logo
Iran Formally Suspends Cooperation with IAEA

Iran Formally Suspends Cooperation with IAEA

Leaders2 days ago
Iran has formally suspended its cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), reported Reuters citing the Iranian state TV.
On Wednesday, the Iranian President, Masoud Pezeshkian, approved a bill passed by Iran's parliament last week, and endorsed by the Guardian Council, to suspend cooperation with the IAEA.
The Iranian measure came in response to the Israeli attacks on Iran in mid-June, which sparked tensions between Tehran and the UN nuclear watchdog. Iran and Israel traded heavy air and missile strikes for 12 days, and the US intervened by striking three key Iranian nuclear sites.
Iran accused the IAEA of providing a justification for Israel's attack, as it came a day after the agency declared Tehran in breach of its nuclear obligations. After Iran and Israel agreed on a ceasefire on June 24, the Iranian parliament voted for a bill halting cooperation with IAEA.
Under the law, the IAEA will need an approval by Iran's Supreme National Security Council before any future inspection of Iranian nuclear sites.
'This suspension will remain in effect until certain conditions are met, including the guaranteed security of nuclear facilities and scientists,' the Iranian state TV said quoting the new law.
Moreover, Tehran considers banning the IAEA Chief, Rafael Grossi, from entering Iran, as he faces accusations of siding with Western countries and facilitating Israel's aggression on Iran, Mehr news agency reported.
In response, the IAEA said it is still waiting for additional information from the Iranian authorities. 'We are aware of these reports. The IAEA is awaiting further official information from Iran,' the UN nuclear watchdog said in a statement.
Short link :
Post Views: 120
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ukraine blames Russian strike for power cut to Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant
Ukraine blames Russian strike for power cut to Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant

Arab News

time3 hours ago

  • Arab News

Ukraine blames Russian strike for power cut to Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant

VIENNA: All external power lines supplying electricity to the Russian-occupied Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant in Ukraine were down for several hours on Friday, the UN nuclear watchdog said, but the station's management later said power had been restored. The head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, Rafael Grossi, acknowledged that power had been restored after 3 1/2 hours. But he added in a statement on X that nuclear safety 'remains extremely precarious in Ukraine.' Ukraine's energy minister blamed Russian shelling for severing the last power line to the plant and its six reactors. The country's power distribution operator said its technicians had taken action to restore it. Europe's biggest nuclear power plant, which is not operating but still requires power to keep its nuclear fuel cool, switched during the outage to running on diesel generators, the IAEA said. The organization has repeatedly warned of the risk of a catastrophic accident at Zaporizhzhia, which is located near the front line in the war in Ukraine. Its reactors are shut down, but the nuclear fuel inside them still needs to be cooled, which requires constant power. The plant's Russia-installed management issued a statement on Telegram saying the high-voltage line to the plant had been restored. The statement said there had been no disruptions to operations at the plant, no violations of security procedures and no rise in background radiation levels beyond normal levels. The IAEA had earlier said that the plant had lost all off-site power for the ninth time during the military conflict and for the first time since late 2023. 'The ZNPP currently relies on power from its emergency diesel generators, underlining (the) extremely precarious nuclear safety situation,' it said. Ukrainian Energy Minister German Galuschenko wrote on Telegram that a Russian strike had cut off the plant. 'The enemy struck the power line connecting the temporarily occupied (Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Plant) with the integrated power system of Ukraine.' Ukrenergo, the sole operator of high-voltage lines in Ukraine, said its specialists had brought it back into service. 'Ukrenergo specialists have brought back into service the high-voltage line which supplies the temporarily occupied power station,' it said on Telegram. Neither the IAEA nor the plant's Russian-installed management initially cited a cause for the cut-off. Russian forces seized the Zaporizhzhia station in the first weeks of Russia's February 2022 invasion of Ukraine. Each side regularly accuses the other of firing or taking other actions that could trigger a nuclear accident.

IAEA pulls inspectors from Iran as standoff over access drags on
IAEA pulls inspectors from Iran as standoff over access drags on

Arab News

time4 hours ago

  • Arab News

IAEA pulls inspectors from Iran as standoff over access drags on

VIENNA: The UN nuclear watchdog said on Friday it had pulled its last remaining inspectors from Iran as a standoff over their return to the country's nuclear facilities bombed by the United States and Israel deepens. Israel launched its first military strikes on Iran's nuclear sites in a 12-day war with the Islamic Republic three weeks ago. The International Atomic Energy Agency's inspectors have not been able to inspect Iran's facilities since then, even though IAEA chief Rafael Grossi has said that is his top priority. Iran's parliament has now passed a law to suspend cooperation with the IAEA until the safety of its nuclear facilities can be guaranteed. While the IAEA says Iran has not yet formally informed it of any suspension, it is unclear when the agency's inspectors will be able to return to Iran. 'An IAEA team of inspectors today safely departed from Iran to return to the Agency headquarters in Vienna, after staying in Tehran throughout the recent military conflict,' the IAEA said on X. Diplomats said the number of IAEA inspectors in Iran was reduced to a handful after the June 13 start of the war. Some have also expressed concern about the inspectors' safety since the end of the conflict, given fierce criticism of the agency by Iranian officials and Iranian media. Iran has accused the agency of effectively paving the way for the bombings by issuing a damning report on May 31 that led to a resolution by the IAEA's 35-nation Board of Governors declaring Iran in breach of its non-proliferation obligations. IAEA chief Rafael Grossi has said he stands by the report. He has denied it provided diplomatic cover for military action. IAEA wants talks Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said on Thursday Iran remained committed to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). '(Grossi) reiterated the crucial importance of the IAEA discussing with Iran modalities for resuming its indispensable monitoring and verification activities in Iran as soon as possible,' the IAEA said. The US and Israeli military strikes either destroyed or badly damaged Iran's three uranium enrichment sites. But it was less clear what has happened to much of Iran's nine tons of enriched uranium, especially the more than 400 kg enriched to up to 60 percent purity, a short step from weapons grade. That is enough, if enriched further, for nine nuclear weapons, according to an IAEA yardstick. Iran says its aims are entirely peaceful but Western powers say there is no civil justification for enriching to such a high level, and the IAEA says no country has done so without developing the atom bomb. As a party to the NPT, Iran must account for its enriched uranium, which normally is closely monitored by the IAEA, the body that enforces the NPT and verifies countries' declarations. But the bombing of Iran's facilities has now muddied the waters. 'We cannot afford that .... the inspection regime is interrupted,' Grossi told a press conference in Vienna last week.

Syria Ready to Cooperate with US to Reimplement 1974 Disengagement Deal with Israel
Syria Ready to Cooperate with US to Reimplement 1974 Disengagement Deal with Israel

Leaders

time9 hours ago

  • Leaders

Syria Ready to Cooperate with US to Reimplement 1974 Disengagement Deal with Israel

Syrian Foreign Minister Asaad Al-Shaibani said on Friday that Syria was ready to cooperate with the US in order to reimplement the 1974 disengagement agreement with Israel, according to Al Arabiya. Return to Disengagement Deal Al-Shaibani's statement comes after a phone call with his American Counterpart Marco Rubio. During the call, Al-Shaibani expressed Syria's 'aspiration to cooperate with the United States to return to the 1974 disengagement agreement.' In May, US President Donald Trump met Syria's Interim President Ahmed Al-Sharaa in Saudi Arabia and urged him to normalize ties with Israel. Aspiration for Diplomatic Ties On Monday, Israel's Foreign Minister Gideon Saar said that his country is 'interested' in establishing diplomatic ties with its neighbors Lebanon and Syria, according to Reuters. 'Israel is interested in expanding the Abraham Accord circle of peace and normalization,' Saar said at a news conference. Crucially, Al-Sharaa confirmed indirect talks with Israel to reduce tensions. Moreover, Al-Sharaa has repeatedly said Damascus does not seek involvement into any conflict with its neighbors. Therefore, he urged the international community to press on Israel to halt its attacks on Syria. Golan Heights Will Be out of Discussion Meanwhile, Saar stressed that the occupied Golan Heights 'will remain part of Israel' under any possible peace agreement with Syria. 'In any peace agreement, the Golan will remain part of the State of Israel,' Saar stated. In 1981, Israel annexed the Golan Heights after taking over most of the area from Syria in the 1967 Six-Day War. On Wednesday, Syrian state media described the statements about normalizing relations with Israel as 'premature', after an Israeli official welcomed diplomatic ties with Damascus, according to AFP. 'Statements concerning signing a peace agreement with the Israeli occupation at this time are considered premature,' state TV reported an unidentified official source as saying. The source also said that the possibility of negotiations over a new peace deal was not possible until Israel fully adhered to the 1974 disengagement agreement and withdrew from the areas it has penetrated. Related Topics: Trump Lifts Decades-old US Sanctions on Syria Israel 'Interested' in Ties with Syria, Lebanon with No Discussion on Golan Saudi Arabia Condemns Terrorist Attack on Syria's Mar Elias Church Short link : Post Views: 24

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store