Super Hornets Are Now Carrying Stormbreaker Glide Bombs On Combat Missions
Videos recently published by U.S. Central Command showing ongoing missions against the Iran-backed Houthi militia in Yemen include footage of StormBreakers being carried by U.S. Navy F/A-18E/F Super Hornets, as well as being prepared by armorers about the aircraft carrier USS Harry S. Truman (CVN 75). User @IntelWalrus on X was the first to bring this to our attention.
Restoring freedom of navigation#HouthisAreTerrorists pic.twitter.com/lq6oU0rE6o
— U.S. Central Command (@CENTCOM) March 23, 2025
U.S Navy ammunition handlers aboard the Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS Harry S. Truman (CVN 75) prepare ordnance for Carrier Air Wing One (CVW-1).#HouthisAreTerrorists pic.twitter.com/z5PizSE1eJ
— U.S. Central Command (@CENTCOM) March 21, 2025
At this stage, we can't be sure if this is actually the first time StormBreaker has been used in combat, but we have reached out to the Navy and to Raytheon for clarification as well as details as to what kinds of targets the weapon may have been used against. We have also asked the manufacturer if the weapon was previously used in combat by the U.S. Air Force — if so, this doesn't appear to have been announced.
Large-scale strikes by the U.S. military against Houthi targets in Yemen were ordered by President Donald Trump earlier this month, as we reported at the time. The first three days of these strikes reportedly killed 'dozens' of militants and hit headquarters, command and control nodes, weapons manufacturing and storage facilities, and drone operations infrastructure. This latest campaign was spurred by the Houthis saying they would resume attacks on Israeli-linked ships over the blockade of humanitarian aid to Palestinians in Gaza.
As well as StormBreaker, we have seen other interesting weapons employed during these strikes, including a lot of standoff types. Among these, the AGM-154 Joint Standoff Weapon (JSOW) glide bomb has been prominent, as well as the AGM-84H/K Standoff Land Attack Missile-Expanded Response (SLAM-ER) missile, and the more familiar Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM) and AGM-88E Advanced Anti-Radiation Guided Missile (AARGM).
As for the GBU-53/B, the weapon's tri-mode guidance system can find targets using imaging infrared or millimeter-wave radar or employing semi-active laser homing to hit a designated aimpoint. Another of the key advantages of StormBreaker is its ability to communicate with the aircraft carrying it. This means the weapon can be launched and, if required, redirected to a new target once in flight, as well as receiving regular midcourse updates.
Depending on the altitude of the launching aircraft, the weapon can also glide on its own using a GPS-assisted inertial navigation system, after which it can strike a specific coordinate or begin searching for a target. This provides considerable flexibility, with the weapon able to engage both stationary and moving targets, including at night or in bad weather.
This latter point provides a major advantage over even the 'Laser SDB,' a development of the original SDB that can strike moving targets, but not in all weather conditions. The Laser SDB also needs the aircraft — or another laser source — within line of sight to actually lase the target.
StormBreaker can hit stationary targets at a maximum of 69 miles and moving targets at 45 miles, the Air Force has disclosed. The munition has particular utility against surface targets, making it especially relevant for the current Houthi campaign.
StormBreaker is also a notably small weapon, with a length of just 69 inches, a diameter of no more than seven inches, and a weight of 204 pounds. An individual aircraft can therefore carry a significant quantity — up to 28 in the case of the F-15E Strike Eagle, for example — allowing more targets to be prosecuted. However, the F/A-18E/F has so far only been seen carrying StormBreaker on twin smart racks, as evidenced aboard the USS Harry S. Truman during the Houthi strikes.
As we reported at the time, the U.S. Air Force was the first to approve the StormBreaker for operational use on its F-15E back in October 2020.
This milestone had been delayed due to issues with the weapon's software and guidance system, as well as addressing safety concerns associated with the bomb's folding tail fins, all of which you can read more about in this previous TWZ piece on the weapon.
Meanwhile, the U.S. Navy announced its first guided launch of a StormBreaker from an F/A-18E/F Super Hornet in June 2020, as seen in the video below.
'StormBreaker is the only weapon that enables pilots to hit moving targets during bad weather or if dust and smoke are in the area,' Cristy Stagg, the StormBreaker program director at Raytheon's Missiles and Defense division, said in a statement at the time. 'Super Hornet pilots will be able to use poor visibility to their advantage when StormBreaker integration is complete.'
In December 2021, it emerged that the Air Force had determined that StormBreaker needed 'additional coordination and planning' before being loaded onto a jet. The Air Force explained in a press release that, since the munition and aircraft communicate with each other, intelligence airmen have to load encrypted information into the bomb's computer, resulting in a more laborious process to get the weapons actually loaded and ready for use.
The Air Force also said that the process should be smoothed out as the service gained more experience with the weapon.
This revelation came in an Air Force press release marking the introduction of StormBreaker into operational service, with the 391st Fighter Squadron, an F-15E unit at Mountain Home Air Force Base, Idaho.
In April of last year, the Navy announced that it planned to field StormBreaker (which it also refers to as Small Diameter Bomb Increment II) on the F/A-18E/F after declaring Early Operational Capability (EOC) in October 2023. At that point, two additional operational test events were required before achieving Initial Operational Capability (IOC).
There are also plans to integrate StormBreaker onto all three variants of the F-35. These aircraft will be able to carry these weapons internally, allowing them to employ them while operating in the stealthiest configuration. The addition of StormBreaker into the F-35's arsenal will greatly expand the type's flexibility and lethality. All three variants of the F-35 will be able to carry four StormBreaker munitions in each of their internal bays.
Looking toward the future, Raytheon has also said it's working on a ground-launched version of StormBreaker, fitted with a rocket motor. Meanwhile, an air-breathing engine is planned to be added to the air-launched version, providing a considerably greater standoff range. You can read more about those plans here, as well as our report on how the munition is already an important part of Marine Corps planning for future Expeditionary Air Basing Operations (EABO) with the F-35B.
For now, however, the original version of StormBreaker appears to have notched up a highly important milestone in its sometimes-protracted development history. Hopefully, more details will emerge soon about the combat use of the GBU-53/B as part of the ongoing operations against the Houthi militia.
Contact the author: thomas@thewarzone.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Talks held over making Trump first US president to be given Freedom of the City of London
Talks have been held over giving Donald Trump the Freedom of the City of London during his state visit in September, in a highly symbolic move. According to a source, the proposal to give President Trump the honour was made because it would give the Corporation the opportunity to meet the US leader and make the case for free trade and against tariffs at the ceremony. It would also be a way of marking the UK receiving the first of the Trump trade deals with questions still over tariffs on steel. The president would helicopter in from Windsor Castle to the US ambassador's Winfield House residence in Regent's Park for the ceremony. The Independent was told: 'It would be an important honour for the president just as our countries prepare to mark the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence next year. 'More importantly it would be the perfect opportunity for the City to address the importance of free trade and the issues of tariffs. 'The symbolism of being allowed to herd your sheep across the bridge and not pay taxes is very important all things considered.' But while the president was understood to be keen on the idea of receiving the honour, the Freedom Applications Sub (Policy & Resources) Committee chaired by Sir William Russell, half brother of the actor Damian Lewis, has not been persuaded. According to sources the sub committee was warned that the award would be 'too controversial'. The Corporation rarely gives government leaders the honour and had to withdraw it from Myanmar'ss Aung San Suu Kyi after criticism of her government being involved with persecution of the Rohingya. However, the official explanation is that President Trump has not been in government long enough. A spokesperson said: 'By convention, only Heads of State or Government who have served a minimum of seven years in office are eligible to be considered for the Honorary Freedom. 'The decision to grant the Honorary Freedom rests solely with the Court of Common Council – our highest decision-making body – not with any individual elected member.' The last head of government to be awarded the Honorary Freedom was Baroness Margaret Thatcher, who was recognised after serving 10 years as prime minister. The Honorary Freedom has never been awarded to a sitting US president, although Dwight Eisenhower received it after the Second World War for his role as commander in chief of the allied forces. According to a source, the City may change its mind if there is a request from the government which has not been made yet. It means that the US president is facing a second snub in his state visit. It follows a decision not to ask him to address a joint sitting of the Houses of Parliament with the state visit happening the day after parliament rises for the conference season recess. This is despite the fact that when Pope Benedict came on a state visit in 2010 he was given the honour of addressing Parliamentarians in Westminster Hall even though it was the day after recess had begun. Trump's state visit - the first time an individual has been granted a second state visit - will take place between 17 and 19 September. It will include a state banquet hosted by the King with the president staying at Windsor Castle.


Bloomberg
16 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Canada Weighs Retaliation Cost as Analysts Warn Hitting Back Isn't Worth It
Canada's decision to retaliate against US tariffs earlier this year appears to be driving a divergence in how President Donald Trump is dealing with America's neighbors. Until this week, Canada and Mexico received similar treatment in White House trade actions. Each was subject to a 25% base tariff, with a large exemption for goods shipped under the North American free trade pact known as USMCA.


Forbes
16 minutes ago
- Forbes
HOW TRUMP'S TARIFFS THREATEN ITALY'S BELOVED WINES
Nobody wanted a trade war, but the price to avoid it is too high anyway. For everybody. The recent agreement reached by European Commission President Ursula van der Leyen and the US President Donald Trump has halved the proposed 30% tariffs on all European products, but it leaves a bitter taste in the mouths of all European manufacturers. For Italy the U.S. remains the single largest export market, accounting for 24% of its total export value in wine. In 2024, the annual turnover of Italian wine exports was approximately $9.15 billion. Once the agreement was announced, reactions were not long in Dissatisfaction Of The Wine Producers And The Minister's Concern According to the secretary general of Unione Italiana Vini Paolo Castelletti, even if a 15% tariff is lower than the proposed 30%, this kind of deal cannot be satisfying for anybody because it's extremely higher than the pre-tariff rate, which was almost zero. For a country like Italy, which prioritizes value for money, this is a devastating blow. The president of Consorzio Tutela Vini Valpolicella Christian Marchesini is of the same opinion. "Any duty or barrier on wine trade causes extremely significant damage to the European and Italian wine industry and to Valpolicella as well – claimed Marchesini - Pending the final negotiations, the 15% duty projected in the medium and long term would have a very serious economic impact. At present, we can say that, according to today's leaks, the uncertainty that will affect us until next autumn is just as serious." The Italian Minister of Agriculture Francesco Lollobrigida has always shown optimism about the deal, but now he admits: 'Wine is what concerns us most.' Meanwhile, the deadline of the 1st of August, when the tariffs should have been effective, has been delayed up to the 7th, although the 15% remains. Tariffs and Dollar Weakness Are A Dangerous Combination Recent studies by Confindustria, the main association representing Italian manufacturing and service companies, show that imposing US 15% tariffs on all Italian goods imported in America could cause Italy to lose €22.6 billion in exports (approximately $24.6 billion). The wine sector only would lose $520 million. The tariffs are not the only obstacle however, the dollar devaluation also complicates things. These two factors combined can make Italian wines less competitive than others in the US markets. Unione Italiana Vini (UIV), the Italian wine companies association, has recently raised the alarm: 15% tariffs penalize at least 80% of the sector. If in January 2025 (pre-tariff) the markup from the winery to the retailer was 123%, with the new tariff regime soars to 186%. As a result, American consumers ultimately pay almost twice the tariff rate in increased prices due to the compounding markup structure throughout the distribution chain. Not All The Wines Are Created Equal The Italian wines most affected by the new tariffs are those with the highest US market exposure: Moscato d'Asti from Piedmont (60% export) and red wines from this region (31%), Pinot Grigio (48%), Chianti Classico (46%) and other Tuscan DOC reds (35%), Prosecco (27%). Overall the new tariff regime will mostly affect the most popular wines, which are affordable to almost every pocket, more than the premium ones. Wines such as Brunello di Montalcino, Barolo, Amarone della Valpolicella, and Super Tuscans are already expensive to begin with, and therefore intended for high-spending consumers. Indeed, in this case, a bottle that was pre-tariffed and cost $25 ex-cellar, $55.75 on the retail shelf, and $150.00 at the restaurant, would now cost $71.50 in the wine shop and $195.00 at the restaurant. If you're a rich person, spending an extra $45 on an excellent Italian wine won't break the bank. Who Wins And Who Loses What has been reported so far are estimates data on behalf Italian wine producers. But what about their overseas trading partners? According to the UIV president Lamberto Frescobaldi, they and their customers could be the ones who will lose the most: 'The tariffs will not only affect consumption, but will also have a severe impact on the US economy, with total damages amounting to $25 billion' he said. This estimate was calculated by the UIV Observatory and is based on the direct, indirect, and induced impact of all wine in the US in the distribution, retail, and transportation phases alone. Wine America quantified this impact at $144.4 billion in its 'United States 2025 Economic Impact Study.' This figure includes not only sales revenues but also the value generated along the distribution chain, the positive effects of wages and the resulting purchasing power, and the increase in demand for goods and services in other related sectors. A significant effect, but one that would lose $25 billion with tariffs on wines at 15%. And things could even get worse: if nothing changes, the revenue loss could reach almost $1.7 billion in the next 12 months. At the time this article was written, there had not been a joint final statement yet, and the details of the deal remain unclear and subject to ratification. In short, the uncertainty keeps on reigning supreme. However, this can mean that perhaps there is still room for further negotiations. Any manufacturer in Europe is crossing their fingers and hoping for the best. With the current deal, it seems that the EU and the US have avoided a trade war, but despite the appearance, the price they could pay is significant for both.