Brendan Taylor added to Zimbabwe squad after completing ICC ban
Taylor, 39, who was banned in January 2022 for failing to report a 2019 spot-fixing approach by an Indian businessman on time, has been added to the Zimbabwe squad for the second Test against New Zealand, scheduled to take place from August 7 to 11 at Queens Sports Club in Bulawayo.
Taylor, who was at the time also handed a one month suspension for failing a dope test which was linked to his intake of cocaine during the episode, was banned after admitting receiving USD 15,000 in 2019.
He was in solid form in red-ball cricket before the sanction, with scores of 92, 81 and 49 in his last three Test innings.
Few days before the ICC sanction, Taylor had made a stunning disclosure that he was blackmailed after 'foolishly" taking cocaine during his meeting with an Indian businessman.
Reflecting on his own journey back into the Zimbabwe squad, Taylor was quoted as saying by ICC, 'The last year and a half has certainly been dedicated to my return.
'I've put in an immense amount of work – from fitness to the technical side to diet – and I'm feeling a lot leaner, fitter and mentally stronger.
'I've thoroughly enjoyed this journey on my own, just rebuilding the blocks, and I feel in a wonderful space." The first Test between Zimbabwe and New Zealand is currently underway in Bulawayo.
Zimbabwe squad: Zimbabwe squad: Craig Ervine (Captain), Brian Bennett, Tanaka Chivanga, Ben Curran, Trevor Gwandu, Roy Kaia, Tanunurwa Makoni, Clive Madande, Vincent Masekesa, Wellington Masakadza, Blessing Muzarabani, Newman Nyamhuri, Sikandar Raza, Tafadzwa Tsiga, Nicholas Welch, Sean Williams, Brendan Taylor. PTI AH AH APA APA
view comments
First Published:
July 30, 2025, 18:15 IST
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
2 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
‘I saw Virat Kohli crying in the bathroom': Chahal lifts lid on when India star broke down and 'had tears in his eyes'
Yuzvendra Chahal's recent interview on a YouTube podcast show with Raj Shamani has been grabbing eyeballs. The India spinner spoke on a variety of topics, and much of the attention fell on his divorce saga. He opened up about what went wrong in their five-year marriage which ended in divorce recently. Yuzvendra Chahal spoke about the former India captain's heartbreaking moment. But Chahal also reflected significantly on his international career, and spoke about Virat Kohli and Rohit Sharma, ending up comparing their captaincy on the podcast. 'I love how Rohit bhaiya carries himself on the ground. He's a very good captain. With Virat bhaiya, it's the energy he brings, the same energy every day. It will only go up and never down. Same energy. Every day,' he said. Yuzvendra Chahal lifts lid on when he say Virat Kohli 'crying in the bathroom' Chahal also spoke about India's heartbreaking 2019 World Cup semi-final exit at the hands of New Zealand, where the match stretched to the reserve day. The host asked Chahal if he had ever seen Kohli cry, and pointed out the recent IPL 2025 final, where the batter was in tears after RCB wn the title. '2019 World Cup, I saw him crying in the bathroom,' he said. 'And then I was the last batter, when I was crossing him, he had tears in his eyes. In 2019, I saw everyone crying in the bathroom,' he added, revealing how shellshocked the Indian team were on that day. During his interview, Chahal revealed that divorce talks with Dhanashree had been going on for sometime, but it wasn't mentioned to the public. Chahal was also accused of cheating on Dhanashree, and the spinner revealed that it was a lie, and he never cheated in his entire life. 'I think when my divorce happened, people alleged me of being a cheater. I have never cheated in my life. I am not that kind of a person. You won't find anyone more loyal than me. I think from my heart for my closed ones, always. I do not demand, I always give. When people don't know anything, but they keep blaming me, so you start thinking [otherwise],' he said.
Hindustan Times
2 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Ricky Ponting would have punched Akash Deep had India pacer given him a Ben Duckett-like send-off: ‘You don't see that…'
Not always do you see a bowler getting severely criticised for his arm around an opposition batter, that too with a smile on his face. Then again, not often does a bowler do that immediately after dismissing him in a hard-fought series. The bowler in question here is India pacer Akash Deep. The batter to receive Akash Deep's arm was Ben Duckett. India's Akash Deep reacts with England's Ben Duckett after taking his wicket(Action Images via Reuters) It happened in the 13th over of the England innings when Duckett, in his attempt to play another reverse ramp, got an outside edge to wicketkeeper Dhruv Jurel. This was the fourth time Duckett was dismissed by Akash Deep but for the first time, it was after the left-hander had given a fair bit of tap to the Indian pacer. Duckett hit four fours and a six off Akash Deep in his blazing innings of 43 off 38 balls before getting dismissed. Akash Deep had the last laugh for sure but what he did after getting the wicket of Duckett became a talking point. The Indian pacer wrapped his arm around Duckett's shoulder and had a few words of wisdom, which were not received well by former cricketers Ricky Ponting, Michael Atherton and Dinesh Karthik. Ponting, in fact, agreed that he wouldn't have shied away from landing a right hook if Akash Deep had done something similar to him during his playing days. "I can think of a few batsmen down the years that would take umbrage at this, and I'm looking very much in your direction. That would have been a Ponting right hook, wouldn't it?" asked sports presenter Ian Warnd in a Sky Sports Lunch break show on Day 2. "Probably yeah, probably," replied Ponting. Thankfully, Duckett didn't see things like Ponting. The England opener took Akash Deep's send-off rather sprotingly before walking off. Ponting said his respect for Duckett grew after seeing how the attacking opener handled things after getting dismissed. "Although I mean, when I saw it, I just thought they must have been mates or played against each other somewhere or together. I would like to have something like that. I mean, you don't see that every day, maybe in a local park game or not in a test match that's been played as fiercely as this series has been played. I love the way that Ben Duckett plays his cricket. I think I like him more now to not to be able to react to that," Ponting added. Yashasvi Jaiswal's fortuitous half-century turned India's slender first-innings deficit into a 52-run lead on a dramatic second day of the fifth Test against England at The Oval. On a pitch offering unpredictable bounce, 15 wickets fell on Friday as bowlers held sway. India, resuming at 219-7, added just five runs in the morning to be bowled out for 224. England responded with an explosive start, racing to 100 in just 13 overs, but collapsed to 247 all out, taking a slim 23-run lead. Jaiswal, dropped twice, counterattacked with an unbeaten 51 off 49 balls to lift India to 75-2 before bad light ended play early. With England leading the series 2-1, both sides have a strong chance, as a result, it now looks likely in the series decider.
Hindustan Times
32 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
SC pulls up Delhi Police for failing to trace missing Russian woman
The Supreme Court on Friday blamed the Delhi Police of sheer negligence and adopting a casual approach in tracing the missing Russian woman accused of leaving the country with her minor son in defiance of court orders. The court noted that no FIR was lodged even when the case also involves removing the child from custody of court and forging the child's Indian passport. (ANI) The apex court pulled up the police for being equally guilty of neglecting its order of May 22 by which they were directed to keep a close watch on the woman while granting her shared custody of the child. However, she left the country on July 8. Even on being told by the child's father on July 7 that the woman was missing, the court noted a 'lack of sensitivity and responsibility' on part of the police to take immediate efforts to trace her. The bench of justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi said, 'The Delhi Police is equally a partner in violation of this court's child has been snatched from the custody of the Supreme Court of India. The police and ministry officials are taking it lightly, thinking that a child has been taken away by the mother in a matrimonial dispute.' The investigation report submitted by the police in court detailed how the woman, Viktoria Basu, travelled in a taxi from Delhi on July 7 and reached Bihar on July 8. The same day, she crossed over to Nepal, and remained there for four days till she boarded a flight to Sharjah on July 12 and onwards to Russia by an Air Arabia flight. The court noted that till date, no first information report (FIR) has been lodged even when the case also involves removing the child from custody of court and forging the child's Indian passport, when the original is lying deposited with the court. Indicating stern steps may follow on the next date, the bench said, 'Before we take any harsh action, the authorities are well advised to establish contact with the Indian Embassy in Russia and with Interpol and apprise this court of the process they intend to adopt for producing the child before this court.' The matter has been kept for further hearing after 10 days. The court said it had exercised its parens patriae (parent of the country) right, as nobody, neither the father nor mother of the child, was granted full custody by the May 22 order. It also questioned why police did not probe the forgery of the child's passport. Additional solicitor general (ASG) Aishwarya Bhati, representing the Centre, told the court that the police, and the ministries of external affairs and home affairs have established contact with authorities in Nepal, Sharjah and Russia through diplomatic channels to get details of the woman and the child. The court said 'this is hardly of any consequence now,' as authorities have confirmed information that she has travelled to Russia. Bhati said that there is no confirmation that she is still in Russia. The court enquired why the Indian Embassy in Russia has not been asked to verify this information using local contacts. 'Between July 7 (complaint of woman's disappearance) and July 14 (confirmation of her escape from India) what have you done? It is we who have been suggesting you to go through Nepal. What has the Delhi Police done except giving an impression they were hobnobbing. Is this not a case where the Delhi Police clearly failed in their duty?' the court asked Bhati. The ASG told the court that till July 18, even the police did not know the woman's whereabouts. The court responded: 'That is because you did not make any effort.' It also questioned why the CCTV footage outside her house from the day she was reported missing was not checked. 'There is a complete lack of sense of responsibility, sensitivity and sheer criminal negligence on part of the police,' the bench observed, adding, 'We are not going to spare the station house officer and the deputy commissioner of police (south district). They have not shown due care to implement our orders.' The incident even raised concerns over the plan of action available with the Centre on how to respond in such a situation, the court remarked. Besides the police, the MHA and MEA also submitted their reports to the court. ASG Bhati said that contact was established with the airline which Basu took from Sharjah to Russia. However, citing privacy issues, the airline authorities have not shared details. The court said it was willing to issue any orders to facilitate response from the airline. 'Even the UAE will cooperate in such matters. No airline can claim privacy in a matter where a crime has been committed,' the bench said. Basu in 2023 approached the court seeking custody of her son following a matrimonial dispute. But when several attempts of reconciliation failed, the court in May this year allowed shared custody of the minor son to the parents for three days in a week. Basu had come to India in 2019 and her visa was extended by the top court while passing the custody order.
