logo
A frugal no more: Russian threat shifts Denmark's thinking on defence spending

A frugal no more: Russian threat shifts Denmark's thinking on defence spending

Irish Times7 hours ago
When patrolling the coast of
Greenland
up near the Arctic Circle on one of
Denmark
's naval ships, the commanding officer, Jens Bach, says the only
Russians
he comes across are in fishing boats.
The bigger concern for Denmark is what might be going on closer to home in the waters of the Baltic Sea.
There have been reported instances of Russian interference, such as the jamming of navigation systems. 'I think it's something that mostly happens in the Baltic area, not that much up in the high north,' says Bach, who was speaking while on the docked naval ship in Aarhus harbour.
Nordic neighbours have recorded a rise in incidents of undersea cables being sabotaged, with Moscow viewed as the most likely culprit.
READ MORE
Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine three years ago was a 'wake up call' for Denmark and Europe, says minister for defence Troels Lund Poulsen.
Back then Denmark spent about 1.5 per cent of its economic output, or gross domestic product (GDP), on defence. This year it plans to have raised defence spending to 3.2 per cent, a significant increase in a short space of time. 'We need to be able to defend ourselves by 2030 at the latest,' Lund Poulsen says.
Anxiety about the future threat Russia poses to Europe if Vladimir Putin is allowed to succeed in Ukraine has changed public attitudes.
[
Denmark greenlights US military bases on Danish soil
Opens in new window
]
Denmark had always been sceptical about leaning further into the European Union and for three decades had a formal 'opt-out' of the union's common defence policy.
The clause was introduced to allay fears that closer integration would eventually lead to Danes being sent off to fight under the flag of a joint EU army.
Two thirds of voters backed a proposal to ditch the opt-out in a June 2022 referendum, meaning Copenhagen has a free hand to co-operate on plans to boost Europe's defence industry.
There was a recognition that Denmark could not go it alone and instead needed to be 'all-in on the European dimension', according to Derek Beach, a professor of political science at Aarhus University.
'It's really been remarkable how quickly that shifted after the invasion,' Beach says. 'It is quite clear something happened related to Danish attitudes to increased defence spending, due to fear of Russia,' he says.
In proportion to its population of about six million people, Denmark is one of the biggest contributors of military and financial aid to Ukraine, sending more than €9 billion to Kyiv to help it keep fighting.
It has been doing more on the home front as well. A draft calling up several thousand young men to spend up to 11 months in the military has been extended to young women as well. It is planning to deploy floating drones in the Baltic Sea to keep a closer eye on undersea cables, given they are vulnerable to hybrid attacks and sabotage.
The sight of Russian tanks streaming across Ukraine's border also prompted two of its Nordic neighbours, Finland and Sweden, to join Nato.
Denmark was one of the original members of the western military alliance and recently pushed for a tight time frame to be set on commitments to massively increase defence spending. Nato members ultimately signed up to spend five per cent of their economic output on defence and related infrastructure projects, by 2035.
It was not just a growing fear of Russia that ended Danes' reluctance about deepening EU ties. The population paid close attention to the rough time Britain had after leaving the union. 'Watching Brexit turn into a sh*t show really impacted Danish attitudes,' Beach says.
US president Donald Trump's threat to take over Greenland, an autonomous territory of Denmark in the Arctic, pushed Copenhagen even closer to its European allies.
One of the few centre-left heads of government in Europe, Danish prime minister Mette Frederiksen has enjoyed a boost in popularity on the back of her strong support for Ukraine. 'She's very much an Iron Lady and takes a crisis very seriously,' Beach says.
Politically the government does not fit into any one neat box. It is led by the Social Democrats yet takes a very hard line on migration. It is instinctively fiscally conservative, yet ambitious on climate and the green transition and hawkish on defence spending.
Frederiksen, who has led the Social Democrats for a decade, took them into power in 2019. They improved their position in the last election in 2022, but rather than govern with a razor-thin majority, Frederiksen opted for a coalition with two smaller parties, the centre-right Liberals and the Moderates, a centrist party led by former prime minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen.
The Social Democrats' political success is in part due to a major pivot around 2015, when it started taking a tougher approach to those seeking asylum in Denmark.
Frederiksen's rightward lurch cut off oxygen to far right nationalist forces, who are threatening to unseat many mainstream governments elsewhere in Europe.
The government is in the middle of a second pivot which may prove to be as defining.
Denmark, Austria, the Netherlands and Sweden have been known as the 'frugal four', who are keen to rein in EU spending and limit the bloc's budget. The fiscally conservative group has resisted calls for the 27 member states to raise money by borrowing funds together.
Cash-strapped southern and eastern states favour common borrowing because the EU would be able to command better loan repayment terms than they would individually. Those with healthier budgets, like the frugals, Germany and Ireland, are nervous about the proposal leading to unchecked EU spending.
In a notable shift, Frederiksen has said Denmark will no longer be among the 'frugal' camp, in the coming negotiations about the size and shape of the next EU budget. This change of heart may stretch to support for some type of common borrowing, on the condition the money raised was put towards defence.
Europe had made a 'grave mistake' by taking its security for granted, Frederiksen said in a speech in Aarhus in recent days. 'For too long we spent too little and we must never repeat that again. We need to rearm,' she said.
Berlin has changed its thinking too. Conservative chancellor Friedrich Merz's new German government has thrown open the door to a major expansion in the amount it spends on its military, after decades of fiscal restraint.
Minister for European affairs Marie Bjerre says Denmark understood the 'status quo' would not cut in when it came to the next EU budget, which is always the product of a contentious fight between Brussels and national governments.
'It is not the Danish government policy that the budget should be bigger or that we should have common debt,' she says. 'However, I think we have said quite clearly we do not consider ourselves part of the Frugal Four, meaning that we are not rejecting anything beforehand. We will go into these discussions with an open mind, because we are in crucial times for Europe.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

A frugal no more: Russian threat shifts Denmark's thinking on defence spending
A frugal no more: Russian threat shifts Denmark's thinking on defence spending

Irish Times

time7 hours ago

  • Irish Times

A frugal no more: Russian threat shifts Denmark's thinking on defence spending

When patrolling the coast of Greenland up near the Arctic Circle on one of Denmark 's naval ships, the commanding officer, Jens Bach, says the only Russians he comes across are in fishing boats. The bigger concern for Denmark is what might be going on closer to home in the waters of the Baltic Sea. There have been reported instances of Russian interference, such as the jamming of navigation systems. 'I think it's something that mostly happens in the Baltic area, not that much up in the high north,' says Bach, who was speaking while on the docked naval ship in Aarhus harbour. Nordic neighbours have recorded a rise in incidents of undersea cables being sabotaged, with Moscow viewed as the most likely culprit. READ MORE Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine three years ago was a 'wake up call' for Denmark and Europe, says minister for defence Troels Lund Poulsen. Back then Denmark spent about 1.5 per cent of its economic output, or gross domestic product (GDP), on defence. This year it plans to have raised defence spending to 3.2 per cent, a significant increase in a short space of time. 'We need to be able to defend ourselves by 2030 at the latest,' Lund Poulsen says. Anxiety about the future threat Russia poses to Europe if Vladimir Putin is allowed to succeed in Ukraine has changed public attitudes. [ Denmark greenlights US military bases on Danish soil Opens in new window ] Denmark had always been sceptical about leaning further into the European Union and for three decades had a formal 'opt-out' of the union's common defence policy. The clause was introduced to allay fears that closer integration would eventually lead to Danes being sent off to fight under the flag of a joint EU army. Two thirds of voters backed a proposal to ditch the opt-out in a June 2022 referendum, meaning Copenhagen has a free hand to co-operate on plans to boost Europe's defence industry. There was a recognition that Denmark could not go it alone and instead needed to be 'all-in on the European dimension', according to Derek Beach, a professor of political science at Aarhus University. 'It's really been remarkable how quickly that shifted after the invasion,' Beach says. 'It is quite clear something happened related to Danish attitudes to increased defence spending, due to fear of Russia,' he says. In proportion to its population of about six million people, Denmark is one of the biggest contributors of military and financial aid to Ukraine, sending more than €9 billion to Kyiv to help it keep fighting. It has been doing more on the home front as well. A draft calling up several thousand young men to spend up to 11 months in the military has been extended to young women as well. It is planning to deploy floating drones in the Baltic Sea to keep a closer eye on undersea cables, given they are vulnerable to hybrid attacks and sabotage. The sight of Russian tanks streaming across Ukraine's border also prompted two of its Nordic neighbours, Finland and Sweden, to join Nato. Denmark was one of the original members of the western military alliance and recently pushed for a tight time frame to be set on commitments to massively increase defence spending. Nato members ultimately signed up to spend five per cent of their economic output on defence and related infrastructure projects, by 2035. It was not just a growing fear of Russia that ended Danes' reluctance about deepening EU ties. The population paid close attention to the rough time Britain had after leaving the union. 'Watching Brexit turn into a sh*t show really impacted Danish attitudes,' Beach says. US president Donald Trump's threat to take over Greenland, an autonomous territory of Denmark in the Arctic, pushed Copenhagen even closer to its European allies. One of the few centre-left heads of government in Europe, Danish prime minister Mette Frederiksen has enjoyed a boost in popularity on the back of her strong support for Ukraine. 'She's very much an Iron Lady and takes a crisis very seriously,' Beach says. Politically the government does not fit into any one neat box. It is led by the Social Democrats yet takes a very hard line on migration. It is instinctively fiscally conservative, yet ambitious on climate and the green transition and hawkish on defence spending. Frederiksen, who has led the Social Democrats for a decade, took them into power in 2019. They improved their position in the last election in 2022, but rather than govern with a razor-thin majority, Frederiksen opted for a coalition with two smaller parties, the centre-right Liberals and the Moderates, a centrist party led by former prime minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen. The Social Democrats' political success is in part due to a major pivot around 2015, when it started taking a tougher approach to those seeking asylum in Denmark. Frederiksen's rightward lurch cut off oxygen to far right nationalist forces, who are threatening to unseat many mainstream governments elsewhere in Europe. The government is in the middle of a second pivot which may prove to be as defining. Denmark, Austria, the Netherlands and Sweden have been known as the 'frugal four', who are keen to rein in EU spending and limit the bloc's budget. The fiscally conservative group has resisted calls for the 27 member states to raise money by borrowing funds together. Cash-strapped southern and eastern states favour common borrowing because the EU would be able to command better loan repayment terms than they would individually. Those with healthier budgets, like the frugals, Germany and Ireland, are nervous about the proposal leading to unchecked EU spending. In a notable shift, Frederiksen has said Denmark will no longer be among the 'frugal' camp, in the coming negotiations about the size and shape of the next EU budget. This change of heart may stretch to support for some type of common borrowing, on the condition the money raised was put towards defence. Europe had made a 'grave mistake' by taking its security for granted, Frederiksen said in a speech in Aarhus in recent days. 'For too long we spent too little and we must never repeat that again. We need to rearm,' she said. Berlin has changed its thinking too. Conservative chancellor Friedrich Merz's new German government has thrown open the door to a major expansion in the amount it spends on its military, after decades of fiscal restraint. Minister for European affairs Marie Bjerre says Denmark understood the 'status quo' would not cut in when it came to the next EU budget, which is always the product of a contentious fight between Brussels and national governments. 'It is not the Danish government policy that the budget should be bigger or that we should have common debt,' she says. 'However, I think we have said quite clearly we do not consider ourselves part of the Frugal Four, meaning that we are not rejecting anything beforehand. We will go into these discussions with an open mind, because we are in crucial times for Europe.'

Where were China and Russia when Iran needed them most?
Where were China and Russia when Iran needed them most?

Irish Times

time24-06-2025

  • Irish Times

Where were China and Russia when Iran needed them most?

After the agreement of a ceasefire between Iran and Israel , among the questions Tehran might ask about the past 12 days is, where were its powerful friends in Beijing and Moscow ? China and Russia offered rhetorical support to Iran but both made clear from the start of the crisis that neither would do anything that might carry a cost in terms of their diplomatic or economic interests. China, Russia and Pakistan drafted a resolution at the United Nations Security Council in the hours after the US bombed Iran's nuclear facilities, calling for an immediate and unconditional ceasefire. China's foreign ministry, which had been quick to denounce Israel's campaign against Iran, said the US action seriously violated the purposes and principles of the UN Charter and international law. Russia also condemned the US attacks, making a public display of warmth towards Tehran by inviting Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi to meet Vladimir Putin in Moscow. Araghchi said before the meeting that he expected serious negotiations with the Russian president. READ MORE 'Russia is a friend of Iran, we have a strategic partnership. We always consult with each other and co-ordinate our positions,' he said. When they met, Putin again condemned the attacks on Iran but declined to mention the US by name and said Russia was 'making efforts to help the Iranian people'. A Kremlin spokesman said the US action in Iran would not affect the relationship between Moscow and Washington and he was vague about the nature of the help Putin promised, beyond saying 'we have offered our mediation services'. Iran, China and Russia are all members of the Brics and of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation and Tehran has bilateral partnership agreements with both Moscow and Beijing. But none of these agreements have counted for much in the past two weeks as Tehran found itself isolated in the face of overwhelming force from its technologically superior adversaries in the US and Israel. The Moscow-Tehran Treaty signed last January promised a 20-year strategic partnership including joint military exercises and intelligence sharing. And Iran offered military support to Russia for almost a decade when Moscow was shoring up Bashar al-Assad 's regime in Syria. China signed a 25-year comprehensive co-operation agreement with Iran in 2021, promising to invest $400 billion (€345 billion) in the Islamic republic's economy. But while the deal has secured privileged access for Beijing to Iranian oil, it has produced few deals for Iranian businesses hoping for Chinese investment. One reason for this is Chinese firms' nervousness about violating US sanctions against Iran, which could have repercussions for their business elsewhere in the world. Another is that China's economic focus in the Middle East is on the Arab Gulf countries, particularly Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. When US secretary of state Marco Rubio asked China to dissuade Iran from closing the Strait of Hormuz, he was pushing at an open door. Most of the oil that is shipped through the strait is destined for Asia and China, which depends on an uninterrupted supply from the Middle East. This means that stability in the region is more valuable to Beijing than any cost or distraction a war with Iran might create for the US. And as the world's major nuclear powers, China, Russia and the US agree that Iran should not be in a position to develop a nuclear weapon. In any renewed negotiations over Iran's nuclear programme that may follow the ceasefire, Tehran will be under pressure to abandon its enrichment of uranium altogether. Iran is entitled under the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty (NPT) to enrich uranium for peaceful, civilian purposes but Moscow and Beijing are unlikely to come to Tehran's aid in exercising that right.

US-Iran: Putin says Washington strikes are pushing world to a ‘very dangerous line'
US-Iran: Putin says Washington strikes are pushing world to a ‘very dangerous line'

Irish Times

time23-06-2025

  • Irish Times

US-Iran: Putin says Washington strikes are pushing world to a ‘very dangerous line'

Russian president Vladimir Putin said on Monday that 'unjustified' US attacks on Iran 's nuclear sites were pushing the world towards great danger and promised to try to help the people of the Islamic republic, though he gave no specifics. US president Donald Trump and Israel have publicly speculated about killing Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and about regime change, steps Russia fears could push the entire region into a major war. Mr Putin received Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araqchi in the Kremlin on Monday alongside his foreign minister Sergei Lavrov, Kremlin foreign policy aide Yuri Ushakov and Igor Kostyukov, the head of Russia's GRU military intelligence agency. 'The absolutely unprovoked aggression against Iran has no basis and no justification,' Mr Putin told Mr Araqchi, adding that he wanted to speak about ways to calm the crisis. 'For our part, we are making efforts to assist the Iranian people.' READ MORE Mr Araqchi was due to deliver a letter from the ayatollah to Mr Putin, seeking more help from Russia, a senior source told Reuters. There was no confirmation of that from Moscow, though Mr Araqchi passed on best wishes from Iran's supreme leader and president. Russia's president Vladimir Putin and Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araqchi meet at the Kremlin in Moscow. Photograph: Alexander Kazakov/AFP via Getty Images At a meeting later with advanced military recruits, Mr Putin noted the escalation of the conflict in the Middle East and the involvement of powers from outside the region, though he did not mention the United States by name. 'Extra-regional powers are also being drawn into the conflict,' Mr Putin said. 'All this brings the world to a very dangerous line.' Iran has not been impressed with Russia's support so far, Iranian sources told Reuters, and the country wants Mr Putin to do more to back it against Israel and the United States. The sources did not elaborate on what assistance Tehran wanted. Mr Putin, whose army is fighting a major war of attrition in Ukraine, has shown little appetite for a confrontation with the US over Iran just as Mr Trump seeks to repair ties with Moscow. While Moscow has bought weapons from Iran and signed a 20-year strategic partnership deal with Tehran earlier this year, the published agreement does not contain a mutual defence clause. Russia has also said it does not want Iran to build a nuclear bomb, a step that Moscow fears would trigger a nuclear arms race across the Middle East. Iranian officials say they feel Russia has not done enough to support it, and that they feel betrayed by major powers such as Russia and China. Russia intervened in the Syrian civil war in 2015 to support Iran's ally Bashar al-Assad, but as his enemies closed in on Damascus in late 2024 it refused to send troops or more air power as it considered the situation too dangerous, though it did grant Mr Assad asylum. Inside Russia, there were calls for Moscow to come to the aid of its partner and to supply Iran with the same support that Washington had given to Ukraine – including air defence systems, missiles and satellite intelligence. At the UN Security Council on Sunday, Russia, China and Pakistan proposed the 15-member body adopt a resolution calling for an immediate and unconditional ceasefire in the Middle East after US strikes. Russia's UN ambassador Vassily Nebenzia recalled former US secretary of state Colin Powell making the case at the UN security council in 2003 that Iraqi president Saddam Hussein constituted an imminent danger to the world because of the country's stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons. 'Again we're being asked to believe the US's fairy tales, to once again inflict suffering on millions of people living in the Middle East. This cements our conviction that history has taught our US colleagues nothing,' he said. – Reuters

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store