Faslane radioactive secrets to be released after FoI ruling
The saga started after the MoD censored its annual nuclear safety assessments, with The Ferret then sending an FOI to the Scottish Environment Protection Agency (Sepa) in 2019 asking for information on 'any environmental issues with radioactivity' at Faslane and Coulport since 2016.
This was then abandoned, along with almost a thousand other requests, following a cyber attack in 2020.
When the request was resubmitted in 2023, Sepa released a few files but withheld others citing 'national security concerns' or that they could prejudice the agency's ability to conduct 'inquiries of a criminal or disciplinary nature'.
Subsequent FoI requests in 2024 also led to Sepa withholding files, which led the outlet to lodge two appeals with the Scottish Information Commissioner, David Hamilton.
Hamilton has now published his decisions on both appeals, ruling that Sepa must release the files as it had breached FoI law by wrongly claiming that releasing the files would endanger defence, national security or public safety.
'The commissioner does not accept that making the majority of the information available would, or would be likely to, lead to the kind of prejudice argued by the authority,' reports from Hamilton's office said.
'The commissioner is of this view as he is not convinced that disclosure of this information is a threat to anything other than reputations.'
Sepa has until July 28 2025 to comply or appeal.
The Scottish Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament accused Sepa of 'complicity in a public-relations culture of secrecy'.
'Sepa should enable public awareness of serious accidents at nuclear bases, along with the small, and not-so-small, accidental and routine radioactive discharges,' the campaign's chair, Lynn Jamieson, said.
'Sadly this is typical of government dishonesty about the real risks of nuclear weapons and nuclear power – adding risks of catastrophic accidents and radiation to our environment, putting a target on our backs and leaving a legacy of harm for future generations.'
Sepa said it was 'firmly committed' to upholding its FoI responsibilities and would take 'every opportunity to embed learning and best practice' and that it had made 'significant improvements' in the last two years.
Its head of governance, Kieron Gallagher, added: 'Sepa respects the decision by the Scottish Information Commissioner on Sepa's handling of these two related information requests."
An MoD spokesperson said: 'We take our responsibilities for the safety and security of radioactive materials very seriously and have robust arrangements for compliance with environmental legislation under clear agreements with Sepa.
'The events at His Majesty's Naval Base Clyde and Coulport previously reported by Sepa had no impact on the environment and demonstrate we have a strong and transparent safety culture that learns from experience and takes action to prevent recurrence.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
5 hours ago
- Scotsman
Sir Keir Starmer under mounting Labour rebel pressure to scrap two-child benefit cap
Sir Keir Starmer is coming under mounting pressure from within his own Cabinet to scrap the two-child benefit cap, despite Treasury warnings over a lack of funding to ditch the policy. Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... The demand to remove the cap on benefit payments to families with more than two children comes in the same week that MPs forced the Prime Minister to back down on plans to cut £5 billion from the welfare budget. The climbdown hands Chancellor Rachel Reeves a major headache ahead of the Budget in the autumn. It comes just weeks after a similar £1.25bn U-turn on winter fuel payments and leaves the Chancellor with a £6.25bn hole to fill. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Any move to ditch the two-child cap, which means families can only claim child tax credit and universal credit for their first two children, would cost the exchequer around £3.5bn, bringing the total expenditure on the welfare policies to £9.75bn, effectively wiping out Ms Reeves's £9.9bn fiscal headroom. Health Secretary Wes Streeting, centre, with Chancellor Rachel Reeves and Keir Starmer, at the Sir Ludwig Guttman Health & Wellbeing Centre in London, England. Picture: Jack Hill/Getty Image The pressure mounts with the Scottish Government having confirmed it lift the two-child benefit cap on March 2 next year north of the Border – just two weeks before the Holyrood election campaign begins. One UK Cabinet minister acknowledged there was a 'significant cost' to scrapping two-child limit, but added: 'There is also a significant cost in other ways, of a Labour government not taking action to bring down child poverty. And we have to be able to go into the next election having made significant progress on child poverty.' The Cabinet member added: 'Whilst it's hard and the cost is high, it's clear that it is an effective way of supporting families and making sure that fewer children grow up in poverty. And the evidence supports that. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'The challenge is less do we do it – it's whether we can do it, and what the timing would look like around that.' Leading members of the welfare rebellion have warned the UK government will have to scrap the two-child cap if it is to meet its obligations to cut child poverty rates. Rachael Maskell, Labour MP for York Central, said: "It is imperative that the government scrap the two-child limit and the benefit cap as this will lift 360,000 children out of poverty. But most of all, this will give these children a life of better opportunities, including to their health and wellbeing.' Another rebel warned: 'It definitely needs to go. We cannot seek to trade off poor children against poor disabled people or poor pensioners. We need to have a mission to tackle all poverty. End of.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Ms Reeves warned MPs on Thursday via a broadcast interview there 'is a cost' to the welfare changes voted for in Parliament this week that would be reflected in the Budget, when asked if there would be tax rises. The comments followed Cabinet Office minister Pat McFadden insisting 'you can't spend the same money twice'. 'So more money spent on [welfare] means less for some other purpose,' he told the BBC this week. But government sources have said scrapping the two-child cap still 'remains on the table', despite the warnings from the Treasury, as removing the policy remains popular within the Cabinet. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Both Sir Keir and Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson have previously signalled the cap will go, with the latter understood to be particularly opposed to the policy. A Whitehall source said: 'It's still being discussed as part of the Child Poverty Taskforce. It's still on the table. This is not something we would have done in government, and it is one of a number of levers that is being looked at to alleviate child poverty." Social Justice Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville has said scrapping the two-child cap in Scotland could work out at nearly £3,500 for affected children and could see 20,000 fewer children living in relative poverty. Finance Secretary Shona Robison announced plans to scrap the cap in the 2025/26 Budget. The Scottish Government has said this is the 'fastest' a Scottish social security benefit has ever been delivered. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad In other UK government developments, Sir Keir Starmer said he had a good relationship with US President Donald Trump because they both 'care about family'. The Prime Minister told the BBC Radio 4 podcast Political Thinking With Nick Robinson it was 'in the national interest' for the two men to connect. He said: 'We are different people and we've got different political backgrounds and leanings, but we do have a good relationship and that comes from a numbers of places. 'I think I do understand what anchors the president, what he really cares about. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'For both of us, we really care about family and there's a point of connection there.' Sir Keir said yesterday in the interview to mark a year in office he had a 'good personal relationship' with Mr Trump, and revealed the first time they spoke was after the-then presidential candidate was shot at a campaign rally in July last year. Addressing recent political turmoil, Sir Keir said he would always 'carry the can' as leader after coming under fire over a climbdown on welfare reforms and that he would 'always take responsibility' when asked questions. 'When things go well … the leader gets the plaudits, but when things don't go well, it is really important that the leader carries the can – and that's what I will always do,' he said. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad
Scottish Sun
6 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Top Scots civil servant now paid £180,000 moaned about long work days & joked about video game distraction
Newly unearthed texts sent during the pandemic also show the Scottish Government's new Permanent Secretary calling Boris Johnson 'irresponsible' MOAN-DARIN Top Scots civil servant now paid £180,000 moaned about long work days & joked about video game distraction Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A TOP civil servant now on a £180,000 salary was last night blasted for moaning about his long working days. Joe Griffin also joked to a colleague about being distracted from playing the video game Tetris. Sign up for the Politics newsletter Sign up 2 Joe Griffin with First Minister John Swinney 2 Griffin joked to a colleague about being distracted playing the classic video game Tetris Credit: Alamy Newly unearthed texts sent during the pandemic also show the Scottish Government's new Permanent Secretary calling Boris Johnson 'irresponsible'. The WhatApp messages were sent while Mr Griffin was £100,000-a-year Director of Safer Communities. They emerged a week after Scotland's highest-ranked mandarin provoked anger by ruling home-working staff should not automatically be disciplined if they refuse to return to offices at least two days a week. Scottish Tory MSP Murdo Fraser hit out: 'Scots who lost loved ones or saw their business go to the wall during the pandemic will have little sympathy for this senior official moaning about long days. 'Mr Griffin also has a duty to steer clear of criticising politicians or his neutrality will be called into question.' Chats from December 2020 obtained under freedom of information show his reply to an official who asked if a winter planning meeting was 'really needed'. He said cancellation 'probably wouldn't go down well', then added: 'We should be prepared to do that in future — not just sleepwalk into even longer days becoming standard. 'Today started with pre-cabinet call for Humza (Yousaf) at 8.30am, in part to brief on a paper 87 pages long issued at 10.30pm.' In a discussion about a meeting with John Swinney on November 17, 2020, another staffer was told by Mr Griffin they'd 'rudely interrupted my Tetris'. By January 2021, then Prime Minister Mr Johnson was 'optimistic' Covid restrictions would be loosened. Anas Sarwar promises to tackle Scotland's 'unfair' tax system Mr Griffin hit out that this 'shows you how irresponsible the PM's promises are'. Mr Griffin was appointed as Permanent Secretary formally on April 7. In 2021, he was appointed as Director General for Education and Justice before becoming the head of the External Affairs Division. A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'Throughout the pandemic, the focus and intention of ministers, clinicians and officials was to protect people of Scotland from the harms of Covid-19, including providing advice and information about how to stay safe.'
Leader Live
7 hours ago
- Leader Live
Gender critical campaigners demand action from government on toilet access
Sex Matters, which intervened in the For Women Scotland case against which went to the Supreme Court, are threatening a lawsuit against Scottish ministers – with the latest letter demanding action by a deadline of next Wednesday. The Supreme Court's ruling in April said the words 'woman' and 'sex' in the Equality Act 2010 refer to a biological woman and biological sex. Sex Matters say the government must make a statement that all single-sex facilities on its estate must be interpreted as meaning biological sex. Ministers, including John Swinney, say they accept the judgment and have convened a working group to review their policies, as well as having discussions with the Equalities and Human Rights Commission. The campaign group, led by Maya Forstater, sent its first letter before action in June and another was sent to Scottish Government officials on Wednesday. The latest letter gives the government seven days to respond and says: 'To the extent that the Scottish Government does not immediately stop the unlawful practices set out in this letter we may decide to commence proceedings without further warning.' It notes there are 1,016 toilets across the government's core estate, in a mixture of unisex and separate-sex facilities. The letter calls on the government to make a statement that 'all facilities designated as male or female within the Scottish Government estate are to be interpreted as meaning biological sex, and that gender-neutral options are widely available'. A Scottish Government's official responded to Sex Matters' previous letter, saying they accept the Supreme Court ruling. The letter, dated June 27, said: 'We are now taking action to implement the ruling. 'This includes the establishment of a short life working group to review existing policies, guidance and legislation which may be impacted by the judgment. 'The work of this group is under way and covers all relevant portfolios across government. 'This work is enabling us towards a state of readiness to take all necessary steps to implement the ruling.' Commenting on the campaigners' letter, Scottish Conservative MSP Tess White said: 'The SNP Government must stop dragging its heels. 'The Supreme Court ruling was crystal clear, and so was the Equalities and Human Rights Commission's guidance in the wake of it, so there is no excuse for the SNP failing to comply fully with the law now. 'Indeed, their failure to do so is leaving the Scottish Government and its public bodies open to the legal challenge Sex Matters are threatening.' A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'The Scottish Government has made clear it accepts the Supreme Court ruling and since April has been taking forward the detailed work that is necessary as a consequence of the ruling. That work is ongoing.'
