and Ed Markey, a Democratic senator from Massachusetts, were among the politicians who criticized the freeze and demanded the administration release the money. Advertisement 'Every day that goes by without this education funding hurts our students, educators, and communities,' said Pedro Martinez, Commissioner of the Massachusetts Department for Elementary and Secondary Education, in a statement Thursday. 'We are still recovering from pandemic learning loss, and these federal funds are directly related to improving student academic achievement.' In early July, Governor Maura Healey said in a statement that districts would be forced to lay off staff, delay or cancel programs, and disrupt learning. 'Our schools were promised this funding, and the Trump Administration needs to deliver it,' Healey said. In a survey by the School Superintendents Association, about three-quarters said they would cut academic programs, and half said they would lay off teachers if funding was not restored. In a statement, the executive director of the association, David Schuler, said he was 'pleased' with the news of the funding being released. Some programs saw an immediate, negative impact following the freeze, including the The program, which has operated in Massachusetts since 1966, aims to address the toll on children's education caused by the frequent moves, as students transfer between different school districts or miss school altogether to work alongside their parents. In Springfield, 9-year-old Ery Perez Gutierrez last summer focused on sharpening his academic skills at Advertisement Ery is among hundreds of children in Massachusetts spending the summer at home because of the funding freeze. President Trump had proposed cutting the Migrant Education Program altogether in the next Last year, the grant served 438 students for summer programs statewide, said Emily Hoffman, director of the program in Massachusetts. The loss of the program at Boland Elementary is 'heartbreaking' and a 'huge step backwards,' as students are going without much-needed services, said Lisa Bakowski, the school's principal, who oversaw the program for the past three summers. Bakowski said the children enrolled in the program are among the most vulnerable in the community. Their parents work in the fields all day and often don't speak English. 'It sickens me that it's become a political issue when it really should never have been,' Bakowski said. 'It's about the betterment of humanity and being able to work to assist and provide for pockets of our community that need it.' Related : Other programs targeted in the freeze weren't immediately impacted. The largest grant frozen, known as Advertisement In previous years, Boston Public Schools used the funding to provide additional support for the district's recruitment efforts and educator preparation, including through an intensive 12-month program that prepares aspiring teachers to enter the classroom at no cost to them. Following the freeze announcement, BPS 'identified temporary one-time funding to maintain these efforts, which will continue in Fiscal Year 2026 despite the funding freeze with the hopes that the funding will eventually be available,' a spokesperson said in a statement Thursday. Massachusetts districts received $27 million in fiscal year 2025 for teacher training, with BPS receiving about Marcela Rodrigues can be reached at

Politico
40 minutes ago
- Politico
Ohio State president says he feels 'no pressure' after White House complaints
Carter's comments come shortly after the Trump administration announced the school — of which Vice President JD Vance is an alum — is one of 60 universities it has deemed may have antisemitic practices and policies on campus. Still, Carter said he is 'not feeling a lot of pressure.' 'We know how we acted during the time of the protests. We never had an encampment here at Ohio State,' he said, adding that some students did try to occupy tents in campus but were dispersed. 'I'm confident that as this plays out forward, that we're going to be just fine,' he said. Carter also appeared to agree with Vance's assertions that higher education has started to build a 'reputation' of being 'controlled by left wing foundations.' 'There was this conversation about the potential indoctrination of students, or that institutions were leaning very liberal,' Carter said. 'We as administrators of higher education maybe ought to listen to the American public and say, maybe we haven't always gotten it right. So I'm here to say, here at the Ohio State University, we have paid attention to that.' The Trump administration has been embroiled in battles with universities over hiring and admissions practices for several months. mixed in with complaints about general 'wokeness.' Most notably, the administration threatened to withhold federal funding from Ivy League schools including Harvard and Columbia.