‘The View's Sunny Hostin Was 'Dismayed' By Judge's Decision To Deny Diddy Bail: 'I Think That's The Wrong Thing'
Combs, who pleaded not guilty to all charges brought against him, was convicted on two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution following an eight-week trial. However, he was acquitted on more serious charges of sex trafficking and racketeering, which did not surprise Sunny Hostin, who was present in the courtroom for much of the trial.
Speaking of the sex trafficking charges, Hostin shared why she felt jurors chose to acquit Combs, despite hearing a testimony from his ex-girlfriend Cassie Ventura, who took the witness stand to speak out about the physical abuse she endured throughout their long-term relationship.
'It's hard for people [to understand] because there was a long relationship with one of the victims,' Hostin said. 'We're talking about an 11-year relationship where someone is never saying no, and actually, actively agreeing to it.'
'I think with eight men on the jury and four women, what man is going to find him guilty of [sex trafficking] and understand that no is no, yes is yes, and the blurred lines between that?' she continued. 'I don't think the government did a good enough job of explaining domestic violence and how yes can mean no. They just didn't have it.'
While Hostin felt Combs' violation of the Mann Act—which prohibits the transportation of women and girls across state lines for prostitution—was a 'slam dunk,' she had doubts that he would actually serve prison time for the guilty charges, which carry up to a 20-year sentence.
'Twenty years in prison? We didn't even prosecute [former New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer] for that very same thing,' she said. 'It's generally not used. That is something the prosecution threw in so that they could get a conviction.'
The former federal prosecutor also felt 'a little dismayed' by the judge's decision to deny Combs bail and hold him in prison until his sentencing later this year. After Ventura's lawyers submitted a letter asking the judge to deny his bail, the judge agreed that, because of the proof of domestic violence that had been brought against the disgraced rapper, 'society couldn't be protected from him,' according to Hostin.
'I think that's the wrong thing,' Hostin said, noting that he's 'not a flight risk' since they could've figured out other ways to keep Combs in the United States by confiscating his passport, his plane, and making him wear an ankle monitor.
The View airs on weekdays at 11/10c on ABC.
, or text START to 88788
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
Trump's Big Bill Is Now Law. What Was Learned?
To the Editor: Re 'Three Lessons From the Big, Awful Bill,' by Jason Furman (Opinion guest essay, July 7): I'm afraid that Professor Furman drew the wrong lessons from this bill. Its passage had nothing to do with the quality of ideas, experts or even economics. It was all about greed (for power and money) and fear (of President Trump). The legislators' constituents or the fate of the country meant nothing in the face of the Big, Awful Tyrant in the White House. Susan BodikerWashington To the Editor: Jason Furman is wrong to think that the way the Republicans brought us the worst piece of legislation in modern times holds a lesson for Democrats. It's easy to put together legislation that enriches the rich, brings cruelty to the vulnerable and is fiscally irresponsible. It's what Trump supporters do. It's much harder to craft legislation that helps bring about economic growth that can be widely shared among all Americans and do good for the world. The lesson here is more simple: Whatever debates Democrats are having between more centrist and progressive elements pales in comparison to the damage we do when we don't get out the vote to prevent Republicans from taking power. Richard DineSilver Spring, Md. To the Editor: Maybe there's only one lesson from President Trump's hugely horrific bill: Legislating works very differently when there is a large dose of authoritarianism in the body politic. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
D.C. hotel housekeepers will receive $215,000 in unpaid overtime settlement
Two related D.C.-area cleaning companies must pay $290,000 to resolve allegations that they sometimes failed to provide full overtime pay to hundreds of housekeepers since 2021, D.C. Attorney General Brian Schwalb said Tuesday. In a statement, Schwalb's office said it launched an investigation into the companies Cuzco Facilities Services LLC and Mardone Inc., which does business as J&B Cleaning Services, after receiving a tip about suspected wage theft from the union that represents the region's hotel workers, Unite Here Local 25. The two cleaning companies are legally considered to be a single employer because they have common ownership and management, Schwalb's office said.
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Analysis: Trump is daring MAGA to oppose him right now
'I will give you everything,' Donald Trump famously intoned during the 2016 presidential campaign. And for his most ardent MAGA supporters, a more unshackled and unchecked second Trump term has carried the promise that he might actually deliver on many of his more controversial proposals – often things he failed to do in his first term. The reality is proving much more complicated. In recent days and weeks, the Trump administration has repeatedly bowed to the realities of governing. It's done things – on Jeffrey Epstein, on Russia's war in Ukraine, on deportations, on government spending and on Iran – that risk alienating the MAGA base that brought Trump to the dance. None of that is to say the president is about to lose his base; such predictions have long proven overzealous. And MAGA supporters often take their cues from Trump, readjusting their principles on the fly. But everyone has their limits. Trump's giving them reasons to be suspect about his and top administration officials' intentions. And there's been at least some evidence of a brewing backlash. The most significant example this week is Epstein. The administration has repeatedly failed to deliver on its promises of significant revelations about the Epstein case, dating back months. The case has for years been the object of MAGA fascination and conspiracy theories, which hold that Epstein's trafficking of underage girls implicated powerful figures who could soon be held to account. But this week, there were further disappointments for the base. Not only did those promises fall flat as the administration effectively concluded the matter, but the Justice Department's final conclusions in two key cases contradicted what Attorney General Pam Bondi had said in hyping the documents. Bondi responded to a reporter's question about a client list by saying she had one on her desk; the DOJ now says there was no client list. (The White House claimed Monday that Bondi was somehow referring to other documents.) And Bondi said there were tens of thousands of videos of Epstein with children or child pornography; the DOJ's conclusions say nothing of the sort. The problem for the administration isn't just that it failed to deliver anything significant; it's that it did so in a way that could lead MAGA supporters to believe it's now in on the fix. Bondi suggested there was much more to these revelations than the administration has now produced, and prominent figures including now-Vice President JD Vance and now-Deputy FBI Director Dan Bongino have for years linked the lack of publicly disclosed 'client list' to a cover-up. That has and will seed suspicion. Much of that suspicion for now is being geared toward figures who aren't Trump. That includes Bondi (who some MAGA figures like Laura Loomer say should be fired) and unnamed law enforcement officials who people like Fox News host Jesse Watters baselessly speculate might have covered things up. But the situation is a powder keg in a MAGA universe that has for years believed Trump was about to rip the lid off a conspiracy of child sex traffickers that included powerful figures. That's not just the case with Epstein, but also with the QAnon conspiracy theory – a theory that animated a large portion of Trump's base. Trump and his allies have cultivated a conspiratorial base, and they're now reaping what they sowed. But that's hardly the only example of a development that could cause the MAGA base to question whether Trump is really set to deliver for them. On Monday, Trump announced that he was reversing a brief pause on weapons shipments to Ukraine. The pause had initially caused many key MAGA figures to celebrate, believing Trump had finally cut off Ukraine. (A March poll found Republicans opposed continuing to send Ukraine weapons and financial aid by a nearly 2-to-1 margin.) Trump has also again signaled that he wants to exempt many undocumented longtime farm workers from deportations, despite his promises of mass deportations. The issue has divided his administration between those who believe in true mass deportation and those who worry about the economic effects of draining a key source of labor. The administration has provided a series of mixed messages in recent weeks. 'I did not vote for this,' Newsmax host Todd Starnes posted Monday on X, citing all three of the above examples. Many echoed that phrase. Other recent examples appear less likely to truly alienate supporters, but have certainly complicated matters. Last week brought a significant setback in Trump's professed campaign to cut government spending. The Trump agenda bill that ultimately passed Congress would balloon the national debt by trillions, according to multiple estimates. It's not clear that either Trump or MAGA truly care that much about the national debt. But it was a remarkable reversal from an administration that made Elon Musk's efforts to rein in government spending its early calling card. Musk pledged to cut as much as $1 trillion. He has now made this about-face from the administration the linchpin of his new third party effort, the America Party. The story is somewhat similar with Trump's recent strikes on Iran, which flew in the face of much of the MAGA movement's emphasis on 'America First' and non-interventionist foreign policy. Many key movement figures initially balked at the idea, and some like Tucker Carlson have continued to do so. Of course, that example shows how these episodes often pan out. Many MAGA influencers who criticized the idea of striking Iran beforehand ultimately came on board. Polls showed a sharp rise in Republican support for the US strikes after they happened. The episode reinforced something we have seen throughout the Trump era. His supporters care a lot less about the details of policies and actions than the fact that Trump spearheaded them. If he does something, it becomes a good idea, because they have largely unflinching faith in him. But that's always subject to change, especially when it concerns the policies and issues they hold near and dear. And Trump has recently set about testing just how much the base is willing to tolerate him departing from the MAGA line.
