logo
Exclusive: Commodity traders Gunvor, Vitol queue to stock up on Russian aluminium from LME storage, sources say

Exclusive: Commodity traders Gunvor, Vitol queue to stock up on Russian aluminium from LME storage, sources say

Reuters31-03-2025
LONDON, March 31 (Reuters) - Major commodity traders Gunvor and Vitol are waiting to withdraw large volumes of Russian-produced aluminium from London Metal Exchange-approved warehouses in the South Korean port of Gwangyang, three sources familiar with the matter said.
Gunvor and Vitol mostly focus on energy, but oil and gas trading giants more broadly have made significant moves into metals markets to explore opportunities offered by the global clean energy transition.
It is not known why Gunvor or Vitol want the aluminium in LME warehouses in Gwangyang, where the lion's share of metal is mostly of Russian origin - deposited after Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022 as consumers shunned the metal.
Vitol and Gunvor declined to comment.
LME data shows metal earmarked to leave warehouses in Gwangyang run by ISTIM - a major operator of LME depositories in the port - at 97,750 metric tons at end-February, worth more than $250 million. Queuing time to take delivery was 81 calendar days, or more than 11 weeks, the data showed.
Queues typically only form when large amounts of metal warrants, title documents conferring ownership, are cancelled in a short period of time.
The sources said Vitol has already taken delivery of some aluminium from LME warehouses in Gwangyang. Gunvor has not yet taken any, other sources said.
In late December, 84,000 tons of aluminium stored in LME warehouses in Gwangyang was cancelled, according to LME data, which also shows another 21,150 was cancelled in January and February.
A small proportion was loaded out in January, while in February, 33,200 tons was removed and 26,800 tons of aluminium has been removed from LME warehouses in Gwangyang so far in March.
Cancelled warrants at 30% of Gwangyang's total stocks of 123,325 tons on March 28 suggest another 37,125 tons of aluminium is due to leave the LME system.
Russian President Vladimir Putin in February offered the U.S. the opportunity for joint exploration of the country's rare earth metals deposits, as well as the supply of aluminium to the U.S. domestic market, under a future economic deal.
Putin said Russian companies could supply up to two million metric tons annually of the metal used in the transport, construction and packaging industries.
Industry sources say major destinations for Russian-origin aluminium are China and Turkey, where users accept sanctioned metal produced in Russia.
The U.S. Treasury Department and the British government in April last year banned the 148-year-old LME and the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) from holding Russian aluminium, copper and nickel produced from April 13.
Aluminium in Russia is produced by Rusal, which last year supplied nearly four million tons or more than 5% of the global total estimated at around 74 million tons.
Aluminium prices on the LME held up for a few weeks after Donald Trump became U.S. president, but have dropped 7% since March 12 to around $2,540 a metric ton on concern about U.S. tariffs and a global trade war.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Workers like Jason question ‘broad brush' return to office mandates as WFH tussle heads to Fair Work showdown
Workers like Jason question ‘broad brush' return to office mandates as WFH tussle heads to Fair Work showdown

The Guardian

time17 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Workers like Jason question ‘broad brush' return to office mandates as WFH tussle heads to Fair Work showdown

Jason Sennitt loves his job, but can't imagine going back to the office up to four days a week. The 53-year-old lives in an outer suburb of Geelong with his wife and two school-age children as well as his elderly mother who has dementia and needs someone to be home. An employee of one of Australia's largest energy providers, Sennitt has been told to return to the office at least three days a week, and four days a week from next year. 'Even though I have to travel five hours to do an eight-hour shift, I'm happy to do that a couple of times a week,' says Sennitt, who works in customer service. 'But being in the office … it's not necessary for me to do my job well and it feels like the business hasn't really considered this.' Sennitt has applied for an exemption to the office mandate, but he believes the company's 'broad brushstroke' policy doesn't take proper consideration of its workers. His comments come ahead of the 1 August submission deadline for a Fair Work Commission process designed to modernise the award for clerical and administrative workers by taking into account work-from-home arrangements. The clerks award, which informs the working conditions of millions of Australians, is seen as a test case for the broader workforce amid a growing tussle over flexible work. Sign up for a weekly email featuring our best reads While employees can request flexible arrangements, there is no assumed right to work from home in Australia. Sennitt's employer, Origin Energy, says it supports its office-based employees to work from home up to two days a week, with the ability to request additional flexibility. 'We believe a balance between work and home locations enables connection, collaboration, productivity, and health and wellbeing benefits,' an Origin spokesperson says. Once seen as a rare perk, remote work exploded during the early stages of the Covid-19 pandemic. After pandemic conditions eased, the significant time and financial saving from reduced commuting, and flexibility to care for family members, has made many workers resistant to return to the office. Many employees also report being more productive working from home. Some employers, however, are worried about being compelled to offer flexible arrangements when it is not practical for their business. There is also the enduring suspicion that some workers slack off at home. The issue has pitted employer association Australian Industry Group against the Australian Services Union (ASU), which has a large base of administrative and clerical members, including Sennitt. AI Group has reportedly proposed to give employers the right to trade off overtime, penalty rates and breaks in exchange for allowing employees to work from home. The confidential proposal was first reported in The Australian. The ASU's national secretary, Emeline Gaske, told Guardian Australia that AI Group wanted to use working from home as an excuse to strip away basic entitlements. 'This is a lurch back in time by the [AI Group] that wants to drag workplace standards back decades if a worker seeks to work from home,' Gaske says. An ASU members' survey found that the ability to work from home was 'not a perk, but an essential condition that makes work possible', allowing many workers to manage health conditions, disabilities and caring responsibilities. Employers and their representative bodies are expected to use the Fair Work process to test whether current provisions are suited to flexible work. For example, the clerks award ensures employees have at least 10 consecutive hours off after working overtime. If an employer doesn't comply, the worker earns double their hourly rate. Sign up to Five Great Reads Each week our editors select five of the most interesting, entertaining and thoughtful reads published by Guardian Australia and our international colleagues. Sign up to receive it in your inbox every Saturday morning after newsletter promotion Employer groups question if that 10-hour rule should apply if a worker is at home, and therefore does not need to commute. They are also raising questions about what constitutes normal working hours in an at-home setting, given penalty rates often apply outside those hours. The Fair Work process may also bring clarity to how flexible work interacts with right to disconnect laws. The AI Group chief executive, Innes Willox, says there is an obvious need to free up restrictive provisions that either prohibit working from home or discourage employers from implementing them. He says the union is engaging in a 'misleading scare campaign'. 'We aren't arguing that overtime and penalty rates should not apply simply because someone is working from home,' Willox says. He says the clerks award contains archaic rules that require all ordinary hours are worked continuously and within strict timeframes. 'If employees want to take breaks during their ordinary hours of work to attend to personal matters, like picking their kids up from schools, and instead work those hours in the evening or early in the morning, they should be able to do that, if their employer agrees,' Willox says. 'Obviously, an employer shouldn't have to pay a penalty for agreeing to an employee request to work this way, but that seems to be what the unions want.' During the federal election, the Coalition spectacularly reversed its policy to restrict work from home arrangements for the public service. Polling found during the campaign that the public service proposal was unpopular, especially among women and working families who have come to rely on flexible work arrangements. As the submission deadline for the Fair Work process nears, there are growing expectations Labor could legislate a work-from-home right for workers. Another Melbourne corporate worker, who asked not to be identified, told Guardian Australia that greater flexibility would lead to increased productivity and improved morale. For them, the only public transport option from their outer-Melbourne home requires a 40-minute bus ride followed by a 55-minute train commute. The bus schedule also doesn't line up with work hours. 'I leave home at 4.30am to get a ride with my husband,' the worker said. 'I'm not allowed to leave [work] early. I still have to stay until 4pm.' 'We find the days [in the office] to be the most unproductive days there are.'

Putin rejects request to meet Zelensky
Putin rejects request to meet Zelensky

Telegraph

timea day ago

  • Telegraph

Putin rejects request to meet Zelensky

Vladimir Putin has refused to meet with Volodymyr Zelensky unless a peace deal is on the table ready to be finalised. Dmitry Peskov, Kremlin spokesman, said that it was unlikely that such a meeting could occur by the end of August, as Ukraine has proposed. He added: 'A summit meeting can and should put an end to the settlement and formalise the modalities and agreements that are to be worked out in the course of expert work. 'It is impossible to do the opposite. Is it possible to complete such a complex process in 30 days? Obviously, it is unlikely.' The remarks came after Mr Zelensky, Ukraine's president, proposed a four-way summit with Russia, the United States and Turkey to progress Donald Trump's efforts to end the three-year war. Earlier this week, Mr Zelensky said negotiation to bring an end to the conflict 'probably begins with a meeting of leaders. It won't work any other way with them'. It is thought that Putin is holding out on any settlement while his armed forces are on the ascendency on the battlefield in Ukraine. The situation for Kyiv's troops defending the key logistics hub of Pokrovsk, in the eastern Donetsk region, was becoming increasingly perilous, analysts said. Meanwhile, Moscow continues to reject Ukrainian and US proposals of an unconditional, 30-day ceasefire, which could pave the way for more substantial peace talks. Russia has been holding out in three rounds of direct talks with Ukrainian officials with demands Kyiv says are unacceptable, such as withdrawing troops from four regions partially occupied by Moscow. Mr Trump said a meeting between Mr Zelensky and Putin was three months overdue, before boarding a flight to Scotland on Friday. 'It's going to happen. But it should have happened three months ago. It's going to happen,' he said. Mr Trump added that the 100 per cent tariffs on Russia, and its allies purchasing Moscow's fossil fuels, could come sooner than the 50-day deadline set earlier this month. Mr Zelensky is attempting to steel himself for a long war by convincing European allies to help finance increased wages for his soldiers. He is also trying to convince allies to deliver seven Patriot air-defence systems – more than the five already agreed between Germany and the US.

Russian central bank slashes key rate by 200 bps in biggest cut since May 2022
Russian central bank slashes key rate by 200 bps in biggest cut since May 2022

Reuters

timea day ago

  • Reuters

Russian central bank slashes key rate by 200 bps in biggest cut since May 2022

MOSCOW, July 25 (Reuters) - The Russian central bank cut its key interest rate by 200 basis points to 18% on Friday, hoping to revive lending and boost flagging economic growth after stubbornly high inflation showed signs of easing. The move is the biggest decrease since May 2022, when the central bank cut by 300 bps as the economy was recovering from the shock from Western sanctions imposed following the launch of Russia's military action in Ukraine. The latest reduction was in line with a Reuters poll of 27 economists, and comes after Russian business leaders and some government officials complained that high interest rates were strangling the economy. The central bank had raised rates substantially since July 2023 in order to deal with the effects of an overheating economy caused by a surge in military spending. Russia's economy minister said last month the country was on the brink of recession as a result. Alongside its sharp rate cut, the central bank lowered its 2025 inflation forecast to between 6% and 7% from between 7% and 8% and said inflationary pressures were declining faster than previously forecast. The bank said it would keep monetary conditions as tight as necessary to return inflation to the target of 4% in 2026. "We are on the path to returning inflation to target, but this path has not yet been completed," central bank governor Elvira Nabiullina said at a news conference following the rate decision. "Returning to the target... implies a stable consolidation of inflation at a low level not only in actual data, but also in the perception of people and businesses," she said. Russia's consumer price index fell by 0.05% in the latest week, marking weekly deflation for the first time since September 2024, while annualized inflation slowed to 9.17% from its peak of 10.3% in March. The central bank maintained its 2025 gross domestic product growth forecast at between 1% and 2% and said it saw some softening in Russia's tight labour market. The economy grew by 4.3% last year. The central bank cut its forecast for the average oil price in 2025 to $55 per barrel from $60 per barrel, implying a fall in state budget revenues, but Nabiullina said she did not expect any surprises from the budget. The Russian economy will face another test in early September when a 50-day deadline set by U.S. President Donald Trump for Russia to show progress toward peace in Ukraine expires, with potential new U.S. sanctions against buyers of Russian oil to follow. Nabiullina said the bank will work to ensure the financial sector's resilience to Western sanctions does not weaken. "We see that indeed the financial sector is one of the main targets for sanctions, and these sanctions are being tightened," Nabiullina said. The bank was under intense pressure from the business community to start easing after it hiked the key rate to the highest level since the early 2000s last year. Business leaders complained that at such a rate, investment no longer made sense. Nabiullina said that such pressure does the economy a disservice by creating the false impression that the central bank has been forced to cave in when cutting rates, which in turn fuels inflationary expectations "Such attempts to exert pressure would, in effect, result in higher interest rates," she warned. President Vladimir Putin has backed the policy of the central bank, but warned it not to cool the economy too much. High interest rates have hit Russia's construction and coal sectors and led to a rise in bad debt for Russian banks. Speaking just before the rate decision on Friday, Deputy Prime Minister Marat Khusnullin, who oversees the construction sector, said that a 400 bps cut was more desirable, indicating that many officials in Russia want the central bank to cut more. The rouble, which rallied by 45% against the U.S. dollar earlier this year in part due to the high key rate, began to weaken ahead of the expected rate cut and touched the 80 mark against the dollar on Friday, a near-six week low. The stronger rouble has aided the central bank in fighting inflation by making imported goods cheaper with some bankers alleging that supporting the rouble was a deliberate policy by the central bank.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store