logo
Taking time out for children can hit your State pension: Here's how to close the gap

Taking time out for children can hit your State pension: Here's how to close the gap

Irish Times2 days ago
It's a no-brainer; the state
pension
is currently worth about €15,000 a year, and is one of the few welfare payments governments always try to increase in the annual budget.
And yet, women still lag behind men when it comes to receiving the weekly payment at the maximum rate. This means a poorer life in retirement.
'All the
inequalities
women face throughout their working life, such as lower average earnings and the gender pay gap – all of that is exacerbated in older age,' says Donal Swan, women's economic equality coordinator at the National Women's Council of Ireland (NWCI).
Indeed, while the gender pay gap may be of the order of about 10 per cent, the gender pension gap remains 'stubbornly' high, at about 30 per cent. This means that the typical woman then has 30 per cent less of an income in retirement than a typical man.
READ MORE
[
The motherhood penalty: 'Once they're in bed, you log back on at 9pm or 10pm and work'
Opens in new window
]
There have been positives on the pensions front of late, such as the introduction of the long-term carer's contributions scheme, which makes it easier for those who have been caring for long periods to qualify for a state pension.
It is changing, says Tony Delaney, founder and CEO of SYS Financial, who notes that participation rates of women in the workforce have increased, which has a corresponding impact on state pension coverage rates.
Moreover, the Government has committed, in the recent programme for government, to introducing changes to support women who fall outside the existing schemes to qualify for a state pension.
But, while such tinkering is positive, 'it doesn't deal with the complexities of women's lives' says Swan.
Time to take some action then, to try to narrow this gap and ensure a brighter financial future for yourself.
1. Check your entitlement
The state pension is currently paid out at a weekly rate of €289.30. This means that if you qualify for the maximum rate, and you claim it from 66 until the age of 91, it will be worth about €376,000 to you.
If you don't have enough contributions, you might qualify for a non-contributory pension (paid at a top rate of €278) but this is based on a means test, so will depend on your household's income. And it might be paid at a rate substantially less than the top rate. Figures from the Department of Social Protection show that it's still primarily women who get this payment. Indeed as of June 30th, there were 58,688 female recipients of this pension, or 59 per cent of claimants, compared with 40,993 male recipients.
It's clear then, that regardless of the rhythms of your working life, you need to maximise your chances of getting this payment at the top level.
It's worth keeping track of how your contributions are stacking up. You can do this by requesting your record through
MyWelfare
.
2. Get 40 years of credits
This year marks the first time that pensions can be calculated on a total contributions approach (TCA). Introduced on a phased basis, it will supercede the current averaging approach by 2034.
So, if you were born after 1968 (aged 57 or less), your pension will be based on the TCA. But what will this mean?
Well, in short, to qualify for a full state pension under the new regime, you will need 40 years' contributions (2,080 or more PRSI contributions). In other words, you need to be working from the age of 22 through to 62 to qualify.
And, while you can get credits for periods spent in the home caring for children (through the
HomeCaring Periods
scheme, for example; see below), such contributions can't exceed 20 years.
So, let's say you have just 20 years of contributions – then you'll qualify for 50 per cent of the maximum pension, or €144.65 a week instead of €289.30, a substantial decrease on the top rate.
The NCWI would like to see the time period lowered, so that you can access the full state pension based on 30 years of contributions.
'We're hopeful we can keep pushing Government and the Department [of Finance] to keep making changes where possible, to expand people's access to this,' says Swan.
3. Make sure you get credits for time out
If you take time out of the workforce (for maternity or parental leave), your employer may continue to make pension contributions on your behalf.
But what happens to your state pension?
When it comes to the state pension, if you're not getting paid while on leave, then you won't be paying PRSI, which means you won't be building up credits for your state pension.
Under the new regime, however, parents who take time out to care for their children can keep their PRSI record intact by applying for credits under the aforementioned HomeCaring Periods Scheme.
If you get maternity benefit, you will get credits automatically. However, as this ends after 26 weeks, if you take a further 16 weeks' unpaid leave you will need to get your employer to complete the application form for maternity leave credits when you return to work.
When it comes to parental leave, you should also be entitled to credits – but, again, you have to make sure your employer applies for these. Parents can take up to 26 weeks of parental leave, which is typically unpaid, for each child up to the age of 12.
4. Time out is good – but get back in the workforce if you can
So far so good, but complications with getting the credits can arise if you subsequently opt to take a longer period of time out of the workforce.
This is because, to qualify for a state pension – even at a reduced rate – you will need at least 10 years' paid contributions, and your home caring years can't exceed 20. And to get the full pension, you will need 40 years of contributions.
So then, it may make sense for many women to return to the workforce once their children are grown up, to try to meet the requirements for a state pension.
5. Think about topping up your state pension
Many stay-at-home parents turn to ad hoc work to boost their income while looking after their family – running a house account on Instagram is one such route, as is running a play group or after school activity.
However, while family friendly, it's important to note that such earnings may not be working towards a state pension for you.
If you are self-employed and earn less than €5,000 a year, you won't be paying S-class PRSI contributions, which means that you won't be building up a State pensions record.
But, you can become a voluntary contributor for €650 (up from €500 to October 2025, and from €253 until 2013). This will boost your entitlement to a state pension.
The challenge here, however, as Swan notes, is that if you're already on a low income, you may not have enough money. However, you can apply to pay in quarterly or half-yearly instalments during the contribution year. And, from a household perspective, it may make financial sense to get your partner, who may be working, to make the payment.
You will need to have 520 paid contributions (ie 10 years) to qualify also. You can apply online using the
Voluntary Contributions Application Form (VC1)
.
6. Remember you may qualify for a pension through your spouse
If you are married but don't qualify for a pension in your own right, you may be entitled to get an increase on your spouse's pension, known as a 'qualified adult' pension. This is offered at a lower rate of up to €259.40 a week.
However, the payment is means tested, and some women may struggle with the concept of being dependent on their partner in retirement. They may also feel that their contribution to society is not being recognised.
'It's a real remnant of the era of that male breadwinner model,' says Swan.
Indeed, until as recently as 2007, the 'qualified adult' payment went straight to the person claiming the state pension, so the spouse – in most cases a woman – had to then rely on their husband to give them the money.
Instead, a bit like the current basic income scheme,
which is being trialled
among artists, the NWCI would like to see the introduction of a universal pension.
While potentially costly, last year, Social Justice Ireland said the introduction of such a scheme could be funded by reducing the higher rate of tax relief on private pensions from 40 per cent to 20 per cent, and by increasing employers PRSI by 0.5 per cent.
'It would be a significant structural change,' says Swan, who adds that the current tax relief is 'disproportionately more valuable to men'.
'The way everyone contributes to society through their life is different,' he says.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Up to 800,000 Betfair and Paddy Power customers hit by data breach
Up to 800,000 Betfair and Paddy Power customers hit by data breach

Irish Times

time4 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Up to 800,000 Betfair and Paddy Power customers hit by data breach

Irish customers of Betfair and Paddy Power have been notified in recent days of a data breach at the Flutter -owned brands, which has impacted as many as 800,000 users in Ireland and Britain. The betting sites 'recently detected that an unauthorised third party' gained access to 'limited betting account information' relating to some of its customers, the company said in an email to customers. Paddy Power and Betfair are owned by Dublin-based Flutter Entertainment, which had 4.2 million average monthly users across its four betting brands in Ireland and Britain, generating $3.6 billion (€3.07 billion) in revenue, according to its annual report. It is the world's biggest publicly listed betting company, with a market capitalisation of $50.6 billion. A spokesman for Flutter UK and Ireland confirmed their Paddy Power and Betfair businesses suffered a 'data incident involving personal information for some of our customers'. READ MORE The company said a 'full investigation' was carried out to contain the breach and to determine the scope of the information accessed. Supported by external IT security experts, it said it would examine the cause of the breach and how the company can increase the security of its network and customer data. The company said it believes 'the unauthorised access has been removed and the incident contained' and that the investigation concluded that the 'affected information was isolated to limited betting account information'. Up to 800,000 users in Ireland and the UK were impacted by the breach, which included usernames, email addresses and IP addresses. There was also a limited number of incidents in which limited address details were accessible. An email to Betfair customers said the breach impacted 'details of some recent activity on your account and technical data like your device ID and IP address'. 'No passwords, ID documents or usable card or payment details were impacted,' the Flutter spokesman said. The sites have appealed to customers to be aware of phishing efforts as a result of the breach. It is understood that the breach, which affected nearly one in five monthly customers, was detected within the last four weeks. The company has notified the Data Protection Commission (DPC) in Ireland and the UK's Information Commissioner's Office. 'The nature of this incident means that regrettably some of your personal information has been impacted,' the firm said in an email to customers. The DPC was approached for comment. Flutter was recently expected to cut more than 200 jobs in Ireland and Britain, as part of a wider strategy to bring its brands on to a single tech platform. The company did not confirm where the redundancies will impact, saying at the time that it was in consultation with staff. The majority of the roles at risk are understood to be at Flutter's technology and product team, and almost all the cuts will fall at the Leeds operation. That leaves a handful of redundancies – expected to be less than 10 – affecting its Dublin office.

Michael Flatley being portrayed as a villain rather than a victim, court told
Michael Flatley being portrayed as a villain rather than a victim, court told

Irish Times

time4 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Michael Flatley being portrayed as a villain rather than a victim, court told

Lord of the Dance star Michael Flatley is being portrayed in proceedings before the Commercial Court as 'a villain' rather than 'a victim of circumstances', his counsel has told a judge. It was the second day of two applications before the court where a building contractor and insurance companies involved in carrying out works at Flatley's Castlehyde mansion in Co Cork are seeking to have the star put up €2.8 million security for costs before his action against them begins. Mr Flatley's counsel Ronnie Hudson BL, instructed by Maxwell Mooney solicitor, on Wednesday referred to what he called the characterisation of the entertainer by the other side in court. 'He is being portrayed as a villain rather than a victim, a victim of circumstances,' Mr Hudson said. READ MORE The statement was made as the Flatley side sought to introduce a chartered accountant's valuation of the Flatley whiskey business which the court had previously heard was worth in the region of €10 million. Andrew Fitzpatrick SC for the underwriting and insurance defendants objected to the new information being put before the court and he said it was 'a naked attempt to upend this application'. And he said there was no evidence why the valuation was not available when documents were being exchanged in advance of the security for costs hearing. Counsel for building contractor Austin Newport, Stephen Dowling SC, said allowing the new document in at this stage could open up a collateral hearing on the basis of the €10 million valuation. Ms Justice Eileen Roberts said it was not obvious to her why the information was not put before the court when there were ongoing directions in place in relation to the exchange of documents. [ Michael Flatley says request to put up €2.8m as security for costs is an attempt to embarrass him Opens in new window ] The judge said she did not want to completely derail the security for costs hearing and she refused to admit the document. Mr Hudson told the court that in the security for costs application, Michael Flatley was being faced with a bill for almost €3 million 'for defending himself'. He said Mr Flatley has never defaulted and is a 'man of means and a man of his word'. He said Mr Flatley 'in theory can return' to Castlehyde but he 'can't in practice because of the condition of the property'. 'Michael Flatley is a man of his word and has a considerable reputation in Ireland and the US,' Mr Hudson said. In an affidavit opened to the court at the start of the hearing on Tuesday, Mr Flatley said the Lord of the Dance show is continuing to sell out venues worldwide and has sold more than €1 billion-worth of tickets. Lord of the Dance, which he said had received 'a lifetime of standing ovations', has been valued 'at a conservative minimum of €200 million'. [ Michael Flatley: The deal that let the dancer keep his Castlehyde mansion Opens in new window ] Mr Flatley said his Statement of Affairs – which valued Lord of the Dance at €200 million, his whiskey business at €10 million and his Castlehyde mansion at €20 million – is accurate. He said he owns all of the rights and intellectual property for Lord of the Dance and that the true valuation could be double the €200 million figure. He said his liability is a €7.9 million mortgage on Castlehyde which will be repaid from his business activities over the next two years. In the affidavit which was sworn last month, Mr Flatley also said he 'intends to return to live in Ireland permanently as soon as possible'. In the main proceedings, the Riverdance performer claims he and his family had to vacate the Castlehyde period property in October 2023 after alleged toxic chemical residue was detected during routine maintenance. Mr Flatley is suing Austin Newport Group Ltd, the main contractor and insurance underwriters – MS Amlin Underwriting Ltd, AXA XL Underwriting Agencies LTD and Hamilton Managing Agency Limited along with Lloyds Insurance Company. All of the allegations are denied. Ms Justice Eileen Roberts will give her decision on security for costs at a later date.

Boss of care home group in RTÉ Investigates says his ‘resignation' was mistakenly filed with Companies Office
Boss of care home group in RTÉ Investigates says his ‘resignation' was mistakenly filed with Companies Office

Irish Times

time4 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Boss of care home group in RTÉ Investigates says his ‘resignation' was mistakenly filed with Companies Office

The chief executive of a nursing home group wants the High Court to rectify an official record incorrectly stating he resigned as a director. Two of the company's homes featured in a recent RTÉ Investigates programme. Neal McGroarty, CEO of Emeis Ireland Ltd, says human error had caused his name to be entered by mistake on one of a large volume of documents filed with the Companies Registration Office (CRO) to notify the resignation of director Alan Donnelly with effect from May 9. The name on the form should have been that of Mr Donnelly, who also resigned as director of 30 companies in the group, which has a total of 33 companies. READ MORE Mr McGroarty says adverse publicity already in the public domain about the company's business affairs had been compounded by the erroneous filing to the CRO. As only the High Court can approve the rectification of such an error, Emeis applied for a hearing before a judge to have it rectified. That hearing was due to take place at the end of this month. On Wednesday, Emeis asked Mr Justice Brian Cregan to give an earlier hearing of its application over the incorrect filing as it has affected the reputation of the company and Mr McGroarty. It may also cause stress for the residents and their families as it creates an incorrect impression of uncertainty, it was claimed. The RTÉ programme, broadcast on June 4, showed multiple examples of alleged care failings and neglect of vulnerable older residents at two nursing homes run by Emeis Ireland. In an affidavit, Mr McGroarty said significant media attention had focused on the company and he had been questioned by the media as to why he had supposedly stepped down as a director when in fact he had not. Emeis is seeking a court order requiring the CRO to remove the relevant B10 form that was filed, rectify it and reinstate Mr McGroarty as director.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store