Construction of private bunkers in Spain rises 200% as fears of war in Europe grow
ADVERTISEMENT
The Russian invasion of Ukraine and rising geopolitical tensions have sparked an increase in interest in survivalism in Spain.
The private construction of bunkers has risen by 200% since the war started, according to industry companies. This trend is spreading across Europe, with Germany, France, and the Baltic countries being the best prepared.
Many families are looking for high-security shelters. Euronews gained access to one that can withstand nuclear radiation, featuring anti-radiation showers, concrete and steel walls, and armoured doors. The owner installed it due to fears of an armed conflict in Europe.
This bunker was developed by VIP Bunker, with its manager, Fernando Díaz, describing it as an "apartment with high security, where one could live for months," equipped with 1,000 litres of drinking water and various backup power systems.
A view of Pokrovsk, the site of heavy battles with Russian troops, in the Donetsk region, 25 March, 2025
AP Photo
However, with an average cost of €150,000 these shelters are a luxury few can afford.
This has led some citizens to create safe spaces in their homes, storing non-perishable food. Meanwhile, the European Union (EU) has urged citizens to prepare 72-hour survival kits and called on governments to improve civilian-military cooperation.
Preparing for 'greater threats'
European leaders have stressed the need for being prepared.
"We need to think big because the threats are greater," said Hadja Lahbib, Commissioner for Crisis Management.
Meanwhile Roxana Minzatu, Commissioner for Preparedness, added, "The pandemic showed that acting together, in solidarity, is crucial. It makes us stronger."
Lieutenant Colonel Manolo Cámara, author of the book "Prepárate" (Get Ready), has been training civilians in survival for years and he has noticed a shift.
"There wasn't much interest before. With the possible war in Europe, people have started to worry, although in Spain, much less than in the rest of the EU," he said.
In his courses, held in various Spanish cities, he teaches essential skills, he tells us "You need to have your backpack ready, know how to start a fire, find water, build a shelter, and navigate with a map. In a war, food, water, and medical support will be scarce. You need to know how to act."
Ukrainian servicemen fix a bomb on a Vampire attack drone on the front line near Chasiv Yar, 31 March, 2025
AP Photo
For the lieutenant colonel, knowledge is key, "The most important thing in your backpack is what doesn't weigh: knowing how to use it. You need a family plan with meeting points and evacuation routes."
Ignacio Ortega, head of Instruction at the Spanish School of Survival, agrees with the rise in interest, he said, "People from all walks of life come to us — not just from security fields, but entire families and independent professionals. Since the war in Ukraine, the profile has changed: before, they were nature lovers, now they are regular families scared of the future."
With around 2,000 students annually, Ortega emphasises the importance of prevention.
ADVERTISEMENT
"The best survival is the one you avoid. Before any activity, assess the risks and prepare with resources and knowledge." He adds that urban crises are the most hostile.
"Most people will experience a survival situation in the city, without electricity or supplies, not in an idyllic forest."
Nuclear war on the horizon?
Tensions between Russia and NATO have popularised the term "nuclear war." Some experts speak of a paradigm shift, as the EU insists on stockpiling supplies in case of conflict.
France, Norway, Finland and Sweden are in the process of distributing war manuals, while Russia is mass-producing mobile nuclear shelters, highlighting the urgency for countries in the conflict's orbit.
ADVERTISEMENT
In Spain, the demand for private bunkers surged after the Ukraine invasion.
Women work in a tunnel of a coal mine in the Dnipropetrovsk region, 30 January, 2025
AP Photo
The government is preparing a National Civil Protection Plan for "military risk," but there are only four public nuclear shelters in the country, mostly located in the capital: the residence of the Spanish Prime Minister, the Moncloa Palace, the Torrejón base, El Capricho park, and the Ébora Hotel (Toledo).
Metro tunnels could be used as shelters, although nuclear radiation would still reach them.
With around 400 private bunkers estimated, Spain is far behind countries like France and Germany.
ADVERTISEMENT
Cámara reflects: "It's difficult to have a shelter at home, but if you have a second home in the countryside or a friend in another area, use it as an alternative."
Related
Zelenskyy: Nuclear power plants 'belong to the people of Ukraine'
Could another European country develop its own nuclear weapons?
Cost is a barrier, a typical bunker costs around €150,000. Companies like VIP Bunker offer luxury models that exceed €350,000, as well as more affordable options based on the owner's needs.
An effective bunker must be at least 10 meters deep, with sturdy walls, air and water filtration, and impact-resistant doors. If it's nuclear-proof, it should have steel coatings.
Because public options are limited, many people are choosing to prepare on their own.
ADVERTISEMENT
Experts interviewed by Euronews believe this trend is growing, "There's no need to go crazy, but you should be ready."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
France 24
an hour ago
- France 24
Russia's 'Mr Nobody' gambles all with film on Kremlin propaganda
Talankin, the school's event organiser and also a keen videographer, found the propaganda work so depressing that he wanted to quit his job in the industrial town of Karabash. Then he received what he says was the strangest message of his life. A Europe-based filmmaker got in touch, offering to collaborate on a project to document the abrupt militarisation of Talankin's school in the wake of Russia's February 2022 invasion of its neighbour. Talankin had earlier seen a post from a Russian company looking for people whose jobs had been affected by the war. Talankin said he was ready to talk. After receiving the foreigner's offer Talankin did not sleep all night. The project changed his life forever. After teaming up with David Borenstein and shooting many hours of footage, Talankin last summer fled Russia with seven hard discs, leaving behind his mother, brothers and sisters and the town he loved. Using the smuggled-out footage Borenstein, a Denmark-based US filmmaker, directed what became "Mr Nobody Against Putin", an award-winning 90-minute documentary which exposes the intensity of the propaganda at Talankin's school and throughout Karabash. It premiered at the 2025 Sundance film festival in January. - 'Persona non grata' - The project cost Talankin dearly. Local officials banned his former colleagues from contacting him, he became a hate figure for supporters of the war and his school librarian mother was upset. "I have become a persona non grata," Talankin, 34, told AFP from Prague, where he is now based. Russia outlawed all criticism of the Russian military and the Kremlin and Talankin knew he had taken huge risks. But he has no regrets. "I would do it all over again." He has been buoyed by the support of people featured in the film including those who lost their loved ones in the war. One former colleague said she became ashamed that she, too, was "part of the system." The documentary reaped awards at festivals and the film crew hopes it will be available to wider audiences in Europe later this year. Borenstein said the film's success had been a "relief" because the multi-national crew overcame numerous obstacles including communication and security. But above all he was "really scared" that if the film flopped Talankin's sacrifice would come to nothing. "I knew the whole time that Pasha would have to leave Russia to make this project happen," Borenstein told AFP, referring to his co-director by his diminutive. "That is a huge sacrifice for him, because his mum is there, his whole life is there, he does not speak English, not at that time." Talankin has not been able to join the crew to present the film at the Sundance festival in Utah and elsewhere due to paperwork issues, but the team hopes this will soon change. For now he is learning English and adjusting to his new life in Prague. 'Like musketeers' Talankin said he was heartened by the reactions at the screenings. One viewer in the Czech Republic said he hated Russians but the film made him reconsider. "We knew nothing about what was happening to you," Talankin quoted the Czech as saying. "It is a powerful and poetic piece of cinema," said producer Alexandra Fechner, who is promoting the film in France. "This film shows the hidden side of propaganda in Russia, which targets the youngest members of society, children who are being taught a rewritten version of history and given guns!" she said. With the war in its fourth year, Moscow has put society on a war footing and leveraged the educational system to raise a fiercely pro-Kremlin generation. The film features Wagner mercenaries telling children about hand grenades and teachers calling Ukrainians "neo-Nazi", and includes an audio recording of a wailing mother at her soldier son's funeral. But critics also point to the documentary's empathy and light touch. In one episode, a history teacher tells pupils that the spiralling prices could soon make gas unaffordable for Europeans. "The French will soon be like musketeers, riding horses, and the rest of Europe too," he said. Borenstein said that by viewing the footage sent by Talankin nearly every day, he understood the effect of the dehumanising war-time propaganda. While at the beginning he found some of the clips shocking, months later his mind had become so used to the onslaught of the propaganda that he did not see the footage depicting the Wagner mercenaries as something abnormal. "I was able to replicate among myself some of the feelings that maybe the students and people in the school felt," he said. "Looking at this propaganda every single day was a lesson in how desensitised you can become to it." A lot of the footage had not made it into the film, including the school's preparations for the possibility of a nuclear attack. Karabash is located close to one of Russia's most sensitive sites, the Mayak nuclear reprocessing plant. Talankin said Borenstein did not want the viewers to "drown in the enormous amount of negative material." © 2025 AFP
Euronews
8 hours ago
- Euronews
Tens of thousands gather to mark Budapest Pride despite Orban ban
Tens of thousands of people gathered in Hungary's capital on Saturday to mark the 30th anniversary of Budapest Pride, defying a government-imposed ban on the event. Among the crowd were members of the European Parliament, international supporters, and many so-called "first priders". Following the ban, Budapest Pride has taken on new meaning, becoming a powerful symbol of resistance against the government's ongoing restrictions on freedom of assembly and human rights, according to participants on Saturday. Euronews journalists on the ground spoke with several attendees who said they had previously been indifferent — or even opposed — to Pride events, but chose to participate this year to stand up for civil liberties and show solidarity with the LGBTQ+ community. Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg was also in Budapest for the Pride march. In a video posted to her Instagram, she accused Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán of making a desperate attempt to ban the event. Thunberg described Pride as both a protest and a celebration of love, calling the ban "another fascist attack on human rights." Pride banned, far-right march allowed While Pride was officially banned, police allowed a far-right march to go ahead. The far-right 64 Counties Youth Movement held an event on the same square in Budapest where Pride participants later gathered. Meanwhile, the Our Homeland Movement—a small far-right parliamentary party—announced a counter-march along the same route as the municipal Pride event. Both far-right events received police approval. Pride without the main opposition leader Peter Magyar is currently on holiday with his three sons. However, the leader of Hungary's main opposition party TISZA posted a strong message of support on Facebook, saying: "We build a country together, with all Hungarians, where it does not matter where you come from, what you believe in, who you love." "I call all police officers to protect all Hungarian citizens from the arbitrariness of a fallen power." Speculation circulated as to the "real" reason why he missed Pride. However, Magyar explained it is because his sons play football, so they had to organise their family holiday around summer sports camps. Political analysts had warned that by banning Pride, Orbán was likely attempting to provoke Magyar. The party's support base is diverse, bringing together people from across the political spectrum. Magyar has repeatedly emphasised that he aims to represent all Hungarians, not just one ideological side. For Fidesz, forcing Magyar to take a clearer stance on liberal issues—such as LGBTQ+ rights—could be politically advantageous. 'Pride is already a success for Fidesz,' political analyst Zoltán Novák told Euronews, 'because they've managed to make the public debate revolve around an issue they own, framed in their language, and on a political topic where they enjoy majority support.' As Fidesz continues to lose ground to its centre-right rival, the TISZA, it has struggled to counter its challenger's strategy. His campaign has focused squarely on the everyday concerns of Hungarians—rising economic hardship, and the deteriorating state of healthcare and education—while contrasting them with the corruption scandals and growing wealth of the Fidesz elite, including members of Orbán's family. This approach has triggered a sharp shift in public opinion. According to the latest poll by the reputable Median Institute, TISZA is now ahead of Fidesz by 15%. Meanwhile, government-aligned pollsters—normally active and vocal—have fallen into an unusual silence. TISZA's Magyar—formerly married to Fidesz's ex-justice minister—has deliberately avoided polarising political issues such as LGBTQ+ rights or topics that fail to resonate broadly with voters, like press freedom. Instead, he has focused on pressing, everyday concerns, including inflation, corruption, the state of healthcare, and failing infrastructure, such as Hungary's rail system. According to political analyst Zoltán Novák, Fidesz introduced the so-called "Pride laws" in an attempt to corner Magyar into taking a stance that could alienate either conservative or liberal voters. While Magyar successfully sidestepped the trap, remnants of the liberal-green opposition stepped in to defend the issue, allowing Fidesz to partially regain control of the political narrative.
Local France
10 hours ago
- Local France
How securing rights through citizenship has become 'increasingly fragile'
The first Global State of Citizenship report, by the Global Citizenship Observatory (GLOBALCIT) at the European University Institute (EUI) in Florence, analyses citizenship laws in 191 countries in 2024. Researchers found that "with the growing number of armed conflicts and incidence of terrorism worldwide, many countries have introduced provisions for withdrawing the citizenship of a person on the basis of national security grounds.' Over a third of countries, including many European ones, 'can now strip a person of their citizenship when their actions are seen as disloyal or threatening to state security,' the report says, and the trend has been expanding. The practice is linked to an 'increasing securitisation of citizenship' since the terrorist attacks of September 11th 2001 in the USA. Between 2000 and 2020, 18 European countries put in place measures to deprive persons of citizenship because of national security or to counter terrorism. Before 2001, these measures were 'virtually absent', the report says. Recently, the Swedish government commissioned an inquiry on the revocation of citizenship from individuals threatening national security . Germany's coalition parties discussed this option for 'supporters of terrorism, antisemites, and extremists'. Hungary also amended the constitution to allow the temporary suspension of citizenship because of national security. Middle East and North Africa are other regions where these policies have expanded, the report says. Advertisement Ways to strip citizenship The report identifies four ways in which citizens can be stripped of their status on security grounds. Nearly 80 per cent of countries have rules covering at least one of these situations. In 132 countries around the world, and two thirds of European states, citizenship can be removed for disloyalty or for acts that threaten national security, such treason, espionage, trying to overthrow a government or terrorism. Such rules exist in Belgium, Estonia, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Turkey and the UK. In 89 countries, however, this rule concerns only to people who naturalised, not those who acquired citizenship by birth. Another reason that can lead to the stripping of citizenship is having committee serious criminal offences, which typically involves having been sentenced to imprisonment for a certain period. These rules exist in 79 countries but only a few in Europe. In 70 countries, citizenship can be removed for serving in a foreign army and in 18 this measure concerns only people who acquired citizenship by naturalisation. In Europe, 40 per cent of countries – including France, Germany, Greece, the Netherlands, Estonia, Turkey, Belarus and Bosnia Herzegovina – can remove citizenship under certain conditions for having served in another army. Latvia, one of the countries that can revoke citizenship for such reasons, changed the law in 2022 to allow its citizens to work with the Ukrainian military forces. Citizenship can also be removed for providing non-military services to another state, such as being elected in a public office, working for certain agencies or just in the civil service. Such rules exist in 75 countries around the world and some in Europe too, including France, Greece and Turkey. Advertisement People naturalised more at risk Luuk van der Baaren, co-author of the report, said at the presentation of the study that 'these developments indeed raise an important question as to what extent is citizenship still a secure legal status'. The data also shows that 'a large share of the citizenship stripping provisions are discriminatory in nature, as they only apply to specific groups, particularly citizens by naturalisation'. This is to prevent that a person remains stateless, but it means that 'citizens by birth have a secure legal status, while those who acquired citizenship later in life do not,' he added. Losing citizenship may not only affect the personal security and life opportunities, but also that of dependants, the report says, as in 40 per cent of countries citizenship deprivation can extend to children. Other ways of losing citizenship There are other ways, intentional or not, to lose citizenship, according to the report. The most common, is to have withdrawn because it was acquired in a fraudulent way. Such rules exist in 157 countries. 156 states have also rules on how to voluntarily renounce citizenship, usually with provisions to ensure that a person does not end up stateless. In 56 countries, people can lose their citizenship if they acquire another nationality, and in 55 this may occur by simply residing abroad. Under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 'everyone has the right to a nationality', but four million people in the world are stateless 'because their citizenship remains denied or unrecognised,' the report continues. On the other hand, 35 countries do not allow people to renounce citizenship, or make this impossible in practice. Advertisement Unequal rights The report also looks at ways to acquire citizenship and finds 'highly unequal pathways'. The most common naturalisation requirement knowledge. Less common are economic self-sufficiency, civic or cultural integration, language or citizenship tests, and renunciation of other citizenships. On residency requirements, Americas and Western Europe have the more inclusive measures. Citizenship in European countries is also regulated via the European Convention on Nationality, under which the residence requirement cannot exceed 10 years. In 15 countries the wait is longer than 10 years: Equatorial Guinea (40 years), United Arab Emirates (30), Bahrain (25), Qatar (25), Bhutan (20), Brunei (20), Eritrea (20), Oman (20), Chad (15), Gambia (15), Nigeria (15), Rwanda (15), Sierra Leone (15), St. Kitts and Nevis (14), and India (11).
