logo
Government rules out cost-of-living package despite another surge in corporation tax receipts

Government rules out cost-of-living package despite another surge in corporation tax receipts

Irish Examiner3 days ago
The Government has ruled out a cost-of-living package for households facing soaring food bills, high energy costs and elevated mortgage rates despite another surge in corporation tax receipts.
The exchequer returns, published on Thursday, show a strong surplus of €4.5bn for the first six months of the year, as wrangling over the budget is due to kick off in the coming weeks with the publication of the summer economic statement.
The Government has already warned the next budget will be more restrained than previous years, as global economic uncertainty means it will be taking a cautious approach after a giveaway budget ahead of last year's general election.
Exchequer returns for the first half of 2025 show corporation tax generated €7.4bn last month, up 25% on the same month last year.
The Government pointed out that the overall surplus drops to €1.2bn when the proceeds from the EU Apple Tax case are excluded.
The Coalition's proposed cautious approach to the next budget comes as households face increased financial challenges.
Food prices are now rising by 4%, more than twice the general inflation rate.
Households also face some of the largest electricity bills in Europe, and mortgage interest rates, while coming down, remain among the highest across the EU.
Defending the decision not to include another cost-of-living package in the next budget to help families cope with soaring prices, Jack Chambers, the public expenditure minister, said the Government is aware of pressures on households but said there are other ways to support people aside from one-off giveaways.
'We need to balance the risks, which are real in terms of the economic context we are in, with the pressing needs that citizens have,' he said.
'Central to the decisions we make in Government would be the improvement of living standards and supporting greater affordability of public services.'
Paschal Donohoe, the finance minister, said he had not anticipated the international volatility around trade rules and US tariffs.
'The way things are settling at the moment means there will be a new normal to come to terms with as global trade is going to look very different,' he said.
Mr Donohoe also warned of a potential future decline in the corporation tax receipts that have helped the economy to record surpluses.
Both ministers emphasised the need for a 'careful, sensible, and sustainable' approach to Budget 2026.
The overall amount collected in tax in the first half of the year rose almost 7% to €47.7bn despite fears over the impact of US tariffs.
Total spending was €58.2bn, which included payments of €3bn to the State's two long-term savings funds: The Future Ireland Fund and the Infrastructure, Climate, and Nature Fund.
During an event last month, Mr Donohoe said that, in the event of an economic downturn, he would make every effort possible to protect capital expenditure, including using the money set aside in these two funds.
In June, €2.9bn was collected in income tax, bringing the total receipts so far this year to €17.4bn — up €700m year on year.
Corporation tax receipts of €7.4bn were collected last month, bringing the total for the year to €14.8bn. However, this drops to €13.1bn when the Apple tax case proceeds are excluded.
This is still €900m higher than last year and 'slightly ahead of profile' for this year, according to the Department of Finance.
Vat receipts were also ahead of projections at €11.6bn, which is 5.6% up on the same period last year.
Excise duty receipts during June stood at €500m — up by €100m.
Exchequer debt service expenditure in the year to the end of June was €2.2bn, down by €300m compared to last year.
Read More
Budget should focus on infrastructure and tax measures, says Central Bank governor
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

EU could crack down on fake digital ads by forcing online platforms to ensure they are dealing with a reputable entity
EU could crack down on fake digital ads by forcing online platforms to ensure they are dealing with a reputable entity

Irish Times

time2 hours ago

  • Irish Times

EU could crack down on fake digital ads by forcing online platforms to ensure they are dealing with a reputable entity

If you're a regular user of social media or search engines, you have probably seen adverts in your feed or search results trying to convince you to get in early with an unmissable investment opportunity, to buy the latest crypto that will go to the moon, or even to buy a bond that guarantees an attractive fixed return. The problem is there is a good chance that these adverts are fake, but how are you supposed to know that? This is the problem at the heart of the EU's new Digital Services Act (DSA). Unless you work in tech , you probably haven't heard of this legislation. Its main goal is to prevent illegal and harmful activities online and the spread of disinformation. It has included fraud and scams in the definition of illegal activities but while it has only been in operation for a little over a year, it has become clear that it can't protect consumers from online fraud. This is mainly due to the principle underpinning the DSA, which is it is the responsibility of general users (that's you) or 'trusted flaggers' to identify fraudulent adverts and report them to the platform. It is then the responsibility for the online platform to investigate these reports, and take action if deemed necessary. READ MORE In policymaking, this is a classic example of a good concept in theory, which doesn't work in the real world. Let me explain why. The most obvious problem is that scam adverts only need to be online for a very short time before they can successfully target someone. Many scam adverts involve getting someone to hand over their contact details, such as their mobile number or email address, so even if the advert disappears the scam continues directly between the criminal and the innocent victim. [ Stricter rules to combat scam social media adverts proposed by Government Opens in new window ] For larger investment scams, it can take weeks or months to convince a victim to send large sums of money. Then, the victim may only realise that they've been scammed when they try to withdraw funds – in some cases many months after the actual fraud took place. By then, of course, the original scam advert has long disappeared into digital oblivion. The next problem is that the vast majority of general users won't have any idea that they are being served fraudulent adverts and therefore won't report them to the platforms. Whack a mole doesn't even begin to describe the scale of the challenge The DSA tries to address this by creating trusted flaggers or sector experts in each EU country that can report suspected fraudulent adverts to the platforms and for the platforms to act quickly on these reports. However, digital adverts are not like adverts in a newspaper that everyone can see – they are targeted at specific categories of users based on what the platform algorithm decides to show them. A trusted flagger may never see a fake advert that is served up to you. And finally, digital adverts are practically unlimited. Criminals can create new accounts and new adverts and deploy them at speed and at scale. You might successfully remove one advert, only to see 10 other accounts serve up the same fake advert. Whack a mole doesn't even begin to describe the scale of the challenge. There is a simple solution. Within the EU and the UK, all firms that sell financial services must be authorised by a local or EU regulator. To prevent fraudulent adverts for financial services ever reaching the general public, online platforms should be obliged to check they are dealing with a regulated entity before they publish an advertisement – for which advertising service, let's not forget, they are charging a fee. This is a simple, practical solution that would prevent huge numbers of fake advertisements from ever being published. Financial scams and fraud, often originating online, are the new front line of financial crime. It is a serious criminal enterprise that steals billions from European consumers every year to fund other criminal enterprises including terrorism, drugs smuggling and human trafficking. [ Fake online ads using Micheál Martin's image believed to have originated in Belarus and Russia Opens in new window ] However, the Digital Services Act is not fit for purpose in tackling this serious problem. For this reason, the Irish Government is to be commended for having proposed changes to EU legislation to introduce advertiser checks for the very large online platforms. In a year when the EU is also looking at new proposals to support retail investing by everyday consumers, it needs to address the vast amount of online scams that will only discourage consumers from taking the leap into investing. The sooner that policymakers accept that the DSA is not the solution to this urgent problem, the quicker new protections can be rolled out to protect EU consumers and cut off a large revenue stream for criminality. Every day matters in the fight against criminal fraudsters. Susan Russell is chief executive of Retail Ireland at Bank of Ireland

Russia could block UN missions involving Irish personnel in Bosnia and Mediterranean, Harris warns
Russia could block UN missions involving Irish personnel in Bosnia and Mediterranean, Harris warns

Irish Times

time2 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Russia could block UN missions involving Irish personnel in Bosnia and Mediterranean, Harris warns

The future of UN-backed missions involving a small number of Irish troops in Bosnia and the Mediterranean could be at risk as a result of Russian opposition, Tánaiste and Minister for Defence Simon Harris has warned. In a formal report to the Oireachtas last week on the deployment of Irish military personnel on UN service overseas, Mr Harris pointed to the EU operation in Bosnia and Herzegovina – known as Operation Althea – and Operation Irini, a UN-mandated EU Naval mission in the eastern Mediterranean which seeks to implement the UN arms embargo on Libya. He indicated that Russia could oppose the reauthorisation of these missions at the UN Security Council. The number of Irish Defence Forces personnel involved in both missions is small, and below the level requiring UN approval. READ MORE The warning from Mr Harris about potential Russian objections, however, comes at a time when the Government is seeking to end the 'triple lock'. This is the requirement that missions abroad involving Irish personnel must be backed by the Government, the Oireachtas and the UN Security Council. Opposition parties and some campaign groups contend that the triple lock arrangement is a core part of Irish neutrality Mr Harris has argued previously that, under the triple lock system, 'countries like Russia (as a member of the UN Security Council) have the power to veto Ireland's participation in missions'. Opposition parties and some campaign groups contend that the triple lock arrangement is a core part of Irish neutrality. Mr Harris said, in his report to the Oireachtas, the primary focus of Operation Althea was the maintenance and stability of a safe and secure environment in Bosnia and Herzegovina, following the war in the 1990s. He said the mandate for this mission had been renewed annually by the UN Security Council and currently runs until November 2025. 'It should be noted that we have seen Russia become increasingly critical of this mission since 2022 and renewal of the UN mandate for Operation Althea in the future may face challenges due to the potential threat of a Russian veto at the Security Council.' There are five Irish military personnel involved in Operation Althea, based at the mission's headquarters in Sarajevo. Mr Harris said Operation Irini had secondary tasks including monitoring of oil and human smuggling from Libya. 'The current mandate of Operation Irini expires in March 2027. 'In 2024, Ireland had three members of the Defence Forces deployed to the operational headquarters in Rome in staff officer posts and a further officer was assigned to the floating headquarters.' 'Operation Irini may face a similar challenge as Operation Althea with its mandate renewal also potentially at risk due to the failure to reach consensus at the UN Security Council', the Tánaiste said. Mr Harris said in his report that the EU operation in Bosnia and Herzegovina – Operation Althea – was established in December 2004, under the authority of UN Security Council Resolution 1575, to replace the NATO-led Stabilisation Force (SFOR) in Bosnia and Herzegovina. He said the mandate had been renewed annually by the UN Security Council. The number of Irish Defence Forces personnel involved in both missions is small, and below the level requiring UN approval He also said Ireland had participated since December 2004, having previously been a participant in SFOR since 1997. Privately, the Government is also concerned about the future of the Unifil peacekeeping mission in south Lebanon. With around 340 troops, it is by far Ireland's largest overseas troop commitment. The mission's mandate is due for renewal by the Security Council in August. There are mounting concerns within Government that the United States will withdraw support for Unifil, effectively ending its mandate. The mission has been strongly criticised by Israel and members of the Trump administration for allegedly not doing enough to curtail Hizbullah. Mr Harris has been engaged in extensive behind-the-scenes lobbying among EU and US politicians to ensure that Unifil is renewed.

Paschal Donohoe and Jack Chambers resist spending demands from ministers
Paschal Donohoe and Jack Chambers resist spending demands from ministers

Irish Times

time2 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Paschal Donohoe and Jack Chambers resist spending demands from ministers

Major decisions on public spending will be taken by the Government in the coming fortnight, with budget ministers Jack Chambers and Paschal Donohoe said to be resisting pressure from colleagues for major spending increases on capital and current budgets. The summer economic statement – a key marker for the October budget – which is normally published in the first or second week of July, will not be agreed until next week at the earliest, according to several people involved in the process. It is being held up by the need to agree a revised National Development Plan (NDP), and also by a Government desire to see the outcome of the trade talks between the EU and the United States, with US president Donald Trump's deadline for a deal due to expire on Wednesday. Failure to agree a deal by then could spark a trade war between the EU and the US, with severe consequences for the Irish economy. READ MORE Sources with knowledge of the issues confirmed that Government ministers have made requests for substantial extra capital spending in the revised NDP, which is provisionally scheduled to be published on July 22nd, amounting to 'tens of billion' above the existing €165 billion plan, bringing it to just under €200 billion. The plan lays out capital projects until 2030. Ministers are also pushing for significant increases in current spending next year, despite signals from the budget ministers and party leaders that the sort of increases seen in recent years cannot be repeated this year. Taoiseach Micheál Martin said last week that it was 'not sustainable' to increase expenditure at the levels of recent years. It is understood that both Mr Donohoe and Mr Chambers have made clear to colleagues that they will not agree to increases in public expenditure which far outstrip the rate of economic growth. Sources confirmed that Government ministers have made requests for substantial extra capital spending in the revised National Development Plan The two ministers met with their party leaders at Government Buildings a fortnight ago which, sources say, saw the key decision-makers agree that they will not repeat the cost-of-living packages that were a feature of the last three budgets. Last week's controversy over possible increases in third-level fees, however, unnerved many in Government by demonstrating how politically difficult it will be to scrap benefits to which people have become accustomed. On Wednesday, the deadline imposed by Mr Trump for agreement of a trade deal between the EU and US expires and the EU faces the possibility of 20 per cent tariffs – imposed by Mr Trump on April 2nd, but delayed until July 9th – being placed on EU imports. If that happens, the EU is likely to respond with its own tariffs on US imports, which could trigger further retaliation from Washington – raising the prospect of a transatlantic trade war.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store