logo
Southern farmers recognised

Southern farmers recognised

Jason Herrick ... Advocate of the year. Photos: supplied
Southern farmers were among those recognised at the Federated Farmers annual meeting last month.
Federated Farmers' national awards celebrate farmers who had gone above and beyond for farmers, rural communities, and the wider agricultural sector.
Southland Federated Farmers president Jason Herrick was presented the advocate of the year award.
Federated Farmers president Wayne Langford said Mr Herrick had been a standout communicator on behalf of farmers.
"When it comes to emerging farming leaders, Jason Herrick is without a doubt one to watch. He's got a huge contribution to make and a big future ahead of him,
"Whether it's calling out Fish & Game's antics or pushing back on unworkable, costly new farming rules, Jason's exemplified what Federated Farmers is all about — fighting for farmers.
"I've been so impressed with not just his workload and ability to prosecute issues in the media, but also with his personal growth and development as a leader in his community.
Sonia Dillon ... Arable advocate of the year.
"He's been tenacious and articulate, and he's shown a thick skin. You can't stick your neck out for farmers without copping some heat back, but he's taken it all in his stride."
The arable advocate of the year award went to Southland Federated Farmers arable chairwoman Sonia Dillon, who operates a mixed cropping and seed production business.
Mrs Dillon had been extremely strong on local advocacy, Mr Langford said.
"There are some issues in Southland that are quite specific for that area and she's great at getting them airtime and discussion.
"That's particularly true when it comes to transportation and logistics, with Southland being at the bottom of the country.
"She's pointed out that if it costs $60 to get something from Christchurch to Southland, how come grain that comes from Canterbury can be cheaper than it's priced in Southland? It's a fair point. The price should be what it costs to buy, plus freight — that's how it should work."
Mrs Dillon was also a great asset for the Federated Farmers Arable Council, Mr Langford said.
"She's always happy to bring challenging issues to the forefront, so the council can look for solutions." — APL
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Greenpeace Vandals Must Lose Charitable Status
Greenpeace Vandals Must Lose Charitable Status

Scoop

time9 hours ago

  • Scoop

Greenpeace Vandals Must Lose Charitable Status

Federated Farmers is renewing its call for Greenpeace to be stripped of its charitable status immediately, following the extreme activist group's latest illegal publicity stunt. "Greenpeace need to be held accountable for their repeated illegal activity and the spread of harmful misinformation," Southland Federated Farmers president Jason Herrick says. "How can they be recognised as a charity when they're breaking all kinds of laws trespassing on private property, vandalising public property, and intimidating the community? "Last night's vandalism of the world-famous trout statue in Gore reinforces why these activists need to lose their status as a charity. I think it's a total abuse of charitable status." Herrick says Greenpeace's vandalism of the statue and welcome sign is a shameless attempt to divide the small rural community and spread anti-farming propaganda. "These activists are total cowards who are slinking around in the shadows vandalising property under the cover of darkness," Herrick says. "There's a reason they've done this at night. They knew it was dodgy behaviour - and that they'd never get away with it in Gore during daylight hours. "We're a tight-knit community down here in Southland. Farming plays a huge role in not only our local economy, but in our social fabric too. "There's no way we're going to put up with this nonsense. Greenpeace should hang their heads in shame." In April, Federated Farmers called for the Government to immediately strip Greenpeace of its charitable status after the group's illegal occupation of Port Taranaki. Charitable status in New Zealand is intended to support organisations that advance public benefit through education, relief of poverty, and other recognised charitable purposes. Under the Charities Act, organisations must operate for the public good and not primarily serve political or advocacy purposes. Herrick says he sees Greenpeace's ongoing illegal activity as clear evidence that it no longer meets these criteria for charitable status. "There are plenty of amazing, honest charities doing fantastic work out there - but Greenpeace is not one of them. "It's become little more than an extreme activist group that's disrupting legitimate businesses and spreading harmful misinformation - repeatedly and deliberately." Federated Farmers lodged a formal complaint with Charities Services in April, requesting a formal inquiry into Greenpeace's conduct and eligibility for charitable status. A copy was also sent to Community and Voluntary Sector Minister Hon Louise Upston and Minister of Internal Affairs Hon Brooke van Velden. The complaint focuses on Greenpeace's repeated involvement in premeditated unlawful protest activity. That includes the 2024 protest at Fonterra's Te Rapa dairy factory where seven individuals were arrested, and last year's occupation of Straterra's Wellington office, where five were arrested during a staged lockdown. "We urge Charities Services to act decisively on our existing complaint and strip Greenpeace of its charitable status quickly," Herrick says. "I can't see any way they meet the requirements for registration under the Charities Act 2005. "Hardworking Kiwi taxpayers should not be forced to subsidise their illegal attacks and extremist political agendas through tax breaks for their donors. "Law-breaking groups cannot hide behind charitable privileges while threatening livelihoods with misinformation about farming." Herrick says it's not just Greenpeace that needs to be held accountable for how it's operating as a charity. "I think Charities Services and the Government need to be held accountable too and answer some tough, but fair, questions about how this rort of the rules is being allowed to continue. "There is absolutely no way Greenpeace should be allowed to constantly break the law and still be recognised as a charity."

Commerce Commission dismisses Federated Farmers complaint on net-zero banking
Commerce Commission dismisses Federated Farmers complaint on net-zero banking

RNZ News

time2 days ago

  • RNZ News

Commerce Commission dismisses Federated Farmers complaint on net-zero banking

ANZ, ASB, BNZ, Westpac, and Rabobank are all signatories to the Net-Zero Banking Alliance. Photo: RNZ The Commerce Commission has dismissed a Federated Farmers complaint that five major local banks acted like a cartel, tying lending to climate targets. ANZ, ASB, BNZ, Westpac, and Rabobank are all signatories to the Net-Zero Banking Alliance, which aligns lending policies to climate change goals. Together, the five banks account for 97 percent of agricultural lending in New Zealand. The Commission's general manager competition Vanessa Horne said no evidence of anti-competitive or cartel-like behaviour had been found. "We thoroughly investigated the complaint and concluded that the banks had made their own, independent decisions. "We found no evidence of unlawful co-ordination between the banks or with the Net-Zero Banking Alliance, either relating to the banks joining or in meeting their obligations under this alliance." Federated Farmers alleged the five banks were co-ordinating their agricultural lending with Net-Zero Banking Alliance strategies which could violate the Commerce Act. It also alleged that this could make it harder for farmers to get loans and increase borrowing costs. Its banking spokesperson Mark Hooper called the Commission's decision disappointing but accepted it. "The reason we made the submission in the first place was that we felt there had been some collusion and there was a sort of collective agreement that would have limited farmers' choice. So in that sense we're disappointed, but we still think it was the right course of action to go down." Hooper said they remained concerned that banks were straying from their "core role of lending money based on real risk considerations and not indulging in the climate change space". The Net-Zero Banking Alliance is a United Nations (UN) initiative that guides banks to lead on climate mitigation in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement. Its website claims 127 banks worldwide have signed up, overseeing $74 trillion in total assets. In background information the Commission said the Alliance did not prescribe targets for signatories, gave a framework for target setting, and tools to assess the emissions within their portfolios and how to speed up lending towards low-carbon activity. Rural concerns about the reduction of lending to rural based petrol stations , prompted New Zealand First MP Andy Foster to pursue a private members' bill to prevent banks from refusing to lend for so-called "woke ideology" reasons. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

Farm-to-forest limits set to protect rural land, Federated Farmers voice support
Farm-to-forest limits set to protect rural land, Federated Farmers voice support

NZ Herald

time5 days ago

  • NZ Herald

Farm-to-forest limits set to protect rural land, Federated Farmers voice support

Schroder said the Rotorua-Taupō region, among others, had a mix of high-performing sheep and beef farms and marginal land, making it attractive for forestry investment. 'While forestry has a useful place in our primary sector, the rapid conversion of entire farms has raised concerns amongst the community about rural depopulation, loss of food production and the erosion of local community infrastructure,' he said. 'The proposed legislation goes some way to getting the balance right.' The Government planting proposal is chiefly based on land-use capability (LUC), ranging from one (highest) to eight. Legislation would restrict conversions to exotic ETS forests on high to medium-versatility farmland (LUC classes 1-6) and introduce a limit of 15,000ha per year for exotic conversions on medium-versatility farmland (class 6). The annual limit will be allocated by a ballot process, while allowing for up to 25% of a farm's LUC 1-6 land to still be planted in exotic forestry for the ETS. Land protection Schroder said capping ETS eligibility on LUC 6 land and excluding LUC 1-5 from conversion helped protect the most productive land. 'Allowing up to 25% of a farm to be planted in exotic forestry means landowners still have the flexibility and choice to diversify and manage erosion-prone areas. 'However, the 15,000ha annual cap may still allow significant change, and the ballot system could create uncertainty for landowners.' Schroder said if the ETS made a clearer distinction between long-term carbon storage and forestry plantations for harvest, it might be easier to balance environmental goals with the needs of rural areas. Federated Farmers acknowledged the value in maintaining flexibility for landowners, he said. 'This legislation doesn't oppose forestry; it supports more strategic long-term thinking about how we use our land. 'The challenge is protecting the future of rural communities while still allowing room for diversification when it makes sense. 'This legislation is a more balanced approach and is a positive step forward for rural communities.' Long-time forestry consultant Jeff Tombleson said the proposed legislation had been signalled before the last election and 'imposes little surprise' on the industry. Since the 1990s, he said farm forestry had not occurred on any scale. 'It almost ceased. Land prices became prohibitive.' Based in Rotorua, he said the current harvest of the 1990s plantings was 75% complete. The land involved has largely been replanted, along with a second planting 'spike' of up to 300,000ha of new forests on sheep and beef country from 2018-2025. With relatively high returns for carbon, Tombleson predicted this 'spike' would have continued if restrictions were not introduced. He said the largest areas of new forests in New Zealand were in Auckland/Northland, Southland and the Central Plateau (Rotorua/Taupō). The Government bill proposes a start date of October 31. 'We will process applications to register in the ETS under the current rules until the restrictions come into effect,' McClay said at Fieldays.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store