How ancient reptile footprints are rewriting the history of when animals evolved to live on land
WASHINGTON — Scientists in Australia have identified the oldest known fossil footprints of a reptile-like animal, dated to around 350 million years ago.
The discovery suggests that after the first animals emerged from the ocean around 400 million years ago, they evolved the ability to live exclusively on land much faster than previously assumed.
'We had thought the transition from fin to limb took much longer,' said California State University paleontologist Stuart Sumida, who was not involved in the new research.
Previously the earliest known reptile footprints, found in Canada, were dated to 318 million years ago.
The ancient footprints from Australia were found on a slab of sandstone recovered near Melbourne and show reptile-like feet with long toes and hooked claws.
Scientists estimate the animal was about 2 1/2 feet (80 centimeters) long and may have resembled a modern monitor lizard. The findings were published Wednesday in Nature.
The hooked claws are a crucial identification clue, said study co-author and paleontologist Per Ahlberg at Uppsala University in Sweden.
'It's a walking animal,' he said.
Only animals that evolved to live solely on land ever developed claws. The earliest vertebrates -- fish and amphibians – never developed hard nails and remained dependent on watery environments to lay eggs and reproduce.
But the branch of the evolutionary tree that led to modern reptiles, birds and mammals – known as amniotes -- developed feet with nails or claws fit for walking on hard ground.
'This is the earliest evidence we've ever seen of an animal with claws,' said Sumida.
At the time the ancient reptile lived, the region was hot and steamy and vast forests began to cover the planet. Australia was part of the supercontinent Gondwana.
The fossil footprints record a series of events in one day, Ahlberg said. One reptile scampered across the ground before a light rain fell. Some raindrop dimples partially obscured its trackways. Then two more reptiles ran by in the opposite direction before the ground hardened and was covered in sediment.
Fossil 'trackways are beautiful because they tell you how something lived, not just what something looked like,' said co-author John Long, a paleontologist at Flinders University in Australia.
___
The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Science and Educational Media Group and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
Christina Larson, The Associated Press
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
16 hours ago
- CTV News
Long-dead satellite emits strong radio signal, puzzling astronomers
Astronomers in Australia picked up a strange radio signal in June 2024 — one near our planet and so powerful that, for a moment, it outshined everything else in the sky. The ensuing search for its source has sparked new questions around the growing problem of debris in Earth's orbit. At first, though, the researchers thought they were observing something exotic. 'We got all excited, thinking we had discovered an unknown object in the vicinity of the Earth,' said Clancy James, an associate professor at Curtin University's Curtin Institute of Radio Astronomy in Western Australia. The data James and his colleagues were looking at came from the ASKAP radio telescope, an array of 36 dish antennas in Wajarri Yamaji Country, each about three stories tall. Normally, the team would be searching the data for a type of signal called a 'fast radio burst' — a flash of energy blasting forth from distant galaxies. 'These are incredibly powerful explosions in radio (waves) that last about a millisecond,' James said. 'We don't know what's producing them, and we're trying to find out, because they really challenge known physics — they're so bright. We're also trying to use them to study the distribution of matter in the universe.' Astronomers believe these bursts may come from magnetars, according to James. These objects are very dense remnants of dead stars with powerful magnetic fields. 'Magnetars are utterly, utterly insane,' James said. 'They're the most extreme things you can get in the universe before something turns into a black hole.' But the signal seemed to be coming from very close to Earth — so close that it couldn't be an astronomical object. 'We were able to work out it came from about 4,500 kilometers (2,800 miles) away. And we got a pretty exact match for this old satellite called Relay 2 — there are databases that you can look up to work out where any given satellite should be, and there were no other satellites anywhere near,' James said. 'We were all kind of disappointed at that, but we thought, 'Hang on a second. What actually produced this anyway?'' A massive short-circuit NASA launched Relay 2, an experimental communications satellite, into orbit in 1964. It was an updated version of Relay 1, which lifted off two years earlier and was used to relay signals between the US and Europe and broadcast the 1964 Summer Olympics in Tokyo. Just three years later, with its mission concluded and both of its main instruments out of order, Relay 2 had already turned into space junk. It has since been aimlessly orbiting our planet, until James and his colleagues linked it to the weird signal they detected last year. But could a dead satellite suddenly come back to life after decades of silence? To try to answer that question, the astronomers wrote a paper on their analysis, set to publish Monday in the journal The Astrophysical Journal Letters. They realized the source of the signal wasn't a distant galactic anomaly, but something close by, when they saw that the image rendered by the telescope — a graphical representation of the data — was blurry. '(T)he reason we were getting this blurred image was because (the source) was in the near field of the antenna — within a few tens of thousands of kilometers,' James said. 'When you have a source that's close to the antenna, it arrives a bit later on the outer antennas, and it generates a curved wave front, as opposed to a flat one when it's really far away.' This mismatch in the data between the different antennas caused the blur, so to remove it, the researchers eliminated the signal coming from the outer antennas to favor only the inner part of the telescope, which is spread out over about 2.3 square miles in the Australian outback. 'When we first detected it, it looked fairly weak. But when we zoomed in, it got brighter and brighter. The whole signal is about 30 nanoseconds, or 30 billionths of a second, but the main part is just about three nanoseconds, and that's actually at the limit of what our instrument can see,' James said. 'The signal was about 2,000 or 3,000 times brighter than all the other radio data our (instrument) detects — it was by far the brightest thing in the sky, by a factor of thousands.' The researchers have two ideas on what could have caused such a powerful spark. The main culprit was likely a buildup of static electricity on the satellite's metal skin, which was suddenly released, James said. 'You start with a buildup of electrons on the surface of the spacecraft. The spacecraft starts charging up because of the buildup of electrons. And it keeps charging up until there's enough of a charge that it short-circuits some component of the spacecraft, and you get a sudden spark,' he explained. 'It's exactly the same as when you rub your feet on the carpet and you then spark your friend with your finger.' A less likely cause is the impact of a micrometeorite, a space rock no bigger than 1 millimetre (0.039 inches) in size: 'A micrometeorite impacting a spacecraft (while) traveling at 20 kilometres per second or higher will basically turn the (resulting) debris from the impact into a plasma — an incredibly hot, dense gas,' James said. 'And this plasma can emit a short burst of radio waves.' However, strict circumstances would need to come into play for this micrometeorite interaction to occur, suggesting there's a smaller chance it was the cause, according to the research. 'We do know that (electrostatic) discharges can actually be quite common,' James said. 'As far as humans are concerned, they're not dangerous at all. However, they absolutely can damage a spacecraft.' ASKAP radio telescope The ASKAP radio telescope in Western Australia picked up a powerful radio signal from a NASA satellite that stopped working in 1967. (Alex Cherney/CSIRO via CNN Newsource) A risk of confusion Because these discharges are difficult to monitor, James believes the radio signal event shows that ground-based radio observations could reveal 'weird things happening to satellites' — and that researchers could employ a much cheaper, easier-to-build device to search for similar events, rather than the sprawling telescope they used. He also speculated that because Relay 2 was an early satellite, it might be that the materials it's made of are more prone to a buildup of static charge than modern satellites, which have been designed with this problem in mind. But the realization that satellites can interfere with galactic observations also presents a challenge and adds to the list of threats posed by space junk. Since the dawn of the Space Age, almost 22,000 satellites have reached orbit, and a little more than half are still functioning. Over the decades, dead satellites have collided hundreds of times, creating a thick field of debris and spawning millions of tiny fragments that orbit at speeds of up to 18,000 miles per hour. 'We are trying to see basically nanosecond bursts of stuff coming at us from the universe, and if satellites can produce this as well, then we're going to have to be really careful,' James said, referring to the possibility of confusing satellite bursts with astronomical objects. 'As more and more satellites go up, that's going to make this kind of experiment more difficult.' James and his team's analysis of this event is 'comprehensive and sensible,' according to James Cordes, Cornell University's George Feldstein Professor of Astronomy, who was not involved with the study. 'Given that the electrostatic discharge phenomenon has been known for a long time,' he wrote in an email to CNN, 'I think their interpretation is probably right. I'm not sure that the micrometeoroid idea, pitched in the paper as an alternative, is mutually exclusive. The latter could trigger the former.' Ralph Spencer, Professor Emeritus of Radio Astronomy at the University of Manchester in the U.K., who was also not involved with the work, agrees that the proposed mechanism is feasible, noting that spark discharges from GPS satellites have been detected before. The study illustrates how astronomers must take care to not confuse radio bursts from astrophysical sources with electrostatic discharges or micrometeoroid bursts, both Cordes and Spencer pointed out. 'The results show that such narrow pulses from space may be more common than previously thought, and that careful analysis is needed to show that the radiation comes from stars and other astronomical objects rather than man-made objects close to the Earth,' Spencer added in an email. 'New experiments now in development, such as the Square Kilometre array Low frequency array (SKA-Low) being built in Australia, will be able to shed light on this new effect.' By Jacopo Prisco, CNN
CBC
5 days ago
- CBC
Scientists say they've proven these Canadian rocks are the oldest on Earth
In 2008, Canadian researchers led by McGill PhD student Jonathan O'Neil said they'd found the world's oldest rocks, formed 4.3 billion years ago in what is now northwestern Quebec. Such rocks would give scientists an unprecedented glimpse into Earth's early history during its very first eon, the Hadean, just a few hundred million years after the Earth formed 4.5 billion years ago. But the discovery was controversial, and other scientists argued that the rocks were simply mixtures of older and younger material, unable to really tell us what the world was like at that time. Now, after more than a decade of hard work, O'Neil and his team have done a new analysis of rocks from the Nuvvuagittuq Greenstone Belt (NGB), a rock formation located in Quebec's Nunavik region, about 40 kilometres south of Inukjuak, close to the eastern shore of Hudson Bay. The newly studied rocks, which formed later than the original rocks analyzed, are at least 4.16 billion years old, reports a paper published today in Science. That confirms that even they are from the Hadean, and since the original rocks are even older, and the rock formation includes "the oldest rocks preserved on Earth," the study says. O'Neil, now a professor of earth sciences at the University of Ottawa, said that to geologists, rocks are like books, full of chemical records of when they were formed and the environment at that time – offering clues about when the oceans formed, when life began, and when plate tectonics started creating the continents. With such old rocks, he added, "We have the opportunity to open a new window on a time when we have almost no record." What we know about the Hadean eon When the Earth first formed, it was a ball of molten lava. And originally, scientists considered the Earth's first eon, the Hadean, to have ended when the first rocks formed. What's known as the "golden spike," marking the end of the Hadean, is also located in Canada, at the Acasta Gneiss formation in the Northwest Territories, which is 4.03 billion years old. Scientists agree on that date because the Acasta Gneiss contains zircons, minerals that give very reliable ages for rocks fairly easily using a technique called isotopic dating. The technique relies on the constant rate of decay or radioactive materials and uses those as a clock. While scientists used to think there were no rocks during the Hadean, O'Neil said, they've changed their minds as a result of more and more evidence uncovered in the past 20 years, including zircons formed 4.4 billion years ago in Australia. (These zircons, which are tiny sand grains embedded in sedimentary rocks, are too small to be considered rocks themselves.) Such tiny mineral grains can't give nearly as much information as an entire rock — only something equivalent to "maybe a page," O'Neil said. With an entire rock, "we may have a chapter or [an entire book]," O'Neil said. In the past decade his team has found intriguing evidence that the NGB rocks were formed on the ocean floor and may show some early traces of life and possible evidence of plate tectonics — but the "unfortunate" age controversy, as O'Neill describes it, has left them unable to say for sure that these are things that happened during the Hadean. Why so controversial? The Nuvvuagittuq Greenstone Belt is made of an unusually pale basalt, a type of rock often formed on the ocean floor. Unfortunately, basalt doesn't contain zircons, so geologists can't tell its age using the most reliable isotopic technique available. Instead, O'Neil and his team turned to a technique called samarium-neodynium dating, suitable for rocks older than four billion years old. "This has been applied on rocks from the moon and on rocks from Mars — it's just there are no rocks on Earth that are old enough to use that technique, except perhaps from the rocks from northern Quebec," O'Neil said. In addition, dates from two different isotopic "clocks" didn't agree in that earlier study. O'Neil thought that was because one of the two clocks was more vulnerable to events that happened to the rocks long after they formed, giving a younger date. But other scientists thought it was a sign that the rock was a mixture of older and younger material. Graham Pearson, a University of Alberta professor who has been dating and tracing some of Canada's oldest rocks for around the past 15 years, said, "It's really easy to get the wrong date on rocks using any approach." But he added that in the case of O'Neil's original study, which he wasn't involved in, some assumptions were made between the relationships of different rocks that allowed for two ways of interpreting the data. New, more convincing proof? To resolve the controversy, O'Neil's team analyzed a piece of neighbouring rock from the NGB. The newly analyzed rock is an intrusion, or liquid magma that had squeezed its way between the cracks of the original rock at a later date and then solidified. By definition, that makes it younger than the original rock. In the new analysis, funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and the government of Ontario, both isotopic clocks agree, O'Neil said, "giving the same exact age at 4.16 billion years old" for that newer rock. Martin Bizzarro, a Canadian professor at the University of Copenhagen, was among those who thought mixing was behind the 2008 results. He acknowledged that the agreement of clocks in the new study is "rare." But he told CBC News in an email, "I don't think [the data] conclusively prove the rocks are Hadean" as there are other explanations "given the complexity of early Earth processes." Meanwhile, Pearson said he is convinced by the new data, given the variety of techniques O'Neil and his team use and their "really careful study." O'Neil hopes the new data will give other scientists confidence that the rocks are Hadean, and that's the time period that pertains to signs of ocean chemistry, plate tectonics and life that his colleagues are finding in these same rocks. "That's why the age of these rocks is so crucial."
National Observer
6 days ago
- National Observer
Canadian and US glaciers doubling melt rate from previous decade
Researchers say some glaciers in Western Canada and the United States lost 12 per cent of their mass from 2021 to 2024, doubling melt rates compared to the previous decade in a continuation of a concerning global trend. The research led by University of Northern British Columbia professor Brian Menounos says low snow accumulation over winter, early-season heat waves, and prolonged warm and dry spells were contributing factors. It says impurities such as ash from severe wildfire seasons have also "darkened" glaciers, causing them to absorb more heat and triggering a feedback loop that will lead to continued loss unless the ice is covered by fresh snow. The study, published in the peer-reviewed journal Geophysical Research Letters this week, examined glaciers in Western Canada and the United States, excluding Alaska and Yukon, as well as Switzerland, where glaciers lost 13 per cent of their mass over the same period. The research letter says glaciers in both regions lost mass twice as fast as they did between 2010 and 2020. Menounos says climate change and its effects, including heat waves and changing snow patterns, are draining the "bank account" of fresh water that glaciers contain. "Doubling the amount of water that's lost from those glaciers, we're sort of stealing from the future," says Menounos, the Canada Research Chair in glacier change. Researchers say some glaciers in Western Canada and the United States lost 12 per cent of their mass from 2021 to 2024, doubling melt rates compared to the previous decade in a continuation of a concerning global trend. "We are just pulling and pulling away and making that bank account closer to zero and perhaps even negative. We're not replenishing these glaciers," he says. The research letter published Wednesday follows a 2021 study published in the peer-reviewed journal Nature that found glaciers outside the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets lost mass between 2010 and 2019 at double the rate they did in the first decade of this century. Menounos contributed to that study. The latest research combined aerial surveys with ground-based observations of three glaciers in Western Canada, four glaciers in the United States and 20 in Switzerland. The analysis shows that between 2021 and 2024, those glaciers experienced their highest rates of loss since monitoring began 60 years ago, Menounos says. The study says that in Western Canada and the United States, black carbon doubled after about 2010, reaching the highest level of deposition in 2023 — coinciding with a severe wildfire season across B.C. and Canada. The study did not include specific data relating to wildfire ash on each glacier, but Menounos says any darker material will absorb more heat and enhance melting. The researchers did zero in on the Haig Glacier in the Canadian Rockies, finding the low reflectivity of the ice contributed to 17 per cent of an unprecedented loss of mass in 2022 and 2023. Summer heat had the greatest effect, responsible for 46 per cent of the loss, the letter says. Current modelling for glaciers often doesn't include wildfire ash and other processes that could accelerate rates of loss in the future, Menounos added. "We think that wildfire will continue to play an important role, and certainly we need better physical models to project how these glaciers are likely to change." Glaciers across the study area are projected to mostly disappear by the end of the century, even under moderate climate change scenarios. Only some of the largest glaciers and icefields are expected to exist beyond 2100, the research letter says. Swiss glaciers represent about 55 per cent of the total volume of central European glaciers, and findings there may be applied across the Alps, the letter notes. From 2000 to 2023, the letter says Earth's glaciers collectively lost mass at a rate of about 273 gigatonnes per year, accounting for about one-fifth of observed sea-level rise. One gigatonne represents one cubic kilometre of water, Menounos says. "The way to perhaps bring some of the smallest glaciers back is, sometime in the future, with reduced greenhouse gas emissions," he says.
