
White House Responds to California City Terminating Contract With ICE
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has criticized a Californian city after it terminated its contract with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) amid protests against deportation policies.
DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin told Newsweek that the City of Glendale's decision was "deeply disturbing," and accused state officials of siding with criminals over public safety after unrest in Los Angeles.
Why It Matters
The Trump administration plans to send 2,000 more National Guard troops to Los Angeles in response to protests over immigration policy, adding to the 2,000 already in place and the 700 Marines deployed by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.
Drag slider
compare photos
California Governor Gavin Newsom's office told Newsweek that only about 300 of the original Guard troops have been deployed so far. His administration has filed a lawsuit challenging the deployment as unlawful.
The move follows a weekend of unrest tied to opposition to President Donald Trump's mass deportation policy, with reports of arson and looting in downtown Los Angeles and 42 arrests.
What To Know
On Sunday, the City of Glendale in Los Angeles County said that it was ending an agreement with the DHS and ICE that had allowed detainees to be held at the Glendale Police Department, where they had access to virtual and in-person visits. A press release issued by city officials said the decision was "not made lightly."
Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin told Newsweek: "It is deeply disturbing that sanctuary politicians in Glendale, California, would terminate an agreement to hold ICE detainees and violent criminals—which the city has had with DHS for more than 15 years—just as violent rioters are destroying Los Angeles and assaulting federal law enforcement."
City officials recognized the change could make family visits harder and noted that access to legal counsel may be more limited at other facilities. The facility will now be used exclusively by local law enforcement.
"Glendale's politicians stand with criminal illegal aliens, including gang members, rapists, and murderers over American citizens," McLaughlin added.
"[Homeland Security] Secretary [Kristi] Noem has a clear message for the LA rioters and sanctuary politicians: You will not stop us or slow us down. ICE will continue to enforce the law."
City officials clarified that the Glendale Police Department does not enforce immigration laws and remains in compliance with the "California Values Act."
The legislation prevents state and local law enforcement agencies from using their resources on behalf of federal immigration enforcement agencies.
Wide-scale protests broke out in Los Angeles on Saturday after ICE carried out multiple raids across the city, as part what the Trump administration has called the largest mass deportation operation in U.S. history.
While the raids are conducted under federal law, protests flared up following reports that detainees were being held in the basement of a federal building. ICE has denied the allegation.
Trump and Newsom remain in a war of words over the federal response to the protests. Trump deployed the National Guard to quell what he called a "rebellion."
Newsom has opposed this move, saying that it infringes upon California's sovereignty and violates constitutional provisions. He filed a lawsuit challenging the federalization of the National Guard, asserting that the deployment was both unlawful and politically motivated.
Trump has backed calls from his top immigration adviser, Tom Homan, that Newsom should be arrested. "I would do it, if I were Tom," Trump said. "It would be great."
Newsom dared the administration to arrest him.
What People Are Saying
The City of Glendale said in a press release: "Nevertheless, despite the transparency and safeguards the city has upheld, the city recognizes that public perception of the ICE contract—no matter how limited or carefully managed, no matter the good—has become divisive."
California Governor Gavin Newsom said in a post on X on Monday, "The President of the United States just called for the arrest of a sitting Governor. This is a day I hoped I would never see in America. I don't care if you're a Democrat or a Republican this is a line we cannot cross as a nation — this is an unmistakable step toward authoritarianism."
What Happens Next
California Democrats are urging the Trump administration to pull back the National Guard and return control to the state. Nationwide protests against federal immigration enforcement are expected to take place.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNBC
2 minutes ago
- CNBC
Delta Air assures US lawmakers it will not personalize fares using AI
Delta Air Lines said on Friday it will not use artificial intelligence to set personalized ticket prices for passengers after facing sharp criticism from U.S. lawmakers and broad public concern. Last week, Democratic Senators Ruben Gallego, Mark Warner and Richard Blumenthal said they believed the Atlanta-based airline would use AI to set individual prices, which would "likely mean fare price increases up to each individual consumer's personal 'pain point.'" Delta said it has not used AI to set personalized prices but previously said it plans to deploy AI-based revenue management technology across 20% of its domestic network by the end of 2025 in partnership with Fetcherr, an AI pricing company. "There is no fare product Delta has ever used, is testing or plans to use that targets customers with individualized prices based on personal data," Delta told the senators in a letter on Friday, seen by Reuters. "Our ticket pricing never takes into account personal data." Senators praised Delta's commitment not to use AI for personal pricing but expressed many questions and want more details about what data Delta is collecting to set prices. "Delta is telling their investors one thing, and then turning around and telling the public another," Gallego said. "If Delta is in fact using aggregated instead of individualized data, that is welcome news." Delta declined comment on Gallego's statement. The senators cited a comment in December by Delta President Glen Hauenstein that the carrier's AI price-setting technology is capable of setting fares based on a prediction of "the amount people are willing to pay for the premium products related to the base fares." Last week, American Airlines CEO Robert Isom said using AI to set ticket prices could hurt consumer trust. "This is not about bait and switch. This is not about tricking," Isom said on an earnings call, adding "talk about using AI in that way, I don't think it's appropriate. And certainly from American, it's not something we will do." Democratic lawmakers Greg Casar and Rashida Tlaib last week introduced legislation to bar companies from using AI to set prices or wages based on Americans' personal data and would specifically ban airlines raising individual prices after seeing a search for a family obituary. They cited a Federal Trade Commission staff report in January that found "retailers frequently use people's personal information to set targeted, tailored prices for goods and services -- from a person's location and demographics, down to their mouse movements on a webpage." The FTC cited a hypothetical example of a consumer profiled as a new parent who could intentionally be shown higher-priced baby thermometers and collect behavioral details to forecast a customer's state of mind. Delta said airlines have used dynamic pricing for more than three decades, in which pricing fluctuates based on a variety of factors like overall customer demand, fuel prices and competition, but not a specific consumer's personal information. "Given the tens of millions of fares and hundreds of thousands of routes for sale at any given time, the use of new technology like AI promises to streamline the process by which we analyze existing data and the speed and scale at which we can respond to changing market dynamics," Delta's letter said.


NBC News
2 minutes ago
- NBC News
Federal officials launch investigation into former Trump prosecutor
Federal officials are investigating former special counsel Jack Smith after President Trump and other prominent Republicans alleged that his investigations into then-candidate Trump amounted to illegal political activity. It comes as protesters demonstrated against the Trump administration on Saturday. NBC News' Vaughn Hillyard 2, 2025


The Hill
32 minutes ago
- The Hill
Smithsonian slated to restore Trump impeachment exhibit
The Smithsonian's National Museum of American History said it is slated to restore the placard with information about President Trump's two impeachments after removing it from the exhibit last month. The museum said in a Saturday statement that the section will be 'updated in the coming weeks to reflect all impeachment proceedings in our nation's history.' The Washington Post reported on Thursday, citing an unnamed source familiar with the exhibit plans, that the removal of the placard occurred as part of an internal content review the institution agreed to after pressure from President Trump's administration to get rid of the art museum director. The Smithsonian said on Saturday that the placard, part of the exhibit 'The American Presidency: A Glorious Burden,' did not meet the institution's standards and argued no one within the administration asked the museum to remove the information. 'The placard, which was meant to be a temporary addition to a twenty-five-year-old exhibition, did not meet the museum's standards in appearance, location, timeline and overall presentation. It was not consistent with other sections in the exhibit and moreover blocked the view of the objects inside its case,' the Smithsonian said in a statement. 'For these reasons, we removed the placard. We were not asked by any Administration or other government official to remove content from the exhibit,' the museum added. The placard, before being removed last month, detailed Trump's two impeachments and was featured as part of the exhibit since September 2021, the Smithsonian previously told The Hill. 'It was intended to be a short-term measure to address current events at the time, however, the label remained in place until July 2025,' a Smithsonian spokesperson said. 'The section of this exhibition covers Congress, The Supreme Court, Impeachment, and Public Opinion,' the spokesperson added. 'Because the other topics in this section had not been updated since 2008, the decision was made to restore the Impeachment case back to its 2008 appearance.' The president was impeached two times during his first White House term: once over a phone call where he allegedly asked Ukraine to investigate then-ex-President Biden and his son, Hunter Biden, and the other over his alleged role in the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol. He was acquitted by the Senate in both instances. The removal of the placard drew backlash from Democratic Party lawmakers. Trump signed an executive order in March, ordering the removal of 'divisive narratives' from the Smithsonian museums that are not compatible with the administration's views and 'remind' Americans 'of our extraordinary heritage.' 'As the keeper of memory for the nation, it is our privilege and responsibility to tell accurate and complete histories. As has been recently reported, in July, a placard was removed from the National Museum of American History's exhibit 'The American Presidency: A Glorious Burden,'' the Smithsonian said on Saturday. 'The intent of the Impeachment section of the exhibit is to reflect all impeachment proceedings in our nation's history,' the institution added.