logo
What can a £5,000 at-home laser do?

What can a £5,000 at-home laser do?

Times13-06-2025
With the beauty-gadget industry growing at four times the rate of the overall skincare category, with sales projected to hit $92.55 billion by 2028, it seems to be becoming the favoured option for people who want the results of a visit to the aesthetician, but prefer less invasive approaches.
• This article contains affiliate links that can earn us revenue
As a result the British wellness brand LYMA is doing better than ever. Founded in 2018, its initial offering was the LYMA supplement, a gold-coloured capsule containing active ingredients formulated to be bioavailable and therefore fully absorbed by the body. Despite coming at a price — around £199 for a month's supply — the pills frequently sold out and were nicknamed the 'supermodel supplement' to those in the wellness world. Unsurprisingly, LYMA loyalists were thrilled when LYMA dropped its first at-home clinic-grade laser in 2020, the launch helped LYMA receive a 40 per cent increase in turnover to £32.5 million, with US sales accounting for 70 per cent of their total revenues.
Now the range includes both the original LYMA laser as well as the LYMA Laser Pro which launched in March 2024. Both use technology called low-level laser therapy (LLLT) first developed in the 1960s which was previously used to treat medical injuries such as healing tendons and rebuilding cartilage. The founder of LYMA, Lucy Goff, decided to harness this existing technology and re-engineer it for the cosmetic market, creating a portable, cordless device that could be used at home without the supervision of a doctor or a prescription*. Goff consulted geneticists, longevity scientists and surgeons and spent five years developing the laser.
In contrast to some other cosmetic procedures which have to deliver micro-injury to the skin and inflict damage in order to create collagen, the LYMA lasers utilise powerful, zero-damage cold laser technology. The original iteration is a smaller, handbag-sized device that features a patented 8cm² treatment lens, primarily designed for the face. The LYMA Laser Pro can also be used on the neck and body, and has cut down the initial treatment time of 15 minutes per day to just three minutes per area of concern (such as cheeks, forehead and eye areas), or a full face in as little as 9 minutes, thanks to its larger 30cm² lens.
Dr Graeme Glass, a craniofacial, aesthetic and plastic surgeon and now the director of aesthetics at LYMA, helped develop the laser and has written several medical papers on its technology. With many women losing fat through the rise of Ozempic and other weight loss alternatives, Glass recommends the LYMA laser. 'Losing weight can be associated with the loss of subcutaneous fat which can give the appearance of laxity as the face and neck structures hang on relatively loose ligaments,' he says. 'The skin loses its lustre because of loss of water content in the dermis, lack of synthesis of the protective fatty acids that condition the skin, and lack of vitamins and minerals essential for healthy skin function.'
Just like the rest of our body, our skin needs energy function, which usually comes in the form of ATP (adenosine triphosphate) to help the skin stay hydrated, produce collagen and elastic, as well as promote cell renewal. Without enough ATP, the skin becomes dull and will start to sag or age at a faster rate, Glass explains. To counteract this, the LYMA laser uses the technique of low level laser therapy using near-infrared light. According to LYMA's website: 'this light triggers a natural process in your cells called photobiomodulation, which helps your skin produce ATP more efficiently. It's like charging up the skin's internal battery, so it has the energy it needs to repair and regenerate itself.'
LYMA claims that over time the ATP produced through using the laser will help boost collagen and elastin production — both key for the appearance of firmer, smoother skin. The brand promises an improvement in as little as 30 days with daily use and recommends following with twice weekly sessions as maintenance. LYMA's own clinical trials involving 10 subjects showed 64.3 per cent improvement in pigmentation, a 53.8 percent improvement in wrinkles, a 42 per cent improvement in rosacea symptoms, and a 56 per cent decline in acne and blemishes.**
At around £1,999 and around £4,995 respectively, the LYMA lasers are undoubtedly an expensive piece of kit, but that hasn't kept customers away. LYMA sold 47 per cent more stock than predicted in the first 24 hours of its US launch and counts a whole host of celebrities, including Sienna Miller and Gwyneth Paltrow, as loyal users. Likewise, the launch of LYMA skincare, a duo of anti-ageing serum and creams, had a waitlist of around 30,000 expectant customers.
But it's the Laser Pro which is helping the brand put a stake in the ground of the $211 billion global professional beauty services market — and a pretty big stake at that.
* LYMA's policy outlines if you have a recurring or previously diagnosed health condition that concerns you, or are taking prescription medication, upon purchase of our products you agree to seek medical advice from your GP before taking our products and/or making dietary and lifestyle changes.
**Based on an independent clinical trial measured by Cutometer dual MPA 580 — a device used to measure skin elasticity and firmness by assessing the skin's ability to deform and return to its original shape, plus LYMA's own studies which can be found here.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hospital worker arrested over assault of patient in Northampton
Hospital worker arrested over assault of patient in Northampton

BBC News

time2 hours ago

  • BBC News

Hospital worker arrested over assault of patient in Northampton

A member of staff at a psychiatric hospital has been arrested in connection with an alleged assault on a Police said a woman, from Northampton, was arrested on suspicion of assault and ill-treatment or wilful neglect following an incident on 29 June and has been released on bail. St Andrew's Healthcare in Northampton, which is used by the NHS, said it had suspended a number of staff and launched an investigation into the hospital said it was "taking urgent steps to reinforce high-quality care across all wards" after NHS England restricted new referrals to the hospital. A Northamptonshire Police spokesman said: "Detectives are investigating a report of an assault which is alleged to have taken place at St Andrew's Hospital, Northampton, on 29 June.""Due to the vulnerability of the victim in this case, officers conducting inquiries as part of this investigation have been in contact with the CQC and local safeguarding leads," they added. St Andrew's Healthcare is a charity that cares for people with complex mental health hospital cares for about 600 patients and employs more than 4,000 people across four locations. Restricted referrals The CQC said it had carried out an inspection of inpatient services at the hospital on 11 July. A spokesman for the regulator said: "As a result, CQC took action requiring [St Andrew's Healthcare] to make immediate, specific improvements around safety. "They are being monitored closely to make sure this happens, and a report containing the full findings from the inspection will be published on CQC's website when the usual quality assurance processes have been completed," they added. NHS England said St Andrew's Healthcare looked after patients with "very complex mental health needs from all over the UK". "The safety of patients is our first priority and commissioners working together with the CQC have restricted referrals to St Andrew's Northampton site," it England said it had "taken immediate action together with St Andrew's to ensure the charity keeps patients safe, meets contractual obligations, and prioritises a targeted programme of support which operates in line with CQC requirements". Follow Northamptonshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.

Resident doctors' strike undermines union movement, Wes Streeting says
Resident doctors' strike undermines union movement, Wes Streeting says

The Guardian

time2 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Resident doctors' strike undermines union movement, Wes Streeting says

A strike by resident doctors 'enormously undermines the entire trade union movement', Wes Streeting has argued, urging them not to join industrial action on Friday morning. In an article for the Guardian, the health secretary says the decision by the British Medical Association (BMA) to push for new strikes in England immediately after receiving a pay rise of 22% to cover 2023-24 and 2024-25 is unreasonable and unprecedented. Taking aim squarely at the leadership of the BMA, which represents the medics formerly known as junior doctors, Streeting condemns their demand for a fresh 29% rise over the next few years. He says that while there was 90% backing for the strike, it was on a turnout of just over 55% of members. Streeting says the move to strike after the offer of a 5.4% pay rise for 2025-26, was rushed into and is 'bitterly disappointing' amid efforts to improve NHS services. 'There was a deal here to be done,' he writes. 'Instead, the BMA leadership's decision to not even consider postponing these strikes will place an enormous burden on their colleagues, and hit the recovery we can all see our health service is making. 'Not only that, it enormously undermines the entire trade union movement. No trade union in British history has seen its members receive a such a steep pay rise only to immediately respond with strikes – even when a majority of their members didn't even vote to strike. This action is unprecedented, and it is unreasonable.' The BMA argues that resident doctors have seen their pay fall by a much greater amount in real terms since 2008-09 than the rest of the population. 'Doctors are not worth less than they were 17 years ago, when austerity policies began driving wages down. We're simply asking for that value to be restored,' it said. Streeting says resident doctors have privately contacted him to express their dismay at the decision to strike, saying they 'feel the BMA's leaders are out of lockstep with not just patients but most resident doctors themselves'. The health secretary urges doctors to defy their union and not join in the strike, which runs until 7am next Wednesday. 'I am urging resident doctors to not follow the BMA leadership, who I do not believe are representing the best interests of their members, any further down this path as strikes begin on Friday at 7am,' he writes. The public have been urged to keep coming forward for NHS care during the strike, and NHS England has urged hospital chief executives to keep routine operations and appointments and only reschedule if there is a risk to patient safety. A Department of Health and Social Care blog noted that the NHS was 'taking a different approach' after learning lessons from previous strikes, and would avoid cancelling planned appointments for illnesses such as cancer because this posed 'a risk to patients too'. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion On Wednesday, the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges urged the BMA to suspend its guidance to resident doctors that they do not have to share their intentions to strike with their employers – as is their entitlement under employment law – to enable hospitals to better plan. It is understood that in previous strikes, healthcare leaders filled rota gaps of unknown size by overstaffing and cancelling procedures, with the result that there was insufficient work for some highly paid consultants. Fewer resident doctors are expected to go on strike on Friday than in the previous round of industrial action that started in 2023 after the BMA achieved a smaller mandate in the strike ballot. Of 48,000 members, 55% voted, of whom 90% supported industrial action – representing less than half of members – compared with a turnout of 71.25% in 2023, of whom 43,440 (or 98.37%) voted to go on strike. The numbers of striking doctors is expected to vary between hospitals and trusts, with anticipated staff rota gaps filled locally by consultants, agency doctors and other NHS staff. Hospital leaders will monitor demand and if they are overwhelmed with patients they will have contingency plans in place, for example cancelling some appointments to prioritise urgent and emergency care, calling in extra bank or agency staff, or requesting derogations – where resident doctors are called in to work – with the BMA. The Health Service Journal (HSJ) reported that the NHS England chief, Sir Jim Mackey, had told trust leaders to crack down on resident doctors' ability to earn money during the strike by working locum shifts.

This unnecessary doctors' strike will hurt patients, the NHS and doctors themselves. Pull back: don't do it
This unnecessary doctors' strike will hurt patients, the NHS and doctors themselves. Pull back: don't do it

The Guardian

time2 hours ago

  • The Guardian

This unnecessary doctors' strike will hurt patients, the NHS and doctors themselves. Pull back: don't do it

Over the past 15 years, NHS staff have had a torrid time: they have been overstretched, buffeted by constant chaos and a chronic lack of investment. This government inherited a situation in which too many staff were burnt out, demoralised and simply done in. It's why one of my first acts as health and social care secretary was to get round the table, end the last resident doctor strikes and provide above inflation pay rises for all NHS staff, including a 22.3% rise for resident doctors (plus another 5.4% this year) – the biggest pay hike across the whole public sector. Since then, I've worked closely with NHS staff to deliver record investment and much-needed reforms to the NHS. From getting waiting lists down to hiring 2,000 more GPs, from bringing in new tech and equipment to making staff's lives easier, to starting the shift from sickness to prevention – we are making real progress. When the prime minister launched our 10-year health plan earlier this month, NHS staff celebrated it. I knew from the hundreds of staff that were part of our engagement process – from doctors to nurses, health visitors to consultants, porters to midwives – that they were hungry for change. But their optimism, energy and ambition showed just how much we will be able to achieve if we work together, and the exciting future we can build. That is why the decision by the British Medical Association's resident doctors committee to rush into completely unnecessary strikes is so bitterly disappointing. Not only have we started turning the NHS around, we did it hand-in-hand. The government proposed a range of measures to massively improve the working conditions doctors face – from tackling the costs of mandatory exams, to dealing with exhausting rotations that involve doctors pinging from hospital to hospital, to tackling bottlenecks by bringing in more specialist training places. There was a deal here to be done. Instead, the BMA leadership's decision to not even consider postponing these strikes will place an enormous burden on their colleagues, and hit the recovery we can all see our health service is making. Not only that, it enormously undermines the entire trade union movement. No trade union in British history has seen its members receive such a steep pay rise only to immediately respond with strikes – even when a majority of their members didn't even vote to strike. This action is unprecedented, and it is unreasonable. My focus now is on doing everything to minimise harm to patients. This government is doing all it can to minimise the impact on patients from this strike, including trying to keep as much scheduled care as we can on track, as well as urgent and emergency care. The BMA leadership would rather we just cancel those appointments because they don't recognise that someone with cancer, for example, who has a scheduled operation could end up in a far worse place if surgery is postponed. It is not for them to determine whether they think the bar for patient pain is high enough. This government will prioritise patients and do everything we can to protect them. All the same, these actions won't just cause disruption, anxiety and patient harm. They are likely to cost a huge amount of money, which the NHS simply can't afford. Instead of working with us on their conditions to put money back into the pockets of resident doctors, the BMA committee put their fingers in their ears and rushed out to strike. I know from the many resident doctors who have reached out to me, and those I've met since I became health and social care secretary, that they feel the BMA's leaders are out of step not just with patients, but most resident doctors themselves. It is hardly surprising a majority of resident doctors did not vote for this strike. So I am urging resident doctors to not follow the BMA leadership, who I do not believe are representing the best interests of their members, any further down this path as strikes begin on Friday at 7am. Wes Streeting is secretary of state for health and social care

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store