logo
Egypt warns Ethiopia: No unilateral control over Nile waters

Egypt warns Ethiopia: No unilateral control over Nile waters

Egypt's Minister of Water Resources and Irrigation, Engineer Hani Sewilam on Thursday, reaffirmed Egypt's categorical rejection of Ethiopia's continued policy of imposing a 'fait accompli' through unilateral actions regarding the Nile River.
He emphasized that the Nile is a shared international water resource, and Ethiopia's actions represent a clear violation of international law, particularly rules concerning the fair and equitable use of international watercourses and the avoidance of causing significant harm.
During a meeting with his country's ambassadors, Sewilam reiterated Cairo's firm rejection of Ethiopia's ongoing unilateral approach to the Nile. He added that the Ethiopian side has consistently promoted the completion of the dam, which Egypt views as illegitimate and contrary to international law, despite the lack of a binding agreement with the downstream nations and despite the fundamental reservations expressed by both Egypt and Sudan.
Sewilam further stated that Egypt has demonstrated a sincere political commitment to reaching a binding legal agreement on the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD), one that serves common interests and prevents harm to downstream countries. He noted that these efforts have been met with a lack of political will from the Ethiopian side, which seeks to impose water hegemony rather than fostering partnership and cooperation – something Egypt will not permit.
He mentioned that Ethiopia's repeated calls for resuming negotiations are merely superficial attempts aimed at improving Ethiopia's international image. He pointed out that the practical reality and the more than thirteen-year negotiation process clearly demonstrate Ethiopia's absence of political will to reach an agreement.
The Minister stressed that Ethiopia's evasive and retreating stances, which impose a 'fait accompli' policy, contradict its declared desire for negotiation. He concluded by reaffirming Egypt's absolute rejection of any attempts for Ethiopia's development to come at the expense of the downstream countries' rights.
On Wednesday, Aregawi Berhe, Director of the Ethiopian Dam Project Coordination Office, announced that the GERD has reached a 98.9 percent completion rate, bringing Ethiopia closer to 'achieving its national dream after 14 years of work.'
Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed on Thursday extended a surprise invitation to Egypt and Sudan to attend the inauguration of the GERD in September.
Late 2024 saw tensions rise between Cairo and Addis Ababa following the failure of negotiations over the Nile River waters.
At the beginning of September 2024, Egyptian Foreign Minister Sameh Shoukry sent a letter to the UN Security Council rejecting the recent statements made by Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed regarding the fifth filling of the GERD.
He stressed Egypt's categorical rejection of Ethiopia's unilateral policies that violate the rules and principles of international law, which constitute a clear violation of the Declaration of Principles Agreement and the Security Council's presidential statement of September 15, 2021.
The Egyptian letter to the UN explained that the end of 13 years of negotiations with Egypt's sincerest intentions came once it was obvious to everyone that Addis Ababa is only interested in using the negotiations as a cover to prolong reaching any solution.
It added that Ethiopia is seeking to legitimize its unilateral policies that contradict international law and to hide behind unfounded claims that these policies are based on the right of peoples to development.
Ethiopia, in turn, responded with a letter to the Security Council in which it claimed that Egypt had participated in negotiations over the past decade with the sole aim of obstructing its progress and returning to its rigid positions, claiming that Egypt's insistence on its historical share of the Nile waters is borne from colonial-era deals and a refusal to accept any different outcomes.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Egypt Becomes First Arab Nation to Chair FAO Council
Egypt Becomes First Arab Nation to Chair FAO Council

CairoScene

time3 hours ago

  • CairoScene

Egypt Becomes First Arab Nation to Chair FAO Council

Egypt becomes the first Arab country to hold the Independent Chairperson position at the UN Food and Agriculture Organization Council. Jul 04, 2025 Egyptian diplomat Mina Rizk has been elected as the Independent Chairperson of the Council of the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), the first Arab official to assume the post since the agency was founded in 1945. The election took place during the FAO's 44th session in Rome, where Egypt also secured a seat on the General Committee of the FAO Conference. The role, held for a renewable one-year term, includes guiding consensus on strategic policies, programme priorities, and budgetary decisions within the Council. According to the Egyptian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Rizk's election reflects Egypt's expanding role in multilateral governance related to agriculture, sustainability, and food systems. It aligns with the country's broader agenda of increasing influence within global development institutions. The FAO Council, comprising 49 regional member countries, acts as the organisation's executive arm. As Independent Chairperson, Rizk will oversee high-level discussions on critical issues such as climate resilience, food insecurity, and sustainable agricultural development.

Egyptian Legal Scholar Ali El-Ghatit Passes Away at 84
Egyptian Legal Scholar Ali El-Ghatit Passes Away at 84

See - Sada Elbalad

time4 hours ago

  • See - Sada Elbalad

Egyptian Legal Scholar Ali El-Ghatit Passes Away at 84

Israa Farhan Renowned Egyptian legal expert Dr. Ali El-Ghatit has passed away, drawing heartfelt tributes from public figures, including businessman Naguib Sawiris, who remembered him as a man of immense knowledge, character, and principle. Dr. El-Ghatit, a towering figure in legal thought and human rights advocacy, died earlier today, leaving behind a legacy defined by intellectual rigor, generosity, and a lifelong commitment to justice. In a tribute shared on social media, Sawiris recalled frequent visits to El-Ghatit's expansive office in Cairo's Garden City district, where rows of important legal and philosophical books lined the floor. He described the warmth with which the late scholar welcomed him, often offering books from his personal collection and insisting on replacing them at his own expense. Sawiris also shared a poignant memory of El-Ghatit's late father, who used to buy multiple copies of books so that his son could gift them to peers interested in the pursuit of knowledge. This gesture, Sawiris said, reflected a deep-rooted family tradition of intellectual generosity. Born in 1940, Dr. El-Ghatit was widely respected for his legal scholarship, particularly in constitutional law, and served as an advisor to many national and international legal bodies. His writings and teachings have influenced generations of Egyptian legal minds. read more Gold prices rise, 21 Karat at EGP 3685 NATO's Role in Israeli-Palestinian Conflict US Expresses 'Strong Opposition' to New Turkish Military Operation in Syria Shoukry Meets Director-General of FAO Lavrov: confrontation bet. nuclear powers must be avoided News Iran Summons French Ambassador over Foreign Minister Remarks News Aboul Gheit Condemns Israeli Escalation in West Bank News Greek PM: Athens Plays Key Role in Improving Energy Security in Region News One Person Injured in Explosion at Ukrainian Embassy in Madrid News Israeli-Linked Hadassah Clinic in Moscow Treats Wounded Iranian IRGC Fighters News China Launches Largest Ever Aircraft Carrier Sports Former Al Zamalek Player Ibrahim Shika Passes away after Long Battle with Cancer Videos & Features Tragedy Overshadows MC Alger Championship Celebration: One Fan Dead, 11 Injured After Stadium Fall Lifestyle Get to Know 2025 Eid Al Adha Prayer Times in Egypt Business Fear & Greed Index Plummets to Lowest Level Ever Recorded amid Global Trade War News Flights suspended at Port Sudan Airport after Drone Attacks News "Tensions Escalate: Iran Probes Allegations of Indian Tech Collaboration with Israeli Intelligence" Videos & Features Video: Trending Lifestyle TikToker Valeria Márquez Shot Dead during Live Stream Technology 50-Year Soviet Spacecraft 'Kosmos 482' Crashes into Indian Ocean

Justice without extra fees - Egypt - Al-Ahram Weekly
Justice without extra fees - Egypt - Al-Ahram Weekly

Al-Ahram Weekly

time5 hours ago

  • Al-Ahram Weekly

Justice without extra fees - Egypt - Al-Ahram Weekly

A statement issued by the Bar Association has demanded the immediate repeal of what it described as 'the unconstitutional decision' issued by the heads of the Courts of Appeal, imposing unprecedented fees on citizens for a number of litigation procedures. Issued in April, the association's statement also noted that the value imposed on fees was excessive, 'becoming a burden on litigants and an obstacle to their right to litigation. This represents a violation of the constitutional obligation that litigation be a protected and guaranteed right for all,' the statement said. The crisis of the higher court fees began on 1 March when successive fees were imposed on a number of litigation procedures. The decisions were followed by successive increases in fees from entities deemed other than those authorised by law and the constitution. 'This represented a violation of constitutional, legal frameworks, and the limits of the constitution and the law,' Ali Suleiman, a former unionist and a lawyer since 1990, told Al-Ahram Weekly. Suleiman said that over the past two years, lawyers have been taken aback by a gradual increase in court fees. However, in 2025, the Council of Presidents of the Courts of Appeal decided to impose exaggerated fees. Court fees are subject to a law related to the establishment of courts and must be paid before filing any lawsuit. What further fuelled the lawyers' protests, represented by the syndicate, was the approval of a LE33 fee for each page submitted in the case document portfolios. The same amount was also imposed for obtaining any computerised document from the court. A LE5 review stamp was added for every paper in a case file. 'According to the Egyptian constitution, no fees may be imposed except pursuant to a law issued by the House of Representatives. Accordingly, the decision of the Council of Appeal Courts is unconstitutional,' Suleiman added. What further caused discontent from lawyers by the decisions was the State Council's rulings in 2003 to abolish the Council of Presidents of the Courts of Appeal, arguing that the council has no legal basis. Accordingly, all decisions issued by it are null and void, according to Ahmed Fouad, secretary-general of the Helwan Branch of the Bar Association. The fact that fees in some cases reach up to LE5,000 and do not go to the Ministry of Justice but to the Judges' Fund for the Courts of Appeal, is unconstitutional and unacceptable, according to Suleiman. He added that these fees stand in the way of achieving justice within society. Fouad adds that even workers and personal status cases are subject to payment of litigation fees, even though they had been exempted since 1929. Fouad points out that in 2009, the Ministry of Justice submitted a draft law to the House of Representatives to increase litigation fees. This led to a 20-day sit-in by lawyers at the syndicate, after which the draft law was withdrawn. This time around, according to Fouad, there has been no response to the demands of lawyers. He said members of the General Assembly of Lawyers continued their strike on 18 and 19 May in implementation of the decision to boycott sessions before all criminal courts nationwide. This was in compliance with the decision of the General Bar Council and branch syndicates to oppose the decision. The Bar Association affirms that violators of the strike will be referred to disciplinary action, suspended from practising the profession, and all union services will be suspended. The strike was not the first action announced by the Bar Association. It was preceded by several escalating measures, including staging protests in front of courthouses to express their opposition, boycotting the treasuries of the Courts of Appeal and their offices nationwide, boycotting all court treasuries, and preventing the payment of fees. A press conference was also held to inform the public of the consequences of the increase in litigation fees. The measures were taken by the Bar Association after it had attempted to communicate with decision-makers but with no response. The strike was part of an escalation of measures against the increase in fees. The general assemblies of the sub-syndicates held a one-hour protest in front of all primary courts nationwide on 29 May and 18 June. It also called on the General Assembly of Lawyers to convene to take whatever action it deems appropriate in this regard on 21 June at the syndicate headquarters on Ramses Street in Cairo. However, the Administrative Judiciary cancelled the meeting. But that has not derailed the Bar Association. It carried out a survey, which revealed that 21,000 of its members agreed to hold a general strike on 7-8 July, whereby they will boycott court proceedings across the country and refrain from making any payments at court treasuries. The Bar Association stressed that these procedures will take place without infraction on citizens' rights. * A version of this article appears in print in the 3 July, 2025 edition of Al-Ahram Weekly Follow us on: Facebook Instagram Whatsapp Short link:

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store